A Forest Residues Biorefinery: some techno-politico-economic analyses based on the La Tuque project Patrice J. Mangin Patrice Bergeron [email protected][email protected]CEO, BioÉnergie La Tuque Chairman of the Board, BioÉnergie La Tuque Bioenergy-BioEconomy Director Economic and Forestry (BEE) Chair, UQTR Development, La Tuque Jean Hamel [email protected]Senior VP, FPInnovations Pulp, Paper and Bioproducts
25
Embed
A Forest Residues Biorefinery · PDF filePatrice J. Mangin, CEO, BioEnergy La Tuque, “A Forest Residues Biorefinery: some techno-politico-economic analyses based on the La Tuque
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A Forest Residues Biorefinery: some techno-politico-economic analyses based on the La Tuque projectPatrice J. Mangin Patrice Bergeron
The Canadian landscape for biofuels Reducing the national GHG emissions profile
Policy for a significant reduction of GHGPlus demand for “non-food” bio-renewable fuels
Canada’s pulp and paper industry is already the largest generator of bioenergy
Integrate with forest industry operationsLonger-term integration of biofuels into national fuel infrastructure is challenging, but…
Significant opportunities are in reachResidues are available: security of supplies to attract
investments Incentives to attract project investors
Pull from industry players is becoming compellingBio-jet fuels ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization)�Aviation fuels – Air Canada, Westjet, SkyNRG, GARDN…�RNG – Canadian Gas Association�Diesel – BioÉnerqie La Tuque
Displaces 4.3 % of Quebec transport diesel consumption.233 MW renewable diesel from
350 MW wood feedstock
CO2 reduction 0.575 MT/y
Vehicles off the road: 143,750/y
Capital investment: 1 G$
CO2 capital cost index***: 70 $/T CO2
Jobs created: 490* Green Metric Tons at 40-50 % humidity** Bio-jet fuel considered – gasoline (by-product)***Calculated from capital invested and 25 years amortising
6
PJM170510-12
Regional assetsWinning conditions 1/2
Strong OVERALL motivation & supportProject is on TOP LIST of both Quebec and federal
governments agendaFully aligned with new Quebec 2030 energy policyStrong business & community supportCommitted partnersAlready good social acceptability, including
Atikamekw (First Nations)A-team secured for in-depth, due diligence techno-economic evaluationNo competition for forest harvest residues
New Quebec policy will increase the available biomass level in area 04 significantly
PJM170510-13
Regional assets Winning conditions 2/2
Significant heritage bark landfill for 20 years (430 T/day)
Reserved location for biorefinery: Vallières site30 000 kms of forest roads with no load restrictionNatural gas station nearby (hydrogen)Railway across territory, down to Trois-RivièresTrois-Rivières commercial harbour has all facilities and storage capacityValidated implementation agenda
� Project implemented by BioÉnergie LaTuque (BELT) as the sole and main promotor.
7
PJM170510-14
Policies
Challenges & IssuesPathways to success
Technologies
Economics
SUCCESS
PJM170510-15
Techno-politico-economic questions
Technologies (related to)SupplyProcessProducts
Economics (related to)SupplyProcessProducts (markets)DistributionCAPEX and OPEX
Policies (politics?)“New industry sector”Legislation/regulations
On the potential issueCanada bioenergy positioning
27.7%
26.7%
26.6%
23%
21.5%
Canada 5.4%
Room for improvement!!!
BRAZIL
FINLAND
CHILE
SWEDEN
DENMARK
AUSTRIA
19,9%
Courtesy of Marzouk Benali,CanMetEnergy - NRCan
PJM170510-17
Project implemented in 4 PhasesThru a comprehensive no compromise approach
Phase 1 main objective is to perform an in-depth thorough evaluation thru 12 studies by A-team from top level organizations…�Supply logistics, integration of forest residues harvesting to standard forest operations;
�Energy densification strategies to reduce biomass mill delivered costs, including CAPEX/OPEX;
�Analysis of markets (e.g. P.E.T. Dorval airport), regulations, diesel type (e.g. jet fuel versus road transport) and quality/standards (e.g.
ASTM,…) to define process manufacturing lines.
�Techno-economic evaluation and screening of technology process lines to produce “drop-in” high quality diesels.
