A historical and A historical and cultural cultural perspective on ICWA perspective on ICWA Why was ICWA Why was ICWA necessary? necessary?
Apr 01, 2015
A historical and A historical and cultural perspective cultural perspective
on ICWAon ICWA
Why was ICWA Why was ICWA necessary? necessary?
Everyone Everyone wants what is wants what is best for the best for the
child !child ! ““Why are Why are Indian Indian
children and families children and families treated differently?”treated differently?”
Understanding:Understanding:When someone says,When someone says, “we know what is best “we know what is best for your children,” for your children,” oror
““I am from the I am from the government - I am government - I am here to help”here to help”
Why trust is not Why trust is not the automatic the automatic
responseresponse
BIA started as part of BIA started as part of the War Departmentthe War Department
Education as a part of the Education as a part of the “civilizing” function“civilizing” function
Solution to the Solution to the “Indian “Indian Problem”Problem”
1878 the Hampton Institute, a 1878 the Hampton Institute, a school for freed slaves, accepted school for freed slaves, accepted Indian prisoners in an assimilation Indian prisoners in an assimilation
experiment.experiment.
In 1879 Carlisle Indian In 1879 Carlisle Indian School, patterned after the School, patterned after the
military model, opened.military model, opened.
By 1890 attendance was enforced By 1890 attendance was enforced through threats of cessation of through threats of cessation of
rations and supplies.rations and supplies.
Early “approved” curricula Early “approved” curricula prohibitedprohibited teaching of teaching of
reading/writing.reading/writing.
Early “approved” curricula Early “approved” curricula prohibitedprohibited teaching of teaching of
reading/writing.reading/writing.
Early “approved” curricula Early “approved” curricula prohibitedprohibited teaching of teaching of
reading/writing.reading/writing.
Many died of disease and Many died of disease and broken hearts.broken hearts.
Succeeded in breaking Succeeded in breaking intergenerational teaching in intergenerational teaching in
Indian communities. Indian communities. Language, religious practices, Language, religious practices,
cultural knowledge were cultural knowledge were targetedtargeted
Generations learned to parent Generations learned to parent from BIA dormsfrom BIA dorms
Motto at BIA Schools…Motto at BIA Schools…
Tradition is the enemy of Tradition is the enemy of progressprogress
A new ‘tradition’ is created A new ‘tradition’ is created that teaches ‘parenting’ from that teaches ‘parenting’ from matrons on the dormitoriesmatrons on the dormitories
We have seen how We have seen how the the federal federal
governmentgovernment has has treated Indian treated Indian
familiesfamiliesBut how have But how have StatesStates
treated families in treated families in Indian Country?Indian Country?
American Indian Policy American Indian Policy Review CommissionReview Commission
of theof theUnited States United States
CongressCongress
May 17, 1977May 17, 1977
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
420
270
050
100150200250300350400450
Arizona
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
840
270
0100200300400500600700800900
California
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
370
710
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Michigan
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
390
1650
0200400600800
10001200140016001800
Minnesota
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
480
1280
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Montana
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100280
2010
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
North Dakota
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
340
1500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Utah
St 100%
Adoption
Foster Care
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100
1900
960
0200400600800
100012001400160018002000
Washington
St 100%
Adoption
FosterCare
Comparative Rates for Comparative Rates for Indian ChildrenIndian Children
100%
1600%
0%0%
200%
400%
600%
800%
1000%
1200%
1400%
1600%
Wisconsin
St 100%
Adoption
FosterCare
How does this How does this happen?happen?
