Top Banner

of 28

Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

Jun 03, 2018

Download

Documents

Jundy Duyag
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    1/28

    THIRD DIVISION

    GLORIA PILAR S. AGUIRRE,

    Petitioner,

    - versus -

    SECRETARY OF THE

    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

    MICHELINA S. AGUIRRE-

    OLONDRIZ, PEDRO B.AGUIRRE, DR. JUVIDO

    AGATEP and DR. MARISSA B.

    PASCUAL,

    Respondents.

    G. R. No. 1!"#

    Present:

    YNARES-SANTIAGO,

    Chairperson,

    AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ,

    CORONA,

    C!ICO-NAZARIO, and

    REYES,JJ.

    Pro"#$%ated:

    Mar&h ', ())*

    + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +

    D E C I S I O N

    CHICO-NAZARIO,J.$

    In this petition or reie on certiorari/01#nder R#$e 23 o the R#$es o

    Co#rt, as a"ended, petitioner G$oria Pi$ar S. A%#irre 4G$oria A%#irre5 see6s

    the reersa$ o the (0 7#$8 ())3Decision/(1and 3 9e&e"er ())3Resolution,/'1oth o the Co#rt o Appea$s in CA-G.R. SP No. **';), entit$ed

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    2/28

    reso$#tions dated 00 >er#ar8 ())2/21and 0( Noe"er ())2,/31respe&tie$8, hi&h

    in t#rn air"ed the * 7an#ar8 ())' Reso$#tion/?1o the Oi&e o the Cit8

    Prosetor 4OCP5 o @#eon Cit8.

    The Assistant Cit8 Prosetor or the OCP o @#eon Cit8 re&o""ended thedis"issa$ o the &ri"ina$ &o"p$aint, do&6eted as I.S. No. )(-0(2??, or io$ation o

    Arti&$es 0;( 4>a$sii&ation 8 Priate Indiid#a$s and Use o >a$siied 9o"ents5

    and (?( 4M#ti$ation5, oth o the Reised Pena$ Code, in re$ation to Rep#$i& A&t

    No. ;?0), otherise 6non as

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    3/28

    ph8si&a$ %roth did not appear nor"a$ in that

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    4/28

    Darr8 as adopted at a%e ' ro" an orphana%e and prenata$ histor8 is not

    6non to the adoptie a"i$8 e+&ept that aortion as atte"pted. 9ee$op"enta$

    "i$estones ere noted to e de$a8ed. !e started to a$6 and spea6 in sin%$e ordat aro#nd a%e 3. !e as enro$$ed in Co$e%io de San A%#stin at a%e ? here he

    shoed si%nii&ant $earnin% dii$ties that he had to repeat 0stand 2th%rades. A

    &ons#$t as done in 0* hen he as 00 8ears o$d. Ne#ro$o%i&a$ indin%s andEEG res#$ts ere not nor"a$ and he as %ien Te&reto$ and En&ephao$ 8 his

    ne#ro$o%ist. Ps8&ho$o%i&a$ ea$#ation reea$ed "i$d to "oderate "enta$

    retardation, spe&ia$ ed#&ation trainin% as adised and th#s, he as transerred toSt. 7ohn Marie ianne8. !e inished his e$e"entar8 and se&ondar8 ed#&ation in

    the said s&hoo$. !e as $ater enro$$ed in a o&ationa$ &o#rse at 9on Bos&o hi&h

    he as #na$e to &ontin#e. There has een no reported ehaiora$ pro$e"s in

    s&hoo$ and he %ets a$on% re$atie$8 e$$ ith his tea&hers and so"e o his&$ass"ates.

    Darr8 %re #p ith a er8 s#pportie adoptie a"i$8. !e is the 8o#n%est

    in the a"i$8 o o#r sisters. C#rrent$8, his adoptie parents are a$read8 o$d andhae "edi&a$ pro$e" and th#s, the8 &o#$d no $on%er "onitor and ta6e &are o

    hi" $i6e eore. !is adoptie "other has Bipo$ar Mood 9isorder and #sed toph8si&a$$8 "a$treat hi". A 8ear a%o, he had an episode o diiness, o"itin% and

    heada&hes ater he as hit 8 his adoptie "other. Cons#$t as done

    in Ma6ati Medi&a$ Center and seera$ tests ere done, res#$ts o hi&h ere&onsistent ith his dee$op"enta$ pro$e". There as no eiden&e o ate

    ins#$ts. The a"i$8 s#seL#ent$8 de&ided that he sho#$d sta8 ith one o his

    sisters to aoid si"i$ar in&ident and the possii$it8 that he o#$d reta$iate a$tho#%h

    he has neer h#rt an8od8. There has een no episode o io$ent o#t#rst ora%%ressie ehaior. !e o#$d oten 6eep to hi"se$ hen sad, an%r8 or

    r#strated.

    !e is rrent$8 e"p$o8ed in the &o"pan8 o his sister and %ien

    assi%n"ent to do so"e photo&op8in%, #s#a$$8 in the "ornin%s. !e enJo8s p$a8in%

    i$$iards and as6eta$$ ith his nephes and, he spends "ost o his $eis#re ti"eat&hin% T and $istenin% to "#si&. !e &o#$d peror" a&tiities o dai$8 $iin%

    itho#t assistan&e e+&ept that he sti$$ needs s#perision in ta6in% a ath. !e

    &annot prepare his on "ea$ and neer a$$oed to %o o#t and r#n errands

    a$one. !e does not hae riends and it is on$8 his adoptie a"i$8 ho" he hassi%nii&ant re$ationships. !e &$ai"s that he on&e had a %ir$riend hen he as in

    hi%h s&hoo$ ho as "ore $i6e a est riend to hi". !e neer had se+#a$

    re$ations. !e has $earned to s"o6e and drin6 a$&oho$ e 8ears a%o thro#%h his&o#sins and the driers. There is no histor8 o a#se o a$&oho$ or an8 prohiited

    s#stan&es.

