Top Banner
&ASRAO SCIETWI NNYVhU SY5VIMk GOUP 81qoj0s 8 V3 NEQ NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 9903240044 890313 PDR ADOCK 0500327 p PDR- 003
49

81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mar 10, 2023

Download

Documents

Khang Minh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

&ASRAO SCIETWI NNYVhU SY5VIMk GOUP

81qoj0s8 V3

NEQ NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

9903240044 890313 PDR ADOCK 0500327 p PDR-

003

Page 2: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I. I U

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM FOR

SILICONE RUUBER INSULATED CABLES FOR USE IN

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY'S SEQUOYAH AND WATTS BAR

NUCLEAR PLANTS

For

Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Somali Hill Drive Knoxville, Tern...., 37902

Page 3: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I NEQ Test Report

3REPORT NO. 18056-1

WyLE jOB3 No. 18056 3 ~ ~~CUSTOMER TV74A P. 6. No. ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ __

3VAPAGE ± OF 291 PAGE REPORT

DATE January 27, 1989

3 SPECIFICATION (S) See References

in Paragraph 5.0 of this

Summary Section

LOU CUSTOMER Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

ADDRESS 400 West Summit Hill Drive. Knoxville. Tennessee 37902

2.0 TEST SPECIMEN Silicone Rubber Insulated Cables

P/N KS-530 and P/N CC-2193 Nuclesil

U MANUFACTURER Rockbestos and Anaconda-Continental, repsectively

4,0 SUMMARY

Silicone Rubber Insulated Cables, as described and noted in Paragraph 6.0, were subjected to a I Qualification Program to verify their ability to maintain loads during an Accident Simulation as specified by TVA. The Qualification Program described herein represents installations at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Sequoyah and -Watts Bar Nuclear Plants.

I The Qualification Test Program was performed to satisfy the intent of IEEE Standards 323-1974, "Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating I Stations,* and 383-1974, 'Standard for Type Test of Class IE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Stations.'

$TAT@ OPUALAWAM Alabama Professionalmab"wm ow0AIsom CUTY@UMOf UO VA4 Engineer Reg. No. 7948By A

Frederick M. Sittason"*R.T aspsi vW sip. Tft ius eIsji 60ta ini 06 ~ j S eg

go emw T Is"T"i ( .~7 u 4_1 - I. a, APROU .BYR~n

#Wy LMOATOASSC*NTIFC SIRVIES 6 SYSTEMS GROUP

WWFVU. MAMAMA

Page 4: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. HI Test Report No. 18056-1

SUMMARY (Continued) The Qualification Program was performed on two independent manufacturer's types of silicone rubber insulated cables. A description of the test specimens ispresented in Paragraph sections:

e Section I

e Section HI

0 Section III

e Section IV

a Section V

e Section VI

e Section VII

6.0 of this Section. This report contains the following

- Specimen Identification- Preparation, and Baseline Functional Test

- Normal Radiation Exposure and PostRadiation Functional Test

* Thermal Aging and Post-Thermal Aging Functional Test

- Accident Radiation Exposure and Radiation Functional Test

Post-

- Accident Simulation and Post-Test Functional Test

* Voltage Withstand Test and Post-Test Inspection

* Wyle Laboratories' Qualification Plan No. 18057-00, Revision A

The test Program was conducted in the sequence indicated by Section I through VI above and in accordance with Wyle Laboratories- Qualification Plan 18057-00, Revision A. which is contained in Section VII.

Four anomalies occurred during the test included in the appropriate sections of below.

Notice of AumonlyNe

Date of

11-03-88

program. Details of the anomalies are this report and are briefly described

Doesrintlom

III Cable Trays A, C, and E were exposed to an over-temperature condition in the initial thermal aging period. During the thermal aging chamber temperature startup, the chamber temperature was inadvertently allowed to increase in excess of the temperature tolerance acceptance criteria. The out-of-specif ication temperature was determined to have been approximately 5.6 dog C above the required temperature of 112*C, for a period of less than 5 minutes. The short period of specimen exposure to the out-of-specification temperature was considered to have no effect upon the qualification program for the silicone rubber Insulated cables..

