1 Solutions to sample problems for Chapter 6 Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, Wiley, 2012 6.1. Using the Reference [5] or other reliable sources, identify the tail configurations of the following aircraft: Stemme S10 (Germany): T-tail Dassault Falcon 2000 (France): Conventional/Cruciform Embraer EMB 145 (Brazil): T-tail Canadair CL-415: Non-conventional/Cruciform ATR 42: T-tail/Cruciform Aeromacchi MB-339C (Italy): Conventional + twin ventral fin Eagle X-TS (Malaysia): PZL Mielec M-18 Dromader (Poland): Conventional Beriev A-50 (Russia): T-tail Sukhoi Su-32FN (Russia): Twin vertical tail Sukhoi S-80: Boom-mounted inverted U Saab 340B (Sweden): Conventional Pilatus PC-12 (Switzerland): T-tail An-225 (Ukraine): H-tail Jetstream 41 (UK): Cruciform FLS Optica OA7-300 (UK): Bell/Boeing V-22 Osprey: H-tail Boeing E-767 AWACS: Conventional Cessna 750 Citation X: T-tail Learjet 45: T-tail Lockheed F-16 Fighting Falcon: Conventional Lockheed F-117A Nighthawk: V-tail McDonnell Douglas MD-95: T-tail Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit: No tail Bede BD-10: Twin vertical tail Hawker 1000: Cruciform
28
Embed
6.1. - John Wiley & Sons · 1 Solutions to sample problems for Chapter 6 Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, Wiley, 2012 6.1. Using the Reference [5] or other reliable
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Solutions to sample problems for
Chapter 6
Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, Wiley, 2012
6.1. Using the Reference [5] or other reliable sources, identify the tail configurations of the
Fokker 100 (F-28-0100) (Courtesy of Antony Osborne)
5
Tupolev Tu-154M (Courtesy of Miloslav Storoska)
Orlican VSO-10b Gradient (Courtesy of Miloslav Storoska)
6
PZL-Bielsko SZD-48 Jantar Standard (Courtesy of Miloslav Storoska)
H-tail: Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey, PZL-Mielec M-28B1R Bryza
Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey (Courtesy of Antony Osborne)
7
PZL-Mielec M-28B1R Bryza 1R-2 (Courtesy of Jenny Coffey)
Non-conventional: RMT 03Bateleur (Germany), Aeronix Airelle (France), North American
Rockwell OV-10B Bronco
North American Rockwell OV-10B Bronco (Courtesy of Miloslav Storoska)
8
Cruciform: Hawker 800XP, Beriev Be-103 Bekas
British Aerospace HS-125 CC3 (HS-125-700B) (Courtesy of Jenny Coffey)
Tri-plane: P-180 Avanti
(Courtesy of Tibboh)
9
Boom-mounted: Adam A500, MiG-110, De Havilland Vampire T11
De Havilland Vampire T11 (DH-115) (Courtesy of Jenny Coffey)
Twin vertical tail: F-22A Raptor
Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor (Courtesy of Antony Osborne)
10
Sukhoi Su-30MKI-3 (Courtesy of Antony Osborne)
Inverted V-tail: General Atomics MQ-1 Predator
(Courtesy of US Air Force)
11
6.5. An unmanned aircraft has the following features:
S = 55 m2, AR = 25, Sh = 9.6 m2, lm
Determine the horizontal tail volume coefficient.
6.6. The airfoil section of a horizontal tail in a fighter aircraft is NACA 64-006. The tail aspect
ratio is 2.3. Using the Reference [8], calculate the tail lift curve slope in 1/rad.
Using the Reference [8], the lift curve slope for NACA airfoil 64-004 is determined as follows:
(Equ 5.19)
(Equ 5.18)
(Equ 6.24)
(Equ 6.57)
S1 55 m2
Sh 9.6m2
l 6.8m AR 25
b1 AR S1 37.081m
CbarS1
b11.483m
Vbarl Sh
Cbar S10.8
CL1 0.6 1 5.5 deg CL2 0.6 2 5.8deg
CL CL2 CL1 1.2 2 1 11.3deg
Clh
C L
6.085 ARh 2.3
CLh
Clh
1Clh
ARh
3.3031
rad
12
6.8. The airfoil section of a horizontal tail in a GA aircraft is NACA 0012. The tail aspect ratio
is 4.8. Using the Reference [8], calculate the tail lift curve slope in 1/rad.
