Agriculture in Agriculture in Thailand Thailand Part A Part A 1
Jan 06, 2016
Agriculture in ThailandAgriculture in ThailandPart APart A
11
Agriculture in ThailandAgriculture in Thailand
References:References:Peter Warr (ed.)Peter Warr (ed.) 1993 1993, , The Thai Economy The Thai Economy in Transition, in Transition, Ch.Ch.22 “Agriculture” by Am “Agriculture” by Ammar, Suthad, and Direkmar, Suthad, and DirekThai Agriculture: From Engine of Growth Thai Agriculture: From Engine of Growth to Sunset Statusto Sunset Status, by Ammar Siamwalla, , by Ammar Siamwalla, 1996 1996 The Decline and Recovery of Thai The Decline and Recovery of Thai Agriculture: Causes, Responses, Prospects Agriculture: Causes, Responses, Prospects and Challenges,and Challenges, by Nipon Poapongsakorn, by Nipon Poapongsakorn, 20062006
22
Agriculture in ThailandAgriculture in Thailand
References:References: (Optional) (Optional)
Chris Dixon: Chris Dixon: The Thai Economy: Uneven The Thai Economy: Uneven Development and InternationalisationDevelopment and Internationalisation, Ch. , Ch. 55
Ingram, Ch. Ingram, Ch. 22
The Political Economy of Productivity, ThThe Political Economy of Productivity, Thai Agricultural Development ai Agricultural Development 1880 - 19751880 - 1975, , by David Feeny, by David Feeny, 19821982
33
I. Importance of AgricultureI. Importance of Agriculture
Past leading sector in the economyPast leading sector in the economy
Most population work and live in the sectorMost population work and live in the sector
Food, labor, and foreign exchange (top Food, labor, and foreign exchange (top exporter of rice, rubber, cassava)exporter of rice, rubber, cassava)
Raw materials for industries e.g. canning Raw materials for industries e.g. canning and rubber industriesand rubber industries
Environment: closely related to land, forest Environment: closely related to land, forest and waterand water
44
I. Importance of AgricultureI. Importance of Agriculture
Agriculture’s output share in the economy:Agriculture’s output share in the economy:– Declining continuously from > 50% to Declining continuously from > 50% to
30% in the 70’s, to 20% in the 80’s, 30% in the 70’s, to 20% in the 80’s, remained constant at 10% since the 90’s remained constant at 10% since the 90’s to 2003, and slightly declined in recent to 2003, and slightly declined in recent yearsyears– If include agro-industries (food, If include agro-industries (food,
beverages, wood, rubber), increasing beverages, wood, rubber), increasing GDP share by another 10%GDP share by another 10%
55
1970 1980 1988 1996 1997 1999
Agriculture 27.0% 20.6% 16.9% 9.5% 9.4% 10.1%
Manufacturing 16.0% 21.7% 23.0% 29.7% 30.2% 36.0%
Construction 5.3% 4.5% 4.0% 7.4% 5.7% 2.9%
Wholesale and Retail Trade 17.4% 16.9% 17.0% 16.5% 17.2% 16.0%
Transport and Communications
6.5% 6.7% 7.4% 7.4% 7.8% 9.4%
Banking 2.5% 2.8% 3.6% 7.1% 6.5% 3.2%
Real Estate ** ** ** 3.4% 3.3% 4.1%
Other Services 25.3% 26.8% 28.1% 18.9% 19.8% 18.4%
Gross Domestic Product, (GDP)
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
66
77
2000 2001r 2002r 2003r 2004r 2005r 2006p
Agriculture 10.3% 10.4% 10.0% 10.5% 9.6% 9.0% 8.9%
Manufacturing 36.4% 36.2% 36.8% 38.0% 38.7% 38.9% 39.2%
Construction 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%
Wholesale and Retail Trade 15.8% 15.3% 14.8% 14.2% 14.0% 14.0% 13.8%
Transport and Communications 9.7% 10.1% 10.2% 9.8% 9.9% 10.0% 10.1%
Banking 2.8% 2.8% 3.0% 3.2% 3.4% 3.5% 3.4%
Real Estate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9%
Others 18.5% 18.8% 18.8% 18.0% 18.1% 18.2% 18.2%
Gross Domestic Product, (GDP) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
88
200
3200
42005r
2006r
2007p
Agriculture10.5
%9.6
%9.0
%9.0
%8.7
%
Manufacturing38.0
%38.7
%38.9
%39.1
%39.6
%
Services51.5
%51.7
%52.1
%51.9
%51.7
%
GDP100
%100
%100
%100
%100
%
II. OutputII. Output
High agricultural growth from the 1960’s High agricultural growth from the 1960’s up to mid-1980s due to unused land and up to mid-1980s due to unused land and export opportunitiesexport opportunities
