A brief look at how the disciplines of Architecture and Interior Design intersect

A BRIEF LOOK AT HOW THE TWO DISCIPLINES OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN INTERSECT, AND HOW TO BEST APPROACH THEM AS STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONALS

RESEARCH IN-THROUGH CREATIVE PRACTICE

OLABISI OLUBUKOLA BANKOLE12398034MA INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN

RESEARCH METHODS

UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN, UK , 2015

I. INTRODUCTION

II. DEFINITION

III. INTERIOR DESIGN IN ARCHITECTURE

IV. INTERIOR DESIGN VS INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE

V. ARCHITECTURE IN DESIGN

VI. CONCLUSION

CONTENT

!2

INTRODUCTION

Although the original spatial hierarchy of a building is always established by its first architect,

subsequent iterations of the interior may not be, and for obvious reasons, older structures are

often modified by designers of a different generation according to society’s changing needs as

our cities evolve.

!Historically, the separation of the design of a building from the design of its interior started as a

result of speculative building, the shift from corporate ownership to leasing and the need for

interior renovation of viable building shells. More importantly, as times are changing, building

interiors are becoming more complex and therefore require both expertise and specialisation in

professional services. This trend toward specialisation continues, and is evidenced by the arrival

of disciplines that continue to fragment expertise of architectural and design services such as:

garden design which has evolved to landscape design cum landscape architecture , and most

recently called external architecture. Museum and exhibition designers have also carved a niche

for themselves.

Nowhere is this more clearly an issue than with the concept of ‘Interior Architecture’. One field of

endeavour where we deliberate over territorial claims at the border of ‘insideness’ and

‘outsideness’. There is an increasingly evolving cross pollination of the role of the architect and

the Interior Designer; a niche that has created a hybrid, the Interior Architectural Designer.

!This paper is not about the existence of the profession, but rather, it is it’s ownership that is being

challenged. Which practices should have jurisdiction? What should they be called? The market

share at stake insures that both legal and ideological battles will continue. The question is

whether or not we as interior architecture and design students might share an understanding of

these underlying concepts. Unfortunately, most of the debates and discourses fail to advance

the dialogue or to suggest new models for collaborative practice that can advance the

collective profession. So where do we go from here?

!3

Interior Architecture is the design of a space which has been created by structural boundaries

and the human interaction within these boundaries. It can also be the initial design and plan for

use, then later redesign to accommodate a changed purpose, or a significantly revised design

for adaptive reuse of the building shell. The latter is often part of sustainable architecture

practices, conserving resources through "recycling" a structure by adaptive redesign.

!Interior architecture is the process through which the interiors of buildings are designed,

concerned with all aspects of the human uses of structural spaces, it can also be referred to as

the spatial art of environmental design, form and practice.

INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE IS THE DESIGN OF AN INTERIOR THROUGH

ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSIONS.

DEFINITION

dIAmeter head office, one of the pioneering Interior Architecture firms in America

!4

Architects continue to argue that the design of interior space falls under their jurisdiction; that

the architect is qualified by education and experience to design the interior; and that they’ve

always had this responsibility. These architect believe architecture is incomplete without interior

design, but also interior design should be under the scope of the architect’s work, they see no

need for interior designers. Similarly, one practicing architects, in his blog claimed that anything

short of design-build project is leaving the work halfway.

!!!!!

An Architecture student’s representation of Architecture !“..We don't finish it, and finishing matters. I did a residence recently, right from the concept, orientation,

design, to electrical, plumbing, HVAC (with consultants), I did everything. But interior wasn't in my scope and

given to the interior dept. in my office. They decided the type of paint, flooring, grill design, false ceiling

and many stuff. I wasn't happy with the end result, I wanted to do it myself.”

