A ccountability

AccountabilityAccountability

Assessment

Parents & Community

PreparingCollege, Career,

& Culturally Ready Graduates

Standards

Support1

2

Accountability

Teacher & Principal

Accountability

School & District

Accountability

Goals Today

After this presentation you will• Understand the purpose, process, and

metric of both ASPI and the AMOs• Be able to read and explain the ASPI

worksheet• Know where to find information and

resources about Alaska’s school & district accountability system

3

4

ESEA Flexibility Waiver from NCLB ESEA Flexibility Waiver application submitted

in October 2012

Approved by US Department of Education in May 2013

Permitted Alaska to develop new regulations for school accountability

Those regulations approved by the Alaska State Board of Education in June 2013

5

The New Accountability System Replaces

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)• Expectation that 100% of students are proficient by Spring of

2013-2014 school year

• Annual Measurable Objectives for 2012-2013 school year were 94.28% proficient in Language Arts; 91.53% proficient for math

Consequences of not meeting AYP• Corrective action• Restructuring• Restricted use of Title funds• School Choice• SES

6

Alaska School Performance Index

(ASPI)

Annual Measurable Objectives

(AMOs)

Alaska’s New Accountability System

7

ASPI SCHOOL WORKSHEETHandout

8

9

Academic AchievementAverage of % of students proficient or above in reading, writing, and math.

Example: 100 students tested• 85% proficient in reading = 85 students• 80% proficient in writing = 80 students• 75% proficient in math = 75 students

Total # proficient R, W, M• 85 students + 80 students + 75 students = 240 students

Average % proficient• 240 students / 300 tested students = 80% proficient

10

80 x 35% = 28 ASPI points

11

Reading Writing Math

Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof

85 85% 80 80% 75 75%

Points Weighting ASPI Points

80.00 0.35 28

ALASKA SCHOOL PERFOMANCE INDEX (ASPI): 2012-2013 ASPI Rating: School Grade Span: School District: School:

Participation Rate Grades 3-10 Participation Rate

Number Enrolled Number Tested Participation Rate Met Participation Rate Points None, acts as a trigger to achievement denominator

^Results are suppressed to protect individual confidentiality N/A—Results do not meet minimum reporting thresholds or no students of the reported grade level were served

Printed

K-8 Performance


Academic Achievement Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof Points Weighting ASPI Points

School Progress (subgroups must have 5> students to be considered)

Growth All Growth-AK Natives Growth-Econ Dis Growth w/Disabilities Growth-LEP

Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance

Reading Writing Math Academic Achievement

Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof Count Prof Pct Prof Points Weighting ASPI Points



Attendance Rate

Graduation Rate 4 Year 5 Year

College Career Readiness

WorkKeys Participation

Total 9-12 Points

K-8 Enrollment Ratio 9-12 Enrollment Ratio

ASPI Score

Academic Achievement

12

School Progress

The progress from the previous year’s Standards Based Assessments.

Calculated for five groups of students: All Students & the four subgroups of students with the highest achievement gaps in Alaska: • Alaska Native• Economically Disadvantaged• Limited English Proficient• Students with Disabilities

13

Proficiency Levels

See Alaska School Performance Index (ASPI) Worksheet Explanation, Appendix A page 5

14

Growth & Proficiency Index

See Alaska School Performance Index (ASPI) Worksheet Explanation, Appendix A page 5

Example

In grade 7 reading, student earned a scale score of 297.

The following year, in grade 8 reading, student earned a scale score of 303.

15

16

Example: Proficiency Levels

In grade 7 reading, student earned a scale score of 297 (BP+). The following year, in grade 8 reading, student earned a scale score of 303 (Pro).

17

Example: Growth & Proficiency Index

In grade 7 reading, student earned BP+ . In grade 8 reading, student earned a Pro. This student has a growth and proficiency index score of 120.