WYLUm NI WIIHS peeity

4.0

Page 5: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. Ill Test Report No. 18056-1

4.0 SUMMARY (Continued)

Notice of Date of AsmlyN. Anomaly Seto Descrintion

32 12-03-88 V Low resistance values recorded for Cable Tray C were documented during the pre-test wet insulation resistance mea4surements. The test chsimber was drained of water and insulation resistance measurements were repeated at certain intervals. At the Customer's .1 request. Cable Tray C was removed from the Accident Chamber and discontinued from the test program. .1 The pre-test wet insulation resistance measurements were repeated on the test specimens of Cable Trays A and E, and testing was continued.

3 12-28-88 V Power supply line voltage fluctuations and power losses resulted in test I specimen out-of-specification conditions. A conservative estimate of 5 hours '0 minutes was added to the test Iprof i i the post-DDE aging temperature of , i50F (+9, -0 deg F). The test specimens remained powered during I the additional test period.

4 12-09-88 V Out-of-specification PH levels existed for the chemical spray solution during I the Accident Simulation. The high PH level (0.15 above tolerance) occurred for approximately the last 2 hours of I the required chemical spray test. The short period of chemical spray at the high PH level was considered not to have a detrimental effect upon the test specimens' performance.

The test specimens were subjected to normal radiation exposure, thermal aging, Iand accident radiation exposure. The 40-year test specimens specified for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant demonstrated the capability to maintain specified voltage and current during the specified Design Basis Event (LOCA Simulation). I It is therefore judged that the Sequcyab Nuclear Plant 40-year silicone rubber insulated cables, described and noted in Paragraph 6.0 of this section, met the acceptance criteria requirements of Wyle Laboratories' Qualification Plan a (WLQP) 18057-00, Revision A.

vYim V0

Page 6: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. I, Test Report No. 18056-1

5.0

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.7

6.0

SpecimenNo Mmasofctrt

RWC-S-A.40 RWC-S-B.40 RWC-S-C.40 RWC-S-D.40 RWC-S-E.40

RWC-S-A. 15 RWC-S-D. 15 RWC-S-C. 15 RWC-S-D. 15 RWC-S-E. I5

RWC-W-A.40 RWC-W-D.40 RWC-W-C.40 RWC-W-D.40 RWC-W-E.40

RWC-W-A. IS RWC-W-D.15 RWC-W-C. 15 RWC-W-D. 15 RWC-W-E.15

Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos

Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos

Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos

Rockbestos Rockbestos Rockbestos Rock bestos Rockbestos

KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-500

KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-S00

KS-500 KS-S00 KS-500 KS-S00 KS-500

KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-500 KS-500

Cable No.

I -3V-62-"S0A/CDBN 1-3V-43-9841 D/SSVN 1-3 V-67.31 lIDI 1-3 V-67-3091 A/9DO 1-3V-62-281 I1D/6D1I

I -3V-62-4450A/CDD3 1-3V-43.984 IB/5SVG 1-3V-67-31 I IDB/9DR 1-3 V-67.309 IA/9DR 1-3V-62-281 I1B/6DG

I -3V.62-44S0A/CDB8 1-3V-43-9841 I /5SVR 1-3V-.67-31 I IDB/9DX 1-3V-67.3091 A/9DX 1-3V-62-281 I D/6DR

I .3V-62-4450A/CDB9 I .3V-43-984 IB/SVISS 1-3 V-67-311II BO9DY I .3V-67.3091IA/9DY 1-.3V-62-28 1 ID/6DC I

Cale Siz

14 AWG 14 AWG 14 AWG 14 AWG 14 AWG

14 AWG 14 AWG 14 AWO 14 AWG 14 AWG

Cable Tra

AWG AWO AWO AWO AWG

AWO AWG AWG AWG AWG

wn UMm Nuftn WepWutuy

REFERENCES

IEEE Standard 323-1974, *Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."

IEEE Standard 383-1974, "Standard for Type Test of Class IE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for Nuclear Power Generating Stations."

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants,w U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1973.

10 CFR 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants,* U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 21, 1983.

TVA Contract No. TV-73743A.

Wyle Laboratories' (Eastern Operations) Quality Assurance Program Mianual, dated June, 1988.

Wyle Laboratories' Qualification Plan No. 18057-00, Revision A.

TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION

Descriptions of the cable specimens are as follows:

Page 7: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. v Test Report No. 18056-1

6.0 TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION (Continued)

anamuienNo

ANA-S-A.40 ANA-S-B3.40 ANA-S-C.40 ANA-S-D.40 ANA-S-E.40

ANA-S-A.15 ANA-S-B3. I AN A-S-C. 15 ANA-S-D. 15 ANA-S-E. 15

Manufacure FM~

Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda

Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda Anaconda

CC-2193 CC-2193 CC-2193 CC-2193 CC-2193

CC-2193 CC-2 193 CC-2 193 CC-2 193 CC-2193

Cable No.

I -3V-30- 1362D/ VFL 11I 1-3V-3 1-7 168A/ VEL1 2-3V-30- 1362B/VFL3 2-3PL-30-4830A/A27AC3 2-4V-70-2855B/T1

1 -3V-30- 1362B/VFL3 I -3V-3 1-7 168A/VBLN 2-3V-30- 1362B/VFLN 2-3PL-30-4830A/A27AA I 2-4V-70-2855B/T2

CableM Si able Tr

AWG AWG AWG AWO AWG

12 AWO 14 AWO 12 AWG 14 AWG 12 AWG

sTest specimens completed the test program including the Accident Simulation.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

All work performed on the test program was done in accordance with Wyle Laboratories' Quality Assurance Program, which complies with the requirements of 10 CFR. S0 Appendix B, ANSI N45.2, and the *daughter" standavd!. Defects are reportable in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.

TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION

All instrumentation, measuring, and test equipment used in the performance of this test program were calibrated in accordance with Wyle Laboratories' Quality Assurance Program which complies with the requirements of Mfilitary Specification MIL-STD-45662A. Standards used in performing all calibrations are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology by report number and date. When no national standards exist, the standards are traceable to international standards or the basis for calibration is otherwise documented as auditable.

WYLE AGMO HuntsillUe Faciitgy

Page 8: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ap

'U a

SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION, PREPARATION, AND BASELINE

FUNCTIONAL TEST

Page 9: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-1 Test Report No. 18056-1

SECTION I

SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION, PREPARATION, AND BASELINE FUNCTIONAL TEST

1.0 REQUIREMENTS

1.1 Specimen Identification

The specimens shall be subjected to an inspection for the purpose of identification and documentation. The inspection shall be performed as specified in Paragraph 3.1 of Section VII.

1.2 Specimen Preparation and Baseline Functional Test

The test specimens, as provided by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), shall be mounted in open cable trays as specified in Paragraph 3.2 of Section VII. Upon completion of specimen preparation, the test specimens shall be subjected to the Baseline Functional Tests described in Paragraph 3.3 of Section VII.

2.0 PROCEDURES

2.1 Specimen Identification

A visual inspection of the test specimens was conducted upon receipt at Wyle Laboratories. This inspection was performed in order to document manufacturer and identification numbers of the specimens to be tested and any noticeable damage. In addition, all specimens were tagged with metal OTest Specimen" tags to facilitate their identification during the test program. The results of the identification inspections were recorded on the 'Test Specimen Inspection* forms in the appendices of this Section.

2.2 Test Specimen Preparation

The test specimens were removed from the TVA shipping enclosure and separated according to manufacturer type. During test specimen removal and preparation, air sampling was conducted in a secured area. The air sampling was performed to determine if excessive levels of asbestos fibers existed during specimen preparation. Results of the air samples indicated that the asbestos fiber level was within safety requirements. The test specimens were placed in open cable trays 18 inches wide and 5 feet long. Rockbestos (RWC) and Anaconda-Continental (ANA) test specimens were placed in Cable Trays A through F as delineated in the following table.

VWYlEL UThE "WHnIP"i PatWt

Page 10: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page. No. 1-2 Test Report No. 18056-1