    ME9ICAD STATUS EAMINATION

    The app$i&ant as appropriate$8 dressed. !e as &ooperatie and he had

    inter"ittent e8e &onta&t. Spee&h as spontaneo#s, sot, and re$eant. !e

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    5/28

    responded to L#estions in sin%$e ords or si"p$e senten&es. !e as an+io#s

    spe&ia$$8 at the start o the interie, ith #$$ ae&t appropriate to "ood and

    tho#%ht &ontent. There as no apparent tho#%ht or per&ept#a$ dist#ran&e. Nos#i&ida$ho"i&ida$ tho#%hts e$i&ited. !e as oriented to ti"e, p$a&e and

    person. !e has inta&t re"ote and re&ent "e"or8. !e &o#$d do si"p$e

    &a$$ation. !e &o#$d rite his na"e and read si"p$e ords. !is h#"an i%#reas &o"para$e to a ;-* 8ear o$d. !e de"onstrated air J#d%"ent and poor

    insi%ht. !e had air i"p#$se &ontro$.

    PSYC!ODOGICAD TESTS

    Ps8&ho$o%i&a$ tests done on Mar&h ?, 0) 49r. Do#rdes Dedes"a5 and

    on A#%#st 2, ())) 49r. Ma. Teresa G#sti$o-i$$aosor5 &onsistent$8 reea$ed "i$dto "oderate "enta$ dei&ien&8.

    SIGNI>ICANT DABORATORY EAMS RESUDTS

    CT s&an done ) 7an#ar8 ())0 shoed nonspe&ii& ri%ht deep parieta$

    s#&orti&a$ "a$a&ia. No $o&a$ied "ass $esion in the rain.

    MRI done on 0) 7an#ar8 ())0 shoed i$atera$ parieta$ + + + o$#"e $oss,

    en&epha$o"a$a&ia, %$iosis and #$e%8ria &onsistent ith seL#e$a o postnata$ orneonata$ inar&ts. E+-ao di$atation o the atria o $atera$ entri&$es asso&iated

    thinned posterior ha$ o the &orp#s &a$$os#".

    ASSESSMENT AN9 RECOMMEN9ATION

    A+is I None

    A+is II Menta$ Retardation, "i$d to "oderate t8peA+is III None

    A+is I None at present

    A+is C#rrent GA> 3)-?)

    Darr8s "enta$ dei&ien&8 &o#$d e asso&iated ith possi$e perinata$

    ins#$ts, hi&h is &onsistent ith the ne#roi"a%in% indin%s. Menta$ retardation

    asso&iated ith ne#ro$o%i&a$ pro$e"s #s#a$$8 has poorer pro%nosis. Darr8 is er8"#&h dependent on his a"i$8 or his needs, adaptie #n&tionin%, dire&tion and in

    "a6in% "aJor $ie de&isions. At his &apa&it8, he "a8 neer #nderstand the nat#re,

    the oreseea$e ris6s and eneits, and &onseL#en&es o the pro&ed#re 4ase&to"85that his a"i$8 ants or his prote&tion. Th#s, the responsii$it8 o de&ision

    "a6in% "a8 e %ien to his parent or %#ardian.

    Marissa B. Pasa$, M.9.

    Ps8&hiatrist/0(1

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn12
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    6/28

    Considerin% the aoe re&o""endation, respondent Pedro A%#irres ritten

    &onsent as dee"ed s#i&ient in order to pro&eed ith the &ond#&t o the

    ase&to"8. !en&e, on '0 7an#ar8 ())(, respondent 9r. A%atep peror"ed a

    i$atera$ ase&to"8 on Darr8.

    On 00 7#ne ())(, petitioner G$oria A%#irre, respondent Pedro A%#irres

    e$dest &hi$d, instit#ted a &ri"ina$ &o"p$aint or the io$ation o the Reised Pena$

    Code, parti$ar$8 Arti&$es 0;( and (?(, oth in re$ation to Rep#$i& A&t No. ;?0)

    a%ainst respondents Pedro A%#irre, O$ondri, 9r. A%atep, 9r. Pasa$ and seera$

    7ohn7ane 9oes eore the Oi&e o the Cit8 Prosetor o @#eon Cit8.

    The Co"p$aint Aidait,/0'1do&6eted as I.S. No. )(-0(2??, &ontained the

    o$$oin% a$$e%ations:(. + + + 9r. A%atep and 9ra. Pasa$ ere 4si&5 "edi&a$ pra&titioners

    spe&ia$iin% in #ro$o%8 and ps8&hiatr8 respe&tie$8H hi$e respondent Pedro B.

    A%#irre is "8 atherH Mi&he$ina S. A%#irre-O$ondri is "8 sister, and the i&ti"Da#reano

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    7/28

    thereater #nder s#r%er8 or MUTIDATION IA

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    8/28

    + + + +

    0). Neither does the Co"p$aint e+p$ain in hat "anner theCo"p$ainant is a#thoried or has an8 standin% to de&$are that

    Darr8s &onsent as not otained. Co"p$ainant is not the %#ardian

    or re$atie o Darr8. Fhi$e she ar%#es that Darr8s &onsent sho#$dhae een otained the Co"p$aint does not disp#te the

    ps8&hiatrists indin%s ao#t Darr8s inai$it8 to %ie &onsent.

    + + + +

    0'. + + + the Co"p$aint does not een state hat a$$e%ed parti&ipation

    as a$siied or the portion o the ps8&hiatri& report that a$$e%ed$8states that so"eone parti&ipated hen in a&t that person did not so

    parti&ipate.

    + + + +

    03. A%ain, I had no parti&ipation in the preparation o the report o 9r.Pasa$ + + +.

    + + + +

    0;. + + + the Co"p$aint does not disp#te that he 4Darr85 is "enta$$8

    dei&ient or in&o"petent to %ie &onsent.

    + + + +

    0. + + + I eriied that the ee&t o a ase&to"8 operation ase+p$ained to hi" 4Darr85 8 oth respondent do&tors.