� Selection of top 3 most promising, risk-free, process lines.
9
PJM170510-18
Implementing a “no compromise” approachDue diligence – PHASE TWO
Phase 2 consists of a thorough technology assessment or first level due technology diligence of the 3 pre-selected process lines for final selection of demonstration plant design. Performed mainly by FPInnovations & selected partners
Phase 2 objective is two-fold:
�Obtaining a design level 30 proposal for the demonstration refinery that constitutes Phase 3 of the La Tuque project by fall 2018.
�Establishing a top level FPInnovations team with the necessary high level expertise to enable duplication of similar projects elsewhere in Canada.
PJM170510-19
Implementing a “no compromise” approach: PHASES THREE & FOUR
Phase 3 objective: demonstration plant
�Decision to go for a demonstration biorefinery plant
�Design level 10 proposal for the demonstration biorefinery.
�Built, commission, and operate.
Phase 4 objective: commercial plant
�From data gathered in Phase 3 demonstration plant operation: decisions related to commercial plant investment
BELT Team Project Kick-Off MeetingLa Tuque – September 6-8, 2016
Some of the experts involved!
12
PJM170510-24
Team work…Selecting the A-team to ensure success!
BELT has succeeded in building a team of top recognized experts to develop and implement a world leading class forest biorefinery project.
Total cost: 7.8 M$ - in fact very little, less than 1% of project estimated capital cost
PJM170510-25
Key Issues & Features
Solution pathway: focus on “best available solution”
Technology pull vs technology push
Supply of biomass to the refinery and process issues are here critical
Addressing investors-banks criteria
CAPEX-OPEX
Security of fibre supply: 25 years
Minimum mandate (long term) requiredCredits (OK but not mandatory)
Based on use of residues: fully sustainable
Propose a “Bullet-proof solution” Does not yet exist BUT it is feasible to minimize and
manage risk to acceptable levels.
13
PJM170510-26
Biomass issuesQuebec perspective
Biomass from saw mill operation too expensive: rate of loss too high, distances, operation costs,…
Energy valorisation requests long term supply security, 25 years for high capital investments amortizing
Presently difficult with Quebec “forest regime”, market free access wood is 25% of allocated volumes through BMMB (Bureau de Mise en Marché des Bois)
Saw mill financial equilibrium linked to a) US housing market, b) paper mills…. presently of high concern, c) 6th
Canada–United States softwood lumber dispute (OR).
Harvesting/logging operations: stumpage royalties to government on a m3 basis need for a “cutting/logging” incentive but also a need for new customers.
PJM170510-27
Biomass challenges
Reduce biomass supply cost delivered at mill: harvest, transport, and integration strategies,…. mainly.
Previous studies: from 88 to 128$/DMT*Pulp supply in excess (drop in paper demand)
Energy system economy cannot pay traditional paper mills chip value (100-115$/DMT)Presently prices are lower… but what in 15 years ?
Ensure long term (25 years) security of supplyDue to integration needs, develop/propose an adequate share of costs/profits in integrated operation strategiesOil prices directly affect any biorefinery project…
Diesel costs affect logging/harvesting operation costs� Think long term, GHG reduction, and carbon
exchange market *DMT: dry metric tons
14
PJM170510-28
Biomass potential solutions
Increase the allowed « top diameter » (tree top/branches) to increase commercial values of products obtained from wood log;
Tests in progress by Quebec government
Optimize commercial harvest operations with forest residues harvesting;
Stumpage royalties (15-20$/m3 versus 0.10$/m3)
Integration to commercial operations
Consider/evaluate various energy densification scenarios (pyrolysis/torrefaction);
Regional “valorisation” centre to allocate wood/biomass according to “4B” concept: best wood, best mill, best use, and best price!
Legislation: a mandate is a key way to create a market to attract investors; presently renewable diesels cannot compete on markets; could be a « bridging scenario.
Source : How harmonized regulations would improve the biofuel blending system , Canadian Fuels Association,
Jan 28, 2016
4% (2017)
No Quebec mandate
19
PJM170510-38
Credit incentivesGHG reduction linked
Carbon tax for renewable fuels producers
RIN (Renewable Identification Number, USA)
Producer credits
….
