Top Banner
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik www.kit.edu A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors 19 th RD50 Workshop 21.11. – 23.11.2011 Florian Petry, Robert Eber T. Barvich, F. Bögelspacher, W. de Boer, A. Dierlamm, A. Kornmayer, Th. Müller, P. Steck
22

A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

kiril

A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors 19 th RD50 Workshop 21.11 . – 23.11.2011. Florian Petry , Robert Eber T. Barvich , F. Bögelspacher , W. de Boer, A. Dierlamm , A. Kornmayer , Th. Müller, P. Steck. Ingredients for the study. Introduction Sensors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association

Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik

www.kit.edu

A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors19th RD50 Workshop 21.11. – 23.11.2011

Florian Petry, Robert EberT. Barvich, F. Bögelspacher, W. de Boer, A. Dierlamm, A. Kornmayer, Th. Müller, P. Steck

Page 2: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop221.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Ingredients for the study

Introduction

Sensors

Mixed irradiation scheme

Annealing procedure

ALiBaVa measuremets

Results

Charge collection

Signal to noise ratio

Leakage current

Summary

Page 3: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop321.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Sensor overview

Sensor thickness: 300µm

5 sensors of each material

Material Type Pitch (µm) Manufacturer

FZ p-in-n 50 (5) HIP

FZ n-in-p (p-spray) 80 (5) Micron

MCz p-in-n 50 (5) HIP

MCz n-in-p (p-spray) 50(1), 80(3), 100(1) Micron

Page 4: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop421.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Irradiation

Mixed irradiation with protons and neutrons

Chose 5 fluence mixtures corresponding to 5 different radii in the CMS Tracker after 3000fb-1

Irradiation with Protons in Karlsuhe

ZAG: Cyclotron, 23MeV protons

Irradiation with neutrons in Louvain-la-Neuve

Neutron generation by shooting deuterons on Be target

1 step only neutron irradiation

Radius (cm)

Total fluence (neq/cm2)

Neutron(neq/cm2)

Proton(neq/cm2)

5 1.2*1016 10.0*1014 110*1014

20 1.8*1015 5.5*1014 12.5*1014

60 7.3*1014 4.5*1014 2.8*1014

120 4.6*1014 3.8*1014 0.8*1014

>120 4.0*1014 4.0*1014 -

Page 5: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop521.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Annealing

Logarithmic annealing steps to observe

short term (beneficial) annealing

long term (reverse) annealing

Temperature (°C)

Duration (min)

Sum @RT Annealing (d)

60 20 4

60 20 8

60 40 15

60 76 28

80 15 58

80 30 133

80 60 337

M.Moll, phd thesis, Hamburg, 1999

Page 6: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop621.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Parameterisation of charge collection

Beneficial annealing Reverse annealing Stable damage

Page 7: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop721.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Measurement

Measurement Setup: 2 ALiBaVa stations in Karlsruhe90Sr source

Signal

Signal to noise ratio

Leakage current

Temperature: -20°C (-30°C)

Voltage 0V – 1000V

Cuts

Seed: S/N > 5

Neighbour: S/N > 2

Total error on measurements: 2.5%

Error on irradiated fluence > 10%

The small ALiBaVa station

HVPre-cooling

DB

Scintillator

Sensor

Page 8: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop821.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Measurement Results

Parameters

T = -20°CV = 900V

Page 9: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop921.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge collection

P-type materials collect more charge than n-type materials

FZ-n

shows highest dependence on annealing time

Large drop in charge collection after 10d@RT (reverse annealing)

Only small dependence of charge collection on annealing time for other materials

P

N

P

N

Incr

easi

ng f

luen

ce

Page 10: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1021.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge collection

1.8*1015neq/cm2

FZ-p shows largest charge collection

Charge multiplication for large annealing (charge > 24000 e-)

MCz: almost no dependence on annealing time

1.2*1016neq/cm2

FZ-n: No signal at highest fluence for all annealing steps

FZ-p: rise in signal for long annealing time

MCz-p sensor didn‘t work for first annealing step

MCz-n: no signal at T= -20°C

Incr

easi

ng f

luen

ce

MCz-nT= -30°C

Page 11: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1121.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge Collection overview

Max: 24k

Max: 22k

Max: 15k/40k

Max: 10k

MCz-nT=-30°C

No Signal at T=-20°C

Page 12: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1221.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Signal to Noise

P

N

4. Lower limit, seed cut > 52. Same rangeFZ-n drops out

1. All quite good 3. p is better than n

Page 13: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1321.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge multiplication

Signal increases after Annealing of >100d@RT

Signal to noise ratio doesn‘t decrease

Large increase of leakage current

Page 14: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1421.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge collection / multiplication

Landau-Gauß-Fit broadens very much

Peak is shifted to higher values

Not a MIP signal any more

usual distribution

Page 15: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1521.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge collection / multiplication

MPV cannot be determined very well

MCz-nT=-30°C

FZ-p + MCz-pT=-20°C

Page 16: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1621.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Charge Collection / Signal to Noise Summary

CC

S/N

T= -30°CMCz-n

Charge multiplication

15d 337d

Page 17: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1721.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Leakage Current Summary

Charge multiplication

15d 337d

Page 18: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1821.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Neutron only / mixed irradiation

Mixed irradiation F = 4.6*1014neq/cm2

F(p) = 0.8*1014neq/cm2

F(n) = 3.8*1014neq/cm2

Neutron only irradiation

F(n) = 4.0*1014neq/cm2

1. Neutron only irradiation: • FZ-n has smaller signal than

MCz-nsimulated by M. Huhtinen NIMA 491, 194-215, 2002

2. Mixed irradiation:• No improvement in CC due to

mixed irradiationG. Casse et al. Vertex2008:036, 2008

MCz

FZ

N-type

Page 19: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop1921.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Summary

P-type materials showed higher charge collection and signal to noise

FZ-p performance most interesting

Charge multiplication only seen with FZ-p F > 1*1015neq/cm2, A > 100d@RTManufacturer Micron

Highest leakage current

FZ-n showed largest dependence on annealing time

Not usable at high fluences

Charge collection of MCz materials does not anneal very much

MCz-n is not working at T= -20°C at F=1.2*1016neq/cm2

Additional differences between n-type and p-type materials due to manufacturer?

Compare to other studies: Charge multiplication study, HPK

Page 20: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop2021.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Thanks for your attention

Diploma thesis of F. Petry (IEKP-KA/2011-27)

Will be published soon:

http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/pub/web/thesis/iekp-ka2011-27.pdf

Page 21: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop2121.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

BACKUP

Page 22: A comparative study of mixed irradiated silicon strip sensors

19th RD50 Workshop2221.-23.11.2011

Robert EberInstitut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, KIT

Prof. Max Mustermann - Title