4. MALARIA PROBLEM AS EVIDENT FROM THE RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF AVAILABLE DATA
4. MALARIA PROBLEM AS EVIDENT FROM THE RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF AVAILABLE DATA
Page. .61
4. ANALYSES OF A V A I M L E WTA ON M I A .
The history of malaria and the gravity of the situation in the
district in the first half of this century have been reviewed in the
prtlvious chapter. This chapter deals with the analyses of data
available for Koraput district. A ccinparison h:s also been made with
the situation in the two neighbouring districts of Andhra Pradesh.
4.1. MTA SOURCE AND MEINIDS OF AVALYSES:
For the present analyses, data were collected from published [data
on India: Kondrashin and Rashid, 1987: Orissa state and districts:
Anonpus, 1987c ) and unpublished sources. The unpublished sources
include the following:
i). PtC and district malaria authorities n f Koraput district,
Orissa.
ii). M and district ~mlaria authorities of Vishakhapatnam and East
Godavari districts, Andhra Pradesh.
iii]. State malaria authorities and regional director at^ of health,
Ht~ub@neswar, Ori ssa.
A computer database was created and data were analyzed for
malarimtric indices, such as annual parasite incidence per 1,000
Page. .62
population [API), slide positivity rate [proportion positivity of blood
smear slides collected expressed as percentage: SPR), annual blood
examination rate (proport ion of population covered by blood smear
examination annually expressed as percentage: ABWI and proportion
positivity for g. falciparm to total positives expressed as percentage
(Pf % ) . Fqhasis was given to the spatial and temporal distribution of
malaria. For studying seasonality, monthly incidence of parasitaemia
per 1,000 population was calculated. Age and gender specific analyses
could not be carried out due to non-availability of suitable data. No
data on spleen examination was available from the above sources.
Regression analysis was used to study the relationship between API and
ABER. Since only two parasite specles (11, falciparm and P, viva) were
recorded in the above data, the figures, for falciparum only are shown
in the tables in this chapter. The period between 1976 and 1988 was
covered depending on the availability of data from individual sources.
4.2. RESULTS:
4.2.1. Contribution of Koraput to malaria cases in Urissa and India:
The total number of srnear proven lr~alaria cases and scme
malarianetric indices for India, Orissa and Koraput for the period
1981-86 are shown in Table: 3. While the national API ranged between
2.40 to 4 .11 in different years (Kondrashin and Rashid, 19871, the
figures for Koraput were about 6 to 7 times higher (API ranging between
'Table: 3
Malaria situation in Koraput compared with that in Orissa state and India.
- ---
Number of malaria cases
INDIA 2701141 2182302 2018605 2184446 1864380 1765631 ORISSA 303471 296478 252152 283927 246703 316138 KORAPUT 65528 61225 50169 57542 43395 39447
Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population
INDIA 4.11 3.22 2.93 3.08 2.57 2.40 OR1 SSA 11.55 11.08 9.26 10.00 10.00 11.29 KORAPUT 26.37 24.12 19.35 21.72 16.04 14.27
Nunher of P. fnlciparun cases
INDIA 589591 551057 600964 655454 545005 621235 CUISSA 238832 239761 200234 226188 195800 259011 KORAPUT 56346 54804 45190 52064 38653 38525
Percentage of P.falciparum to total cases
INDIA 21.8J 25.25 29.77 iU., i1 2Y.UU 35.18 CUI SSA 78.70 80.87 79.41 80.00 79.00 80.03 KORAPUT 85.99 89.51 90.07 90.48 89.07 97.66
(Source: Kondrashin and Rashid, 1987: State and district malaria authorities).
14.3 to 26.4). The API in the district was about one and half to twice
that of the figures for the whole of Grissa state. While P. falciparm accounted for 22-358 of cases in India, i t accounted for about 80% of
cases in Orissa and between 86-98% of cases in Koraput.
Though Orissa state contributed to about 11-18% of all malaria
cases of India, its contribution to P. falciparm cases was highest and
ranged between 33% and 44%. Koraput district with a population
measuring a fraction of less than 1 percent (0.36%) contributed between
2.23% to 2.81% of all cases and 6.20% to 9.95% of P. falciparun cases
of the nation (Table: 4). The official records indicate that 80 deaths
due to malaria had occurred in this district between 1981 and 1986
[Table: 5).