    (). + + + I a&&o"panied Darr8 and oe8ed "8 ather on the e$ie that"8 ather &ontin#es to e the $e%a$ %#ardian o Darr8. I 6no o no

    one e$se ho asserts to e his $e%a$ %#ardian + + +./031

    A$$e%in% the sa"e state"ent o a&ts and deenses, respondent Pedro A%#irre

    ar%#es a%ainst his &o"p$i&it8 in the &ri"e o "#ti$ation as &har%ed and asserts that:

    3. In an8 &ase, as I did not peror" the ase&to"8, I &an state ith &o"p$ete

    &oniden&e that I did not parti&ipate in an8 a8 in the a$$e%ed "#ti$ation./0?1

    Neerthe$ess, he "aintains that the ase&to"8 peror"ed on Darr8 does not in an8

    a8 a"o#nt to "#ti$ation, as the $atters reprod#&tie or%an is sti$$ &o"p$ete$8

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn16
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    9/28

    inta&t./0;1 In an8 &ase, respondent Pedro A%#irre e+p$ains that the pro&ed#re

    peror"ed is reersi$e thro#%h another pro&ed#re &a$$ed asoasosto"8, to it:

    *. I #nderstand that ase&to"8 is reversi$le thro#%h a pro&ed#re &a$$ed

    asoasosto"8. I &an a$so state ith &oniden&e that the pro&ed#reena$es "en ho hae #nder%one a ase&to"8 to sire a &hi$d. !en&e,nopermanent da"a%e as &a#sed 8 the pro&ed#re.

    Respondent Pedro A%#irre &ha$$en%es the &har%e o a$sii&ation in the

    &o"p$aint, to it:

    02. + + + I did not "a6e it appear that an8 person parti&ipated in an8 a&t or

    pro&eedin% hen that person did not in a&t parti&ipate + + +.

    + + + +

    0?. + + + I had no parti&ipation in the preparation o the report o 9ra. Pasa$.She arried at her report independent$8, #sin% her on proessiona$

    J#d%"ent + + +.

    + + + +

    '0. Fhat I &annot #nderstand ao#t Petitas Co"p$aint is ho Darr8 is ar%#ed

    to e $e%a$$8 a &hi$d #nder the deinition o one $a #t nonethe$ess andsi"#$taneo#s$8 ar%#ed to e &apa&itated to %ie his &onsent as #$$8 as an

    ad#$t./0*1

    Respondent Pedro A%#irre #rther &$ariies that &o-%#ardianship oer Darr8

    had een %ranted to hi"se$ and his ie, Do#rdes A%#irre, a8 a&6 on 0 7#ne

    0*? 8 the Re%iona$ Tria$ Co#rt, Bran&h ' o Ba$an%a, Bataan. Respondent Pedro

    A%#irre &ontends that ein% one o the $e%a$ %#ardians, &onseL#ent$8, parenta$

    a#thorit8 oer Darr8 is ested in hi". B#t ass#"in% or the sa6e o ar%#"ent that

    Darr8 does hae the &apa&it8 to "a6e the de&ision &on&ernin% his ase&to"8,

    respondent Pedro A%#irre ar%#es that petitioner G$oria A%#irre has no $e%a$

    persona$it8 to instit#te the s#Je&t &ri"ina$ &o"p$aint, or on$8 Darr8 o#$d hae

    the ri%ht to do so.

    7#st as the to pre&edin% respondents did, respondent 9r. A%atep a$so

    disp#ted the a$$e%ations o a&ts stated in the Co"p$aint. Adoptin% the a$$e%ations

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn18http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn18
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    10/28

    o his &o-respondents insoar as the8 ere "ateria$ to the &har%es a%ainst hi", he

    ehe"ent$8 denied ai$in% to inor" Darr8 o the intended pro&ed#re. In his

    &o#nter-state"ent o a&ts he aerred that:

    45 + + + I s&hed#$ed Darr8 or &ons#$tatie interie + + + herein Ipainsta6in%$8 e+p$ained hat ase&to"8 is and the &onseL#en&es thereoH #t

    indin% si%ns o "enta$ dei&ien&8, + + + I adised his re$aties and his n#rse ho

    a&&o"panied hi" to hae Darr8 e+a"ined 8 a ps8&hiatrist ho &o#$d proper$8

    deter"ine hether or not Darr8 + + + &an rea$$8 %ie his &onsent, th#s I reL#iredthe" to sere irst a ps8&hiatri& ea$#ation and &$earan&e prior to the

    &onte"p$ated pro&ed#re.

    4&5 On 7an#ar8 (0, ())(, I as #rnished a &op8 o a ps8&hiatri&

    report prepared 8 9r. Marissa Pasa$ + + +. In her said report, 9r. Pasa$ o#nd

    Darr8 to s#er ro"

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    11/28

    Ps8&hiatr8 Report, dated 7an#ar8 (0, ())(, in re$ation ith her ie$d o proession,

    an e+pert opinion. I do not hae an8 parti&ipation in the preparation o said

    report, + + + neither did I #ti$ied 4si&5 the sa"e in an8 pro&eedin%s to the da"a%eto another. + + + I a$so den8 #sin% a a$siied do"ent + + +.

    4&5 M#ti$ation. + + + ase&to"8 does not in an8a8 eL#ate to &astrationand hat is to#&hed in ase&to"8 is not &onsidered an or%an in the &onte+t o $a

    and "edi&ine, it is L#ite re"ote ro" the penis + + +.

    4d5 Chi$d A#se. + + + the &o"p$aint-aidait is er8 a%#e in spe&i8in%

    the app$i&ai$it8 o said $a. It "ere$8 aers that Da#reano

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    12/28

    the oended part8, pea&e oi&er or other p#$i& oi&er &har%ed ith the

    enor&e"ent o the $a io$ated + + +./(01

    The Assistant Cit8 Prosetor he$d that the &ir"stan&es attendant to the

    &ase did not a"o#nt to the &ri"e o a$sii&ation. !e he$d that /T1he &$ai" o the &o"p$ainant that the Ps8&hiatri& Report as a$siied, e&a#se

    &onsent as not %ien 8 Darr8 A%#irre to the ase&to"8 andor he as not&ons#$ted on said operation does not &onstit#te a$sii&ation. It o#$d hae een

    dierent i it as stated in the report that &onsent as otained ro" Darr8

    A%#irre or that it as ritten therein that he as &ons#$ted on the ase&to"8,e&a#se that o#$d "ean that it as "ade to appear in the report that Darr8

    A%#irre parti&ipated in the a&t or pro&eedin% 8 %iin% his &onsent or as

    &ons#$ted on the "atter hen in tr#th and in a&t, he did not parti&ipate. Or i not,the entr8 o#$d hae een an #ntr#th#$ state"ent. B#t that is not the &ase.