2.0 PROCEDURES (Continued)

2.2 Test Specimen Preparation (Continued)Cable Tray

Spec~ime o

RWC-S-A.40 RWC-S-D.40 RWC-S-C.40 RWC-S-D.40 RWC-S-E.40

RWC-S-A.1 S RWC-S-B.1 S RWC-S-C.l 5 RWC-S-D.l S RWC-S-E. IS

RWC-W-A.40 RWC-W-B.40 RWC-W-C.40 RWC-W-D.40 RWC-W-E.40

RWC-W-A. IS RWC-W-D.15 RWC-W-C. 15 RWC-W-D. 15 RWC-W-E.1 S ANA-S-A.40 ANA-S-D.40 ANA-S-C.40 ANA-S-D.40 ANA-S-E.40

ANA-S-A.l 5 ANA-S-D. 15 ANA-S-C.15 ANA-S-D. IS ANA-S-E.l S

Plaint/Age PsituatioSequoyah 40-Year

Sequoyah IS-Year

Watts Bar 40-Year

Watts Bar I15-Year

Sequoyah 40-Year

Sequoyah 15-Year

14 AWG (All)

14 AWG (All)

14 AWG (All)

14 AWG (All)

12 AWO 14 AWG 12 AWO 14 AWO 12 AWG

12 AWG 14 AWO 12 AWO 14 AWG 12 AWG

Each test specimen was mounted to its respective cable tray such that both lead ends were positioned at one end of the tray. The lead ends of the test specimens were prepared for connection to test equilpment, during functional tests, and elevated approximately four inches from the bottom of the cable tray. The specimens were positioned on each cable tray with a minimum 1/2-inch spacing between specimen cables and with an individual bend radius greater than the minimum as specified in Paragraph 3.2 of Section VII. A small length of Rockbestos (RWC) cable was mounted to the center of Cable Tray A. An equal length of Anaconda-Continental (ANA) cable was mounted to the center of Cable Tray E. The small lengths of cable were intended for use by TVA personnel and the lead ends were not prepared for Functional Tests. The test specimens and small cable lengths were secured to the cable trays with Tcfzel cable ties.

WYLE LABOUATMOR Huntsville Faciity

Page 11: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-3 Test Report No. 18056-1

S 2.0 PROCEDURES (Continued)

.2.2 Test Specimen Preparation (Coutionued)

:5 Upon completion of specimen preparation, the cable specimens were photographed as mounted in their respective cable trays.

I 2.3 Baseline Functional Test

2.3.1 Visual Insisection

The test specimens were subjected to a visual inspection prior to initiation of the wet insulation resistance measurements. All observations noted during the visual inspection were recorded.

U 2.3.2 Wet Insulation Resistance Measurements

The test specimens as mounted in the cable trays were immersed in tap water with both leads of each specimen suspended out of the water. Insulation resistance measurements were taken of each cable specimen by applying 500 VDC for I minute prior to reading the resistance value between conductor and ground (the cable tray). All insulation resistance measurements were

recorded for information only.

I 3.0 RESULTS

The test specimens were subjected to the specimen identification, preparation, and Baseline Functional Tests of Paragraph 2.0 and met the requirements of Paragraph 1.0. Observations recorded during the Baseline Functional Test visual inspection are presented below.

I During the visual inspection it was noted that some of the cable specimens exhibited varying degrees of an ash discoloration on the asbestos jacket material. This discoloration of the jacket material did not seem to be Iattributable to a particular plant/age designation or manufacturer. Cable specimens that did not exhibit this discoloration were noted to maintain a dark black tone.

I The data recorded during this phase of the test program is presented in Appendices I through IV of this Section as noted below.

0 Appendix I contains the Test Specimen Inspection Sheets.

a Appendix II contains Photographs 1-1 through 1-12 which show I the specimens mounted to the open cable tray.

0 Appendix III contains the Data Sheet generated during Baseline U Functional Tests.

e Appendix IV contains the Instrumentation Equipment Sheet 3 generated for the Baseline Functional Tests.

WYLI LAUOMATONIU B IHuntsville Facility

Page 12: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WYLI AAO H~untsville Paeclilty

U

3 I

Page No. 1-4 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 13: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-5 Test Report No. 18056-1

APPENDIX I

TEST SPECIMEN INSPECTION SHEETS

WYL AWu ofunhaville Poe IV

Page 14: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

wyw wumpww FUahhV

U I

Pago No. 1-6 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 15: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

TEST SPECIMEN INSPECTION

CUSTOMER ~EN~~'A~

Joe NO. SPECIFICATION vJ-('lCY -

DATE-- Q.-7, lbe

DESCRIPTION MANUF. PARTIN(

Pago No. 1-7 Test Report No. 11056.1

CHECK AS APPROPRIATE

DOEL NO.

