Top Banner
PBW N302 Credit Hours CEM/WEE/STE Dr. Asmaa Moddather Soil Mechanics and Foundations Faculty of Engineering –Cairo University FALL 2012
83

6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Nov 08, 2014

Download

Documents

amoddather

Lecture about soil compressibility and consolidation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

PBW N302

Credit Hours

CEM/WEE/STE

Dr. Asmaa ModdatherSoil Mechanics and Foundations

Faculty of Engineering – Cairo University

FALL 2012

Page 2: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather
Page 3: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Definitions

• Compressibility: is the property through which

particles of soil are brought closer to each other, due

to escapage of air and/or water from voids under the

effect of an applied pressure.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 4: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Settlement of Cohesive Soils

• Coefficient of Compressibility (av): is the rate of change of

void ratio (e) with respect to the applied effective pressure

(p) during compression.

p

ea v

∆=

e

e-p curve

e

eo = initial void ratio

po = initial effective stress

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

p

e∆

p∆

eo

e1

po p1

po = initial effective stress

e1 = final void ratio

p1 = final effective stress

∆e = eo – e1

∆p = p1 – po

Page 5: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Coefficient of Volume Compressibility: (mv) is the volume decrease

of a unit volume of soil per unit increase of effective pressure during

Settlement of Cohesive Soils

of a unit volume of soil per unit increase of effective pressure during

compression

)e(1

a

Δp

Δe

)e(1

1

Δp

)Ve(1

ΔeV

Δp

V

Δv

mo

v

o

so

s

Ov

+=

+=

+==

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 6: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• For a thin layer , ∆p at mid depth is considered as an average

stress within the layer.q

Settlement of Cohesive Soils

stress within the layer.

)e(1

Δe

H

ΔH

o+=

H)e(1

Δp

ΔP

ΔeH

)e(1

ΔeSΔH

oo +=

+==

ΔpH)e(1

aS v

+=

H∆p

Clay

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

1

eo

1+eo H

∆e ∆H

ΔpH)e(1

So+

=

∆pHmS v=

mv = coefficient of volume compressibility

∆p = increase in effective stresses at mid depth of layer

H = thickness of layer

Page 7: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Settlement of Cohesive Soils

• For a thick layer the layer may be divided to number of sub-

layers, each of thickness Hi. The stress at mid-depth of each sub-

H1∆p1

q

iiH∆pmS vi∑=

layers, each of thickness Hi. The stress at mid-depth of each sub-

layer is ∆pi.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

H1

Clay

H2

∆p2

Page 8: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Sand may be considered as elastic material with Young’s Modulus.

• Young’s Modulus (E): is the slope for the linear portion of the

Settlement of Cohesionless Soils

• Young’s Modulus (E): is the slope for the linear portion of the

stress-strain curve.

E

1

stress

strain=

E

1

Δp

H

ΔH

=

q

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

E

p

H

H ∆=

E

p

H

S ∆=

pHE

1S ∆=

E

1mv =

2kg/cm dense) (v. 800-loose) (v. 100E =

EΔp

H∆p

Sand

Page 9: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Example

• Compute the settlement due to

compressibility of the sand layer and

consolidation of the clay layer at points (a)

and (b) of the building shown in Figure.

The building has a basement and is

founded on raft foundation. The stress

from the building at the foundation level

is as shown in the figure.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

is as shown in the figure.

Sand: γ = 1.70 t/m3 , E = 500 kg/cm2

Clay: mv = 0.03 cm2/kg.