Sharp slowdown since mid-1980’s, due to Sharp slowdown since mid-1980’s, due to cost-price squeezecost-price squeeze
Strong recovery since the 1997 crisis, baht Strong recovery since the 1997 crisis, baht depreciation and commodity price surgedepreciation and commodity price surge
99
II. OutputII. Output
Structure (1960- 2003):Structure (1960- 2003):– Crops: 70% - 75% of agri. GDP, fluctuatingCrops: 70% - 75% of agri. GDP, fluctuating
– Livestock: 17% - 11% of agri. GDP, increasingLivestock: 17% - 11% of agri. GDP, increasing
– Fisheries: 6% - 19% of agri. GDP, increasingFisheries: 6% - 19% of agri. GDP, increasing
– Forestry: 2% - 8% of agri. GDP, decliningForestry: 2% - 8% of agri. GDP, declining
1010
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: RiceCrops: Rice
– Most important crop (historical, Most important crop (historical, economic and social)economic and social)
– Biggest in production value, planted Biggest in production value, planted area, number of farmers, and export area, number of farmers, and export earnings (world’s biggest exporter)earnings (world’s biggest exporter)
– Staple foodStaple food
1111
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: RiceCrops: Rice– Regional variationsRegional variations– Central: “rice bowl”, 45% of rice area, more Central: “rice bowl”, 45% of rice area, more
than half of total production, and bulk of than half of total production, and bulk of exportexport
– Northeast: 43% of rice area, less than 30% of Northeast: 43% of rice area, less than 30% of production, some jasmine rice for exportproduction, some jasmine rice for export
– North: 6% of rice area, 10% of productionNorth: 6% of rice area, 10% of production– South: 7% of rice area, 9% of production, rice South: 7% of rice area, 9% of production, rice
deficitdeficit1212
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: RiceCrops: Rice– Long-term declining trend in yield per rai Long-term declining trend in yield per rai
reversed in the 1960’s due to irrigation reversed in the 1960’s due to irrigation (vs. rain-fed), improved seeds, and (vs. rain-fed), improved seeds, and mechanization (tractors)mechanization (tractors)– Other factors: soil fertility, fertilizers & Other factors: soil fertility, fertilizers &
pesticides, transplanting (more labor-pesticides, transplanting (more labor-intensive) vs. broadcastingintensive) vs. broadcasting– Thailand’s rice yield per rai is among the Thailand’s rice yield per rai is among the
lowest in Asialowest in Asia1313
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: Upland cropsCrops: Upland crops
– High growth in 1960s and 1970’s for High growth in 1960s and 1970’s for upland crops in new land areas, mainly upland crops in new land areas, mainly for exportfor export
– Maize (corn), kenaf, cassava, and sugar-Maize (corn), kenaf, cassava, and sugar-canecane
– Land expansion rather than yield Land expansion rather than yield increase explain most growthincrease explain most growth
1414
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: Upland cropsCrops: Upland crops
– Declining share of rice, due to relative Declining share of rice, due to relative scarcity of paddy landscarcity of paddy land
– Proportion of rice area dropped from Proportion of rice area dropped from 77% in 1960 to 55% in 199077% in 1960 to 55% in 1990
1515
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: Upland cropsCrops: Upland crops
– Land use in 2003:Land use in 2003:
Paddy 53%Paddy 53%
Upland crops 18%Upland crops 18%
Tree crops 19%Tree crops 19%
Vegetables & flowers 1.4%Vegetables & flowers 1.4%
Others 8%Others 8%
1616
Structure of crop Structure of crop production by crop production by crop
typetype
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985
Paddy
Upland
Vegetable
Tree crop
Other
1717
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: Upland cropsCrops: Upland crops
– What triggered rapid expansion?What triggered rapid expansion?