-. tic-A~t so ckr L _______ 9a i caj -- --- 4

-- 34 -4- - -S 1

- 1,4S%.l.AT~lD c.&__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ -

- -lo - vi--29i

114 Avo __mila

-. lk S~iuco#AT EA CuRIWL ______x&%A _____________VC

NOTUW 4 C-AA T2.A- A

A,* "AL YRAE 16

SedIwe FOR"~ Spoime Passed NOA Written-

WIIM4 -Date:

ShotAe. of

rw un

Page 16: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

jAt lawAman

TEST SPECIMEN INSPECTON - IA

JOB No. ~ i~

DATE i a- 2.4 - ;i

DESCRIPMiN UANUF. PARTIM4

Page No. 1-8 Test Report No. 180%-1

CMECK AS APPROPRIATE

DOEL NO. 9 '

YL J~J Q.&&*L Aa "a:iii%1& 2 - Bw~u%-ATE~b CA&GE DR_

- 14 A1v*a _ _ I 'Slit- 3 in

SI4 .LACAiNJ Q..ueC&&-P Lau w pL~, -0 is

-14 A-4a __ _ ~I(~- %..FI -6- -&-

10- S'I imAL Suglfl. &6 L bCLjChj 9Qwt,4L: F is All. Iift - muui..M0 c*A*&.& s4--

-~ ~~~~~~r= -4ed. ,____ -T

.92j. - A"aw~E 9.uB6Se w - a -40 - I.J~~J~ 0 A ~Ao 9 CA & .__ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

%-0 4J SiLA j"__ __________________I-L 40 IL14

NO ~th&~ .AL.b CaA% 6 -

14. LA4Wt 15~ 111

spni.~ pa"e~ - Paned,

NOA Whiltg-

WApG~td IV ý- - Dg*e K-'Ut Wilwime kiA oe So"t No. Go AOPoNW 51&ed ew-,mL

I I I U I U I

.3 I U

eWeNe Kl-- A

ALL-

Page 17: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

TEST SPECIMEN INSPECTION

CUSTOER ? r

ion No.

SPECIFICATION ,(~P7-c DATE

OISCNPT1N UMAUF.

Page No. I.9 Test Report No. 13056.

CHECK AS APPROPRIATE

PARTIM4

VG stcom. a.aszL RV - a *-0 . ý

- -- - -4a.

I +Aw ____ i-U-(.Z.- 4445c -A

r.ck± 14 laijco&w. MuggSle eoLE-u R.wJcX - W - ep- IS I*.uMJAT. 6A& 1__ _ S qI__

- --A

- 4 I4w" ___1_i._A

ZG- C 3Su~o& ( 9*41S ý Mas AL".- %ft - 4-s %OakI

tw&QA'rG CAG.&A __&"AVF

NiM.A LA ,9& _A& _ _ _ _ _ _ _

$""Waied

IJMtAepewedl 9124

U"m

Page 18: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

TEST SPECMEN INSPECTION

~UItflM**

Pae. No. 1-10 Tect Report No. 18054-1

CHECK AS APPROPRIATE

JoeNO. I

DATE

ffw DESCRIPTION MANUF. PART/WM

U. k TLAeo AMM~w~A. A#A-Aý -6-44z A, As

- c.Q Pk. _______ eV&.eAA40.AA --- -4 AL

- 2 -- -'sV

- .r.qQ ri -4aa A&______SAL___

MA.. --. .. SE A.JAc.-&-b-oli1~

14 44( ____ -5,L-'50-40rS -A t,.c5j eu14* Ap Laab& Q - I- - 4,o J4

____Z.-4t/ -la - ZS

Z6,41~ q.aca 'q%&A &&-gA.~ ~eAm - A

~2A~ i-:W-'1

'I( &WA-A AN-j -- "lsl

jij ~IA~tAIE. ~ AUL. t.&.aAi Ar4A- -c..- is -~i

V~i-9

MOZ- 4- -mWL

h~h'6L ~A&i £

"*A W~#.~eLLr

40ewe~d oI-z4.

Mifffmas

,&" Aý -W %d =

Page 19: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

TEST SPECIMEN INSPECTION

CUSTOM"RT h~ ,,. b~

Jos NO.

DATE .

ITEM AM~ DESCRIPTION MANUF.

