Top Banner
Adani Appendix B11 – Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach
17

Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Apr 18, 2018

Download

Documents

buituong
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

 

 

 

 

AdaniAppendix B11 – Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys,

Abbot Beach

Page 2: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Abbot Point Coal Terminal 0 EIS • Adani

Terminal 0 Environmental Impact Statement

Page 3: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      iii  

Table of Contents  

 

Section1 MarineTurtleNestingSurveys–AbbotBeach...................................................................................11.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................................................................11.2 Background..........................................................................................................................................................1

1.2.1 FlatbackTurtles...........................................................................................................................................21.2.2 GreenTurtles.................................................................................................................................................31.2.3 PreviousStudiesatAbbotPoint...........................................................................................................4

Section2 Surveymethods............................................................................................................................................5

Section3 Results.............................................................................................................................................................63.1.1 Walkingtransect..........................................................................................................................................63.1.2 Beachhabitatsuitability...........................................................................................................................9

Section4 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................10

Section5 References...................................................................................................................................................11

List of Figures 

Figure 1‐1 Nesting locations in northern and eastern Australia for Flatback Turtles (from Limpus and Miller 2008) ................................................................................................................................................................... 3Figure 1‐2 Nesting locations in northern and eastern Australia for Green Turtles (from Limpus and Miller 2008) ................................................................................................................................................................... 4Figure 1‐3 Marine turtle nesting survey results ‐ Abbot Beach (Dec 2012) ........................................................ 8

List of Tables 

Table 1‐1 Conservation status of marine turtles found in Australian waters ..................................................... 2

Appendices 

Appendix A ‐ Disclaimer and Limitations

Page 4: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    iv 

Document History and Status 

Revision  Date Issued  Reviewed By  Approved By  Date Approved  Revision Type 

Rev A  20/2/2013  Dr Toivo Zoete  Dr Toivo Zoete  20/2/2013  Draft Rev 0  22/2/2013  Brett Taylor/Daryl 

McPhee Dr Toivo Zoete  26/2/2013  Final 

                                            

Distribution of Copies 

Version  Date Issued  Quantity  Electronic  Issued To Rev A  20/2/2013  ‐  1  Gordana Vidovic Rev 0  26/2/2013  ‐  1  Gordana Vidovic                            

Printed:   26 February 2013 

Last Saved:  26 February 2013  03:33 PM 

File Name:  CDM Smith‐B12859.0‐RPT Draft Turtle Nesting Report Abbot Beach RevA 200213.docx 

Author:  Daryl McPhee and Brett Taylor 

Project Manager:  Toivo Zoete 

Client:  Adani Mining Pty Ltd 

Document Title:  Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach 

Document  Version:  Final 

Project Number:  B12859.01 

Page 5: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      1  

Section 1 Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys – Abbot Beach 

1.1 Purpose This reportprovides the resultsof surveysofAbbotBeach toassess itsuseasanesting sitebymarineturtles.CDMSmithwascommissionedbyAdaniMiningPtyLtdtocarryoutsurveysalongbeachanddunehabitatlocatedadjacenttotheproposedT0CoalTerminalfacilitytoascertainthepotential use of the area by marine turtles as a nesting site. The study area is locatedapproximately20kmnorth‐westofBowenonthenorthQueenslandcoast.

ThesurveyswerecarriedoutaspartofcommitmentsoutlinedinSection3.9.8oftheAbbotPointTerminal 0 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (2011), which includes undertaking amonitoringprogramtomanagethepotentialimpactsoflightingfromtheProjectonnestingturtlesduringandafterconstruction.Thesurveyswerecarriedouttoreflectbaselineconditionspriortodevelopmentoftheproposedterminal.

Artificiallightingcanleadtoavoidanceofnestbeachesbybreedingadultmarineturtlesandmayimpact a hatchling turtle’s ability to orientatewhen leaving the nest (Witherington andMartin1996;Pendoley2005;Limpus2008).Ithasbeenreportedthatmarineturtlesavoidbeacheswithexcessive lightpollution. Ineffect, lightpollution leads tohabitat loss (WitheringtonandMartin1996).Hatchlingsmaysufferincreasedmortalitybybecominglostinvegetationandthroughheatexhaustion (Limpus 2008). Hatchlingsmay also be at greater risk of predation from terrestrialspeciesthatobservethemleavingthenest(Pendoley2005).