4.2.2. Comparison of malaria situation between four physiographic
regions in Orissa state:
Orissa has been divided into 4 physiographic regions [Dash 2 g.,
1984), of which Koraput district comes under the eastern ghat zone (for
details, see chapter: 2.1). Comparison of the malaria situation in the
four zones (Table: 6) showed that highest API was recorded in the
northern plateau followed by the eastern ghat region. The proportion
[ % ) of 1. falciparlul~ cases howcvcr was the highest In Ihc latter. While
the national figures have shown a declining trend, all the zones in
Grissa recorded higher API in 1986 ccmpared to 1985. When analysis
Page. .65
Table: 4
Contribution of Orissa state to national. Koraput district to state and national malaria situation.
YEAR
1 9 8 1 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
ORISSA COMPARED TO INDlA
% of all cases 11.23 1 3 . 5 9 12 .49 1 3 . 0 0 13.23 1 7 . 9 1 % off. falciparm cases 40 .51 43 .51 33.32 34 .51 35.93 40.73
KORAPUT m m m TO ORISSA
% of all cases 21.59 20 .65 1 9 . 9 0 20.27 17 .59 12 .48 % of P. falciparum cases 23.59 22.86 22.57 23.02 19.74 15.23
KORAPUT COMPARED TO INDIA
% of all cases 2 .43 2 .81 2.49 2.63 2.33 2.23 % , O f P . falciparwncases 9.56 9.95 7.52 7.94 7.09 G.20
(Source: coopliled from data available from Kondrashin and Rashid. 1987: State and district malaria authorities).
Table: 5
Malaria si tuatir~n in Ko~.~lpul district.
No. +ve - P. falciparwn Nu. of Year ESC ABM for SPH API malaria
malaria No. +ve 8 deaths
I3SC : Blood smears collected and examined ABM: Annual blood examination rate ( 8 1 SPR : Slide positivity rate ( 8 1 API : Annual parasite incidence per1.000 population. N"i: No1 Abailable (Source: District nnlaria authorities)
Table: 6
Comparison of malarianetric indices between four physiographic zones of Orissa state.
YEAR
ZONE INDEX 1984 1985 1986 84-866
COASTAL API 5 .00 3.90 4.75 4.55 PLAINS pf rb 48.38 46.80 60.73 51.97
W m N AP I 22.33 16.27 21.84 20.15 GHATS p f % 87.53 84.91 83.32 85.25
NORTHEEN API 20.00 22.24 27.17 23.14 PLATCAU Pf % 76.64 79.21 83.26 79.70
API: Annual lJarasi te lncitlence per 1,000 [~opulatiorl P f % : P. falciparum as proportion of all malaria cases ( 8 )
* Average of 1984 to 1986.
(SOURCE: State malaria authorities).
was done for individual districts (Table: 71, Phulbani, adjacent to
Koraput in the sane zone recorded the highest API, while Koraput ranked
fourth.
When the data for Koraput district [Table: 5) was examined, both
API and SPR showed a declining trend over tht: ys~lrs. c. lalciparwn was the predominant parasite in the locality and its prevalence showed an
increasing trend until 1986, when about 98% of the cases reported were
due to this species. The prevalence of this parasite, however,
decreased marginally in the last two years (1987-88).
4 . 2 . 3 . Comparison of malaria situation between the physiographic zones
within the district:
'he malarimtric indices for the four zones in the district are
shown in Table: 8. Malkangiri zone was the worst affected recording
highest API throughout the period. Jeypore zone recorded the lowest API
each year. The year to year variations between 1981 and 1988 in the
four zones are shown in Figure: 7. ?he declining trend in API (Figure:
7C] and SPR [Figure: 7B) was qualitatively similar in all zones,
excluding in Koraput zone where the API has clearly increased during
1987-88 canpared to the previous years. The pattern of API and SPR
mimicked the pattern of ABER in general [Figure: 7A) . A significant
correlation was observed between ABER and API (r = 0.78; P (0.0011
irrespective of the zones. The prevalence of 11. lalciparum over the
Page. .69
Table: 7
Ccmparison of malaria situation between different districts of Orissa state (Average of 1984 to 1986) .