18

Group WeightingGroup # of

studentsIndex Score

Weight Points

All Students

100 96.42 70% 67.49

Alaska Native

10 103.13 10% 10.31

Econ Dis 47 98.85 10% 9.89

Stud w/ Dis

5 64.17 10% 6.42

LEP 4 64.17 0% 0

TOTAL 94.11

19


94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points

20

Growth all Growth AK Natives

Growth- Econ Dis

Growth w/Disabilities

Growth LEP

96.42 103.13 98.85 64.17 N/A

School Progress


94.11 0.4 37.64




^Results are suppressed to protect individual confidentiality

N/A—Results do not meet minimum reporting thresholds or no students of the reported grade level were served

Printed

K-8 Performance





Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance





Attendance Rate




Total 9-12 Points


ASPI Score

21

Triad activity (3 minutes) Appendix A: School Progress

Look at example on page 6

• What factors remove a student’s score

from the school’s calculation?

• When you think about your school, how

might your subgroup scores effect your

school growth score?

22

Attendance Rate

Attendance Rate (%)

ASPI Points

96-100 10093-95 9590-92 8085-89 5070-85 25Below 70 0

Average attendance of all students.

Example:

• 100 students total

• 16,100 combined days of attendance

• 17,000 days of membership (@170 days each)

• 16,110 / 17,000 = 94.7% attendance rate

23


94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points

95 x 25% = 23.75 ASPI points

24

94.7%

Attendance Rate


95 0.25 23.75





Printed

K-8 Performance





Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance





Attendance Rate




Total 9-12 Points


ASPI Score

25


94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points

95 x 25% = 23.75 ASPI points

TOTAL ASPI POINTS =

89.39

26

ASPI Points Number of Stars

94 – 100

85 – 93.99

65 – 84.99

55 – 64.99

0 – 54.99

Star Ratings

27


94.7 x 10% = 9.5 ASPI points94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points

28

Graduation Rate

Use higher of 4-year or 5-year cohort rate (required graduation rate formula)

4 year rate 5 year rate Points

98-100 98-100 100

90-97 93-97 95

85-89 89-92 90

80-84 85-88 70

70-79 80-84 50

60-69 70-79 25

50-59 60-69 10

Below 50 Below 60 0

Graduation Cohort Formula

The number of students who entered the school in grade 9 who graduate either 4 or 5 years later, minus students who transfer out of school.Students who transfer in join the cohort of their origin.

29

Grade 9 100 students10 transfer out

90 in cohort

Grade 10 5 drop out (Still in cohort)5 transfer in (same cohort)

95 in cohort

Grade 11 5 drop out5 transfer out

90 in cohort

Grade 12 10 drop out; 80 graduate80/90= grad. rate

90 in cohort89% graduation rate

30


95 x 10% = 9.5 ASPI points94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points


31

4 Year 5 Year

89% 90%

Graduation Rate


90 0.2 18





Printed

K-8 Performance





Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance





Attendance Rate




Total 9-12 Points


ASPI Score

32

College & Career Ready Indicator

Calculated by dividing the combined value of all grade 12 scores by the combined count of grade 12 students who attempted any qualifying test.• Qualifying scores earned in WorkKeys, ACT, or

SAT assessment.• Includes current 12th graders tested in either 11th

and/or 12th grades.• The test score leading to the highest number of

ASPI points will be used.

33

25 12th graders; 25 took assessment(s)

17 earned qualifying points3 x 100 = 300 points

6 x 95 = 570 points

8 x 80 = 640 points

College & Career Ready Indicator

WorkKeys Certificate ACT Score SAT Score PointsGold or Platinum 25 1680 100

Silver 23 1560 95

Bronze 21 1450 80

1,510 points/25 students = 60.4

34


95 x 10% = 9.5 ASPI points94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points


60.4 x 8% = 4.83 ASPI points

35

60.40



60.40 0.08 4.83






Printed

K-8 Performance





Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance





Attendance Rate




Total 9-12 Points


ASPI Score

36

College & Career Ready Assessment Participation Rate

Percentage of grade 11 students who take WorkKeys assessment (required by regulation).