Page 10: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Due to distributed load:

qnet = q – γh = 20 – 1.70x3.0 = 14.9 t/m2

Example

For sand layer

z = 5.0 m = 1” = 2.5 cm

L = 30 m � 30x2.5/5.0 = 15.0 cm, B = 20 m � 20x2.5/5.0 = 10.0 cm,

na = 191 ∆σa,sand = n/200 (qnet) = 191/200 x 14.9 = 14.2 t/m2

nb = 50 ∆σb, sand = n/200 (qnet) = 50/200 x 14.9 = 3.7 t/m2

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

ab

Page 11: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Due to distributed load:

qnet = q – γh = 20 – 1.70x3.0 = 14.9 t/m2

Example

For clay layer

z = 11.0 m = 1” = 2.5 cm

L = 30 m � 30x2.5/11.0 = 6.82 cm, B = 20 m � 20x2.5/11.0 = 4.55 cm,

na = 144 ∆σa,clay = n/200 (qnet) = 144/200 x 14.9 = 10.7 t/m2

nb = 47.3 ∆σb,clay = n/200 (qnet) = 47.3/200 x 14.9 = 3.5 t/m2

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

ab

Page 12: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Sa = Sa,sand + Sa,clay

Example

Sa,sand = 1/Esand ∆σa,sand H

H = 10.0 m E = 500 kg/cm2 ∆σa,sand = 14.2 t/m2

Sa,sand = 1/5000 x 14.2 x 10.0 = 0.0284 m = 2.84 cm

Sa,clay = mv ∆σa,clay H

H = 2.0 m m = 0.03 cm2/kg = 3.7 t/m2

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

H = 2.0 m mv = 0.03 cm2/kg ∆σa,clay = 3.7 t/m2

Sa,clay = 0.03/10 x 3.7 x 2.0 = 0.0222 m = 2.22 cm

Sa = Sa,sand + Sa,clay = 2.84 + 2.22 = 5.06 cm

Page 13: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Example

Sb = Sb,sand + Sb,clay

Sb,sand = 1/Esand ∆σb,sand H

H = 10.0 m E = 500 kg/cm2 ∆σb,sand = 10.7 t/m2

Sb,sand = 1/5000 x 10.7 x 10.0 = 0.0214 m = 2.14 cm

Sb,clay = mv ∆σb,clay H

H = 2.0 m m = 0.03 cm2/kg = 3.5 t/m2

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

H = 2.0 m mv = 0.03 cm2/kg ∆σb,clay = 3.5 t/m2

Sb,clay = 0.03/10 x 3.5 x 2.0 = 0.021 m = 2.10 cm

Sb = Sb,sand + Sb,clay = 2.14 + 2.10 = 4.24 cm

Page 14: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Settlement

H∆p

q

∆pHmS =

(Sand)

(Clay)

ΔpHE

1S =

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

∆pHmS v= (Clay)

Page 15: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Time of Settlement Compared to Construction Time

� Loading diagram:

Construction period

� Settlement of sandpH

E

1S ∆=

Time

Time

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

� Settlement of clay∆pHmS v=

Time

Page 16: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Causes of Settlement

• Static loads

•• Dynamic loads

• Groundwater lowering

• Capillary forces

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• Loads from adjacent structures

Page 17: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Theory of Consolidation

• Consolidation: is the process of squeezing water out of soil under the

effect loads, provided no lateral movement occurs.effect loads, provided no lateral movement occurs.

• In sandy soils, high permeability, drainage of water out of the soil

under the effect of loading happens immediately.

• In clay soils, low permeability, drainage of water out of the soil under

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• In clay soils, low permeability, drainage of water out of the soil under

the effect of loading is time dependent.

• Therefore, parameters governing consolidation process include: soil

properties, stress (p), time (t), drainage conditions.

Page 18: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Analogy:

Confined saturated soil (solids Valve ~ soil Piston for

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

and voids filled with water)

Versus

Container filled with water that

has a spring and a valve

Valve ~ soil permeability

Piston for loading

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Remember: water is incompressible

Spring ~ Solids

Water ~ pore-water

Container

Page 19: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• If we apply a certain load, and the valve is closed, then water

(incompressible material) carries the entire added load.

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

(incompressible material) carries the entire added load.

• If the valve is opened, water flows out, and thus its volume is

reduced.

• Since the total volume is reduced, the spring starts to be

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• Since the total volume is reduced, the spring starts to be

compressed and carries part of the load. Meanwhile, additional

pressure in the water decreases.