1.2 Background Marineturtlesarelong‐livedandlatematuringwithmaturityreachedatbetween30and50yearsofage(Miller1996).Marineturtlesnestonmainlandcoastalbeachesandoffshore islands.Mostmarine turtles are highly migratory and undertake extensive movement between foraging andnestingareasandalsosignificantmovementsbetweenlife‐stages(Limpusetal.1993;Milleretal.1998).However,individualscanbeattachedtositespecificforagingareasforlongperiodsoftime.

Femalemarine turtles emerge from thewater, generally atnight, andmoveup the shoreline toselectanestinglocation.Mostfemalesdonotnestinconsecutiveyears(Miller1996).However,afemale marine turtle may lay several clutches of eggs per year (Limpus et al. 1984). Nestingmarineturtlesgenerallydemonstratefidelitytoanestingbeachandreturntonestontheirnatalbeachwithaveryhighdegreeofprecision(Limpusetal.1984).Nestinggenerallyoccursbetweenthehighwatermarkandthefore‐dune,however,nestsmayalsobelaidbelowthehightidemark(Whitingetal.2007).Ifinundationofnestsissignificant,thenestbecomesunviable.

Theprocessbywhichturtlesselectnestingsitesalongabeachhasnotbeenclarified(Miller1996),however light regime is considered to have a significant influence on the emergence of femalemarine turtles from the ocean. Once hatched, lighting cues are also identified as critical forhatchlings tomove from the beach to the ocean – a behaviour known as sea‐finding. In simpleterms, where there are no anthropogenic light sources, hatchlings move away from the darksilhouettedshorelinetowardsthebrighteroceanhorizon.Brightnessinthiscontext,however,isaterm encompassing wavelength and intensity (Witherington and Martin 1996). Further, theheterogeneityofthelightregimecanalsoactasacue.Thatis,hatchlingsmayorientateawayfromahorizonthathasspatialpatternsof lightandshadowwhichinpractical termswouldseethem

Page 6: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    2 

orientateawayfromtheshoreandheadtowardsthemorehomogenouslightenvironmentoftheoceanhorizon(GodfreyandBarreto1995;WitheringtonandMartin1996).Thesexratioofturtlehatchlingsisdependentonthetemperatureofincubationwhichisafunctionofsandcolour.Nestsindarkersandincubateathighertemperaturesandproducemorefemales(Haysetal.2001).

TheconservationstatusofmarineturtlespeciesfoundinAustralianwatersisdescribedinTable1‐1.Currently,thereisaRecoveryPlaninplaceundertheEnvironmentProtectionandBiodiversityConservationAct1999(EPBC)forallmarineturtlespeciesinAustralia.

TheAbbotPointareaprovidesbothforagingandnestinghabitatforanumberofspeciesofmarineturtles. Surveys by Bell (2003) identified that Abbot Point provides nesting habitat for bothFlatbackTurtle(Natatordepressus)andGreenTurtle(Cheloniamydas).

Table 1‐1 Conservation status of marine turtles found in Australian waters 

Species name  Scientific name Conservation status1 

IUCN  EPBC  NC Green Turtle   Chelonia mydas  Endangered  Vulnerable  Vulnerable Hawksbill Turtle   Eretmochelys imbricata  Critically 

endangered Vulnerable  Vulnerable 

Flatback Turtle   Natator depressus  Data deficient  Vulnerable  Vulnerable Olive Ridley Turtle   Lepidochelys olivacea  Vulnerable  Endangered  Endangered Leatherback Turtle   Dermochelys coriacea  Critically 

endangered Vulnerable2  Endangered 

Loggerhead Turtle   Caretta caretta  Endangered  Endangered  Endangered 1  Status:  IUCN  =  The  International  Union  for  the  Conservation  of  Nature;  EPBC  =  Commonwealth  Environment  Protection  and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; and NC = Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992. 2 The leatherback turtle has been nominated as critically endangered under the EPBC Act. The results of this nomination are pending.         