ZONE DISTRICT API Pf %
COASTAL G A N J W 12.75 78.61 PLAINS PURI 3.24 54.32
CU?TPCK 0.84 44.35 &4LASORE 1 . 3 6 30.60
CENTRAL S-PUR 8.13 82.27 TABLE LAND BOLANGIR 7.01 75.00
WEM(ANAL 12.03 49.91
W T E R N KDRAPUT 17.87 88.90 GHAT HiU1HANI 34.17 87.05
KALAHANDI 8.47 79.81
NORTHERN M4YUREltiAN.l 16.08 68.48 PLATE4U KEDNJHAR 26.58 82.88
SUNDERGARH 26.76 07.75
API: Annual parasite incidence per 1.000 population Pf%: Proportion of p. falciparum cases to total
malaria cases ( % I
(Source: State malaria authorities)
Table: 8
Carparison of Malaria situation in different physiographic zones of Koraput district.
Koraput Jeypore Rayagada Malkangiri (46001 ) * (989956) (523135) (290805)
Year API Pf% API Pf% APT Pf% API Pf%
API: Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population Pf%: P. falci arum as proportion of all rnalarla cases (81 * ~i~iires in Earentheses show the population of 1981: NMEP census
Page. .71
- 20
E 15 RAYAGADA MALKANGIRI KORAPUT JEYPORE
30 - E 20 UALKANGIRI KORAPUT
a 10 a 0 JEYPORE RAYAGMA
60
40 MALKANGIRI KORAPUT RAYAGADA JEY PORE
100
90 KORAPUT
" 80 RAYAGWA HALKANGIRI 2 70 JEY PORE
FIGURE: 7. Comparison of year to year variations in Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER), Slide Positivity Rate (SPR). Annual Parasite Incidence/l,OOO Population (API) and proportion of P. falciparun out of total parasite carriers (PI 2 ) in four different zones of Koraput. (order of zones arranged differently for clarity)
years did not show any uniform trend (Figure: 70). While proportion of
P, falciparun cases to total malaria cases was highest in Koraput zone - betwen 1981 and 1984, i t was highest in Jeypore zone in 1985 and ih
Malkangiri zone between 1986 and 1988 (Table: 8) .
4.2.4. Comparison of malaria situation between primary health
centres within the district:
The district has 42 Primary Health Centres (PHCs). All the PHCs
have recorded malaria cases throughout the period between 1981 and
1988. The average annual malariometric indices for the period 1981 to
88 are shown in Tat~le: I). The average API rangetl between 2.52 in
Kosomaguda PHC (in Jeypore zone) to 50.74 in Chandrapur PHC [in
Rayagada zone). API as high and 102 and 162 were recorded in Chandrapur
(in 1982) and in Mathalput RIC (in 1987) respectively. To have an idea
of the spatial distrikution 01 malaria, the PHCs were classified into 4
groups based on the average API (Map: 4 ) . It was observed that areas of
high, moderate and low API were distributed throughout the four zones.
b s t areas recording API of over 30 appeared to lie on roughly a
straight line f r m southern tip of the district towards middle of
northeastern side near Bism Cuttack, which actually corresponds to the
chain of hills in eastern ghat ranges. There were 6 PHCs n'ith . P I less
than or equal to 10 , 1 8 R1Cs recorded API between 1 0 and 20, 8 PHCs
between 20 and 30 and 1 0 PHCs above 30 (the lower limits are not
included). The year to year variation in API in 42 R1Cs do not show any
Page. .73 Table: 9
Caparison of malaria situation between the different R1Cs of Koraput district (Average between 1981-88).
- -
RIC W POPULATION ABER API SPR ~ f %
Chandrapur Narayanapatna Khairput Kalimla Hamanaguda Malkangiri Lamp taput Laksbipur Kolnara Mathalput Bori gmna Boipariguda Jaganathpur Korukunda Kundura Gudari Kotpad Podia Dabugon Kalyan Singhpur Bandhugaon Kashipur Sarmosigam Jharigaon Ha tbharandi Chandahandi Kudunu lugma Pottangi B.Cut tack Nandahandi Muniguda Kundul i Rabanguda Puj ari guda Jemadipetho Dasamnthpur Mathili Packnapur Tentulikhunti Papadahandi Nandapur Kosagmda
ABER: Annual blood examination rate ( % ) SPR : Slide positivity rate ( P i ) : API : Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population. Pf% : Proportion of P. falciparum cases to total positives ( % I
(SOURCFi: District malaria authorities, Koraputl
Page. . 7 4
HAP: 9 Malaria situation in Koraput district:
Classification of Primary Health Centres (PHCs) according to average Annual Parasite Incidence (API) per 1,000 population (1981-1988).