Using the Reference [8], the lift curve slope for NACA airfoil 0012 is determined as follows:
6.9. The wing reference area of an agricultural aircraft is 14.5 m2 and wing mean aerodynamic
chord is 1.8 m. The longitudinal stability requirements dictate the tail volume coefficient to be
0.9. If the maximum fuselage diameter is 1.6 m, determine the optimum tail arm and then
calculate the horizontal tail area. Assume that the aft portion of the fuselage is conical.
(Equ 6.57)
(Equ 6.47)
(Equ 6.24)
CL1 1.2 1 9.5 deg CL2 0.8 2 6.7deg
CL CL2 CL1 2 2 1 16.2deg
Clh
C L
7.074 ARh 4.8
CLh
Clh
1Clh
ARh
4.8151
rad
S1 14.5m2
Cbar 1.8m VH 0.9 Df 1.6m Kc 1
lopt Kc
4 Cbar S1 VH
Df 4.324m
Sh
Cbar S1 VH
lopt
5.433m2
13
6.10. Consider a single-seat GA aircraft whose wing reference area is 12 m2 and wing mean
aerodynamic chord is 1.3 m. The longitudinal stability requirements dictate the tail volume
coefficient to be 0.8. If the maximum fuselage diameter is 1.3 m, determine the optimum tail arm
and then calculate the horizontal tail area. Assume that the aft portion of the fuselage is conical.
(Equ 6.47)
(Equ 6.24)
S1 12 m2
Cbar 1.3m VH 0.8 Df 1.3m Kc 1
lopt Kc
4 Cbar S1 VH
Df 3.496m
Sh
Cbar S1 VH
lopt
3.57m2
14
6.11. A 19-seat business aircraft with a mass 6,400 kg is cruising with a speed of 240 knot at
26,000 ft. Assume that the aircraft lift coefficient is equal to the wing lift coefficient. The aircraft
has the following characteristics:
S = 32 m2, ARw = 8.7, Wing airfoil: NACA 651-412
Determine the downwash angle (in degrees) at the horizontal tail.
Using the Reference [8], the lift curve slope for NACA airfoil 651-412 is determined as follows:
The wing list curve slope is:
The downwash angle at the horizontal tail is determined as follows:
(Equ 5.20)
(Equ 5.10)
(Equ 6.55)
(Equ 6.56)
CL1 0.1 1 4 deg CL2 1.3 2 10deg
CL CL2 CL1 1.4 2 1 14deg
Clw
C L
5.73
ARw 8.7 CLw
Clw
1Clw
ARw
4.7371
rad
m1 6400kg S1 32.m2
VC 240knot hC 26000ft C 0.00103slug
ft3
CL2 m1 g
C VC2
S1
0.485
CLw CL 0.485
o
2 CLw
ARw2.032deg
dd2 CLw
ARw0.347
deg
deg
15
The Wing airfoil NACA 651-412 has an ideal lift coefficient of 0.4. The corresponding wing setting
angle for this coefficient is 1 deg. If the fuselage has zero degrees of angle of attack,
6.12. Suppose that the angle of attack of the fuselage for the aircraft in problem 11 is 2.3
degrees and the horizontal tail has an incidence of -1.5 degrees. How much is the horizontal tail
angle of attack at this flight condition?
(Equ 6.54)
(Equ 6.53)
iw 1 deg f 0
w iw f 1deg
o dd w 2.379deg
2.379deg ih 1.5 deg f 2.3deg
h f ih 1.579 deg
16
6.13. The horizontal tail of a transport aircraft has the following features:
ARh = 5.4, h = 0.7, Sh = 14 m2, h_LE = 30 degrees
Determine span, root chord, tip chord and the mean aerodynamic of the horizontal tail. Then sketch the
top-view of the tail with dimensions.
Given:
(Equ 6.63)
(Equ 6.66)
(Equ 6.65)
(Equ 6.64)
Sh 14 m2
ARh 5.4 h 0.7 h 30deg
ARh
bh
Ch
Sh bh Ch
bh Sh ARh 8.695m
Ch
bh
ARh
1.61m
Ch2
3Ch_r
1 h h2
1 h
Ch_r
Ch3
2
1 h h2
1 h
1.875m
h
Ch_t
Ch_r
Ch_t h Ch_r 1.312m
17
6.15. The vertical tail of a transport aircraft has the following features:
ARV = 1.6, V = 0.4, SV = 35 m2, V_LE = 45 degrees
Determine span, root chord, tip chord and the mean aerodynamic of the vertical tail. Then sketch the side-
view of the tail with dimensions.