    Pre&ise$8 4si&5 the report as "ade to deter"ine hether Darr8 A%#irre &o#$d %ie

    his &onsent to his intended ase&to"8. Be that as it "a8, the "atter o Darr8s

    &onsent hain% otained or not "a8 nor e an iss#e ater a$$, e&a#se&o"p$ainants 4si&5 herse$ a$$e%ed that Darr8s "enta$ &ondition is that o a &hi$d,

    ho &an not %ie &onsent. Based on the ore%oin% &onsideration, no a$sii&ation

    &an e esta$ished #nder the &ir"stan&es. /((1

    Een the state"ent in the Ps8&hiatri& Report o respondent 9r. Pasa$ that

    Do#rdes A%#irre had Bipo$ar Mood 9isorder &annot e &onsidered a$sii&ation

    sin&e

    The report did not state that Do#rdes A%#irre as in a&t persona$$8 interieed

    8 respondent 9r. Pasa$ and that the $atter &on&$#ded that Do#rdes A%#irre has

    Bipo$ar Mood 9isorder. The report "ere$8 L#oted other so#r&es o inor"ationith respe&t to the &ondition o Do#rdes A%#irre, in the sa"e "anner that the a&t

    that Do#rdes A%#irre as ph8si&a$$8 a#sin% Darr8 A%#irre as a$so not o 9ra.

    Pasa$ persona$ 6no$ed%e. B#t the a&t that 9ra. Pasa$ &ited indin%, hi&h is

    not o her on persona$ 6no$ed%e in her report does not "ean that she&o""itted a$sii&ation in the pro&ess. !er so#r&es "a8 e ron% and "a8 ae&t

    the era&it8 o her report, #t or as $on% as she has not a$$e%ed therein that shepersona$$8 dia%nosed Do#rdes A%#irre, hi&h a$$e%ation o#$d not then e tr#e,she &annot e &har%ed o a$sii&ation. Thereore, it %oes itho#t sa8in% that i the

    a#thor o the report is not %#i$t8, then ith "ore reason the other respondents are

    not $ia$e./('1

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn22http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn23http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn22http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn23
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    13/28

    Respe&tin% the &har%e o "#ti$ation, the Assistant Cit8 Prosetor a$so he$d

    that the a&ts a$$e%ed did not a"o#nt to the &ri"e o "#ti$ation as deined and

    pena$ied #nder Arti&$e (?( o the Reised Pena$ Code, i.e.,

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    14/28

    Petitioner G$oria A%#irres Motion or Re&onsideration as $i6eise denied

    ith ina$it8 8 the 9O7 in another Reso$#tion dated 0( Noe"er ())2.

    Reso$#te in her e$ie, petitioner G$oria A%#irre ent to the Co#rt o Appea$s

    8 "eans o a Petition or #ertiorari,Prohiition andManamus#nder R#$e ?3 othe R#$es o Co#rt, as a"ended.

    On (0 7#$8 ())3, the Co#rt o Appea$s pro"#$%ated its 9e&ision dis"issin%

    petitioner G$oria A%#irres re&o#rse or $a&6 o "erit.

    Thefalloo the assai$ed de&ision reads:

    F!ERE>ORE, pre"ises &onsidered, the present petition is here89ENIE9 9UE COURSE and a&&ordin%$8 9ISMISSE9 or $a&6 o "erit.

    ConseL#ent$8, the assai$ed Reso$#tions dated >er#ar8 00, ())2 and Noe"er0(, ())2 o the Se&retar8 o 7#sti&e in I.S. No. )(-0(2?? are here8 A>>IRME9./')1

    Petitioner G$oria A%#irres "otion or re&onsideration proed #ti$e as it as

    denied 8 the appe$$ate &o#rt in a Reso$#tion dated 3 9e&e"er ())3.

    !en&e, the present petition i$ed #nder R#$e 23 o the R#$es o Co#rt, as

    a"ended, pre"ised on the o$$oin% ar%#"ents:

    I.

    T!E COURT O> APPEADS COMMITTE9 SERIOUS, GRAE AN9

    REERSIBDE ERRORS O> DAF F!EN IT CONCDU9E9, BASE9PURPORTE9DY ON T!E INTERNET F!IC! RUNS AMUCQ FIT! OUR

    SYSTEM O> T!E RUDE O> DAF AN9 T!E EI9ENCE ON RECOR9,

    T!AT BIDATERAD ASECTOMY IS PURPORTE9DY 0)) REERSIBDEBY A >UTURE ME9ICAD PROCE9URE !ENCE NOT AMOUNTING TO

    MUTIDATION, H AN9

    + + + +

    II.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn30http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn30
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    15/28

    FORSE, T!E COURT O> APPEADS COMMITTE9 GRAE, SERIOUS AN9

    REERSIBDE ERRORS O> DAF F!EN IT RE>USE9 TO 9IRECT T!E

    IN9ICTMENT O> T!E PRIATE RESPON9ENTS >OR MUTIDATION AN9>ADSI>ICATION 9ESPITE T!E EISTENCE O> SU>>ICIENT PROBABDE

    CAUSE T!ERE>OR .[31]

    The ore%oin% iss#es notithstandin%, the "ore proper iss#e or this Co#rts

    &onsideration is, %ien the a&ts o the &ase, hether or not the Co#rt o Appea$s

    erred in r#$in% that the 9O7 did not &o""it %rae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin% to

    $a&6 or e+&ess o J#risdi&tion hen the $atter air"ed the p#$i& prosetors

    indin% o $a&6 o proa$e &a#se or respondents Pedro A%#irre, O$ondri, 9r.

    A%atep and 9r. Pasa$ to stand tria$ or the &ri"ina$ &o"p$aints o a$sii&ation

    and "#ti$ation in re$ation to Rep#$i& A&t No. ;?0).