Page 20: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• The process continues until sufficient amount of water escapes

from the valve, which will result in the compression of the

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

from the valve, which will result in the compression of the

spring that would allow it to carry the entire load.

• At this point, the additional pressure in water decreases to zero,

the spring carries the entire load, the system is in equilibrium.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 21: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

For Sands: high permeability ~ valve is open, water gets out immediately

(t = 0), ∆u = 0

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

Stress = p

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

At t = 0 (immediately), ∆u = 0Load carried by spring

Page 22: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

For Clays: low permeability ~ valve is partially open, water gets out

slowly (time-dependent), ∆u decreases with t

Stress = p

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

Stress = p

Stress = p

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

At t = 0 (immediately), ∆u = pSpring carry no load

At t = t1, 0 < ∆u < pLoad carried by water and spring

Page 23: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

For Clays:

Mechanism of Consolidation ProcessMechanism of Consolidation Process

Stress = p

Stress = p

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

At t = long time, ∆u = 0Load carried by spring

At t = t2, 0 < ∆u < pLoad carried by water and spring

Page 24: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Stress distribution before application of load

Application on SoilApplication on Soil

GSGWT

Sand

Clay

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Gravel

tσ 'σu

Page 25: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Short time (immediately) after application of q (t = 0)

Application on SoilApplication on Soil

qGSGWT

Sand

Clay

q

q

q

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Gravel

tσ 'σu

q

q

Page 26: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Long time after application of q (t = h)

Application on SoilApplication on Soil

qGSGWT

Sand

Clay

q

q

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Gravel

tσ 'σu

q

q

Page 27: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Application on Soil

• Total stress:

• Pore water pressure:

qΣγhσ t +=

• Pore water pressure:

o t = 0 � (clay)

� (sand)

o t = h � (clay)

� (sand)

• Effective stress:

qhγu ww +=

wwhγu =

wwhγu =

wwhγu = At time t ???

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• Effective stress:

o t = 0 � (clay)

� (sand)

o t = h � (clay)

� (sand)

qhΣγ'σ' +=

hΣγ'σ'=

qhΣγ'σ' +=

qhΣγ'σ' +=

Page 28: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Rate of Consolidation

qGSGWT

Sand

Clay

q

q

q

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Gravel

tσ 'σu

q

q

Page 29: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Rate of ConsolidationRate of Consolidation

Clay

u

t = 0

t = t1

t = t2

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

q

t = t3

t = t2

t = ∞

Page 30: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Assumptions of Theory of Consolidation

• Clay is homogeneous, isotropic, and saturated.

•• Water and clay particles are incompressible.

• Darcy’s law is valid.

• The clay layer is laterally confined.

• One-dimensional compression, and one-dimensional flow.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• One-dimensional compression, and one-dimensional flow.

•Consolidation parameters from test applies to clay layer from

which sample for test was taken.

• Soil properties are constant with time.

Page 31: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

• Objectives:

o Volume change-effective pressure relationship

o Stress history of soil

o Volume change – time – pore water dissipation relationship

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 32: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test Load cell LoadDial gauge

Compression cell

Oedometer

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 33: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

Load cell

Dial gauge

Compression cell

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Oedometer

Page 34: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

Load cell

Dial gauge

Compression cell

Load

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Oedometer

Page 35: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

Dial gaugeLoad Head

Dial gauge

Porous stone

Saturated sampleMetal ring

Filter paper

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Porous stone

Filter paper

Compression Cell/Oedometer

Page 36: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

Dial gaugeLoad Head

Load (P )Dial gauge

Porous stone

Soil saturated sampleMetal ring

Filter paper

Load (P1)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Compression Cell/Oedometer Porous stone

Filter paper

Page 37: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test

• Equipments:

o Compression cell/Oedometero Compression cell/Oedometer

o Loading frame to apply weights (Po)

o Dial gauge to measure soil compression

Note:

Load acting on the cell (P1) is magnified by the lever arm ratio of the

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Load acting on the cell (P1) is magnified by the lever arm ratio of the

loading frame (LAR), where: P1 = LAR x P

Page 38: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Procedure:

1. Measure initial conditions of sample: ho, eo, wo, Gs

Consolidation Test

o o o s

2. Trim the sample into the metal ring and place filter paper on both

sides of sample.