--
Lower limits of API not included.
uniform pattern in any zone (Figure: 8; data for some randomly chosen
IllCs U ~ O SIICJWII 111 1110 Ilgu~u). AS in 1110 cilso ul zullcs, lliu N'l ul~d
ABER in the W C s showed a significant correlation (r = 0.63; P<O.001).
lhis is also evident from the similarity in patterns of the two
parmters in different RiCs (Figure: 8 ) .
4 . 2 . 5 . Comparison of malaria situation between sections within WCs of
the district:
For operational purposes the 42 PHC areas are divided into 502
sections. For the implementation of control programne, sect ions are
considered as the smallest unit of population. The population in each
section is to be covered by one surveillance worker in the fortnightly
fever surveys. Though the average population for each section would
workout l o 4,015, Lllo ;rc:t11,11 [ ~ c ~ l ~ ~ ~ l a t ior~ i l l Lhi!sn st:ct Ions varicd
between 1,197 and 26,638, Data for the sections were available only
for the 3 year period (1983-85). lhe data revealed that the API varied
widely between these sections. 'he lowest API of 0.1 was recorded both
in Ramgiri section (Boipariguda PHC) in 1983 and in Maligam
(Rabanaguda PHC) in 1985. Highest API of 314.3 was recorded in
Narayanpatna-A section (Narayanpatna MIC] in 1984. Ihe wide variations
in the malaria situation is also evident from the data for the sections
of 2 PHC areas presented in Table: 10.
Page. . 7 6
80 80
40 API 40
ABER 0 0
Y U
100 APl
50 ABER
0
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [Year)
8 API
4 ABER
o ; , , , 81 82 83 84 d5 06 $7 QB
(Year)
PICURE: 8. patterns of year to year variation in APl and ABER in 6 randomly chosen primar, Health Centre areas in KoraPut district.
Page. .77
Table: 10
Canparison of annual parasite incidence ( A P I ) in different sections of two PHC areas in Koraput district.
SECTION YFA? SECTION E A R
1983 1984 1985 AVERAGE 1983 1984 1985 AVET(AGE
- - - -
A P I . Annual Paras~te lncldence per 1,OII~l pupulatlon
(SOURCE: District malaria authorities)
Page. .78
4.2.6. Caparison between villages:
There are 5,683 villages and on an average, each section covers
about 10 to 11 villages. To study the village to village variations in
API, the data from 22 villages from 7 sections of Borigm R1C were
analyzed [since data were available only for these villages). It was
observed that the average API [between 1984 and 1988) varied widely
between 24 and 245/1,000 population in these villages (Table: 11)
4.2.7. Seasonal pattern of malaria:
Data on soasoliai pallcrn of ni,iiaria in Ihc ri15trlr.l WCIS iivoilahl~:
for a period of 6 years (1981-86). Malaria cases were recorded
throughout the year and the average monthly lncldence of malaria per
1,000 population (1981-86) peaked during rainy season between July and
Scpterrber (Figure. ' 3 ) . Tl~c int:~rir:nc.c In i~ year [lc:r~riri shr~wod a
declining trend over the years (Figure: 10). But this declining trend
was also acc~npanied by corresponding decline ~n year to year AQER
(Table: 5 1 .
Canparison of seasonal variations in incidence of malaria between
the four zones was done by calculating the nmber of malaria
cases/1,000 ppulation for each month [average of ii years data
1981-1986; Figure: 11). Two peaks of parasite incidence were observed
in Koraput and Jeypore zones, one in July - August and the other in
Page. .79
Table: 11
Comparison of Annual parasite incidence (APII between 22 villages in Lhrigcrma tW, Jeypora zone.
API in the year Village Section Popul-
nmber ation 1984 1985 1986 1!)87 1988 - /"''r"6t!