    In r#$in% that the 9O7 did not &o""it %rae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin%

    to $a&6 or e+&ess o J#risdi&tion, the Co#rt o Appea$s e+p$ained that:

    Eident$8, the &ontroers8 $ies in the per"anen&8 o steri$iation as a

    res#$t o a ase&to"8 operation, and the &han&es o restorin% erti$it8 ith a

    reersa$ s#r%er8 + + +.

    Fe s#stain the 9O7 in r#$in% that the i$atera$ ase&to"8 peror"ed on

    Darr8 does not &onstit#te "#ti$ation een i intentiona$$8 and p#rpose$8 done to

    preent hi" ro" sirin% a &hi$d.

    + + + +

    Steri$iation is to e distin%#ished ro" &astration: in the $atter a&t the

    reprod#&tie &apa&it8 is per"anent$8 re"oed or da"a%ed./'(1

    It then &on&$#ded that:

    The "atter o $e%a$ $iai$it8, other than &ri"ina$, hi&h priate

    respondents "a8 hae inrred or the a$$e%ed asen&e o a a$id &onsent to the

    ase&to"8 peror"ed on Darr8, is &ertain$8 e8ond the proin&e o this &ertiorari

    petition. O#t tas6 is &onined to the iss#e o hether or not the Se&retar8 o7#sti&e and the Oi&e o the Cit8 Prosetor o @#eon Cit8 &o""itted %rae

    a#se o dis&retion in their deter"inin% the e+isten&e or asen&e o proa$e &a#se

    or i$in% &ri"ina$ &ases orfalsification and mutilation #nder Arti&$es 0;( 4(5 and(?( o the Reised Pena$ Code./''1

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn31http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn32http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn33http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn31http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn32http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn33
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    16/28

    Petitioner G$oria A%#irre, hoeer, &ontends that the Co#rt o Appea$s and

    the 9O7 ai$ed to appre&iate seera$ i"portant a&ts: 05 that i$atera$ ase&to"8

    &ond#&ted on petitioners rother, Darr8 A%#irre, as ad"itted

    /'21

    H (5 that thepro&ed#re &a#sed the perpet#a$ destr#&tion o Darr8s reprod#&tie or%ans o

    %eneration or &on&eptionH/'31'5 that the i$atera$ ase&to"8 as intentiona$ and

    de$ierate to deprie Darr8 oreer o his reprod#&tie or%an and his &apa&it8 to

    pro&reateH and 25 that respondents,

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    17/28

    does not ino$e &astration or a"p#tation o an or%an ne&essar8 or reprod#&tion as

    the tin e$e"ents o the &ri"e o "#ti$ation + + + are asent=/'1H and (5

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    18/28

    &o"p$ained o &onstit#tes the oense &har%ed. A indin% o proa$e &a#se "ere$8

    inds oer the s#spe&t to stand tria$. It is not a prono#n&e"ent o %#i$t./2?1

    The e+etie depart"ent o the %oern"ent is a&&o#nta$e or the

    prosetion o &ri"es, its prin&ipa$ o$i%ation ein% the aith#$ e+etion o the$as o the $and. A ne&essar8 &o"ponent o the poer to e+ete the $as is the

    ri%ht to prosete their io$ators,/2;1the responsii$it8 o hi&h is thr#st #pon the

    9O7. !en&e, the deter"ination o hether or not proa$e &a#se e+ists to arrant

    the prosetion in &o#rt o an a&sed is &onsi%ned and entr#sted to the 9O7. And

    8 the nat#re o his oi&e, a p#$i& prosetor is #nder no &o"p#$sion to i$e a

    parti$ar &ri"ina$ inor"ation here he is not &onin&ed that he has eiden&e to

    prop #p the aer"ents thereo, or that the eiden&e at hand points to a dierent

    &on&$#sion.

    P#t si"p$8, p#$i& prosetors #nder the 9O7 hae a ide ran%e o

    dis&retion, the dis&retion o hether, hat and ho" to &har%e, the e+er&ise o

    hi&h depends on a s"or%asord o a&tors hi&h are est appre&iated 8 4p#$i&5

    prosetors./2*1 And this Co#rt has &onsistent$8 adhered to the po$i&8 o non-

    intereren&e in the &ond#&t o pre$i"inar8 inesti%ations, and to $eae to the

    inesti%atin% prosetor s#i&ient $atit#de o dis&retion in the deter"ination o

    hat &onstit#tes s#i&ient eiden&e as i$$ esta$ish proa$e &a#se or the i$in%

    o an inor"ation a%ainst the s#pposed oender./21

    B#t this is not to dis&o#nt the possii$it8 o the &o""ission o a#ses on the

    part o the prosetor. It is entire$8 possi$e that the inesti%atin% prosetor "a8

    erroneo#s$8 e+er&ise the dis&retion $od%ed in hi" 8 $a. This, hoeer, does not

    render his a&t a"ena$e to &orre&tion and ann#$"ent 8 the e+traordinar8 re"ed8

    o certiorari, asent an8 shoin% o %rae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin% to e+&ess

    o J#risdi&tion./3)1

    Pres&indin% ro" the aoe, the &o#rts d#t8 in an appropriate &ase,

    thereore, is &onined to a deter"ination o hether the assai$ed e+etie

    deter"ination o proa$e &a#se as done itho#t or in e+&ess o J#risdi&tion

    res#$tin% ro" a %rae a#se o dis&retion. >or &o#rts o $a to %rant the

    e+traordinar8 rit o certiorari, so as to J#sti8 the reersa$ o the indin% o

    hether or not there e+ists proa$e &a#se to i$e an inor"ation, the one see6in%

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn46http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn47http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn48http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn49http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn50http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn46http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn47http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn48http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn49http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn50
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    19/28

    the rit "#st e a$e to esta$ish that the inesti%atin% prosetor e+er&ised his

    poer in an aritrar8 and despoti& "anner 8 reason o passion or persona$

    hosti$it8, and it "#st e patent and %ross as o#$d a"o#nt to an easion or to a

    #ni$atera$ re#sa$ to peror" the d#t8 enJoined or to a&t in &onte"p$ation o

    $a. Grae a#se o dis&retion is not eno#%h./301 E+&ess o J#risdi&tion si%niiesthat he had J#risdi&tion oer the &ase #t has trans&ended the sa"e or a&ted itho#t

    a#thorit8./3(1

    App$8in% the ore%oin% disL#isition to the present petition, the reasons o the

    Assistant Cit8 Prosetor in dis"issin% the &ri"ina$ &o"p$aints or a$sii&ation

    and "#ti$ation, as air"ed 8 the 9O7, is deter"inatie o hether or not he

    &o""itted %rae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin% to $a&6 or e+&ess o J#risdi&tion.