3. Place the ring into the compression cell between the two porous

stones.

4. A metal cap (loading head) is placed over the top porous stone, on

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

4. A metal cap (loading head) is placed over the top porous stone, on

which the load (P1) is applied.

5. Set-up the dial gage to zero reading. Fill the compression cell with

water until the top porous stone is covered with water.

Page 39: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Procedure:

6. Place the hanging load (Po) such that the pressure on the clay

Consolidation Test

o

sample is equal to the first loading step.

7. Record readings of dial gage (compression of sample) with time

until compression stops (usually within 24 hours).

8. Repeat steps 6 and 7 for subsequent loading and unloading

increments.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

increments.

Page 40: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Loading scheme, for example:

o 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0 (kg/cm2) Loading

Consolidation Test

o 16.0, 4.0, 1.0, 0.25 (kg/cm2) Unloading

• Results: for each loading/unloading increment, we record:

dial gage (∆h) that measures sample compression versus

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

elapsed time (t).

Page 41: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

• For each loading increment, plot ∆h-log t:

0.1 1 10 100 1000Time (min)

0

10

20

30

40

50

h (

x 1

0-2

mm

)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

60

70

80

90

100

∆∆ ∆∆h

(x

Page 42: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• At the end of each loading increment:

1. Calculate effective pressure (p) = Load x LAR/sample area

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

2. Measure ∆h = sample compression during this loading increment

3. Calculate void ratio (e):

oo h

∆h

e1

∆e=

+ eo

∆e ∆h

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

e = eo – ∆e

• Plot e-p curve

1

1+eo ho

Page 43: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

232116582914.570Load (kg)

Example: LAR = 3, sample area = 41.85 cm2, ho = 25.4 mm, eo = 0.636

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

232116582914.570Load (kg)

705550359223135890Dial Reading x 10-2 (mm)= ∆h

16.638.324.162.081.047 x 3/41.85

= 0.500

Stress (p) = Load x lever arm ratio/area (kg/cm2)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0.45410.35430.23120.14360.0870.89/25.4 (1+0.636)= 0.0573

0∆e = ∆h/ho (1+eo)

0.18190.28170.40480.49240.54900.636-0.0573

= 0.57870.636e = eo - ∆e

Page 44: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Plot e-p Curve

0.7

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

e

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0

0.1

0.2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

p (kg/cm2)

Page 45: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• From e-p curve, for a certain stress range, calculate av and

mv, where:

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

mv, where:

p

ea v

∆=

e

e∆

p∆

eo

e1

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

)e(1

am

o

vv

+=

ppo p1

Page 46: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Plot e-log(p) curve:

0.7

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

e

e∆

eo

e1

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0

0.1

0.2

0.1 1 10 100

p (kg/cm2)

p)log(∆

po p1

e1

Page 47: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• From e-log(p) curve, the slope of the linear portion is the

Compression Index (Cc):

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

c

• Determine preconsolidation pressure (pc): is the largest

∆log(p)

∆eCc =

o1

1o

logplogp

ee

−= 402.0

log4.8log12.0

22.00.38=

−=

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

• Determine preconsolidation pressure (pc): is the largest

effective pressure that has been applied on the soil in its

geological history.

Page 48: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

• Determination of preconsolidation pressure:

0.7

5

Consolidation Test Data Reduction

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

e

1

2

3

4

5

ba

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0

0.1

0.2

0.1 1 10 100

p (kg/cm2)

pc = 1.8 kg/cm2

Page 49: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

1. Determine point of maximum curvature (a).

2. At (a), draw tangent to e-log(p) curve.

Determination of Preconsolidation Pressure

3. At (a), draw horizontal line.

4. Draw a bisector to the angle enclosed between the tangent and

horizontal lines.