An Interior Architecture student’s representation of Architecture

As a response to architect like him, interior design was brought out of the back room, allowed to

prosper and blossom , not as a division or subset of a larger practise, but a stand-alone design

profession––This was the birth of Interior architecture. In this context, architects started to practice

professional architectural design from the inside out as interior architects. Contrary to this, It is

worth knowing that architectural education has not evolved relatively to architectural practice,

likely given its longer history and somewhat more entrenched position. These conversation

inevitably lead one to wonder if interior designers really do take work away from Architects’ and

vice versa, because it is apparent that architects do like to take control of their projects from

concept to completion and interior designers likewise.

INTERIOR DESIGN IN ARCHITECTURE

!5

WEAR HOUSE by YSY HAUS

An example of architecture where Architects have designed the outside to create a distinct interior

architecture.

!6

INTERIOR DESIGN VS INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE

The war-of-words is mild, but it does feel like a divide exists not only outside the discipline but

also within the discipline. The architect has a clearly defined role and can very much own the

project, the designer on the other hand can at times feel like his poor relative, brought into the

project as an afterthought ‘to add a bit of colour’. A blogger likened this relationship to the

Class System; the architect (upper class), interior designer (middle class), interior decorator

(lower class).

Two Ronnies image of the Class System

I don’t think this is the case but I’m not sure this is the universal opinion within the industry, but of

course, it is a real sticking point. We are all creative, we are all visionaries and are all offering a

different level of design detail from macro to micro . Why then do we have to feel like we need

to debate the issue?‘Interior architectural designers’ are the ones really stuck somewhere in the

middle.

I for one feel the cross over of my creative practise into the discipline of architecture but to the

outside world I always have to state that I am not an interior decorator. When asked, I usually

reply the question by asking : is a draughtsman an architect? Is a general practitioner a

dentist? Or can a truck driver automatically drive a motorcycle?In this same way, architecture

and interior design are both connected but distinct.

!

!7

Perhaps the issue lies with the definition of services that an ‘interior designer’ can offer.

For example, I am a designer, I can offer the residential soft furnishings as this is

something that is self taught throughout the years. I have a B.SC degree in real estate

and a diploma in interior design ,but I am now concentrating on interior architecture

and I have been taught by architects. I studied for 7 years and covered everything

from history of architecture, to the psychology of design, but I do not call myself an

interior architect due to the legal implications. I do not have the level of knowledge to

design complete buildings but I do call myself an interior architectural designer and

work on design teams with architect, I respect their knowledge and know I can

complement their scheme and offer my expertise to enhance the function, safety, and

aesthetics of interior spaces.

In line with this, I read a discussion on an american architectural forum, which argues

this very matter. It was interesting to read comments from architect, Interior designers

and Interior decorators. There is one very good point from one designer; !“Well, I think that there is no such thing as an “interior architect” and the term actually denigrates

interior design. (Are there “exterior architect”?) What’s wrong with being an Interior Designer to the

fullest extent of the definition? I had an educator tell me that they used the “Interior Architecture.”

term to attract males to the program that didn’t want to be labeled as an interior designer. That’s

a sad commentary on the image of our profession”

!Here is my take, I am an interior designer, I do not want to be an architect, but I would

like to be recognised for my specialty that compliments architecture, and so I feel that

the term “Interior architectural design” better defines my scope of work.

!Nonetheless, the definition of interior designer is so diverse and any individual can give

themselves the title, especially those individuals who turn their hand to it as they enjoy

it as a hobby. Slowly but surely we will gain the same recognition as other professions

in the building industry and yes, we may be more pigeon-holed into either the interior

designer or interior architectural designer as defined roles, but I live in hope that my

title will one day carry the gravity and prestige it fully deserves.

!8

INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE IN DESIGN

!In many other disciplines, design has evolved from the production of stuff into a wider, more diffuse set

of activities. The focus on the object as the thing that design produces has been pulled so that a

whole other range of activities come into view. In part this is due to the rise of digital products, but it

is also the design of information, systems, forms of innovation and the power of ideas like “design

thinking", which applies a design approach to all manner of things that used to be outside the scope

of design. Almost anything from money to healthcare to the functioning of democracy can now be

framed as a design problem. Therefore, a designer can also design space, and spatial qualities

including exhibition space, galleries, outdoor events, and architecture.