    In r#$in% the a8 he did that no proa$e &a#se or a$sii&ation and

    "#ti$ation e+ists - the Assistant Cit8 Prosetor de$ierated on the a&t#a$ and $e%a$

    "i$ie# o the &ase. !e o#nd that there as no s#i&ient eiden&e to esta$ish

    aprima facie&ase or the &ri"es &o"p$ained o as deined and p#nished #nder

    Arti&$es 0;(, para%raph (, and (?( o the Reised Pena$ Code in re$ation to

    Rep#$i& A&t No. ;?0), respe&tie$8. Con&ernin% the &ri"e o a$sii&ation o a

    priate do"ent, the Assistant Cit8 Prosetor reasoned that the &ir"stan&es

    attendant to the &ase did not a"o#nt to the &ri"e &o"p$ained o, that is, the $a&6 o

    &onsent 8 Darr8 A%#irre eore he as ase&to"iedH or the a&t that the $atteras not &ons#$ted. The $a&6 o the to pre&edin% attendant a&ts do not in an8 a8

    a"o#nt to a$sii&ation, asent the &ontention that it as "ade to appear in the

    assai$ed report that said &onsent as otained. That o#$d hae een an #ntr#th#$

    state"ent. Neither does the a&t that the Ps8&hiatri& Report state that Do#rdes

    A%#irre has Bipo$ar Mood 9isorder 8 the sa"e to6en a"o#nt to a$sii&ation

    e&a#se said report does not p#t orard that s#&h indin% arose ater an

    e+a"ination o the &on&erned patient.Aproposthe &har%e o "#ti$ation, he

    reasoned that tho#%h the ase&to"8 rendered Darr8 #na$e to pro&reate, it as notthe per"anent da"a%e &onte"p$ated #nder the pertinent proision o the pena$

    &ode.

    Fe a%ree. Grae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin% to $a&6 or e+&ess o

    J#risdi&tion on the part o the 9O7 and the Assistant Cit8 Prosetor as not

    shon in the present &ase.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn51http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn52http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn51http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn52
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    20/28

    In the present petition, respondents Pedro A%#irre, O$ondri, 9r. A%atep and

    9r. Pasa$ are &har%ed ith io$atin% Arti&$es 0;( and (?( o the Reised Pena$

    Code, in re$ation to Rep#$i& A&t No. ;?0). Arti&$e 0;(, para%raph ( o the

    Reised Pena$ Code, deines the &ri"e o a$sii&ation o a priate do"ent, vi!

    Art. 0;(. Falsification by private individuals and use of falsified

    documents. The pena$t8 oprision correccional in its "edi#" and "a+i"#"periods and a ine o not "ore than 3,))) pesos sha$$ e i"posed #pon:

    + + + +

    (. An8 person ho, to the da"a%e o a third part8, or ith the intent

    to &a#se s#&h da"a%e, sha$$ in an8 priate do"ent &o""it an8 o the a&ts o

    a$sii&ation en#"erated in the ne+t pre&edin% arti&$e.

    Petitioner G$oria A%#irre &har%es respondents ith a$sii&ation o a priate

    do"ent or &onspirin% ith one another in 6eepin% Darr8

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    21/28

    ?. Ma6in% an8 a$teration or inter&a$ation in a %en#ine do"ent

    hi&h &han%es its "eanin%H

    ;. Iss#in% in an a#thenti&ated or" a do"ent p#rportin% to e a

    &op8 o an ori%ina$ do"ent hen no s#&h ori%ina$ e+ists, or in&$#din% in s#&h

    &op8 a state"ent &ontrar8 to, or dierent ro", that o the %en#ine ori%ina$H or

    *. Inter&a$atin% an8 instr#"ent or note re$atie to the iss#an&e thereo

    in a proto&o$, re%istr8, or oi&ia$ oo6.

    vis-(-visthe "#&h &riti&ied Ps8&hiatri& Report, shos that the a&ts &o"p$ained o

    do not in an8 "anner, 8 hateer stret&h o the i"a%ination, a$$ #nder an8 o the

    ei%ht 4*5 en#"erated a&ts &onstit#tin% the oense o a$sii&ation.

    In order to proper$8 address the iss#e presented 8 petitioner G$oria A%#irre,it is ne&essar8 that e disss the e$e"ents o the &ri"e o a$sii&ation o priate

    do"ent #nder the Reised Pena$ Code, a &ri"e hi&h a$$ the respondents hae

    een a&sed o perpetratin%. The e$e"ents o said &ri"e #nder para%raph ( o

    Arti&$e 0;( o o#r pena$ &ode are as o$$os: 05 that the oender &o""itted an8

    a&ts o a$sii&ation, e+&ept those in par. ;, en#"erated in Arti&$e 0;0H (5 that the

    a$sii&ation as &o""itted in an8 priate do"entH and '5 that the a$sii&ation

    &a#sed da"a%e to a third part8 or at $east the a$sii&ation as &o""itted ith

    intent to &a#se s#&h da"a%e. Under Arti&$e 0;0, para%raph (, a person "a8 &o""it

    a$sii&ation o a priate do"ent 8 &a#sin% it to appear in a do"ent that a

    person or persons parti&ipated in an a&t or pro&eedin%, hen s#&h person or

    persons did not in a&t so parti&ipate in the a&t or pro&eedin%. On the other hand,

    a$sii&ation #nder par. ' o the sa"e arti&$e is perpetrated 8 a person or persons

    ho, parti&ipatin% in an a&t or pro&eedin%, "ade state"ents in that a&t or

    pro&eedin% and the oender, in "a6in% a do"ent, attri#ted to s#&h person or

    persons state"ents other than those in a&t "ade 8 s#&h person or persons. And

    the &ri"e deined #nder para%raph 2 thereo is &o""itted hen 05 the oender

    "a6es in a do"ent state"ents in a narration o a&tsH (5 he has a $e%a$ o$i%ationto dis&$ose the tr#th o the a&ts narrated 8 hi"H '5 the a&ts narrated 8 the

    oender are aso$#te$8 a$seH and 25 the perersion o tr#th in the narration o a&ts

    as "ade ith the ron%#$ intent o inJ#rin% a third person.