Past No. 1-11 Test Report No. 18054-1

CHECK AS APPROPRIATE

.0 L-oF Rw~g A~at ALA- - b - :: km W

-Cf -uicm -&ee -rkNA AA '

-2 -rm 2- 4V-- S

-OIR. - -~ F

IPeeWeN Psed 8pow Fieed.

NOA Wdftme -

Au-~WIIrm. Da1te: Sheet No. of ... 1.......

-WV oQ- .+

PARTiM4

Page 20: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Pago No.1.12Tut 303ff t No. 1805.1

THINS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LIFT BLANK

wyw

Page 21: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-13 Test Report No. 18056-1

APPENDIX 11

PHOTOGRAPHS

WYLw rnMT I"vntvIIl FuWiBIy

Page 22: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Test

THIS PAGE

Page No. 1-14 Report No. 16056-1

INTETIONLLY EFT LAN

VJVL LAM I 0I Huntvill Faclit

Page 23: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

13

I U I I I I

Page No. 1-15 Test Report No. 18056-1

PHOTOGRAPH 1-1

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY A WITH ROCKDESTOS 40-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR SEQUOYAH, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page 24: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~.. ~.

K

K

PHOTOGRAPH 1-2

SPECIMEN PREPARATIOK

CABLE TRAY A WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED BY TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA)

Page No. 1-16 Test Report No. 18056-1

r3, I I I I U

.1 I U I.

Page 25: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-17 Test Report No. 18056-1

PHOTOGRAPH 1-3

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY B WITH ROCKBESTOS 15-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR SEQUOYAH, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page 26: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PHOTOGRAPH I-A

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY 3 WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED DY TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVAJ

77-

I I U I I U I 3 I I

Page No. 1-18 Telt Report No. 18056-1

Page 27: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I *1 *1 I I I I

I I

I I I I I I I

PHOTOGRAPH I-5

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY C WITH ROCKBESTOS 40-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR WATTS BAR, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page No. 1-19 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 28: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PHOTOGRAPH 1-6

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY C WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED BY TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA)

Page No. 1-20 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 29: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

A.'

:3 I I

I U I I U I U I I I I I U U I

PHOTOGRAPH 1-7

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY D WITH ROCKBESTOS 15-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR WATTS BAR, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page No. 1-21 Test Report No. 13056-1

Page 30: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-22 Test Report No. 18056-1

PHOTOGRAPH 1-1

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY D WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS ANi IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED BY TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYV (TVA)

I I I I I U U U U I U I I I U U I I I

Page 31: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I

S U I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I

PHOTOGRAPH 1.9

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY I WITH ANACONDA-CONTINENT;, 40-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR SEQUOYAH, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page No. 1-23 Test Report No. 11056-1

Page 32: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-24 Test Report No. 18056-1

I

PHOTOGRAPHI1-10

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY E WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED BY TFNNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA)

Page 33: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-25 Test Report No. 18056-1

.PHOTOGRAPH I-11

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY F WITH ANACONDA-CONTINENTAL 15-YEAR SPECIMENS, DESIGNATED FOR SEQUOYAH, MOUNTED TO PERFORATED STEEL BOTTOM

Page 34: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-26 Test Report No. 18056-1

PHOTOGRAPHI1-12

SPECIMEN PREPARATION

CABLE TRAY F WITH PREPARED CABLE SPECIMEN LEAD ENDS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS AS PROVIDED BY TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA)

Page 35: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[I I I I

APPENDIX III

DATA SHEET

WHw . m meum IN Pg4Ufy

'Page No. 1-27 Test Report No. 18056.1

Page 36: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-21 Test Roport No. 18056-1

THIS PAGI INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WYLiMwift"W PM Aty

Page 37: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-29 Test Report No. 18056-1

DATA SHEET

customer Tennessee Specimen Silicone Part No. Various Qns WL40P 18057-00Pars. 3.. SIN Listed GSI N/A

valley Authority

Rubber Insulated CablesWYLE LABORATORIES

Amb. Temp. 70oF Job No. 18056 Photo No Report No. 18056-1 Test Med. Zý A~a WATOOL Start Date 10~-Pq-186 Specimen Temp. _.Ajoignt...