Bsinghpur 431 1389 28.8 29.5 32.4 33.8 33.8 31.68 Benagam 423 925 22.7 22.7 33.5 22.7 24.9 25.30 mnasur 431 691 50.7 243.1 62.2 42.0 47 .8 89.15 Bi j apur 425 202 267.3 203.0 1 6 3 . 4 158.4 148.5 188.12 Bondhuguda 425 656 36.6 45.7 44.2 39.6 30.5 39.33 Deulaguda 424 146 205.5 287.7 356.2 191.8 184 .9 245.21 Dul laguda 424 555 39.6 64.9 68 .5 39.6 41.4 50.81 Jhilimili 424 415 50.6 50.6 53 .0 67.5 69.9 58.31 Kadaliguda 423 271 81.2 73 .8 77.5 62.7 55.4 70.11 Kanagam 426 614 34.2 48.9 42.3 70.0 65 .1 52.12 Kenduguda 424 305 75.4 154 .1 150 .8 65.6 49.2 99.02 Keraput 431 429 86.2 79 .3 83.9 53.6 60.6 72.73 Kunduraguda 426 619 24.2 33.9 35.5 30.7 35.5 31.99 Mndaguda 431 1061 33.0 30.2 16 .0 54.7 37.7 34.31 Nuaguda 431 595 45.4 47.1 47.1 H.4 20 .2 33.61 P . B o r i g m 424 952 34.7 36.8 33.6 13 .7 11.6 26.05 Podapadar 431 1500 24.0 30 .7 33.3 27.3 25.3 28.13 Porli 428 761 32.9 31.5 31 .5 1H.4 15.8 26.02 Ranaspur 432 799 86.4 42.6 53.8 33.8 30.0 49.31 Sargiguda 423 750 34.7 36.0 38.7 20.0 20.0 29.87 Seamalaguda 431 1139 29.9 28.1 29.9 19 .3 4 24.41 jontoshpur 423 529 58.6 104.0 62.4 51.0 51.0 65 .41
API: Annual parasite incidence per 1 , 0 0 0 population
(SOURCE: FHC authorities. Borigunnal.
Page. .80
J P M A I J J A S O N D (Months)
PICURE: 9. Seasonal change8 in average (1981-86) parasite (1) and P. falciparum (2 ) incidence in Koraput diatrict in re- - - lation to the rainfall pattern.
Page. .81
PICURE: 10. Year to year variations in parasite incidence in Koraput district in relation to the rainfall pattern.
J P M A l J J A S O N D (Month)
J P M A M J J A S O N D (Month)
PIGURE: 11. Seasonal variations in average (1981-861 parasite (11 and P. falciparum (2) incidence in relation to rainfall pattern - - in 4 zonea of Koraput.
Noventwr. However, the peeks were less conspicuous in Jeypore zone. ?he
seasonal fluctuations in the Rayagada zone were not well marked,
though the highest incidence was in July - August. In Malkangiri zone, there was only one peak during Septenber - Decerrber in the post monsoon season. The incidence was low in the month of May which gradually
increased to reach a peak in Septmer, following which i t declined.
4.2.8. Malaria situation in the two adjoining districts of Andhra
Pradesh:
Vishakhapatnam and East Godavari districts of Andhra Pradesh, lie
to southeast and south of Koraput district respectively (Map: 1).
Physiographically both the districts are divided into plain areas and
agency tracts. The hills on south eastern parts of Koraput are
continuous with those in north western parts of these districts in the
agency tracts. In fact, all these were part of the 'Agency area' of
erstwhile Madras Presidency. The population and its distribution in
these areas are similar. Tribals constitute 94% and 68% of population
of agency areas in Vishakhapatnam and East Godavari districts
respectively. The density of population is also low I68 and 34 per
sq.lan, in Vishakhapatnam and East Godavari respectively) .
?he malaria situation in these two districts are shown in Tables:
12 and 13. The data for Vishakhapatnam city and the steel plant area
are not included in the district figures, since these areas have a
Page. .84
Table: 12
Malaria situation in Vishakhapatnam district. Andhra Pradesh (excluding the Steel Plant Township).
No. +ve - P. falciparm Year BSC for ABER SPR API
malaria No. +ve %
BSC : Blood smears collected and examined ABEX: Annual blood examination rate ( % ) SF3 : Slide positivity rate ( % I API : Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population (Source: District malaria authorities)
Page. .85
Table: 13
Malaria situation in East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh.
