Top Banner
Aerodynamic Study of Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Computer Aided Engineering Engineering Becker, Joe Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000 May 1, 2000
24

Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Jemima McKinney
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Aerodynamic Study ofAerodynamic Study ofGo-kart Nose ConesGo-kart Nose Cones

ME450 Introduction to Computer ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided EngineeringAided Engineering

Becker, JoeBecker, Joe

Professor H. U. AkayProfessor H. U. Akay

May 1, 2000May 1, 2000

Page 2: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Example of Enduro Type Go-kartExample of Enduro Type Go-kart Driver lays on his\her backDriver lays on his\her back Race on road courses such Race on road courses such

as Mid-Ohioas Mid-Ohio Speeds are in excess of 80 Speeds are in excess of 80

mph (35.76 m/s)mph (35.76 m/s)

Page 3: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Project ObjectiveProject Objective

Use Finite Element Code (ANSYS: CFD Use Finite Element Code (ANSYS: CFD component FLOTRAN) for the followingcomponent FLOTRAN) for the following– Comparison of two nose cone shapes to Comparison of two nose cone shapes to

determine which is more aerodynamicdetermine which is more aerodynamic– Comparison of two meshing techniquesComparison of two meshing techniques

» Mapped Mesh (Structured Mesh)Mapped Mesh (Structured Mesh)

» Free MeshFree Mesh

Page 4: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Theory: AssumptionsTheory: Assumptions

Steady StateSteady State Newtonian FluidNewtonian Fluid No-slip at Fluid\Solid No-slip at Fluid\Solid

InterfaceInterface TurbulentTurbulent IncompressibleIncompressible IsothermalIsothermal

Property Value Units

Density 1.205 kg/m3

Dynamic Viscosity 1.81E-05 Ns/m2

Characteristic Length 2.44 mFree Stream Velocity 35.76 m/s

Reynolds Number 5.80E+06

Page 5: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Model Setup: Basic GeometryModel Setup: Basic Geometry

Figure 1: Shape 1 in Flow Field

Figure 2: Shape 2 in Flow Field

Page 6: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Basic Geometry ComparisonBasic Geometry Comparison

Similarities Differences

Kart Length 8' (2.43 m) Upper surface of kart between leading

Inlet Length 10' (3.05 m) edge and 32" (0.813 m) from leading edge

Outlet Length 10' (3.05 m) Upper surface of flow field between leading

Min. Flow Height 9' (2.74 m) edge and 12.7' (3.861 m) from leading edge

Page 7: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

ANSYS ProcedureANSYS Procedure

Define Keypoints and Create LinesDefine Keypoints and Create Lines Make Areas from Line LoopsMake Areas from Line Loops Mesh AreasMesh Areas Set Boundary ConditionsSet Boundary Conditions Set Solver ParametersSet Solver Parameters Solve FLOTRANSolve FLOTRAN

Page 8: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 1: AreasShape 1: Areas

Page 9: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 2: AreasShape 2: Areas

Page 10: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Mapped MeshesMapped Meshes

Shape 1 Mapped Mesh

Shape 2 Mapped Mesh

Page 11: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Free MeshesFree Meshes

Shape 1 Free Mesh

Shape 2 Free Mesh

Page 12: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Boundary ConditionsBoundary Conditions

All Boundary Conditions were applied to All Boundary Conditions were applied to lineslines

Velocity of 0 m/s applied to ground and all Velocity of 0 m/s applied to ground and all surfaces of kartsurfaces of kart

Velocity of 35.76 m/s in x-direction applied Velocity of 35.76 m/s in x-direction applied to the upper free stream surfaceto the upper free stream surface

Relative Pressure of 0 Pa applied to “outlet”Relative Pressure of 0 Pa applied to “outlet”

Page 13: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

FLOTRAN ParametersFLOTRAN Parameters

Steady-state with turbulent solverSteady-state with turbulent solver Fluid properties set to air in standard SIFluid properties set to air in standard SI Solver set to perform 250 iterationsSolver set to perform 250 iterations

Page 14: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

ResultsResults

Page 15: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 1 Velocity (m/s)Shape 1 Velocity (m/s)

Page 16: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 2 Velocity (m/s)Shape 2 Velocity (m/s)

Page 17: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 1 Pressure (Pa)Shape 1 Pressure (Pa)

Page 18: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 2 Pressure (Pa)Shape 2 Pressure (Pa)

Page 19: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 1 Turbulent KE (J)Shape 1 Turbulent KE (J)

Page 20: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 2 Turbulent KE (J)Shape 2 Turbulent KE (J)

Page 21: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 1 Free Mesh ResultsShape 1 Free Mesh Results

Shape 1 Velocity (m/s) Shape 1 Pressure (Pa)

Shape 1 Turbulent KE (J)

Page 22: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

Shape 2 Free Mesh ResultsShape 2 Free Mesh Results

Shape 2 Velocity (m/s) Shape 2 Pressure (Pa)

Shape 2 Turbulent KE (J)

Page 23: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

ConclusionConclusion

Shape 1 is better than Shape 2Shape 1 is better than Shape 2 A mapped mesh is slightly better than a free A mapped mesh is slightly better than a free

meshmesh Results are only as good as the mesh that Results are only as good as the mesh that

they arise fromthey arise from

Page 24: Aerodynamic Study of Go-kart Nose Cones ME450 Introduction to Computer Aided Engineering Becker, Joe Professor H. U. Akay May 1, 2000.

I AM DONE!I AM DONE!