Participation Rate Points

95-100 100

90-94 50

0-89 0

37


95 x 10% = 9.5 ASPI points

94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points


60.4 x 8% = 4.83 ASPI points


38

87%



0 0.02 0






Printed

K-8 Performance





Attendance Rate

Total K-8 Points

9-12 Performance





Attendance Rate




Total 9-12 Points


ASPI Score

39


95 x 10% = 9.5 ASPI points

94.11 x 40% = 37.64 ASPI points


60.4 x 8% = 4.83 ASPI points0 x 2% = 0 ASPI points

TOTAL ASPI POINTS = 85.82

40

ASPI Points Number of Stars

94 – 100

85 – 93.99

65 – 84.99

55 – 64.99

0 – 54.99

Star Ratings

41

Total K-8 ASPI Points: 89.27 Total 9-12 ASPI Points: 85.82

K-8 Enrollment Ratio

.5

(100/200=.5)

(represents the percentage of students enrolled K-8; divide the number of student enrolled K-8 by total number of students K-12)

9-12 Enrollment Ratio

.5

(100/200=.5)

(represents the percentage of students enrolled 9-12; divide the number of student enrolled 9-12 by total number of students K-12)

ASPI scores x Enrollment Ratios(89.39 x .5) + (85.97 x .5) = ASPI score(44.70) + (42.99) = 87.69 ASPI scoreFour Star K-12 School

K-12 Schools– enrollment ratios

52

190

162

49

50

Number of Schools by ASPI Star Rating (2013)

*****

****

***

**

*

43

13,332

64,471

40,578

4,8605,809

Number of Students by ASPI Star Rating

***** ****

*** **

*

44

Alaska School Performance Index

(ASPI)

Annual Measurable Objectives

(AMOs)

Alaska’s New Accountability System

45

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

School AMO targets met if• School or state target is met• Graduation rate (90%) and participation rate

(95%) are met

Targets set in reading, writing, and math.• For all-students

group and for subgroups

• For State, districts, and schools

Goal to reduce by ½ over a 6-year period the number of non-proficient students• Reduction in equal

increments over 6 years

46

AMO Example

2012• Percent not proficient in reading = 24%• Percent proficient in reading = 76%

2018 Targets• Percent not proficient in reading = 12%• Percent proficient in reading = 88%

Each year…• 2% reduction in the number of students

who are not proficient [12% over 6 years]

47

2013 Target

2014 Target

2015 Target

2016 Target

2017 Target

2018 Target

78% 80% 82% 84% 86% 88%

AMO Targets

Based on 2012 baseline of 76% proficient

2% increase in the number of proficient students each year for 6 years

48

Star Ratings & AMOs

Used to:• Identify priority schools, focus schools,

and reward schools

• Identify schools and districts that need to complete school improvement plans

• Assist districts and EED in determining where to direct resources and support

Information and Resources

49

50Find your school’s rating

51

Find your school’s rating

52

You’ve earned it!

ASPI?Ask Me!

53

THANK YOU!Elizabeth DavisAssessment [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Participation RateParticipation Rate is calculated by dividing the number of students tested in a school by the number of students enrolled.

The Participation Rate drives the calculation used for the Achievement score. If the school meets or exceeds 95% participation in the

standardized tests, only the students who assessed are included in the calculation for the Achievement score.

If the school does not meet 95% participation, any students who were not assessed but were enrolled will be counted as not proficient in the Achievement score calculation. If a school has 40 or fewer students enrolled in the assessed grades (3‐10), the requirements for participation are satisfied if two or fewer students do not participate in the state assessments.

54

A ccountability

Documents

students proficient

school accountability

students average

tested students

students total

m85 students

proficient240 students

students tested85