No. +ve P. falciparum Year BSC for SPR API
malaria No. +ve %
BSC : Blood smears collected and examined ABER: Annual blood examination rate ( % I SPR : Slide positivity rate ( % ) API : Annual parasite incidence per 1.000 population
(SOURCE: District malaria authorities)
different problem altogether not related to any other part of the
district: in 1985 a total of 5,222 malaria cases were detected in these
areas as against 4,203 cases in rest of the district. 'he data indicate
that these two districts recorded lower API compared to Koraput
[compare Tables: 1 2 6 1 3 with Table: 51 . Approximately 80 and 60 % of
all reported malaria cafiefi wore frim thrl iq:onr:y ;I~O;IH 1 1 1
Vishakhapatnam and East Godavari districts respectively. However, the
data from the agency areas indicate that API in Vishakhapatnam declined
from 29.3 in 1976 to 19.3 in 1981 and to 5.0 in 1986 (year to year
details for agency areas of Vishakhapatnam were not ava~lablel, and in
East Godavari f r m 30.1 in 1981 to 12 .6 in 1985 (Table: 1 4 ) . The
decline was marked in the f o m r when compared to the latter. Though
the PHCs bordering Koraput recorded higher malaria compared to other
parts of agency area in both districts, a declining trend over the
years was observed here also. In Dmuriguda PHC in Arraku area of
Vishakhapatnam district the API had declined from 42.5 in 1976 to 5.7
in 1986 (Table: 1 5 ) . In Maredmalli PHC in East Godavari, i t had
declined from 188.3 in 1977 to 16 .9 in 1986 [Table: 16). The sections
bordering Koraput in hnriguda PHC in Vishakhapatnam recorded high API
in late 70s, following which there was a decline (Table: 1 7 ) . In 1986,
the Donkarai and Mangapadu sections in East Godavari district bordering
Koraput , recorded API of 39.6 and 22.8 respectively [ABER of 52.75% and
34.72% respectively). The ABER in agency areas of both the districts
was much higher ccmpared to Koraput (Tables: 14 to 171. Relationship
between API and ABER was also studied. 'he data for the district as a
Page. .87
Table: 14
Malaria situation in the agency areas of East Codavari district, Andhra Pradesh.
No. +ve P. falciparm Year BSC for ABER SPR API
malaria No. +ve %
BSC : Blood smears collected and examined ABER: Annual blood examination rate ( % ) SPR : Slide positivity rate ( % I API : Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population
Page. .88
Table: 15
Malaria situation in Dunriguda R1C (Arakku subunit), Vishakhapatnam district. Andhra Pradesh.
No. +ve P. falciparun Year BSC for ABW SPR API
malaria No. +ve %
BSC : Blood smears collected and examined ABER: Annual blood examination rate (8) SPR : Slide positivity rate (8) API : Annual parasite incidence per 1000 population
(SOURCE: District malaria authorities)
Page. .89
Table: 16
Malaria situation in Maredunalli PHC. East Godavari district. Andhra Pradesh.
No. rvo c. falciparun Year BSC for ABER SPR API
malaria No. +ve %
BSC : Blood smears collected and examined ABER: Annual blood examination rate 1 % ) SPR : Slide positivity rate ( $ 1 API : Annual parasite incidence per 1.000 populatirln
(SOURCE: District malaria authorities)
* Includes collections under IGvR scheme
Page. .90
Table: 17
Annual parasite incidence (API) in different sections of Vishakha- patnam district, Andhra Pradesh, bordering Koraput district.
API: Annual parasite incidence per 1,000 population.
whole showad that there was a significant correlation between the two
parmters [Vishakhapatnam: r = 0.70, P = 0.04, Table: 12: East
Godavari: r = 0.78, P = 0.04, Table: 13). But the data did not show any
correlation between the two parameters in the Agency areas of East
Godavari (r = 0.78, P = 0.06, Table: 14). Dunuriguda R1C (r = 0.50, P =
0.12, Table: 15) and Maredunalli FlK [r = 0.01, P = 0.97, Table: 1 6 ) ,
which are very close to Koraput and where the ABER was high.
Analysis of the data on seasonality of malaria indicated that the
patterns in these two districts were similar to that in Koraput
district: the peak monthly incidence of parasitaemia was between June
and August, during rains (Figures: 12 and 13). However, quantitatively
the levels of parasi taemia were much lower compared to Koraput [conpare
Figures: 12 and 13 with Figures: 9 and 10). For the above comparison,
data from 1977 to 1985 were available for entire Vishakhapatnarn
district, while for East Godavari district data only for 1985 and 1986
that too for Maredunalli PHC alone were available.