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    22/28

    App$8in% the aoe-stated e$e"ents o the &ri"e to the &ase at ar, in order

    that respondent 9r. Pasa$, and the rest a&tin% in &onspira&8 ith her, to hae

    &o""itted the &ri"e o a$sii&ation #nder par. ' and 2 o Arti&$e 0;0 o the

    Reised Pena$ Code, it is essentia$ that that there eprima facieeiden&e to sho

    that she had &a#sed it to appear that Darr8 %ae his &onsent to e ase&to"ied orat the er8 $east, that the proposed "edi&a$ pro&ed#re as e+p$ained to Darr8. B#t

    in the assai$ed report, no s#&h thin% as done. Dest it e or%otten, the reason or

    hain% Darr8 ps8&hiatri&a$$8 ea$#ated as pre&ise$8 to as&ertain hether or not he

    &an a$id$8 &onsent ith i"p#nit8 to the proposed ase&to"8, and not to otain his

    &onsent to it or to o$i%e respondent 9r. Pasa$ to e+p$ain to hi" hat the i"port

    o the "edi&a$ pro&ed#re as. >#rther, that Darr8s &onsent to e ase&to"ied

    as not otained 8 the ps8&hiatrist as o no "o"ent, e&a#se nohere is it

    stated in said report that s#&h assent as otained. At an8 rate, petitioner G$oriaA%#irre &ontradi&ts her er8 on a$$e%ations hen she persists in the &ontention

    that Darr8 has the "enta$ a%e o a &hi$dH hen&e, he as $e%a$$8 in&apa$e o a$id$8

    &onsentin% to the pro&ed#re.

    In the "atter o the s#pposed in&orre&t dia%nosis o Do#rdes A%#irre, ith

    re%ard to para%raph ( o Arti&$e 0;0 o the Reised Pena$ Code, e L#ote ith

    approa$ the s#&&in&t state"ents o the Assistant Cit8 Prosetor:

    /T1he a&t that 9ra. Pasa$ &ited indin%, hi&h is not o her on persona$6no$ed%e in her report does not "ean that she &o""itted a$sii&ation in the

    pro&ess. !er so#r&es "a8 e ron% and "a8 ae&t the era&it8 o her report, #t

    or as $on% as she has not a$$e%ed therein that she persona$$8 dia%nosed Do#rdes

    A%#irre, hi&h a$$e%ation o#$d not then e tr#e, she &annot e &har%ed oa$sii&ation. Thereore, it %oes itho#t sa8in% that i the a#thor o the report is

    not %#i$t8, then ith "ore reason the other respondents are not $ia$e./321

    As to the &har%e o "#ti$ation, Art. (?( o the Reised Pena$ Code deines

    the &ri"e as

    Art. (?(.Mutilation. The pena$t8 o reclusion temporal to reclusion

    perpetua sha$$ e i"posed #pon an8 person ho sha$$ intentiona$$8 "#ti$ateanother 8 depriin% hi", either tota$$8 or partia$$8, o so"e essentia$ or%an or

    reprod#&tion.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn54http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn54
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    23/28

    An8 other intentiona$ "#ti$ation sha$$ e p#nished 8prision mayor in its

    "edi#" and "a+i"#" periods.

    A strai%htorard s&r#tin8 o the aoe proision shos that the

    e$e"ents/331o "#ti$ation #nder the irst para%raph o Art. (?( o the Reised Pena$

    Code to e 05 that there e a castration, that is, "#ti$ation o or%ans ne&essar8 or

    %enerationH and (5 that the "#ti$ation is &a#sed p#rpose$8 and de$ierate$8, that is,

    to deprie the oended part8 o so"e essentia$ or%an or reprod#&tion. A&&ordin%

    to the p#$i& prosetor, the a&ts a$$e%ed did not a"o#nt to the &ri"e o "#ti$ation

    as deined and pena$ied aoe, i.e.,

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    24/28

    or%ans o %eneration, the a&t, a$tho#%h o$#ntar8, not ein% intentiona$ to that end,

    it o#$d not &o"e #nder the proisions o this arti&$e, #t #nder No. ( o arti&$e

    2'0. 4iada, Codi%o Pena$, o$. ', p. ;). See to sa"e ee&t, 2 Groiard, Codi%oPena$, p. 3(3.5

    Th#s, the L#estion is, does ase&to"8 deprie a "an, tota$$8 or partia$$8, o

    so"e essentia$ or%an o reprod#&tion Fe anser in the ne%atie.