Given:
(Equ 6.75)
(Equ 6.77)
(Equ 6.80)
(Equ 6.79)
(Equ 6.78)
Sv 35 m2
ARv 1.6 v 0.4 v 45 deg
ARv
bv
Cv
bv Sv ARv 7.483m
Sv bv CvCv
bv
ARv
4.677m
Cv_r
Cv3
2
1 v v2
1 v
6.296mCv
2
3Cv_r
1 v v2
1 v
v
Cv_t
Cv_r
Cv_t v Cv_r 2.518m
18
6.16. The aircraft in problem 11 has other features as follows:
h = 0.18, ho = 0.23, h = 0.97, l = 12 m, Sh = 8.7 m2
Determine the aircraft static longitudinal stability derivative (Cm) and discuss whether the
horizontal tail is longitudinally stabilizing or destabilizing.
d
dh
C
l
S
SChhCC h
hLoLmhwf
1 (6.67)
From Problem 6.11, we have:
Given:
The wing-fuselage lift curve slope and tail lift curve slope are not given. We assume that the
wing-fuselage lift curve slope and tail lift curve slope are equal to the wing lift curve slope.
So:
Since Cm is negative, the horizontal tail is longitudinally stabilizing and aircraft is statically
longitudinally stable.
So
(Equ 5.19)
(Equ 5.18)
(Equ 6.67)
CLw 4.731
rad S1 32 m
2 d_d 0.347
deg
deg ARw 8.7
b1 ARw S1 16.685m
CbarS1
b11.918m
h 0.18 ho 0.23 h 0.97 l1 12m Sh 8.7 m2
CLh CLw 4.731
rad CLwf CLw 4.73
1
rad
Cm CLwf h ho CLh hSh
S1 1 d_d( )
l1
Cbarh
5.1861
rad
19
6.17. This is an open-ended design problem, which has no single distinct solution, and can have several
acceptable designs. See the solution for Example 6-2 for an example of the design process.
6.18. This is an open-ended design problem, which has no single distinct solution, and can have several
acceptable designs. See the solution for Example 6-2 for an example of the design process.
20
6.19. Figure 6.29 shows the original design for the empennage of a transport aircraft with a
horizontal tail area of 12.3 m2. The wing reference area is 42 m
2, and wing aspect ratio is 10.5.
Figure P6.19a. Side-view of the aircraft in problem 19
The aircraft is spinnable and the designer found out that the vertical tail is not effective for spin
recovery. Move the horizontal tail horizontally such that the vertical tail becomes effective in
recovering from spin. Then determine the horizontal tail area such that the horizontal tail volume
coefficient remains unchanged. Assume that the sketch in figure 6.29 is scaled.
Solution:
An experimental rule for the vertical tail effectiveness to achieve a recoverable spin is as
follows: At least 50 percent of the vertical tail planform area must be out of the horizontal tail
wake region to be effective in the case of a spin. The horizontal tail wake region is considered to
lie between two lines. The first line is drawn at the horizontal tail trailing edge by the orientation
of 30 degrees. The second line is drawn at the horizontal tail leading edge by the orientation of
60 degrees.
Figure P6.19b. Side-view of the aircraft when 30o-60
o rule is applied.
30o 60o
ach acwf
6 m
ach acwf
6 m
21
The Figure P16.19b indicates that the vertical tail is graphically located to be inside the horizontal tail
wake region. Thus, the horizontal tail moment arm needs to be adjusted. The arm may be gets shorter or
longer. A longer arm is recommended, since it does not require the horizontal tail area to be increased.
Figure P6.19c. Side-view of the aircraft when horizontal tail is moved aft.
The new arm illustrates that the more 50 percent of the vertical tail planform area is out of the
horizontal tail wake region. Since the sketch is scaled, the new arm is measured to be 7.3 m.