1.2.1 Flatback Turtles  

In Queensland, Flatback Turtles nest at a number of mainland and island locations in centralQueensland,westernCapeYorkandanumberofislandsintheTorresStraitregion.Mostnestingfor the easternAustralian stock (>70%)of FlatbackTurtles is contained inprotectedhabitat ofNationalParksorConservationParksdeclaredunderQueensland’sNatureConservationAct(NC).Themajornesting areas for FlatbackTurtles innorthern and easternAustralia are indicated inFigure 1‐1. Themajor easternAustralian breeding aggregations occur on continental islands ininshore areas of the southern Great Barrier Reef (GBR) at Peak, Wild Duck, Avoid and CurtisIslands(Limpus2007).IncentralQueensland,minorrookeriesareidentifiedat:InflexIslets,FlockPigeon Island, Aquilla Island, Red Clay Island, Brampton Island, St Bee’s Island, Rabbit Island,CockermouthIsland,PenrithIslandandWigtonIsland.Otherlocationswithsuitablebeachnestinghabitatalsomakeacontributiontoreproductiveoutputofthepopulation.

In eastern Queensland breeding is seasonal with nesting commencing in mid October. Nestingactivity reaches a peak in late November‐early December, and ceases by about late January.Hatchlings emerge from nests during early December until about late March, with a peak ofhatchingactivityinFebruary(Limpus2007).TheFlatbackTurtleiscarnivorousandmostlyfeedsonepibenthicinvertebratesincludingseacucumbersandsoftcorals.

      

Page 7: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    3 

Figure 1‐1 Nesting locations in northern and eastern Australia for Flatback Turtles (from Limpus and Miller 2008) 

1.2.2 Green Turtles  

Sevenwidelyseparatedbreedingaggregationsofgreenturtlesthatareseparatestockshavebeenidentified for Australia (Bowen etal. 1992;Norman etal. 1994;Moritz etal. 2002). These are:southernGBR, Coral Sea, northernGBR, Gulf of Carpentaria, AshmoreReefs, Scott Reef and theNorthwestShelf.WithinthesouthernGBRbreedingunit,majorbreedingconcentrationsoccurontheislandsoftheCapricornBunkerGroupsofthesouthernGBR.Keynestinglocationsforgreenturtles are described in Figure 1‐2. Green turtle nesting on mainland beaches in centralQueenslandisgenerallylimitedtosporadicnestingonly.

                

Page 8: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    4 

Figure 1‐2 Nesting locations in northern and eastern Australia for Green Turtles (from Limpus and Miller 2008) 

1.2.3 Previous Studies at Abbot Point 

TwoprevioussurveysforturtlenestingactivityhavebeencarriedoutalongAbbotBeachbetweenEuriCreekandthecoalloadingfacilityatAbbotPoint.Bell(2003)carriedoutatwoday/onenightnestingsurveyofAbbotBeachinlateNovember2002.Ninenestingtrackswererecorded.Trackidentificationtospecieswasdifficultduetoprevailingwindsobscuringtrackdetail.Threetrackswere considered likely to be Green Turtle (based on track width) and the remaining six werethoughttobethatoftheFlatbackTurtle.Bell(2003)suggestedthatalthoughnestingoccursatlowdensity, the port area of Abbot Point provides important nesting habitat on the mainland forFlatbackTurtles.

SurveysassociatedwiththeAbbotPointMCFEISlocated4and7nestingtracksinNovemberandDecember2008respectively(GHD2010).Speciesidentificationcouldnotbeattributedtotracks;howevertwoneststhathadsufferedpredationwereidentifiedasthoseofFlatbackTurtlesafterexaminationoftheeggs.

Page 9: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      5  

Section 2 Survey methods Turtle nesting surveys consisted of a walking transect extending 6 km south from the existingMaterialOffloadFacility(MOF)sitelocatedsouthofAbbotPointitself.Twoobserverswalkedthelengthofthetransect,examiningthebeachandadjacentforedunesfornestingturtletracks.Wheretrackswereencountered,theirpositionwasrecordedwithaGPS.Recenttracksthathadnotbeensufficientlyobscuredbyprevailingweather conditionswerephotographedand trackwidthwasmeasured. The inspections of the beachwere undertaken on 19/20th December 2012 and 29thJanuary2013.

The suitability of beach habitat for viable marine turtle nesting was classified based on thefollowingcategories:

A. Nestinghabitat suitablewithappropriatebeachaccess andaccess to the supra‐littoral zoneformarine turtles. A knownmarine turtle rookerywhere nesting density is high (e.g.MonRepos,HeronandNorth‐WestIslands).