Maize: Guatemala variety suited to Maize: Guatemala variety suited to Thai conditionsThai conditions
Kenaf: crop failure in PakistanKenaf: crop failure in Pakistan
Cassava: unexpected demand from EUCassava: unexpected demand from EU
Sugar-cane: protection to promote Sugar-cane: protection to promote import substitutionimport substitution
1818
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: RubberCrops: Rubber– Thailand is now the world’s largest producer Thailand is now the world’s largest producer
and exporterand exporter– Now the second most important crop, in terms Now the second most important crop, in terms
of production valueof production value– Introduced from Malaysia (1901) and grown Introduced from Malaysia (1901) and grown
mainly in the South, with some recent mainly in the South, with some recent expansion in the East and Northeast; over 90% expansion in the East and Northeast; over 90% exportedexported
1919
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: RubberCrops: Rubber– 80% of planted acreage are small holdings of 80% of planted acreage are small holdings of
<50 rai (different from other major producers)<50 rai (different from other major producers)– Continuous expansion in planted area, Continuous expansion in planted area,
production and yield (with replanting of high-production and yield (with replanting of high-yield trees since 1950’s)yield trees since 1950’s)
– Enjoy high prices in the last few years, due to Enjoy high prices in the last few years, due to buoyant world demand, notably in Chinabuoyant world demand, notably in China
2020
II. OutputII. Output
Crops: Fruits, Vegetables, FlowersCrops: Fruits, Vegetables, Flowers– World’s major producer and exporter of World’s major producer and exporter of
pineapple and orchidspineapple and orchids– Wide variety of fruits and vegetables for Wide variety of fruits and vegetables for
canning and fresh products: longan, asparagus, canning and fresh products: longan, asparagus, baby corn, bamboo shootsbaby corn, bamboo shoots
– Good potential for expansion, with better skill Good potential for expansion, with better skill in farming, processing and marketingin farming, processing and marketing
– More competition from Australia, NZ, and More competition from Australia, NZ, and China through FTAChina through FTA
2121
II. OutputII. Output
Livestock: CattleLivestock: Cattle
– Slow growth due to decline in buffalo Slow growth due to decline in buffalo being substituted by tractors, and low being substituted by tractors, and low technology for small holderstechnology for small holders
– High income elasticity of demand for High income elasticity of demand for beef: good potential for beefbeef: good potential for beef
2222
II. OutputII. Output
Livestock: DairyLivestock: Dairy
– Small farms and cooperatives for milk Small farms and cooperatives for milk collection and processingcollection and processing
– Can it survive competition from imports Can it survive competition from imports from Australia and NZ, via “Free Trade from Australia and NZ, via “Free Trade Agreement”?Agreement”?
2323
II. OutputII. Output
Livestock: Poultry and pork Livestock: Poultry and pork
– Highly successful thru modern breeds, Highly successful thru modern breeds, advanced raising methods, and low feed advanced raising methods, and low feed pricesprices
2424
II. OutputII. Output
Livestock: Poultry and pork Livestock: Poultry and pork
– Large agribusiness firms (e.g. CP) Large agribusiness firms (e.g. CP) pioneered contract farming: firms pioneered contract farming: firms providing breed stock (baby chickens), providing breed stock (baby chickens), feeds, medicines to contract farmers feeds, medicines to contract farmers (using labor and skill), and buy back at (using labor and skill), and buy back at guaranteed pricesguaranteed prices
2525
II. OutputII. Output
Livestock: Poultry and pork Livestock: Poultry and pork
– Competitive prices promote domestic Competitive prices promote domestic consumption and exportsconsumption and exports
– Recent avian flu affecting poultry, Recent avian flu affecting poultry, particularly “open” small farmsparticularly “open” small farms
2626
II. OutputII. Output
Fisheries: Fisheries:
– Marine fishery more important than Marine fishery more important than fresh waterfresh water
– Rapid growth in 1960’s due to intensive, Rapid growth in 1960’s due to intensive, motorized fishing technique (destructive)motorized fishing technique (destructive)