5. Extend the linear portion of the curve until it intersects the bisector at

point (b).

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

point (b).

6. The preconsolidation pressure (pc) is the x-coordinate of the point (b).

Page 50: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

1. Normally consolidated clay:

Clay that has never been loaded in the past by more than the existing

effective overburden pressure (p ) p ~ p

Types of Clay w.r.t. Preconsolidation

effective overburden pressure (po) pc ~ po

2. Overconsolidated (preconsolidated) clay:

Clay that has been loaded in the past by more than the existing effective

overburden pressure (po) pc > po

Causes: pre-existing structures, erosion of overburden

3. Underconsolidated clay:

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

3. Underconsolidated clay:

Clay that has been loaded partially by the existing effective overburden

pressure (po) pc < po

o

c

p

pOCR =Define: Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR):

Page 51: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� For normally consolidated clays, Cc can be calculated as follows:

� From e-log(p) curve:

Determination of Compression IndexDetermination of Compression Index

� From liquid limit:

∆log(p)

∆eCc =

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

where wL is in (%)

)100.009(wC Lc −≈

Page 52: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

0.6

0.7

Recompression curve

DefinitionsDefinitions

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

e

Virgin compression curve

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0

0.1

0.1 1 10 100

p (kg/cm2)

Unloading/reloading curve

pc

Page 53: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� From e-log(p) curve, the recompression index (Cr) is the slope of

the equivalent linear portion of the unloading/reloading curve.

DefinitionsDefinitions

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

e

)log( p

eCr

∆=

Cr

Cr

Cc

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0

0.1

0.2

0.1 1 10 100p (kg/cm2)

Cr

Page 54: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Calculate settlement (S) of normally consolidated clay layer of

thickness (H) due to added stress (∆p) given Cc of clay:

∆e

SettlementSettlement

∆log(p)

∆eCc =

)log(p)log(p

eeC

01

10c

−=

)p

log(

∆eC

1c =

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

e

eo

e1

e Cc

∆p

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

)p

plog(

0

1

.......1..........).........p

plog(C∆e

0

1c=

......2..............................H

S

h

∆h

e1

∆e

oo

==+

0

0.1

0.1 1 10 100p (kg/cm2)

p1op~c p

Page 55: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� From 1 and 2:

)e(1S

)p

log(C 1 +=

SettlementSettlement

)e(1H

S)

p

plog(C o

o

1c +=

)p

plog(H

e1

CS

o

1

o

c

+=

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 56: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� For overconsolidated clay, (po and p1) < pc:

0.7e

SettlementSettlement

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

e

eo

e1

Cr

∆p

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

)p

plog(H

e1

CS

o

1

o

r

+=

0

0.1 1 10 100p (kg/cm2)

p1 pcpo

Page 57: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� For overconsolidated clay, po < pc and and p1 > pc

0.7e

SettlementSettlement

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

e

eo

e1

Cr

∆p

Cc

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

)p

plog(H

e1

C)

p

plog(H

e1

CS

c

1

o

c

o

c

o

r

++

+=

0

0.1 1 10 100p (kg/cm2)

p1pcpo

Page 58: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Rate of ConsolidationRate of Consolidation

q

Short time after application of load “q”

GSGWT

Sand

Clay

q

q

q

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Gravel

tσ 'σu

q

q

Page 59: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Rate of consolidationRate of consolidation

u

t = 0

u

t = 0

Isochrone

Sand

zu σ'

Clay

t = 0

t = t1

t = t3

t = t2

t = ∞

t = t2

t = ∞

umax σ‘minClay

Sand

2H

hDu σ'

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

∆p ∆p Sand

At time “t” and depth “z”:

∆p = ∆u + ∆σ’ = increase in total stress due to added load∆u = excess pore water pressure due to added load∆σ’ = increase in effective stress due to added load

Hydrostatic pore water pressure

(GWT)