An exercise …An exercise …
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a frown, are all little smile, a frown, are all little things, but powerful for good things, but powerful for good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
Find the number Find the number ofofFFss
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a frown, are all little smile, a frown, are all little things, but powerful for good things, but powerful for good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a frown, are all little smile, a frown, are all little things, but powerful for good things, but powerful for good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerful for good things, but powerful for good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerthings, but powerfful for good ul for good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources of large they are sources of large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerthings, but powerfful ul ffor good or good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources othey are sources off large large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts of a large building parts of a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerthings, but powerfful ul ffor good or good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources othey are sources off large large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts oparts off a large building a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerthings, but powerfful ul ffor good or good or evil. Think of this and or evil. Think of this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
MIND THE LITTLE THINGSMIND THE LITTLE THINGS
Springs are little things, but Springs are little things, but they are sources othey are sources off large large streams; nails and pegs are streams; nails and pegs are little things, but they hold the little things, but they hold the parts oparts off a large building a large building together; a word, a look, a together; a word, a look, a smile, a smile, a ffrown, are all little rown, are all little things, but powerthings, but powerfful ul ffor good or good or evil. Think oor evil. Think off this and this and mind the little things.mind the little things. - Hillis - Hillis
Another view of Another view of the impactthe impact
When someone says,When someone says,
“ “ we know what is we know what is best for your best for your children.”children.”
IDENTIFICATION IDENTIFICATION WITH THEWITH THE
AGGRESSORAGGRESSOR
Thematic Thematic Apperception Apperception
testtestGood BadGood Bad
Beautiful UglyBeautiful Ugly
Smart DumbSmart Dumb
Honest DishonestHonest Dishonest
Identification with the Identification with the AggressorAggressor Baseline:Baseline:
Suicide rate of Suicide rate of teenagers in teenagers in U.S.U.S.
Inner CityInner City twicetwice as high as high
ReservationsReservations higherhigher
Indian kids in non-Indian kids in non-Indian homesIndian homes highesthighest
Identification with Identification with the Aggressorthe Aggressor Baseline:Baseline:
Suicide rate of Suicide rate of teenagers in teenagers in U.S.U.S.
Inner CityInner City twicetwice as high as high
ReservationsReservations higherhigher
Indian kids in non-Indian kids in non-Indian homesIndian homes highesthighest
Teenage Suicide
Baseline Inner City
Reservation Non-Ind homes
ICWA …ICWA …
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) that an alarmingly high (4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian families are broken up by families are broken up by the removal, often the removal, often unwarranted, of their unwarranted, of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) (4) that an alarmingly high that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian familiesfamilies are broken up by are broken up by the removal, often the removal, often unwarranted, of their unwarranted, of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) that an alarmingly high (4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian families families are broken up by are broken up by the removal,the removal, often often unwarranted, of their unwarranted, of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) that an alarmingly high (4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian families are broken up by families are broken up by the removal, the removal, often often unwarrantedunwarranted,, of their of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) that an alarmingly high (4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian families are broken up by families are broken up by the removal, the removal, often often unwarrantedunwarranted, , of their of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Sec. 2Sec. 2…the Congress finds……the Congress finds…(4) that an alarmingly high (4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian percentage of Indian families are broken up by families are broken up by the removal, the removal, often often unwarrantedunwarranted, of their , of their children…children…by nontribal public and by nontribal public and private agencies….private agencies….
Differences of OpinionDifferences of Opinion Proposition:Proposition: The Indian child welfare The Indian child welfare
system/tribal approach ought to be system/tribal approach ought to be more like the state approach. Indian more like the state approach. Indian children should be treated just like all children should be treated just like all other children.other children.