The horizontal tail volume ratio is:
The new arm is 7.3 m, so the new horizontal tail area will need to be:
(Equ 5.19)
(Equ 5.18)
(Equ 6.24)
(Equ 6.24)
Sh 12.3 m2
Sw 42 m2
Lh 6 m AR 10.5
b AR Sw 32.404m
CbarSw
b1.296m
VH
Sh Lh
Sw Cbar1.356
Lh 7.3m
Sh
Cbar Sw VH
Lh
10.11m2
acwf
7.3 m
30o 60o
ach
22
6.20. A fighter aircraft has the following features:
S = 57 m2, AR = 3, Sh = 10.3 m2, Sv = 8.4 m2, lm, lv = 6.2 m
Determine the horizontal and vertical tails volume coefficients.
(Equ 5.19)
(Equ 5.18)
(Equ 6.24)
(Equ 6.72)
Sw 57 m2
ARw 3 Sh 10.3 m2
Sv 8.4 m2
Lh 6.8m Lv 6.2m
b ARw Sw 13.077m
CbarSw
b4.359m
VH
Sh Lh
Sw Cbar0.282
Vv
Sv Lv
Sw b0.07
23
6.22. The airfoil section of the vertical tail for a twin-jet engine aircraft is NACA 66-009. Other
features of the aircraft are as follows:
S = 32 m2, AR = 10.3, SV = 8.1 m2, ARV = 1.6, l m, 32.0
d
d, V = 0.95
Determine the aircraft static directional stability derivative (Cn). Then analyze the static
directional stability of the aircraft.
bS
Sl
d
dCKCC VVt
VLfnnVV
1 (6.73)
NACA 66-009:
(Equ 5.20 revised)
Selected based on page 322
(Equ 6.73)
Sw 32 m2
ARw 10.3 Sv 8.1 m2
Lv 9.2m d_d 0.32 v 0.95 ARv 1.6
CL1 0.6 1 6 deg CL2 0.6 2 6 deg
CL CL2 CL1 1.2 2 1 12deg Clv
C L
5.73
CLv
Clv
1Clv
ARv
2.6781
rad
Kf1 0.75
Cn Kf1 CLv 1 d_d( ) vLv Sv
b Sw 0.231
24
6.23. The angle of attack of a horizontal tail for a cargo aircraft is -1.6 degrees. Other tail
features are as follows:
Sh = 12 m2, ARh = 5.3, h = 0.7, airfoil section: NACA 64-208, h = 0.96
If the aircraft is flying at an altitude of 15,000 ft with a speed of 245 knot, determine how much
lift is generated by the tail. Assume that the tail has no twist.
Solution:
The following MATLAB m-file is utilized to calculate the tail lift coefficient:
clc clear N = 9; % (number of segments-1) S = 12; % m^2 AR = 5.3; % Aspect ratio lambda = 0.7; % Taper ratio alpha_twist = 0.00001; % Twist angle (deg) a_h = -1.6; % tail angle of attack (deg) a_2d = 4.521; % lift curve slope (1/rad) alpha_0 = -1.3; % zero-lift angle of attack (deg) b = sqrt(AR*S); % tail span MAC = S/b; % Mean Aerodynamic Chord Croot = (1.5*(1+lambda)*MAC)/(1+lambda+lambda^2); % root chord theta = pi/(2*N):pi/(2*N):pi/2; alpha=a_h+alpha_twist:-alpha_twist/(N-1):a_h; % segment's angle of attack z = (b/2)*cos(theta); c = Croot * (1 - (1-lambda)*cos(theta)); % Mean Aerodynamics chord at each
segment mu = c * a_2d / (4 * b); LHS = mu .* (alpha-alpha_0)/57.3; % Left Hand Side % Solving N equations to find coefficients A(i): for i=1:N for j=1:N B(i,j) = sin((2*j-1) * theta(i)) * (1 + (mu(i) * (2*j-1)) /
sin(theta(i))); end end A=B\transpose(LHS); for i = 1:N sum1(i) = 0; sum2(i) = 0; for j = 1 : N sum1(i) = sum1(i) + (2*j-1) * A(j)*sin((2*j-1)*theta(i)); sum2(i) = sum2(i) + A(j)*sin((2*j-1)*theta(i)); end end CL_tail = pi * AR * A(1)
25
where the zero lift angle of attack of the airfoil section (NACA 64-208) is -1.3 degrees and it has
the following lift curve slope.