Page 60: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

u

t = 0

Sand

z∆u ∆σ'

2H

Rate of consolidationRate of consolidation

Degree of Consolidation (Utz) at time “t” and depth “z”:

∆p

t = tt = ∞

Clay

Sand

2H

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Degree of Consolidation (Utz) at time “t” and depth “z”:

∆p

∆u1

∆p

∆u∆p

∆p

∆σU

'

tz −=−

==

Page 61: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Average degree of consolidation (Ut) for the clay layer at time “t”:

Rate of ConsolidationRate of Consolidation

dzU2UDh

tzt ∫=

u

t = 0Sand

zdzU2U

0

tzt ∫=

diagram∆pofarea

diagramσ'ofareaU t

∆=

∆p

∆u∆p

∆p

∆σU

'

tz

−==

t = 0

t = t

t = ∞

umax σ‘minClay

2H

z

hDu σ'

Where

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

diagram∆pofarea

diagram∆pofarea

diagramuofarea-diagram∆pofareaU t

∆=

2H∆pdiagram∆pofarea =

2Hu3

2diagramuofarea max=∆

∆p

t = ∞

Sand

Where

Page 62: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Settlement of clay layer of thickness 2H at time t=∞:

Sultimate = mv∆p (2H)

Rate of ConsolidationRate of Consolidation

� Settlement of clay layer of thickness 2H at time t=t:

St = mv∆σ’ (2H)

� Average degree of consolidation (U ) at time “t”:

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

� Average degree of consolidation (Ut) at time “t”:

Ut = St/Sultimate

The degree of consolidation at any time (t) is the percentage of

settlement that took place at this time w.r.t. to ultimate

consolidation settlement.

Page 63: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Equation governing rate of consolidation

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

� Consider a differential element of soil

Surcharge load

ground surface

Qin Area = dAVolume = dV

dx

dyx

z

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Qout

dzy z

Page 64: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

kidAQ −=

)dzz

Q(QQ

t

(dV)inout

∂=−=

∂−compression and flow 1-D

Darcy’s law is valid

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

kidAQ −=

dAz

hk

∂−=

)dAγ

u(

zk

w∂

∂−=

dAz

u

γ

k

w ∂

∂−=

Darcy’s law is valid

u = excess p.w.pQin Area = dA

Volume = dV

dxdz

dy

xy

dA)dzz

u

γ

k(

zt

(dV)

w ∂

∂−

∂=

∂−

dVz

u

γ

k

t

(dV)2

2

w ∂

∂=

∂Equation (1) soil is homogeneous

Qout

dz y

z

Page 65: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

e1

e

dV

dVv

+= dV

e1

edVv

+=

dVv

de

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

e1

dV

t

edV

t

e

t

)(edV

t

dV)e1

e(

t

)(dV

t

(dV)s

sv

+∂

∂=

∂=

∂=

+∂

=∂

∂=

dVs

dV

1e1

1

dV

dVs

+= dV

e1

1dVs

+=

dVe(dV) ∂=

∂Equation (2)

e1tt +∂=

From equations 1 and 2,

e1

dV

t

edV

z

u

γ

k2

2

w +∂

∂=

Equation (2)

Page 66: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

t

e

z

u

γ

e)k(12

2

w ∂

∂=

∂+

σ'ee ∂∂=

∂(chain rule)

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

t

σ'

σ'

e

t

e

∂=

t

ua)

t

u

t

σ(a

t

evv

∂=

∂−

∂−=

t

σ'a

t

ev

∂−=

(chain rule)

σ'

ea: v

∂=

0t

σ: =

∂ (load doesn’t vary with time)

t

ua

z

u

γ

e)k(1v2

2

∂=

∂+

tzγv2

w ∂∂

2

2

wv z

u

γa

e)k(1

t

u

∂+=

2

2

vz

uc

t

u

∂=

wvwv

vγm

k

γa

e)k(1c: =

+=

Page 67: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Coefficient of Consolidation: cv

v

kc = cm2/sec

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

where:k = soil permeabilitymv = coefficient of volume compressibility

wv

vγm

c = cm2/sec

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 68: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Boundary conditions:

Example: a clay layer, of thickness 2H, with top and bottom boundaries freely draining Sand

Differential Equation of ConsolidationDifferential Equation of Consolidation

� u(z=0,t) = 0

� u(z=2H,t) = 0

� u(z,t=0) = ui

Sand

Clay

u

t = t1

t = t2z

as time increases, u decreases2H

Page 69: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Solution:

)TM((sinMZ)expM

2ut)u(z, v

2i −=∑∞

Solution of Differential Equation of ConsolidationSolution of Differential Equation of Consolidation

where:

Tv = Time factor

)TM((sinMZ)expM

t)u(z, v

0m

∑=

1)(2m2

πM +=

2

vv

H

tcT =

Tv = Time factor

� Solution in terms of degree of consolidation (U):

……………… Equation 3)TMexp(M

21U v

2

0m2

−−= ∑∞

=

Page 70: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Equation 3 was solved and the results were tabulated:

Tv = f(U)

Solution of Differential Equation of ConsolidationSolution of Differential Equation of Consolidation

2

d

vv

h

tcT =

where:T = time factor corresponding to degree of consolidation occurring at time t

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Tv = time factor corresponding to degree of consolidation occurring at time tcv = coefficient of consolidation (determined from consolidation test)hd = longest drainage path within clay layer

The above equation holds for consolidation of sample in the lab, and for clay layer consolidating in the field

Page 71: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

0

10

20

3030

40

50

60

70

80

90

U (

%)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

90

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Tv

10099959080706050403020100U (%)

∞1.7811.1290.8480.5670.4030.2870.1970.1260.0710.0310.0080.0Tv

Page 72: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� Drainage Path: hd

Sand Sand

Solution of Differential Equation of ConsolidationSolution of Differential Equation of Consolidation

2H Clay

Sand

2H Clay

Impervious Rockhd = H hd = 2H

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

Page 73: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Determination of cv

� cv is determined from the consolidation test data

� The is a c value that corresponds to each loading � The is a cv value that corresponds to each loading

increment, i.e. cv is stress dependent

� For the following test data corresponding to a certain

loading increment, find cv.

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

885240120603015106.2542.2510.50.250Time (min)

223221220219215209202193184173161155153135Dial Reading x 10-2 (mm)

888685848074675849382620153-135

=18135-135

= 0= ∆h x 10-2 (mm)

Page 74: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Time (min)

t50 = 3.6 min0.25 1.00

� ∆h-log t Curve

Determination of cv

0

10

20

30

40

50

h (

x 1

0-2

mm

)

U = 0%

t50 = 3.6 min0.25 1.00

U = 50%

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

60

70

80

90

100

∆∆ ∆∆h

(x

U = 100%

Page 75: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

1. Plot the (∆h) or (e) on the vertical axis (arithmetic scale), and the time (t) on

horizontal axis (logarithmic scale) S-shape

2. Determine (∆h) or (e) corresponding to 0% consolidation:

Determination of Determination of ccvv

2. Determine (∆h) or (e) corresponding to 0% consolidation:

� Consider (∆h1) corresponding to a small time (t1)

� Consider (∆h2) corresponding to (4t1)

� Determine the difference between (∆h1) and (∆h2) y

� Determine (∆h) corresponding to 0% consolidation at a distance

equivalent to y above (∆h1)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

1

3. Determine (∆h) or (e) corresponding to 100% consolidation:

� Extrapolate the linear portion at the middle of the consolidation curve

� Extrapolate the linear portion at the end of the consolidation curve

� The two lines intersect at a point corresponding to (∆h) or (e) at 100%

consolidation

Page 76: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

1. Two points on the first portion of curve are selected for which the values

of “t” are in the ratio of 4:1.