– Fishing abroad limited by 200-mile Fishing abroad limited by 200-mile exclusive economic zones (1970’s) and exclusive economic zones (1970’s) and high oil priceshigh oil prices
2727
II. OutputII. Output
Fisheries: Fisheries:
– Canning of seafood, including imported tunaCanning of seafood, including imported tuna
– Prawn aquaculture: largest producer and Prawn aquaculture: largest producer and exporter of black tiger prawn and white exporter of black tiger prawn and white prawnprawn
– Prawn farming in coastal areas Prawn farming in coastal areas unregulated mangrove destruction, affecting unregulated mangrove destruction, affecting marine environmentmarine environment
2828
III. InputIII. Input
Land, Labor, Capital, TechnologyLand, Labor, Capital, TechnologyLand:Land:
– Major cause of crop expansionMajor cause of crop expansion
– Land expansion possible due to roads Land expansion possible due to roads (access to markets) and tractors (easier (access to markets) and tractors (easier land clearing by loggers/farmers)land clearing by loggers/farmers)
– Farm land expanded at expense of Farm land expanded at expense of forestsforests
2929
III. InputIII. Input
Land:Land:
– Forest VS farmland Forest VS farmland
19501950 19701970 19801980 19881988
Forest 66% 44% 24% 19%Forest 66% 44% 24% 19%
Ag. Land 32% 50% 54% 60%Ag. Land 32% 50% 54% 60%
– End of land surplus in 1980sEnd of land surplus in 1980s
3030
Land Utilization (1950-Land Utilization (1950-1990)1990)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
Forest land
Paddy land
Field crops
Tree crops
Vegetables and flowers
Other
3131
III. InputIII. Input
Land:Land:
– Agriculture of small holders, not large Agriculture of small holders, not large plantations: average farm size of about plantations: average farm size of about 25 rai (10 acres)25 rai (10 acres)
3232
III. InputIII. Input
LaborLabor
Agriculture’s labor share in total labor Agriculture’s labor share in total labor force:force:
– Declining, but not as fast as outputDeclining, but not as fast as output
– 1960: 82%; 1970: 78%; 1980: 71%; 1960: 82%; 1970: 78%; 1980: 71%; 1990: 66%; 2001: 41%; 2008: 39% (15 1990: 66%; 2001: 41%; 2008: 39% (15 million of 37 million labor force)million of 37 million labor force)
3333
III. InputIII. Input
LaborLabor
Agriculture’s labor share in total labor Agriculture’s labor share in total labor force:force:
– Exaggerated agri. labor figures, as off-Exaggerated agri. labor figures, as off-farm income is found to be important: farm income is found to be important: about 80% of agri. households in 2003 about 80% of agri. households in 2003 earn also from non-agri. sources earn also from non-agri. sources (handicraft, factory work, etc.)(handicraft, factory work, etc.)
3434
III. InputIII. Input
Agriculture’s labor share in total labor Agriculture’s labor share in total labor force:force:
– in 2003, 5.8 mill. households are in agri. in 2003, 5.8 mill. households are in agri. 22 mill. persons or 36% of total 22 mill. persons or 36% of total population (62 mill.)population (62 mill.)
3535
III. InputIII. Input
Public Capital:Public Capital:
– Roads and irrigation (up to 1984)Roads and irrigation (up to 1984)
– Irrigation mainly in central plain and Irrigation mainly in central plain and north, especially for rice; need upgrading north, especially for rice; need upgrading for non rice cropsfor non rice crops
– Road development: dominated by Road development: dominated by strategic rather than economic strategic rather than economic considerationsconsiderations
3636
III. InputIII. Input
Private Capital: Land development and Private Capital: Land development and machinery, particularly small tractorsmachinery, particularly small tractors
3737
III. InputIII. Input
Technology:Technology:– Little technological change in crop, Little technological change in crop,
except machine and new crop varieties except machine and new crop varieties (rice, corn, cassava), explaining low yields(rice, corn, cassava), explaining low yields
3838
III. InputIII. Input
Technology:Technology:– Passive government technological Passive government technological
promotion, inadequate R&D: no self-promotion, inadequate R&D: no self-sufficiency drivesufficiency drive– Public research following, not leading Public research following, not leading
comparative advantagecomparative advantage– Active private agro-business role in Active private agro-business role in
livestock and farmers’ new crop adoptionlivestock and farmers’ new crop adoption
3939