But….But…. 500,000500,000 children in foster care in this children in foster care in this
countrycountry 19,000 19,000 will age out this yearwill age out this year 60%60%
Homeless, in jail or deadHomeless, in jail or dead
Differences of OpinionDifferences of Opinion Proposition:Proposition: Tribes should be Tribes should be
providing the child welfare services providing the child welfare services without state assistance if they wish without state assistance if they wish to assume jurisdictionto assume jurisdiction
But….But…. Approximately Approximately 60% of state 60% of state
spendingspending on child welfare is federal on child welfare is federal source or reimbursementsource or reimbursement
Approximately Approximately 20% of tribal 20% of tribal spendingspending on child welfare is federal on child welfare is federal source or reimbursementsource or reimbursement
Differences of OpinionDifferences of Opinion Proposition:Proposition: The ICWA is federal The ICWA is federal
law, adopted in in 1978, and is law, adopted in in 1978, and is applicable to state courts dealing applicable to state courts dealing with Indian childrenwith Indian children
But….But…. Many judges do not understand, or Many judges do not understand, or
even know of, the requirements of even know of, the requirements of the ICWA…or do not agree with the the ICWA…or do not agree with the reasons for it’s enactmentreasons for it’s enactment
Differences of OpinionDifferences of Opinion Proposition:Proposition: Tribes delay too long Tribes delay too long
in participating in state child welfare in participating in state child welfare proceedings, especially when making proceedings, especially when making a decision to request transfer late in a decision to request transfer late in a casea case
But….But…. ??
Differences of OpinionDifferences of Opinion Proposition:Proposition: Tribes delay too long Tribes delay too long
seeking “permanency” under ASFA, seeking “permanency” under ASFA, particularly when ASFA requires [with particularly when ASFA requires [with exceptions] the filing of petitions to exceptions] the filing of petitions to terminate parental rights after 15 out terminate parental rights after 15 out of 22 months in out of home careof 22 months in out of home care
But….But…. ??
Understanding the Understanding the purpose of ICWA is purpose of ICWA is
crucialcrucial to to interpreting and interpreting and applying the lawapplying the law
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation Existing Indian Family Doctrine Existing Indian Family Doctrine [[Matter Matter
of the Adoption of Baby Boy Lof the Adoption of Baby Boy L – Kansas – Kansas Supreme Court 1982]Supreme Court 1982]
V. Opportunity to develop Indian identity V. Opportunity to develop Indian identity [In re Junious M – Cal. Ct. App. 1983][In re Junious M – Cal. Ct. App. 1983]
Baby Boy L implicitly overruledBaby Boy L implicitly overruled [[Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v HolyfieldHolyfield – U.S. Sup Ct 1989] – U.S. Sup Ct 1989]
State court deciding if family of removal State court deciding if family of removal is “Indian enough” to warrant protection is “Indian enough” to warrant protection under ICWA, notwithstanding the under ICWA, notwithstanding the definitions of Indian and Indian child in definitions of Indian and Indian child in ICWAICWA [ [In re CrewsIn re Crews – Wa. Sup. Ct. 1993] – Wa. Sup. Ct. 1993]
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
Acknowledgement of paternity & Acknowledgement of paternity & putative putative fathersfathers
ICWAICWA: Parent “does : Parent “does notnot include the include the unwed father where paternity has not unwed father where paternity has not been acknowledged or established”been acknowledged or established”
New JerseyNew Jersey: according to state law – : according to state law – written and timely acknowledgementwritten and timely acknowledgement
ArizonaArizona: simple acknowledgement : simple acknowledgement and no formal process requiredand no formal process required
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
P.L. – 280 and the ICWAP.L. – 280 and the ICWA Wisconsin A.G. Opinion [70 Op. Att’y Wisconsin A.G. Opinion [70 Op. Att’y
Gen. Wis. 237 (1981)] :Gen. Wis. 237 (1981)] : “…Pub. L. “…Pub. L. No. 280 and non-Pub. L. 280 No. 280 and non-Pub. L. 280 Wisconsin Indian tribes’ have Wisconsin Indian tribes’ have exclusive regulatory jurisdiction exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over child custody proceedingsover child custody proceedings involving Indian children who involving Indian children who reside or are domiciled within reside or are domiciled within the reservation.”the reservation.”