!The real motivations for design's contemporary mutations are not stylistic, they are not unprincipled

either, they come from changes in the way the world works. Therefore, new forms of creative design

practice have adapted faster to their circumstances; faster at least than architecture and property,

two industries with the turning circle of a supertanker.

Similarly, advertising agencies and design consultancies are increasingly converging because the

distance between traditional roles of designer, manufacturer and consumer has shrunk, often occurring

within the same space, within different components of the same design project. However instead of

evolving with the temporality and situation of design process , architects and of course creatives in

many other areas of design remain hung up on what they perceive to be their rightful role and their

moral purpose.

In our case, designing interior space has become more than “interior architecture” which implies just the

structural and architectural components of a space. Interior design will need to evolve into so much

more than that. In other words, in parts of what we might loosely describe as the design world, the very

idea of what design is and what a designer might do is evolving at a rapid pace.

!9

Examples of building design that takes a creative design approach to architecture in a contemporary

context and places emphasis on excellence in design and innovation.

Flower building Prospect Place London by Frank Gehry Roca Showroom, London by Zaha Hadid Architects

Marina + beach Towers Dubai by Oppenheim Architecture and design

!10

When I look at designers such as Phillipe starck or an architect as Zaha Hadid, this issue of labels ,

titles and names suddenly become trivial. Is it not possible to just be a ‘designer’? At least some

designers work in mixed discipline studios, on a variety of projects and still describe themselves as

“designer”, certainly not a graphic designer or interior designer, whether they study in one or as

none specifically, yet they work in these disciplines. To them, the label of ‘designer’ is enough.

On the other hand, people are busy disputing over territories and boundaries more than they

actually produce designs., we could literarily start another debate just by mentioning freelancer or

design consultant.

In order not to loose focus of what is important, the task of any contemporary designer should be

to incorporate all these diverse forms of media, operations, and systems into something coherent,

something appealing, something users want. Using design as a tool, till it becomes a kind of glue

between a huge range of scales and services and substances.

!In other words, design should be a link between interior architecture and exterior architecture and

not interior architecture being a link between design and architecture. What I mean is that Interior

architecture and architecture are physical , but also the place where investment, communications,

marketing and media all come together, where these issues congeal into built form.

As a form of good practice, interior design should be the link that embeds ideas and ethics within

the built environment, a practice that can develop the services, processes and programmes

alongside physical things. It could position itself as the place where building design, engineering,

planning, sales and marketing come together.

!Finally, separating ourselves from our design roots into traditional architectural principles will only

defuse our potential to engage in the very real politics, vision and social possibility of design. It is

in the interweaving of these concerns where we create value (social as well as economic). This is

where design meets architecture.

!11

CONCLUSION

I started this MA with the intention of mixing and collaborating with architecture students, and

perhaps watching how they apply architectural principles and theories to their designs, but

instead, we were plunged in the monday morning research class with other design studios. To an

extent this was a bit deflating at first, but in some way, it has shifted my focus from the ’silo

mentalities’ and boundaries of interior design and architecture and helped me reflect on my

creative practise as an individual. What makes me tick, what makes me unique and valuable as

a designer, as well as what I share in common with other designers.

!As we continued to explore the verticality of our various discourses, I have realised that we have

more in common than I imagined. On the other hand, our differences has helped me to reflect on

interior design’s uniqueness, aspects that should perhaps be reinforced. Interior design has the

potential to provide for a complementary view of the world and address issues faced by

designers of both the built environment and other disciplines.