B. Nestinghabitat suitablewithappropriatebeachaccess andaccess to the supra‐littoral zoneformarineturtles.Notaknownturtlerookerybutlowdensitynestingpreviouslyrecordedorhighlylikely.

C. Nesting habitat less than optimal. Narrow supra‐littoral zone and/or physical barriers toeffectivenesting(e.g.largescarps).

D. Nestinghabitatextremelylimitedorabsent.Shorelinefringedbymangrovesorsaltmarshwithbeachhabitatlimitedinextentorabsentbynaturalorman‐madefeatures.

Nestingandhatchlingactivitywasalsorecordedwhenitwasencounteredandfeedingactivitiesofmarineturtlesintheimmediatenear‐shoreareawasalsonoted.Nestingactivitywasrecordedbyobserving thedistinctive tracks left following themarine turtlesnestingcrawl(Wyneken1997).Although,dependingontheirage,aspectsoftrackmorphologyrequiredforsuccessfulnestingcanbeobscuredbywindinparticular.

BothsurveyswerecarriedoutbyCDMSmithecologists.DrDarylMcPheeaccompaniedCDMstaffontheJanuary2013surveyandassessedthebeachhabitatformarineturtlenestingsuitability.DrMcPheealsoidentifiedmarineturtlespecies(wherepossible)fromphotographsofnestingtracksfrom theDecember survey.DrDarylMcPhee isAssociateDean (Research) atBondUniversity’sInstitute of Sustainable Development and Architecture. He has undertaken numerous turtlesurveysinQueenslandandwasamemberoftheCommonwealth’sMarineTurtleRecoveryTeam.Heplayedanintegralroleinmitigatingtheimpactsofprawntrawlfisheriesonmarineturtles.

Page 10: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      6  

Section 3 Results 

3.1.1 Walking transect 

Evidence of limited marine turtle nesting was recorded in the December 2012. Eleven sets oftrackswererecordedoverthetwodays(Figure3‐1).Nineindividualtrackswererecordedonthe19thDecemberincludingonesetoftracksthatwaslikelytohavebeenproducedonthepreviousnight.Twomorefreshtrackswereobservedonthesubsequentmorningfollowingthenightofthe19thDecemberindicatingthatnestingactivitywasongoingatthetimeofthesurvey.Trackswerealsorecordedatthemostsouthernextentofthetransectindicatingthatturtlenestingmayextendfurther south of the survey area. At least three sets of tracks appeared to lead to a successfulnestingattempt.Theremainingtracksoftenfeaturedmultipleattemptsatnestingalthoughitwasuncertainwhethersuccessfulnestinghadoccurred.Ofthetracksidentified,sixweresufficienttoallow identification of the species likely to be responsible – five tracks were likely to be fromFlatback Turtles and one from a Green Turtle (Plate 1‐1 and 1‐2). Two examples of hatchlingemergence were also recorded indicating the beach is used early in the turtle nesting season.Identification of the hatchling species could not bemade. The first trackwas recorded 2.2 kmsouthoftheMOF(Figure3‐1)despiteapparentlysimilarhabitatbeingpresentalongmuchofthisarea. Eight sets of tracks and two hatching sites were located within the next 1.4 km ofbeach/dune.

 Plate 3‐1:  Flatback Turtle tracks recorded on Abbot Beach (Dec 2012)

Page 11: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    7 

 Plate 3‐2:  Green Turtle track recorded on Abbot Beach (Dec 2012)

NomarineturtlenestingorhatchlingemergencewasrecordedintheJanuarysurvey.TheJanuarysurveyoccurredat theendof thenestingperiod. Itwashypothesisedthatevidenceofhatchlingemergence,more than newmarine turtle nesting activitywould have been encountered in thissurvey period. However, the survey was undertaken approximately a week after ex‐tropicalcycloneOswaldpassedthroughtheregionandevidenceofsignificantshoreline inundationoverandabovethehighesttideoftheyearwasevident.Thismayhaveimpactedhatchlingemergenceand/ortheabilitytodetecthatchlingemergence.

Both survey periods identified a concentration ofmarine turtles associatedwith the rocky reefarea that extends approximately2.5 km southof theMOF.This consistedofGreen, LoggerheadandFlatbackTurtles (Plate1‐3).Bell (2003)discussedanecdotal reportswhich indicated thatapopulationofGreenTurtlesutilisetherockysub‐tidalreeffaceextendingsouthforapproximately3.5kmfromAbbotPointJettyforbothforagingandrestingrefugiaathightide.Althoughanexactnumberofindividualsusingtheareacouldnotbeobtained,anindicativeestimateisbetween16and25animals.Theobservationsmadeaspartofthisstudysupporttheuseofthisareabymarineturtles.