4.3. DISCUSSION:
The present analyses indicated that the Koraput district continued
to remain highly malarious. P. falciparm was the predominant parasite
species and its prevalence was high from the early part of the century
(Perry, 1914; Senior White, 1937a; Senior White, 1938; Viswanathan,
1951). P. ~ l a r i a e which was prevalent in the early part of the! century
Page. .92
0.6-
a 3 0 . 5 - a
J F l A M J J A S O N D (Month)
FIGURE: 12. Seasonal changes i n average (1977-85) Paras i t e ( 1 ) P. falciparum ( 2 ) and P. ( 3 ) inc idence i n - - Vishakhapatnam d i e t r i c t .
J P M A M J J A S O N D (Month)
FIGURE: 13. Seasona l changes i n average (1985-861 P a r a s i t e (1 ) . P. falciparum ( 2 ) and P. =x ( 3 ) inc idence i n - - Waredurnalli PHC area of Bast Codavart d t u t r l c l .
Page, ,93
(Perry. 1914) was conspicuous by its absence in these records.
Analysis on spatial distribution indicated that malaria problem
was not homogenous in different parts of the district. Tht?re were
variations between physiographic zones, W s within the zones, sections
within the PHCs and villages within the sections. The seasonality of
malaria also differed betwen the zones. These findings confirm the
fact that malaria is essentially a local problem as emphasized earlier
[Covell, 1949; Downs, 1981). Therefore the feasibility of malaria
control by application of an uniform strategy throughout the district
is debatable. This in turn justifies the ntxd for detailed
epidemiological investigation of the local malaria problem for
replanning control measures IWn, 1974; Kondrashin anrl Rash~d. 1987;
Beales etg. , 1908; Kondrashln and Kalra, 1988a; Kondrashln and Kalra,
1988b: Kondrashin and Kalra, 1989a; Kondrashln and Kal ra, 198Sb;
Rajagopalan, 1989).
Comparison of malaria problem in the two neighbouring districts of
Andhra Pradesh intiicatod that thore has bct?n a cons~dt:rablc: Improverent
in these districts unlike in Koraput. Further, the malaria problem in
these districts is primarily limited to the agency tract and areas
bordering Koraput. The reasons for improverent in the situation in
Andhra Pradesh and persistence of the problem in Koraput have been
dealt in detail elsewhere [chapter: 10 ) .
There were certain difficulties in the assessment of malaria
situation with the available data. Since spleen surveys were not
carried out (as this is not done under present programne: S h a m ,
1984a), classification of areas under degrees of endemicity (Pampana,
1969; Bruce-Chwatt. 1985) was not possible. Age (and sex) specific
anfllyfils cnulri riot 11u rl11m1 111111 1 1 1 nl~rl-ilv~ll l c ~ l l l l l l y 1 1 1 h111 1,111111
infomtion. The usefulness of age specific patterns of prevalence in
understanding the disease epidemiology is well known. While the level
of infant parasitaemia indicates transmission, data on child
parasitaemia is useful for endemicity classification of areas (Pampana,
1969; Bruce-Chwatt, 1985; bblineaux. 1988). Differentlation of
symptmtic and asymptomatic parasite load in the popl~lation was not
possible. This is not only important for deciding the level of imnunity
in the population, but also in designing control strategy (Greenwood,
1987).
Under the present programne. API forms the basis for deciding the
type of control measure (Pattanayak and Roy, 1980; S h a m , 19114a). In
an ideal situation. API and ABER are expected to show a positive linear
relationship initially, but as the malaria control becomes effective,
API should decline even when ABER remains high (hblineawt. 1988). m e
fact that API in Koraput district continued to remain as a function of
ABER, shaved that effective control has not been achieved. In the agency
areas of Andhra Pradesh, on the other hand API continued to be low even
when ABW was high (Compare Tables: 14. 15. lfi with Table: 5 ) . Tne use
of API however, may not be suitable in situations where there are large
nunber of asymptamtic parasite carriers. mere have been several other
limitations in the use of API (WH3, 1964: Najera, 1989) .
No doubt that the present analyses could reveal the tenporal and
spatial variations in the distribution of malaria in the district, the
gravity of the situation may be worse than h a t is apparent. Studies
carried out in other parts of the country had shown that the actual
prevalence of malaria was higher than reported under the national
programne ( S h a m g z.. 1983; Choudhury. 1984). I t is well known that
due to several reasons the estimates of malaria deaths under the
national programne is far f rorn sat isfactory IAnonjm~us, 1985a). A1 1
these necessitated a detailed study of the lrlalarla problem tor
understanding the causes of persistence in the locality.