!My take is that, if architecture already creates buildings and it's resulting spaces, perhaps interior

design should step back from the act of recreating the physical aspects of architectural interiors

as its ultimate fulfilment. But instead focus on designing spatial qualities, experience; emotions,

and narratives. This will provide a deeper, more significant vision of how people live, work and

play and how places can become economically and socially meaningful and sustainable in the

long term for the people who live in them.

!In my design project, I chose to work on immersive design and experiential architecture and

found myself in an ironic situation where I had to become less architectural and more all

embracing. I applied the concept of “syn-aestetics” in contemporary immersive performance to

the design of a live-work studio in interior design.

!12

Therefore, instead of creating boundaries within the interior space (mediating position

between the body) I placed the boundaries within the space (literarily merging the

boundaries and immersing them in one another), allowing the body (users) to experience

space as a whole (throughout the body), rather than in parts. Doing this created a

seamless multi-functional and flexible living and working space for the artists in residence.

!In the same vein, interior design might have to model itself on more youthful and vigorous

forms of creative practice. It might have to (or better, want to) learn from communications

agencies, from advertising, from digital and interaction design and from research and

innovation experts , serving as sociology experts of the construction industry.

!Rather than selling out, we need to escape from the shrinking professional limitations and

create a wider definition of interior design. By doing this, we might find ways to strongly

argue for the absolute necessity of interior design to architects, clients, the public and to

society at large.

!13

2529 words

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Applied Research Collaborative (2008) Studying Architecture. http://www.ncarb.org/Studying-Architecture/

Educators/NCARB-Prize-Program/~/~/. Accessed 24th january 2015

Architect, Interior Architect, Interior Designer, Interior Decorator? The debate.Posted on August 13, 2010

Ashgate Studies in Interior Architecture and Design .http://www.ashgate.com/default.aspx?

page=5097&series_id=460&calcTitle=1. Accessed 2nd of December, 2014

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique. Maryland:

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Brown, Tim. (2014) Design Thinking Thoughts: The Career Choice Nobody Tells You About .Accessed

November 27, 2014. http://designthinking.ideo.com/?p=1412. Accessed 2nd of December, 2014

DEZEEN (2014) "Architecture might have to become less architectural ”http://www.dezeen.com/2014/01/16/

opinion-sam-jacob-how-architecture-can-regain-social-significance/ accessed 20th January ,

2015

DIAmeter (2014) The Early Years Leading to IA Interior Architects. http://www.interiorarchitects.com/blog/the-

early-years-leading-to-ia-interior- Accessed 24th January, 2014

DIAmeter (2014) Establishing IA: Vision and Values. http://www.interiorarchitects.com/blog/establishing-ia-

interior-architects- Accessed 24th January, 2014

Faculty Of Architecture And Design, Victoria University Of Wellington, New Zealand (2015) : Interior

Architecture Course Overview http://www.victoria.ac.nz/fad/study/subjects/itda#overview

accessed 20th January , 2015

Frederick, M (2007) 101 Things I Learned In Architecture School. Original from the University of Virginia MIT

Press.

James C.K, Jason C. C, Johnbaer. J (2009) The Construct of Creativity: Structural Model for Self-Reported

Creativity Ratings.Volume 43 Number 2 Second Quarter.

John Weigand. (2013) Design Intelligence. Interior Design and Architecture. http://www.di.net/articles/interior-

design-and-architecture/ Accessed November 27, 2014

Lawson, G and Franz, J and Adkins, B (2005) Rhetoric of landscape architecture and interior design

discourses: preparation for cross-disciplinary practice. IDEA Journal: pp. 41-49.

Mind Share (2012) Jack of Trades: How Cross-Disciplinary Skills Enhance Creativity. Accessed November 27,

2014

Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (in press). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative

accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.

Siriporn Kobnithikulwong (2010) Thai Creativity In Interior Design: A Cross-Cultural Examination Of

Practitioner Evaluations On Creative Dimensions In Entry-Level Portfolios. Pdf

!14