Liquid Biofuels First 150 ML Over 150 ML
First generation ethanol or
other fuel alcohols0,10 $ 0,06 $
Second generation ethanol
or other fuel alchohols0,14 $ 0,09 $
Renewable diesel,
biodiesel, pyrolysis oil0,13 $ 0,09 $
Producers Credit Rates (Alberta)
PJM170510-39
Conclusions 1/3
La Tuque is the BEST LOCATION for the first Canadian biorefinery to produce renewable drop-in quality fuels based on harvest forest residues biomass.
Quebec forest are mainly government owned, harvest rights allocated for 5 years (X4), for a total of 25 years, residues remain government property biomass supply can be guaranteed for 25 years.
Government harvest policy is modified to favour the development of the bioenergy sector.
Studies objective of 4-5 $Can/GJ target is quite feasible and could reach the 4$/GJ. Very competitive.
Required mandate: minimum 5% (2017) with a 10% target (2020) or better mandate before 2030
20
PJM170510-40
Conclusions 2/3
Alignment of all parties is almost attained (Quebec mandate still lacking): industry, federal, and provincial governments, policy makers, and research organizations success probability �The project is structured for replication in Canada to maximize impact on Canadian (bio)economy.
The question of “demonstration plant or not” and “size of the demonstration plant” are an integrated part of studies.
There will be no compromise on
a) economic risk,
b) environmental impact, and
c) social acceptance.
PJM170510-41
Conclusions 3/3
Pre-feasibility studies are encouraging
NO set mind for technology-process line solution asBest technology solution not necessarily equivalent to
lower techno-economic risk solutionNO technology can provide THE answer if studied
SEPARATELY
Constant need to always go back and think, re-think, and re-think the whole process line and project steps
Although technologies need first to be pre-screened for feasibility and initial choices (NEW TECH.?)
Lots of work in progress… more questions and more challenges…
21
PJM170510-42
BELT – FPI Partnership – May 2016
Pierre Lapointe, CEO, FPInnovations and Patrice J. Mangin, CEO BELT signing the partnership agreement. In the background: left to right : Luc Marchand, Louis-Serge Gagnon, BELT Board, members, Normand Beaudoin, La Tuque mayor and Patrice Bergeron, BELT chairman of the Board.
PJM170510-43
BELT-NESTE Partnership - Janurary 17, 2017P. Bergeron, BELT/La Tuque - J.P. Martel, FPInnovations - J. Boulet, ambassadeur de Finlande L. Blanchette, Ministre Forêts, Faune et Parcs - N. Beaudoin, mairede La Tuque – P. Mangin, BELT
22
PJM170510-44
ATIKAMEKW NATION supports BELT project March 1, 2017
Sitting: P. Mangin, BELT, C. Awashish, Atikamekw Nation Council Great Chief (CNA) – Standing: P. Boucher, consultant (CNA), D. Boivin, Grand Chief politicaladvisor (CNA); D. Bouchard, general director (CNA); P. Bergeron, BELT; F. Fournier, FPInnovations.
PJM170510-45
Professor Patrice Mangin holds the regional bio-
economy/bio-energy development chair at University of
Quebec in Trois-Rivières (UQTR). He is CEO of BIOENERGY
LA TUQUE (BELT) and a member of the Renewable Materials
(CRMR) and of the Sustainable Development (CIRODD)
research centers. He is also a member of US Agenda 2020
CTO Committee (Washington), of the Quebec Association
for Renewable Energy Production (AQPER), and a researcher within BioFuelNet
Network. With over 40 year experience in the forest products industry, he was CEO of
Integrated Pulp and Paper Research Centre (CIPP, Trois-Rivières) and of Centre
Technique du Papier (Grenoble, France); scientific director of a Swedish research
network, and section head/researcher at FPInnovations. He held two industry research
chairs (KTH, Stockholm, and UQTR). He has been on over 30 boards and was chairman
of PAPTAC, PAPIER, TAGA, TAPPI International Research Management Committee, of
the CEPI European research group, and an FAO expert. He has managed projects up to
300 M$. He is (co)author of over 300 articles and presented twice as much all over the
globe. He contributed many strategic ventures/documents in Europe, Canada, and the
USA. He received many awards for excellence in research, including gold medals and