Top Banner

of 46

4-9 Attribute Data SPC

Apr 14, 2018

Download

Documents

anjo0225
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    1/46

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    2/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 1

    Module Objectives

    By the end of this module, the participant will be able to:Apply SPC rules

    Interpret run and trend patterns in control charts

    Create and interpret

    np-charts

    p-charts

    c-charts

    u-charts

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    3/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 2

    Why Learn About SPC for Attribute?

    SPC for variable data will Keep process centered

    Minimize variation

    Reduce excursions

    Validate improvements

    Focus Six Sigma process activity

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    4/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 3

    What is SPC for Attributes?

    SPC for attribute data is Industry standard control language

    Reliable, easy method of determining

    Common cause variation

    Special cause variation

    Graphical communication

    Set of statistical tools for analyzing variables performance data

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    5/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 4

    Attribute Control Charts

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    6/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 5

    Control Chart Roadmap

    Attribute

    u-chartp-chart

    Defects ordefective?

    Defects

    Constant area of

    opportunityn = const

    Defectives

    np-chart c-chart

    YesNo YesNo

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    7/46

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    8/46 2001 ConceptFlow 7

    np-chart Principles

    np-charts Measure the proportion non-conforming

    uses binomial distribution

    good/bad, accept/reject, yes/no

    Each proportion is a subgroup of samples

    large subgroups required (50 minimum)

    Subgroup size must be constant

    Control limits will be constant

    20 or more subgroups suggested for analysis

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    9/46 2001 ConceptFlow 8

    np-charts and Uniform Subgroup Size

    The sourcing department

    measures 125 purchase orders

    daily and records the number of

    entry errors.

    Is the order entry process in

    control?

    Since the data has a constantsubgroup size (orders processed) of

    defectives (error/no error) an np-chart

    will be used

    Day Orders Errors

    1 125 14

    2 125 5

    3 125 7

    4 125 17

    5 125 4

    6 125 3

    7 125 148 125 5

    9 125 10

    10 125 6

    11 125 5

    12 125 26

    13 125 6

    14 125 14

    15 125 6

    16 125 7

    17 125 8

    18 125 11

    19 125 13

    20 125 10

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    10/46 2001 ConceptFlow 9

    Constructing an np-chart Graph

    Day Orders Errors Prop np1 125 14 0.112 14

    2 125 5 0.040 5

    3 125 7 0.056 7

    4 125 17 0.136 17

    5 125 4 0.032 4

    6 125 3 0.024 3

    7 125 14 0.112 14

    8 125 5 0.040 5

    9 125 10 0.080 10

    10 125 6 0.048 6

    11 125 5 0.040 5

    12 125 26 0.208 26

    13 125 6 0.048 6

    14 125 14 0.112 14

    15 125 6 0.048 616 125 7 0.056 7

    17 125 8 0.064 8

    18 125 11 0.088 11

    19 125 13 0.104 13

    20 125 10 0.080 10

    Total 191

    pbar 0.076

    npbar 9.55

    Out of

    control point

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    11/46 2001 ConceptFlow 10

    Defining the np-chart UCL and LCL

    Control limits are constant; subgroup size mustalso be constant

    1 1

    3 (1 )

    3 (1 )

    n p

    n p

    k k

    i i

    i i

    UCL n p n p p

    LCL n p n p p

    where n is subgroup size

    X X

    p n pnk k

    where k is number of subgroups

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    12/46 2001 ConceptFlow 11

    Calculated valuesagree with MinitabTM

    Calculating the np-chart UCL and LCL

    Manual calculations may differ slightly

    from Minitab due to rounding and

    binomial estimates

    1910.0764

    125*20

    125* 0.0764 9.550

    p

    n p

    9.55 3 9.55(1 0.0764)

    18.46

    9.55 3 (1 0.0764)