Plate 3‐3:  Green Turtle ‐ Abbot Beach (August 2012) 

Page 12: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

MOF 2.2km

148°6'30"E

148°6'30"E

148°6'0"E

148°6'0"E

148°5'30"E

148°5'30"E

148°5'0"E

148°5'0"E19

°54'0

"S

19°5

4'0"S

19°5

4'30"S

19°5

4'30"S

19°5

5'0"S

19°5

5'0"S

19°5

5'30"S

19°5

5'30"S

19°5

6'0"S

19°5

6'0"S

LegendTurtle hatching siteTurtle nesting site

RoadExisting RailAPSDA Boundary

Project AreaProposed Project Infrastructure Area

0 250 500125

Metres

CAIRNS

BRISBANE

MOUNT ISATOWNSVILLE

ROCKHAMPTON

Data source:Turtle survey by CDM SMith, 2012; Roads by Geoscience Australia;Terminal data by Adani; Aerial Image by BingMaps, 2011; All other data byDERM, 2010.

Job: B12705_113-R1_TurtleSurveyDate: 15/01/2013

DISCLAIMERCDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions oractions resulting from the information contained within this map.

Abbot Point Coal Terminal 0 (T0) ProjectFigure 1-3 Marine turtle nesting survey results - Abbot Beach (Dec 2012)

Page 13: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    9 

3.1.2 Beach habitat suitability 

With the exception of a small area (approximately 100metres) directly south of theMOF, thebeachhabitatcanbeclassifiedas“B”.Whilethequalityofthehabitatvariedtoadegreeatsmallerspatial scales with respect to optimal marine turtle habitat, the habitat overall warranted theclassification.Asbeachhabitatsclearlyhaveadynamiccomponent,finerscalespatialassessmentsalso need a temporal component,whichwas not able to be undertaken, and in any case is notnecessarilyrelevanttoconsideringpotentialportimpacts.ThesmallareaadjacenttotheMOFwasclassified as “C” due to the presence of a large scarp (~ threemetres high)whichwould havelimited any nesting activity. The height of this scarp would have been enhanced by theaforementionedweather.

Partsofthesupralittoralzonehowever,containedCoastalShe‐oak(Casuarinaequisetifolia)whichis identified as potentially compromising marine turtle nesting success (Ryder et al. 2000;Mohanty 2002). This tree species rapidly propagates to form dense standswith extensive rootsystems,whichprohibitturtlesfromsuccessfullydiggingbodypitsandeggchambers.Thegeneralcoverage of C. equisetifolia was such that the value of the entire beach area for marine turtlenesting was not compromised. However, it is uncertain if the tree species causes the samepotential impacts in Australia with respect tomarine turtle nesting in comparison to overseaslocations. However, one nesting turtle had made multiple attempts to successfully nest withsuccessfulnestconstructionapparentlyimpededbyofC.equisetifoliaroots(Plate1‐4).

 Plate 3‐4:  Marine turtle nesting attempt at base of Coastal She‐oak (Dec 2012) 

Page 14: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      10  

Section 4 Conclusion Overall,thefieldworkundertakenprovidesadditional,updatedinformationonmarineturtleuseofthenear‐shoreandbeachenvironmentbymarineturtles.Inthecaseofthesecondsurvey,anabsenceofnestingactivitywasrecorded;however,thisshouldnotbeinterpretedastheareabeingunimportantfornestingactivities.