2. The vertical distance between the two points is measured.

Determination of Determination of ccvv

2. The vertical distance between the two points is measured.

3. An equal distance set off above the first point fixes a line corresponding

to U = 0%.

4. The line corresponding to U = 100% passes through the intersection of

the two linear parts of the curve.

5. The line corresponding to U = 50% is located at the midway between

the two lines (U = 0% & U = 50%)

6. The intersection between the curve and the line (U = 50%) is

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

6. The intersection between the curve and the line (U = 50%) is

corresponding to t50.

2

D

vv

h

tcT =

t

hTc

2

Dvv =

50

2

Dv

t

0.197hc =

Page 77: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

4. Determine (∆h) or (e) corresponding to 50% consolidation at mid

distance between 0% consolidation and 100% consolidation.

5. Determine t

Determination of Determination of ccvv

5. Determine t50

6. Calculate cv:

where: T = 0.197, h = ½ sample height (sample drains from both

2

d

vv

h

tcT =

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

where: T50 = 0.197, hd = ½ sample height (sample drains from both

sides), and t = t50 from consolidation curve

Page 78: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

Types of Compression

0

0.1 1 10 100 1000

Time (min)Immediate consolidation

∆h = 00

10

20

30

40

50

h (

x 1

0-2

mm

)

U = 0%

Primary consolidation

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

60

70

80

90

100

∆∆ ∆∆h

(x

U = 100%

Secondary consolidation

Page 79: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

1. Immediate: due to compression of entraped air and

machine parts.

Types of CompressionTypes of Compression

machine parts.

2. Primary: due to consolidation by escapage of water

(relief of excess pore-water pressure) under the effect of

pressure (loading)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

pressure (loading)

3. Secondary: compression at constant effective stress (no

excess pore-water pressure) [creep]

Page 80: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

� A rectangular building 24 × 16 m is

shown in Figure and is founded on a

raft and has its foundation level at

ExampleExample

(a) (c) (b)

raft and has its foundation level at

2.0 m below ground surface. If the

building exerts a net stress of 2.0

kg/cm2 on soil at foundation

level, determine:

i. The ultimate settlement of

(a) (c)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

points a, b and c.

ii. The time required for these

points to settle 5.0 cm and the

time required undergo 90%

consolidation.

Page 81: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

i. The ultimate settlement of points a, b and c.

qnet = 20 t/m2

Example

z = 8.0 m

H = 5.0 m

Using Influence Chart:

ca & bPoints

1224L (m)

88B (m)

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

88B (m)

1.53m

11n

0.2030.193Iz

0.203x20x4 = 16.240.193x20x2 = 7.72∆σ (t/m2)

0.004x16.24x5 = 0.325 m0.004x7.72x5 = 0.154 mS = mv ∆σ H

Page 82: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

ii. The time required for these

points to settle 5.0 cm.

Example

(a) (c) (b)

cv = 0.006 cm2/sec

bcaPoints

=5/15.4 = 0.3255/32.5 = 0.154=5/15.4 = 0.325U = St/Sf

0.0830.0190.083From Chart

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0.0830.0190.083From Chart(Tv)

40.09.210.0t (days)

2

D

vv

h

tcT =

2(500)

t0.006019.0 =

2(250)

t0.006083.0 = 2(500)

t0.006083.0 =

Page 83: 6 Soil Compressibility_GB_Dr. Asmaa Moddather

ii. The time required for these

points to undergo 90%

Example

(a) (c) (b)

consolidation.

cv = 0.006 cm2/sec

bcaPoints

0.900.900.90U = St/Sf

0.8480.8480.848From Chart

Dr. Asmaa Moddather – PBW N302 – Fall 2012

0.8480.8480.848From Chart(Tv)

409.0409.0102.2t (days)

0.90 x 15.4 = 13.9 cm0.90 x 32.5 = 29.3 cm0.90 x 15.4 = 13.9 cmSt (cm)

2

D

vv

h

tcT =

2(500)

t0.006848.0 =

2(250)

t0.006848.0 =

2(500)

t0.006848.0 =