    0.640

    n p

    n p

    UCL

    LCL n p

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    13/46 2001 ConceptFlow 12

    np-charts in MinitabStep 1

    Copy or enter the data by subgroupsinto the worksheet

    Open file SPC Attribute np-chart.MPJ

    Stat>Control Charts>np

    Either 125 orColumn

    http://d/SPC%20Attribute%20np-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20np-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20np-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20np-chart.MTW
  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    14/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 13

    np-charts in MinitabStep 2

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    15/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 14

    np-chart Class Exercise

    Using np-chart Data tab of file SPC At tr ibu te Class Exercises.xls For Shipment Number subgroups

    1. Calculate UCL and LCL

    2. Copy the data into Minitab

    3. Verify your calculations

    4. Determine if process is in control

    5. Run an I-MR chart on this data

    What does I-MR show?

    Why is it wrong?

    6. Prepare for discussion

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    16/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 15

    p-charts

    Varying Subgroup Size

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    17/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 16

    p-chart Principles

    p-charts Measure the proportion non-conforming

    Uses binomial distribution

    Good/bad, accept/reject, yes/no

    Each proportion is a subgroup of samples

    Large subgroups required (50 minimum)

    Subgroup size does not have to be constant

    Control limits may vary from subgroup to subgroup based upon

    subgroup size

    20 or more subgroups suggested for analysis

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    18/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 17

    p-charts and Varying Subgroup Size

    The sourcing department

    measures the number of entry

    errors on a daily basis.

    Is the order entry process in

    control?

    Since the data has varying subgroupsizes (orders processed) of defectives

    (error/no error) a p-chart will be used

    Day Orders Errors

    1 123 14

    2 102 5

    3 87 7

    4 119 17

    5 88 4

    6 72 3

    7 100 148 94 5

    9 111 10

    10 103 6

    11 92 5

    12 155 26

    13 47 6

    14 116 14

    15 97 6

    16 102 7

    17 117 8

    18 101 11

    19 89 13

    20 103 10

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    19/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 18

    Constructing a p-chart Graph

    Day Orders Errors Prop

    1 123 14 0.114

    2 102 5 0.049

    3 87 7 0.080

    4 119 17 0.143

    5 88 4 0.045

    6 72 3 0.042

    7 100 14 0.140

    8 94 5 0.053

    9 111 10 0.090

    10 103 6 0.058

    11 92 5 0.054

    12 155 26 0.168

    13 47 6 0.128

    14 116 14 0.121

    15 97 6 0.062

    16 102 7 0.069

    17 117 8 0.068

    18 101 11 0.109

    19 89 13 0.146

    20 103 10 0.097

    Total 2018 191 0.09465

    Out of

    control point

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    20/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 19

    Defining the p-chart UCL and LCL

    Control limits are dependent upon subgroup sizeand are individually calculated for each point

    (1 )3

    (1 )3

    p

    p

    p pUCL p

    p pL

    n

    pn

    CL

    (1 )3

    (1 )3

    i

    i

    p

    p

    p pUCL p

    p pL

    n

    p nCL

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    21/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 20

    Calculating the p-chart UCL and LCL

    Average over subgroups

    Calculated valuesagree with Minitab

    0.09465(1 0.09465)0.09465 3

    0.1821

    0.09465(1 0.09465)0.0

    2018/ 20

    2018/9465 3

    0.00720

    2

    p

    p

    UCL

    LCL

    13

    13

    0.9465(1 0.09465)0.9465 3

    0.223

    0.9465(1 0.09465)0.9465 3

    0.0335

    47

    47

    0.0

    p

    p

    UCL

    UCL

    Individual subgroup

    Manual calculations may differ slightlyfrom Minitab due to rounding and

    binomial estimates

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    22/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 21

    p-charts in MinitabStep 1

    Copy or enter the data by subgroupsinto the worksheet

    Open file SPC Attribute p-chart.MPJ

    Stat>Control Charts>p

    http://d/SPC%20Attribute%20p-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20p-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20p-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20p-chart.MTW
  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    23/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 22

    p-charts in MinitabStep 2

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    24/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 23

    p-chart Class Exercise

    Using p-chart Data tab of file SPC Att r ibu te Class Exercises.xls For Daily Tests subgroups