MarineTurtlenestingactivityalongAbbotBeachoccursinlowdensitieswhencomparedtoislandnestingbeaches.ThemajornestingaggregationsforbothFlatbackandGreenTurtlesintheGBRoccuronislandsandcoralcays(Limpus2007;2008).However,nestingactivityforFlatbackTurtlemaycomparefavourablywithwell‐knownmainlandsitesfurthersouthintheMonReposregion(referLimpus2007).Bell (2003)statesalthoughFlatbackTurtlesnest in lowdensities, theportarea of Abbot Point provides importantmainland nesting habitat in north Queensland. Cautionshouldbeexercised in interpreting lowdensitynestingas “unimportant”as lowdensitynestingcan make an important reproductive contribution. This is particularly the case if low densitynestingonmainlandbeachesproducesadisproportionatenumberoffemalehatchlingscomparedto islandbeachesofhigherdensitynesting.Thisscenariooccurs forFlatbackTurtles inwesternCapeYork and the various adjacent offshore islands, and althoughuncertainties exist,may alsopotentiallyoccurontheQueenslandeastcoast.FromaregionalperspectiveAbbotBeachmaybeconsideredlessimportantthanoffshorenestingsites;however,giveneachmarineturtle’sfidelitytoits’natalnestingbeachthesiteshouldbeconsideredaslocallyimportant.

Aswithprevioussurveys(i.e.Bell2003;GHD2010)thisstudywaslimitedinscopeasonlyasinglesurvey could be carried out in December after the peak nesting period for Flatback Turtle hadfinished. In the future, more intensive surveys along Abbot Beach may provide representativenumbers of marine turtle nesting activity on the site, and information regarding the potentialeffectsofCoastalShe‐oakonnestingsuccessinthearea.

It is recommended that monitoring programs focussed on nesting females and hatchlings bedevelopedasacomponentofadaptivemanagementofthepotentialimpactsoflightingonmarinefauna.

Page 15: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      11  

Section 5 References Bell I 2003,TurtlePopulationDynamics in theHayPoint,AbbotPointandLucindaPortAreas. AReportpreparedforthePortsCorporationofQueensland.

Bowen BW, Meylan AB, Ross PJ, Limpus CJ, Balazs GH and Avise JC 1992, ‘Global populationstructure and natural history of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in terms of matriarchalphylogeny.’Evolution,vol.46,pp.865–881.

GHD2010,Terrestrialandaquaticecologicalassessment.ProposedAbbotPointMultiCargoFacilityEIS,reportpreparedforNorthQueenslandBulkPortsCorporation.

GodfreyMHandBarretoR1995,‘Beachvegetationandseafindingorientationofturtlehatchlings.’BiologicalConservation,vol.74,pp.29‐32.

HaysGC,AshworthJS,BarnsleyMJ,BroderickAC,EmeryDR,GodleyBJ,HenwoodAandJonesEL2001, ‘The importanceof sandalbedo for the thermal conditionsonsea turtlenestingbeaches.’Oikos,vol.93,pp.87‐94.

LimpusCJ,CouperPJ andCouperKLD1993, ‘Crab Island revisited: reassessmentof theworld'slargestflatbackturtlerookeryaftertwelveyears.’MemoirsoftheQueenslandMuseum,vol.33,pp.227‐289.

Limpus CJ 2007, A Biological Review of Australian Marine Turtles. 5. Flatback turtle, Natatordepressus(Garman).ReportforEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Queensland.

Limpus CJ, Fleay A. and Baker V 1984, ‘The flatback turtle, Chelonia depressa, in Queensland:reproductiveperiodicity,philopatryandrecruitment.’AustralianJournalofWildlifeResearch,vol.11,pp.579‐587.

LimpusCJ2008,ABiologicalReviewoftheAustralianMarineTurtles.2.GreenturtleCheloniamydas(Linnaeus),ReportpreparedforEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Queensland.

LimpusCJandMiller JD2008,AustralianHawksbillTurtlePopulationDynamicsProject.AreportpreparedfortheJapanBekkoAssociation.

Miller JD1996, ‘Reproductioninseaturtles., In:PLLutzandJAMusick(eds.),TheBiologyofSeaTurtles.CRCPress,NewYork,pp.51‐81.

MillerJD,DobbsKA,LimpusCJ,MattocksNandLandryJrAM1998,‘Long‐distancemigrationsbythehawksbillturtle,Eretmochelysimbricata,fromnorth‐easternAustralia.’WildlifeResearch.vol.25,pp.89‐95.

MohantyB2002.‘CasuarinaforestsruinturtlenestingbeachesinOrissa.’KachhapaNo.7,pp.20‐21.

Moritz C, Broderick D, Dethmers K, Fitzsimmons N, and Limpus C 2002, Population genetics ofsoutheastAsianandwesternPacificgreenturtles,Cheloniamydas.FinalreporttoUNEP/CMS,Bonn.