    In the "a$e steri$iation pro&ed#re o ase&to"8, the t##$ar passa%e, &a$$ed

    the as deerens, thro#%h hi&h the sper" 4&e$$s5 are transported ro" the testi&$e

    to the #rethra here the8 &o"ine ith the se"ina$ $#id to or" the eJa$ant, is

    diided and the t ends "ere$8 tied. /3;1 That part, hi&h is t, that is, the as

    deerens, is "ere$8 a passa%ea8 that is part o the d#&t s8ste" o the "a$e

    reprod#&tie or%ans. The as deerens is not an or%an, i.e.,a hi%h$8 or%anied #nit

    o str#&t#re, hain% a deined #n&tion in a "#$ti&e$$#$ar or%anis" and &onsistin%

    o a ran%e o tiss#es./3*1 Be that as it "a8, een ass#"in% arguenothat the t##$ar

    passa%e &an e &onsidered an or%an, the ttin% o the as deerens does not diest

    or den8 a "an o an8 essentia$ or%an o reprod#&tion or the si"p$e reason that it

    does not entai$ the ta6in% aa8 o a part or portion o the "a$e reprod#&tie

    s8ste". The t ends, ater the8 hae een tied, are then dropped a&6 into the

    in&ision./31

    Tho#%h #ndenia$8, ase&to"8 denies a "an his poer o reprod#&tion,

    s#&h pro&ed#re does not deprie hi",

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    25/28

    It is on&e "ore aproposto pointed$8 app$8 the Co#rts %enera$ po$i&8 o non-

    intereren&e in the &ond#&t o pre$i"inar8 inesti%ations. As it has een ot said,

    the S#pre"e Co#rt &annot order the prosetion o a person a%ainst ho" the

    prosetor does not ind s#i&ient eiden&e to s#pport at $east aprima facie&ase./?(1 The &o#rts tr8 and aso$e or &oni&t the a&sed #t, as a r#$e, hae no part in

    the initia$ de&ision to prosete hi"./?'1 The possi$e e+&eption to this r#$e is here

    there is an #n"ista6a$e shoin% o a %rae a#se o dis&retion a"o#ntin% to $a&6

    or e+&ess o J#risdi&tion that i$$ J#sti8 J#di&ia$ intr#sion into the pre&in&ts o the

    e+etie. B#t that is not the &ase herein.

    %HEREFORE, pre"ises &onsidered, the instant petition is 9ENIE9 or

    $a&6 o "erit. The assai$ed (0 7#$8 ())3Decisionand 3 9e&e"er())3Resolution,oth o the Co#rt o Appea$s in CA-G.R. SP No. **';) are

    here8 AFFIRMED. Costs a%ainst petitioner G$oria A%#irre.

    SO ORDERED.

    MINITA V. CHICO-NAZARIO

    Asso&iate 7#sti&e

    FE CONCUR:

    CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO

    Chairperson

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn62http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn63http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn62http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftn63
  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    26/28

    MA. ALICIA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ

    Asso&iate 7#sti&e

    RENATO C. CORONA

    Asso&iate 7#sti&e

    RUBEN T. REYES

    Asso&iate 7#sti&e

    ATTESTATION

    I attest that the &on&$#sions in the aoe 9e&ision ere rea&hed in

    &ons#$tation eore the &ase as assi%ned to the riter o the opinion o the Co#rts

    9iision.

    CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO

    Asso&iate 7#sti&e

    Chairperson, Third 9iision

    C E R T I F I C A T I O N

    P#rs#ant to Arti&$e III, Se&tion 0' o the Constit#tion, and the 9iision

    Chair"ans Attestation, it is here8 &ertiied that the &on&$#sions in the aoe

    9e&ision ere rea&hed in &ons#$tation eore the &ase as assi%ned to the riter o

    the opinion o the Co#rts 9iision.

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    27/28

    REYNATO S. PUNO

    Chie 7#sti&e

    7#sti&e Renato C. Corona as desi%nated to sit as additiona$ "e"er rep$a&in% 7#sti&e Antonio Ed#ardo B.Na&h#ra per Ra$e dated 0) 9e&e"er ());.

    /01 Rollo, pp. '-*./(1 Penned 8 Co#rt o Appea$s Asso&iate 7#sti&e Martin S. i$$ara"a, 7r. ith Asso&iate 7#sti&es Ros"ari 9.

    Carandan% and D#&enito N. Ta%$e, &onrrin%H Anne+

  • 8/12/2019 Aguirre vs Doj Gr 170723

    28/28

    /2)1 Id. at ;?3./201 Id. at *?'./2(1 Id. at ;''./2'1 R.R. Parees v. #alilung, G.R. No. 03?)33, 3 Mar&h ());, 30; SCRA '?, '2./221 Id./231 Id./2?1 *e$$ v. +on. De 'eon, '0; Phi$. ;3*, ;* 4035./2;1 R.R. Parees v. #alilung, s#pra note 2' at '2./2*1 *e$$ v. +on. De 'eon, s#pra note 2? at *))./21 Anres v. #uevas, G.R. No. 03)*?, 7#ne ())3, 2?) SCRA '*, 3(./3)1 D.M. #onsui, nc. v. %sguerra, '(* Phi$. 00?*, 00*3 40?5./301 R.R. Parees v. #alilung, s#pra note 2' at ';./3(1 Sarigum$a v. Sanigan$ayan, G.R. Nos. 032('-20, 0? >er#ar8 ())3, 230 SCRA 3'', 32./3'1 Rollo, pp. ('3-(2'./321 Id. at ()*./331 Re8es, The Reised Pena$ Code, Boo6 To 40'thed.5, p. 23;./3?1 '? Phi$. *2), *2)-*20 400;5./3;1 So$is, De%a$ Medi&ine 40*; ed.5, p. ?('./3*1 C$#%ston, 9i&tionar8 o S&ien&e 40* ed.5, p. 33*./31 S&hart, Shires, Spen&er, Storer, Prin&ip$e o S#r%er8, o$. To 42thed.5, pp. 0;(-0;')./?)1 Festers Third Ne Internationa$ 9i&tionar8 40' ed.5, p. 02'./?01 Id. at '2./?(1 Sanche! v. Demetriou, G.R. Nos. 000;;0-;;, Noe"er 0', ((; SCRA ?(;, ?2'./?'1 Id.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref40http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref41http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref42http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref43http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref44http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref45http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref46http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref47http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref48http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref49http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref50http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref51http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref52http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref53http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref54http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref55http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref56http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref57http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref58http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref59http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref60http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref61http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref62http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref63http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref40http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref41http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref42http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref43http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref44http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref45http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref46http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref47http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref48http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref49http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref50http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref51http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref52http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref53http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref54http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref55http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref56http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref57http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref58http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref59http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref60http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref61http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref62http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/march2008/170723.htm#_ftnref63