    1. Calculate UCL and LCL for overall Pbar

    2. Calculate UCL and LCL for point 11

    3. Copy the data into Minitab

    4. Verify your calculations

    5. Determine if process is in control

    6. Copy the Is this the same? data in Minitab?

    7. Determine if process is in control

    8. Prepare for discussion

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    25/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 24

    c-charts

    Constant Area of Opportunity

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    26/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 25

    c-chart Principles

    c-charts Measure the count of non-conforming defects

    uses Poisson distribution

    good/bad, accept/reject, yes/no

    Each count is a subgroup of samples

    Area of opportunity must be constant

    lot, unit, invoice

    Control limits will be constant

    20 or more subgroups suggested for analysis

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    27/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 26

    c-chart Subgroups

    A BB measures the number of non-

    suppressed confirms on consults

    accounts for 100 account lots from 20

    complexes.

    Is the process in control?

    Cmplx Non-Surpr

    1 31

    2 39

    3 38

    4 5

    5 22

    6 34

    7 108 23

    9 11

    10 36

    11 25

    12 4

    13 4

    14 11

    15 2516 4

    17 38

    18 36

    19 36

    20 17

    Average 22.45

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    28/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 27

    Constructing a c-chart Graph

    Cmplx Non-Surpr

    1 31

    2 39

    3 38

    4 5

    5 22

    6 34

    7 108 23

    9 11

    10 36

    11 25

    12 4

    13 4

    14 11

    15 2516 4

    17 38

    18 36

    19 36

    20 17

    Average 22.45

    One out of

    control point

    Non-Surpressed

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    29/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 28

    Defining the c-chart UCL and LCL

    3

    3

    c

    c

    UCL c c

    LCL c c

    Control limits are constant; subgroup size mustalso be constant, i.e. piece, lot, shipment etc.

    Non-Surpressed

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    30/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 29

    Calculated valuesagree with Minitab

    Calculating the c-chart UCL and LCL

    22.45 3 22.45

    36.66

    22.45 3 22.45

    8.236

    c

    c

    UCL

    LCL

    Manual calculations may differ slightly

    from Minitab due to rounding andPoisson estimates

    Non-Surpressed

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    31/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 30

    c-charts in MinitabStep 1

    Copy or enter the data by subgroupsinto the worksheet

    Open file SPC Attribute Data c-chart.MPJ

    Stat>Control Charts>c

    Non-Surpressed

    Cmplx NonSurpr

    NonSurprCmplx

    http://d/SPC%20Attribute%20c-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20c-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20c-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20c-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20c-chart.MTW
  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    32/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 31

    c-charts in Minitab

    Step 2

    Non-Surpressed

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    33/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 32

    c-chart Class Exercise

    Using c-chart Data tab of fileSPC At tr ibu te Class Exercises.xls

    For CSR subgroups of complaints

    1. Calculate UCL and LCL

    2. Copy the data into Minitab

    3. Verify your calculations

    4. Determine if process is in control

    5. Prepare for discussion

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    34/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 33

    u-charts

    Varying Area of Opportunity

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    35/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 34

    u-chart Principles

    u-charts

    Measure the count of non-conforming defects

    Uses Poisson distribution

    Good/bad, accept/reject, yes/no

    Each count is a subgroup of samples

    Area of opportunity may vary

    Lot, unit, invoice

    Control limits may vary

    20 or more subgroups suggested for analysis

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    36/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 35

    u-chart Subgroups

    A group of FAs track their trades

    through the system to determine how

    many defects are found in the process

    over the week. It is possible to have

    more than 1 defect per trade.

    Is the process in control?