SAK~w"IE Functional Test

Notice of Anomaly *y6 POW *a O41L a" me -

Tested By Date: Witness _________ Date: Shoet No. 1.Of 1 Approved V-L.L. LMJk 41tKI &A4L

Test Title

SPeciMen No. Reading Specmen No. Reading

RNC-SA. 40 1.9 X0` ISL RWC-W-A. 15 3S.5SY %17~ .ZL

NWC-S-D. 40 (i.-(. Y. *t .elNfRWC-W-D. 15 -1A V. to.J

F&C-S-E. 40 2.Z-tiAO' .nL. RWC-W-E. 15 4.0LC A.Id L

RN6C-S-A.15 V.~. 10.L ft. ANA-S-A,40 I.SxL1O toL.

RVC-S-D.15 1 I Ax. AN&-S-D.40 4.jAtoe.%

NfC"S.E.15 4.0 Y. %0L.n J&N-S-E. 40 4.6 OY.it

R1C-W-A. 40 S. ,I OltO11 j%- ANA-S-A,15 9.0YtoKI$a .TL

NC-W-13. 40 7.4 xI -) MANS-3. 15XI&jo

RUC-W-D. 40 tA x 10 It A. ANA-S-D. 15 Y 0 t

UWC-W-Z. 40 4.o %.e A aN-S-E.S isId J,-

Page 38: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-30 Test Report No. 18056-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WVLE LAUMMTO01 H4untsille Facility

I

Page 39: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX IV

INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET

WJYLE ADTU H~untsville Facii~ty

Page No. 1-31 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 40: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 1-32 Test Report No. 18056-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WYLE I rm

Page 41: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~i. I mm

I

I U I I I I I I I I I I

~TI

I I I

10/91/8 icmu &. mIM

-ifm

MNo m

WWmIne

amm MID

INSTRUMENTATION EGU11 MENT SHEEI Page No. 1-33

Test Report No. 18056-1 in mamfd low-0 0umsD 1. V. IL

1864 057113180 0ox1% U50K-SO"

TOT? Aflf 11W lTs XIiS

~La1

"OI3J04/11/89

13 TO UNTIFY TOT? TM OWA DOWlUES MElE CAUbUT9 eta ITE4F-TW6WI lJuECSa wITh SIAIU "a0 Ca3UTIDi 18 METO YE WTINX UIM OF STAIL

manm~: ~. hL .. 1641 -im 050DW I HMIVIO P1 WbL ii0.4

PAKIEOF I

-86

Page 42: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

wnI ui wo"Wgpw " u1~

Page No. 1-34 Test Report No. 18056-1

Page 43: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

NORMAL RADIATION EXPOSURE AND POSTaRADIATION

FUNCTIONAL TEST

Page 44: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. Il-I Test Report No. ISIS-I

SECTION 11

NORMAL RADIATION WIXPOSURE AND POST-RADIATION VUACT1IONAL TEST

REQUIRENMNT

Normal Radiation Expeoure

The test specimens shall be subjected to the normal radiation exposure as specified in Paragraph 3.4 of Section VII.

Post-Radiation Vunutcena Tast

The test specimens shall be subjected to a Functional Test upon completion of radiation exposure. The Functional Tast shall be performed as specified in Paragraph 3.5 of Section VIL

PROCEDURES

Nevmal Radiation Exposure

The test specimens were subjected to thme normal irradiation at Georgia Institute of Technology's Neely Nuclear Research Centar. Each test specimen cable tray was subjected to a Total Integrated Doss MTD) depending upan plant and/or age desigaatios. The TID to each of the cable trays was as described below:

Cable Tray rn-p--al -t

A

3

C

D

F

Plant/Ago

&nqumb 40-year Seuoyah 1 S-year Watts hr 40-year Watts Bar I $-year Soquoyah 40-year Weqomb IS-year

Spoe"lo

RWC

RWC

RWC

1WC

ANA

ANA

Cumulative

8.071E7

3.0417

L0317

3.0717

2.07E7

7.6316

upon completos of irradiatio. the tats specimens werý returned to Wyle Laboratoris' Tats facility for compkleuos of taist&n

WY. Po p"

Page 45: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Faew No. 11-2I Teot Repert N&. 186061

2.0 PROCEDURES (Cueosslue)

2.2 PeetRodisdoei Functional TestI

UPo" 00ompe101on Of irradiation. the tast specimens were subjected to a Post. Radiation Functional Teom The Functional Test was performed as described in Paragraph 2.3, Section 1. of this report.

