Top Banner
Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic challenge Astrianda Suryono, Benjamin Tan, Maria Cecilia Aquino, Paul Chew Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital (NUH)/ National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore Purpose To present a case of acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye. Results A report of one case, a 64 year-old Chinese Singaporean male, came with sudden onset of right-eye pain, blurring of vision and redness accompanied by right-sided headache, nausea and vomiting. Visual acuity was hand movement on the right, and 6/9 on the left. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 61 and 13 mmHg in right and left-eye, respectively, using Goldmann tonometry. Conjunctiva injection and corneal edema were noted. Anterior chamber on the right-eye was shallow, angles were closed. Anterior segment-OCT (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) were done. Vitreous was seen in the pupillary margin. Both eyes were pseudophakic, with history of cataract surgeries done 20 years ago. A diagnosis of secondary acute angle closure was made, and patient was given mannitol and acetazolamide intravenously, eye drops (timolol, pilocarpine 1%, brimonidine, and prednisolone). The acute angle closure attack was broken 48 hours later, IOP went down to 5 mmHg. One week after, he underwent an Ahmed tube implantation with vitrectomy. Two-weeks post-operatively, IOP was 10 mmHg, with 6/7.5 visual acuity on the right eye. Methods This is a case report from The Eye Surgery Centre, National University Hospital. Conclusions The unusual presentation of this case poses a challenge in finding the underlying mechanism of acute angle closure. Potential causes entertained were pupil block, angle crowding, rotation of ciliary body with uveal effusion, and aqueous misdirection, with the latter as the most plausible mechanism for this case. The misdirected aqueous trapped behind the vitreous had caused the vitreous to move in front of the intraocular lens pushing the iris forward leading to the block. This scenario showed that aqueous misdirection may still occur several years after surgery. RIGHT EYE VA 6/30 (pinhole 6/15), IOP 31 mmHg, RIGHT EYE Very deep posterior chamber, No IOL-iris touch, cortical material seen in the bag, Gonioscopy: closed angle LEFT EYE Horizontal AS OCT scans Vertical AS OCT scans
1

Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic ...egscopenaghen2012/posters/june18/P3.17/poster.pdf · Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic challenge Astrianda

May 08, 2019

Download

Documents

phamnhu
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic ...egscopenaghen2012/posters/june18/P3.17/poster.pdf · Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic challenge Astrianda

Acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye: a diagnostic challenge

Astrianda Suryono, Benjamin Tan, Maria Cecilia Aquino, Paul Chew Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital (NUH)/

National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore

Purpose To present a case of acute angle closure in a pseudophakic eye.

Results A report of one case, a 64 year-old Chinese Singaporean male, came with sudden onset of right-eye pain, blurring of vision and redness accompanied by right-sided headache, nausea and vomiting. Visual acuity was hand movement on the right, and 6/9 on the left. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 61 and 13 mmHg in right and left-eye, respectively, using Goldmann tonometry. Conjunctiva injection and corneal edema were noted. Anterior chamber on the right-eye was shallow, angles were closed. Anterior segment-OCT (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) were done. Vitreous was seen in the pupillary margin. Both eyes were pseudophakic, with history of cataract surgeries done 20 years ago. A diagnosis of secondary acute angle closure was made, and patient was given mannitol and acetazolamide intravenously, eye drops (timolol, pilocarpine 1%, brimonidine, and prednisolone). The acute angle closure attack was broken 48 hours later, IOP went down to 5 mmHg. One week after, he underwent an Ahmed tube implantation with vitrectomy. Two-weeks post-operatively, IOP was 10 mmHg, with 6/7.5 visual acuity on the right eye.

Methods This is a case report from The Eye Surgery Centre, National University Hospital.

Conclusions The unusual presentation of this case poses a challenge in finding the underlying mechanism of acute angle closure. Potential causes entertained were pupil block, angle crowding, rotation of ciliary body with uveal effusion, and aqueous misdirection, with the latter as the most plausible mechanism for this case. The misdirected aqueous trapped behind the vitreous had caused the vitreous to move in front of the intraocular lens pushing the iris forward leading to the block. This scenario showed that aqueous misdirection may still occur several years after surgery.

RIGHT EYE VA 6/30 (pinhole 6/15), IOP 31 mmHg,

RIGHT EYE Very deep posterior chamber, No IOL-iris touch, cortical material seen in the bag, Gonioscopy: closed angle

LEFT EYE

Horizontal AS OCT scans

Vertical AS OCT scans