    FA Trades

    Count of

    Defects

    1 159 17

    2 138 6

    3 120 9

    4 148 21

    5 127 5

    6 98 4

    7 136 178 134 6

    9 139 12

    10 127 7

    11 125 6

    12 161 23

    13 75 7

    14 161 17

    15 139 7

    16 143 9

    17 163 10

    18 192 32

    19 119 16

    20 134 12

    Total 2738 243

    Ubar 0.08875

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    37/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 36

    FA Trades

    Count of

    Defects

    Percent

    age

    1 159 17 0.107

    2 138 6 0.043

    3 120 9 0.075

    4 148 21 0.142

    5 127 5 0.039

    6 98 4 0.041

    7 136 17 0.125

    8 134 6 0.045

    9 139 12 0.086

    10 127 7 0.055

    11 125 6 0.048

    12 161 23 0.143

    13 75 7 0.093

    14 161 17 0.106

    15 139 7 0.050

    16 143 9 0.063

    17 163 10 0.061

    18 192 32 0.167

    19 119 16 0.134

    20 134 12 0.090

    Total 2738 243

    Ubar 0.088751

    Constructing a u-chart Graph

    Out of

    control point

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    38/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 37

    Defining the u-chart UCL and LCL

    Control limits are dependent upon subgroup areaand are individually calculated for each point

    3

    3

    u

    u

    uUCL u

    a

    uLCL u

    a

    3

    3

    i

    i

    u

    i

    u

    i

    uUCL u

    a

    u

    LCL u a

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    39/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 38

    Calculating the u-chart UCL and LCL

    Manual calculations may differ slightly

    from Minitab due to rounding andPoisson estimates

    Calculated valuesagree with Minitab

    Individual subgroup

    Average over subgroups0.08875

    0.08875 3136.9

    0.165

    0.088750.08875 3

    136.90.012

    u

    u

    UCL

    LCL

    12

    12

    0.088750.08875 3

    161

    0.159

    0.088750.08875 3

    161

    0.0183

    u

    u

    UCL

    LCL

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    40/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 39

    u-charts in MinitabStep 1

    Copy or enter the data by subgroupsinto the worksheet

    Open file SPC Attribute Data u-chart.MPJ

    Stat>Control Charts>c

    FA Trades

    Trades

    TradesFA

    http://d/SPC%20Attribute%20u-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20u-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20u-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20u-chart.MTWhttp://d/SPC%20Attribute%20u-chart.MTW
  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    41/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 40

    u-charts in MinitabStep 2

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    42/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 41

    u-chart Class Exercise

    Using u-chart Data tab of file SPC Att r ibu te Class Exercises.xls

    For errors from line items ordered

    1. Calculate overall UCL and LCL

    2. Calculate UCL and LCL for point 3

    3. Copy the data into Minitab

    4. Verify your calculations

    5. Determine if process is in control

    6. Prepare for discussion

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    43/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 42

    Departing Note on SPC and Control Charts

    Clearly the last class exercise for u-charts showed the process is in

    control. Bu t is con trol an acceptable level of performance?

    Certainly not in this case.

    SPC and control charting will point the Black Belt in the right direction

    to solve the problem. The u-chart shows that focus should be applied

    to the systemic common cause variation. The process random

    variation is the culprit.

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    44/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 43

    Module Key Learning Points

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    45/46

    2001 ConceptFlow 44

    Objectives Review

    The participant will be about to:

    Apply SPC rules

    Interpret run and trend patterns in control charts

    Create and interpret

    np-charts

    p-charts

    c-charts

    u-charts

  • 7/27/2019 4-9 Attribute Data SPC

    46/46

    Trademarks and Service Marks

    Six Sigma is a federally registered trademark of Motorola, Inc.

    Breakthrough Strategy is a federally registered trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    ESSENTEQ is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    METREQ is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    Weaving excellence into the fabric of business is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    FASTART is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    Breakthrough Design is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    Breakthrough Lean is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    Design with the Power of Six Sigma is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    Legal Lean is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    SSA Navigator is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    SigmaCALC is a trademark of Six Sigma Academy.

    SigmaFlowis a trademark of Compass Partners, Inc.

    SigmaTRAC is a trademark of DuPont.

    MINITAB is a trademark of Minitab, Inc.