&s0 RESULTSI

Th seast specimens were subjee to the Normal Radiation Exposure and PostRaduation Functional Test of Paragraph 2.0 sad met the requirements of Paragraph. 1.0. Photograpwhs of the seat specimens mounted in the cable trays were takren upon receipt as Wyle Laboratories. Observations recorded during the Poss-Radiasift Functional Teast Visual Inspection are presented in the3 following paragraphs.

During the visual inspection it was note that. in general, the teat specimens9 were in good condition and showed so indication of damap or severe degradation. The Tefze cable ties were iatact sand were maintaining specimen cable position on the cable trays. The test speimen separated from the metlW asurac of the cable tray(s) in some areas between the specimen cable ties. This ¶lexls of the lset specimens can be attributed to the normal radiation exposue that the specimens received, and to the natural coiling assure of the cables Visual inspectioes for each individual cable tray are presented In the3

Cable Tray A was n01ed to have Silicone insulation on the lead ends of Teat Specimens A and I that was much darker in apperance than the remaining teat Wspcimens on the tray. The asbestos braided Jacket material on Test Specimen E was found to be fraying; at the lead ends. All of the test specimens on this tray exhilbited as ask coloring on their Jacket material. The test specimens, as mounted In she cable tray, bad lestome flexibility.

Cable Tray 3 was noted to have ash coloring on the Jacket material on all ofI the test specimens, with Test Specimen D being the least apparent. The test speimes,% as mounted in hbe cable tray. had lost some flexibility. All of the teat specimens wen *NWe to bae" curved at the lead ends Is the elevated3 portion of the cable teay.

Cable Tray C was note to hae" darkened hosicoe Insulation at the lead ends3 Of Tess Specimens A sad 9. as described previously for Cable Tray A. The asbestos braided Jacket material on Test Specimens A sand a was found to be fraying 2t the lead enak All 0f Sim test speimens on this tray exhibited an ash 40oloring on the Jacket material with Test Specimens D and I being theS Neas apparent. Test specime flexibility was as described previously for Cable Tray A.

welft -

Page 46: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

I Pagp No. 11-3 Test Report No. 13054-1

3.0 RESULTS (Continued)

Cable Tray D was noted to have ash coloring on the jacket material on all of the test specimens, with Test Specimens D and E being the least apparent. The asbestos braided jacket material on Test Specimen E was found to be fraying I ~at oue lead end. The test specimen lead ends were noted to have curved in the elevated portion of the cable tray. The test specimens had lost some p flexibility.

Cable Tray E was noted to have ash coloring on the jacket material on all of the test specimens, with Test Specimen A being the least apparent. The asbestos braided jacket material on Test Specimens B through E was found to be f raying at the lead ends. Test specimen flexibility was as described previously for Cable Tray A.

Cable Tray F was noted to have ash coloring on the jacket material of Test Specimens B through E. The asbestos braided jacket material on Test Specimens C and E were found to be fraying at the lead ends. The test I specimen lead ends were noted to have curved in the elevated portion of the cable tray. The test specimens had lost some flexibility.

The data recorded during this phase of the test program is presented in Appendices I through IV. of this Section, as noted below:

0 Appendix I contains a Letter of Certification indicating dose rates, exposure time and cumulative total dose on the test

Appndi 11contains Photographs 11-1 through 11-8 which show I the test specimens during the Post-Radiation Visual Inspection and Functional Test. I Appendix III contains the Data Sheet generated during the PostRadiation Functional Tests.

I Appendix IV contains the Instrumentation Equipment Sheet generated (fo the Post-Radiation Functional Tests.

WfLAUAT bgjvgusfe PUM6V

Page 47: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 11-4 Tast R@pit No. 13056-

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

WYULm

Page 48: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 11-5 Test Report No. 18056-1

APPENDIX I

LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR THE IRRADIATION EXPOSURE

WWYLE Wit Sl Fee"i

Page 49: 81qoj0s - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Page No. 11-6 Test Report No. 18056-1

SI

S

t.THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

-3 £

WYLI IAAOU mutwuitlvII Feolltv