Norman JA, Moritz C and Limpus CJ 1994. ‘Mitochondrial DNA control region polymorphisms:geneticmarkersforecologicalstudiesofmarineturtles.’MolecularEcology,vol.3,pp.363–373.

Pendoley KL 2005, ‘Sea turtles and the environmental management of industrial activities innorthwestWesternAustralia’,Ph.D.Thesis,PhDThesis,MurdochUniversity:Perth.

Page 16: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    Adani Mining Pty Ltd  

   Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach    12 

RyderJ2000,‘Preliminaryinvestigationofloggerhead(Carettacaretta)nestingaftertheremovalofAustralianpines(Casuarinaequisetifolia).’ProceedingsoftheNineteenthAnnualSymposiumonSeaTurtleBiologyandConservation.U.S.Dept.Commerce.NOAATech.Memo.NMFS‐SEFSC‐443,pp.207‐208.

WhitingSD,LongJL,HaddenKM,LauderADKandKochAU2007, ‘Insights intosize,seasonalityandbiologyofanestingpopulationof theOliveRidleyturtle inAustralia.’WildlifeResearch,vol.34,pp.200‐210.

WynekenJ2001,‘TheAnatomyofSeaTurtles.’NOAATechnicalMemorandumNMFS–SEFSC470,pp.1–172.

Witherington BE and Martin RE 1996, Understanding, Assessing, and Resolving Light‐PollutionProblemsonSeaTurtleNestingBeaches.TechnicalReportTR‐2,FloridaMarineResearchInstitute,StPetersburg,Florida.

Page 17: Adani B11 Nesting Surveys, Abbot Beach - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/adani/pdf/eisdoc_b11-marine-turtle... · Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach iii Table

 

Marine Turtle Nesting Surveys ‐ Abbot Beach      1  

Appendix A ‐ Disclaimer and Limitations ThisreporthasbeenpreparedbyCDMSmithAustraliaPtyLtd(CDMSmith)forthesolebenefitofMundraPortP/L for thesolepurposeofprovidingareportoncurrentmarineturtleactivityonAbbotBeach.

ThisreportshouldnotbeusedorrelieduponforanyotherpurposewithoutCDMSmith’spriorwrittenconsent.CDMSmith,noranyofficeroremployeeofCDMSmith,acceptsnoresponsibilityorliabilityinanywaywhatsoeverfortheuseorrelianceofthisreportforanypurposeotherthanthatforwhichithasbeenprepared.

ExceptwithCDMSmith’spriorwrittenconsent,thisreportmaynotbe:

(a) releasedtoanyotherparty,whetherinwholeorinpart(otherthantoMundraPort’sP/Lofficers,employeesandadvisers);

(b) usedorrelieduponbyanyotherparty;or

(c) filedwithanyGovernmentalagencyorotherpersonorquotedorreferredtoinanypublicdocument.

CDM Smith, nor any officer or employee of CDM Smith, accepts no liability or responsibilitywhatsoeverfororinrespectofanyuseorrelianceuponthisreportbyanythirdparty.

TheinformationonwhichthisreportisbasedhasbeenprovidedbyMundraPort’sP/Landthirdparties.CDMSmith(includingitsofficerandemployee):

(a) hasrelieduponandpresumedtheaccuracyofthisinformation;

(b) has not verified the accuracy or reliability of this information (other than as expresslystatedinthisreport);

(c) hasnotmadeany independent investigationsorenquiries inrespectof thosemattersofwhichithasnoactualknowledgeatthetimeofgivingthisreporttoMundraPort’sP/L;and

(d) makesnowarrantyorguarantee,expressedorimplied,astotheaccuracyorreliabilityofthisinformation.

Inrecognitionof the limiteduse tobemadebyMundraPort’sP/Lof thisreport,MundraPort’sP/Lagrees that, to themaximumextentpermittedby law,CDMSmith (including itsofficer andemployee)shallnotbeliableforanylosses,claims,costs,expenses,damages(whetherinstatute,incontractortortfornegligenceorotherwise)sufferedorincurredbyMundraPort’sP/Loranythird party as a result of or in connection with the information, findings, opinions, estimates,recommendationsandconclusionsprovidedinthecourseofthisreport.

Iffurtherinformationbecomesavailable,oradditionalassumptionsneedtobemade,CDMSmithreservesitsrighttoamendthisreport.