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
P.L. – 280 and the ICWAP.L. – 280 and the ICWA Doe v MannDoe v Mann, 9, 9thth Circuit filed July Circuit filed July
19, 2005:19, 2005: “…“…case of first impression for case of first impression for
the federal courts, requiring us the federal courts, requiring us to reconcile [P.L.280]…with the to reconcile [P.L.280]…with the exclusive jurisdiction granted exclusive jurisdiction granted to tribes by ICWA…”to tribes by ICWA…”
“…“…ICWA does not provide ICWA does not provide [tribe] with exclusive [tribe] with exclusive jurisdictionjurisdiction…”…”
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
NoticeNotice In any In any involuntaryinvoluntary proceeding proceeding
in a State court, where the in a State court, where the court court knows or has reason to knows or has reason to knowknow that an Indian child is that an Indian child is involved, ...involved, ...shall notifyshall notify the the parent or Indian custodian parent or Indian custodian and the Indian child’s tribe…and the Indian child’s tribe…
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
NoticeNoticeWisconsin [ In re Wisconsin [ In re Arianna R.GArianna R.G., .,
2003]: specific allegations of 2003]: specific allegations of heritage with an Ojibwa Tribe heritage with an Ojibwa Tribe in Marinette, Wi, where BIA in Marinette, Wi, where BIA unable to ascertain tribe, was unable to ascertain tribe, was too vague and therefore no too vague and therefore no notice was requirednotice was required
Differences of Legal Differences of Legal InterpretationInterpretation
NoticeNoticeCalifornia App Ct [In re Nikki California App Ct [In re Nikki
R, 2003] evidence that R, 2003] evidence that child’s paternal great child’s paternal great grandparents were Indian grandparents were Indian was sufficient to require was sufficient to require noticenotice
Finally,Finally,
The endThe end
But first one last storyBut first one last story
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
An old grandfather, whose grandson came to him, angry at a schoolmate who had done him an injustice, said "Let me tell you a story. I too, at times, have felt a great hate for those that have taken so much, with no sorrow for what they do. But hate wears you down, and does not hurt your enemy. It is like taking poison and wishing your enemy would die. I have struggled with these feelings many times."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
An old grandfather, whose grandson came to him, angry at a schoolmate who had done him an injustice, said "Let me tell you a story. I too, at times, have felt a great hate for those that have taken so much, with no sorrow for what they do. But hate wears you down, and does not hurt your enemy. It is like taking poison and wishing your enemy would die. I have struggled with these feelings many times."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
An old grandfather, whose grandson came to him, angry at a schoolmate who had done him an injustice, said "Let me tell you a story. I too, at times, have felt a great hate for those that have taken so much, with no sorrow for what they do. But hate wears you down, and does not hurt your enemy. It is like taking poison, but wishing your enemy would die. I have struggled with these feelings many times."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
An old grandfather, whose grandson came to him, angry at a schoolmate who had done him an injustice, said "Let me tell you a story. I too, at times, have felt a great hate for those that have taken so much, with no sorrow for what they do. But hate wears you down, and does not hurt your enemy. It is like taking poison, but wishing your enemy would die. I have struggled with these feelings many times."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
He continued, "It is as if there are two wolves inside me; one is good and does no harm.
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
He continued, "It is as if there are two wolves inside me; one is good and does no harm. He lives in harmony with all around him and does not take offense when no offense was intended. He will only fight when it is right to do so, and in the right way."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
But the other wolf, ah! He is full of anger. The littlest thing will set him into a fit of temper. He fights everyone, all the time, for no reason. He cannot think because his anger and hate are so great. It is helpless anger, for his anger will change nothing. Sometimes it is hard to live with these two wolves inside me, for both of them try to dominate my spirit."
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
But the other wolf, ah! He is full of anger. The littlest thing will set him into a fit of temper. He fights everyone, all the time, for no reason. He cannot think because his anger and hate are so great. But it is a helpless anger, for his anger will change nothing.
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
Sometimes it is hard to live with these two wolves inside me, for both of them try to dominate my spirit.
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
The boy looked intently into his Grandfather's eyes and asked, "Which one wins, Grandfather?"
The Wolves WithinAuthor Unknown
The boy looked intently into his Grandfather's eyes and asked, "Which one wins, Grandfather?"
The Grandfather smiled and said, "The one I feed."
Thank-you for Thank-you for letting me visit letting me visit
with youwith you