The output of this m-file is:
CL_tail = -0.0181
Thus, the horizontal tail is producing a lift with the amount of
NACA 64-208:
(Equ 6.57)
(Equ 6.28 and 6.12)
CL1 0.5 1 6 deg CL2 0.8 2 6 deg
CL CL2 CL1 1.3 2 1 12deg Clh
C L
6.207
1
rad
CLh
Clh
1Clh
ARh
4.5211
rad
hC 15000ft C 0.0015slug
ft3
CLh 0.0181 Sh 12 m2
h 0.96 VC 245knot
Lh1
2C VC
2 Sh CLh h 1280.3 N
26
6.24. The sideslip angle of a vertical tail for a maneuverable aircraft during a turn is 4 degrees.
Other vertical tail features are as follows:
Sv = 7.5 m2, ARV = 1.4, V = 0.4, airfoil section: NACA 0012, V = 0.92
If the aircraft is flying at an altitude of 15,000 ft with a speed of 245 knot, determine how much
lift (i.e. side force) is generated by the vertical tail. Assume that the tail has no twist.
The following MATLAB m-file is utilized to calculate the vertical tail lift coefficient:
clc clear N = 9; % (number of segments-1) S = 7.5; % m^2 AR = 1.4; % Aspect ratio lambda = 0.4; % Taper ratio alpha_twist = 0.00001; % Twist angle (deg) a_h = 4; % tail angle of attack (deg) a_2d = 2.488; % lift curve slope (1/rad) alpha_0 = 0; % zero-lift angle of attack (deg) b = sqrt(AR*S); % tail span MAC = S/b; % Mean Aerodynamic Chord Croot = (1.5*(1+lambda)*MAC)/(1+lambda+lambda^2); % root chord theta = pi/(2*N):pi/(2*N):pi/2; alpha=a_h+alpha_twist:-alpha_twist/(N-1):a_h; % segment's angle of attack z = (b/2)*cos(theta); c = Croot * (1 - (1-lambda)*cos(theta)); % Mean Aerodynamics chord at each
segment mu = c * a_2d / (4 * b); LHS = mu .* (alpha-alpha_0)/57.3; % Left Hand Side % Solving N equations to find coefficients A(i): for i=1:N for j=1:N B(i,j) = sin((2*j-1) * theta(i)) * (1 + (mu(i) * (2*j-1)) /
sin(theta(i))); end end A=B\transpose(LHS); for i = 1:N sum1(i) = 0; sum2(i) = 0; for j = 1 : N sum1(i) = sum1(i) + (2*j-1) * A(j)*sin((2*j-1)*theta(i)); sum2(i) = sum2(i) + A(j)*sin((2*j-1)*theta(i)); end end CL_V_tail = pi * AR * A(1)
where the zero lift angle of attack of the airfoil section (NACA 64-208) is 0 and it has the
following lift curve slope.
27
The vertical tail angle of attack is equal to the sideslip angle (i.e. 4 deg).
The output of this m-file is:
CL_V_tail = 0.1059
Thus, the vertical tail is producing a lift with the amount of
NACA 0012:
(Equ 5.57 revised)
(Equ 6.70 revised)
CL1 0.8 1 8 deg CL2 0.8 2 8 deg
CL CL2 CL1 1.6 2 1 16deg Clv
C L
5.73
1
rad
CLv
Clv
1Clv
ARv
2.4881
rad
hC 15000ft C 0.0015slug
ft3
VC 245knot
CLv 0.106 Sv 7.5 m2
v 0.92
Lv1
2C VC
2 Sv CLv v 7118N
28
6.25. An aft horizontal tail is supposed to be designed for a single piston engine aircraft. The
aircraft with a mass of 1,800 kg is cruising with a speed of 160 knot an altitude of 22,000 ft. The
aircraft center of gravity is at 19% MAC and the wing-fuselage aerodynamic center is located at
24% MAC.
S = 12 m2, AR = 6.4, Sh = 2.8 m2, lm, 06.0owfmC
Determine the horizontal tail lift coefficient that must be produced in order to maintain the
longitudinal trim.
The aircraft longitudinal trim equation is:
0howf LHhoLm CVhhCC (6.29)
In this problem, the tail efficiency is not given, so it is assumed to be 1. The solution is as