This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
3T MR SPECTROSCOPY IN DRUG-RESISTANT TEMPORAL LOBE
EPILEPSY WITH HIPPOCAMPAL ABNORMALITIES
S. Battaglia1, A.F. Marliani1, F.Toni1, L.Albini Riccioli1, V. Clementi2, G. Rubboli3, P. Agati4, R. Agati1, M. Leonardi1
2 GE Healthcare Technologies, GE Healthcare, Bologna, Italy3 Neurology Department, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
4 Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, Italy
The most common cause of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE: 80% of partial epilepsies) is hippocampal sclerosis, followed by
cortical dysplasia, from migration and gyration abnormalities, tumors, etc.
The MRI study is crucial to identify the presence or absence of morphological and/or signal abnormalities, particularly in
cases of drug-resistant epilepsy (20-30%), in which surgical therapy can be resolutive
Single voxel MR Spectroscopy 1H-MRS can complete the morphological MRI study to identify metabolic abnormalities in
patients affected by cryptogenic or symptomatic TLE.
In both cases, metabolic abnormalities have been described either in the side identified as "pathological" with
electrophysiological and morphological examinations, and in the contralateral one
We selected 20 patients (9 ♂ 11 ♀, mean age 39 +/- 7 ys) with drug-resistant TLE surgical candidates
MRI study showed temporal lobe tissue morphological and/or signal abnormality (not tumoral) in one side (13 right and 7 left), concordant with the one suggested by clinical and electrophysiological data (almost all MTS +/- suspected dysplasia of the pole).
All patients undergone surgical treatment.
Histological examination confirmed classic/global type Ammon’s horn sclerosis, archit./cytoarchitettural temporal pole cortical dysplasia or microdysgenetic aspects.
MTS DXMTS Right side
1H-MRS on bilateral hippocampal regions TE 35 ms TR 2000 ms 128 NEX 5’ 04’’ Acquisition VOI min 1.3 cm3 - max 5.9 cm3 Data post-processing was performed by using LC-Model
3T MR Protocol
Morphological examination FSPGR T1 3D and MPR Reformatted Axial FSE DP e T2 Coronal FLAIR T2 Coronal FSE-IR Coronal GRE T2*
Rectangular VOI along the hippocampus, to minimize artifacts due to the adjacent tissue.
Axial sequences are acquired in parallel to the course of the temporal horns and the coronal ones perpendicular to it.
The tNAA/Cr, tNAA/Cho, tCho/Cr, mI/Cr, Glx/Cr ratio were calculated and compared with data collected from 12 healthy
volunteers (8 ♀ and 4 ♂, mean age 39 +/- 10)
1299.5
p < 0.001
(p = 0.0001298)
1062
NN
1299.5
p < 0.001
(p = 0.000256)
996.5
mI/Cr
Pathological Hippocampus
Vs Contralateral
Contralateral Hippocampus
Vs controls
Pathological Hippocampus
Vs controls
2.55
p < 0.05
(p = 0.01372)
3.20
NN
2.55
p < 0.001
(p = 0.000762)
3.37
tNAA/Cho
NNNNNN tCho/Cr
NNNNNNGlx/Cr
913.5
p < 0.01
(p = 0.005581)
1063.5
1063.5
p < 0.05
(p = 0.04824)
1198.5
913.5
p < 0.001
(p = 0.000253)
1198.5
tNAA/Cr
Statistical analysis (two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test)
Median values
Left contralateral
tNAA
control
control
Right pathological
tNAAmI
Over the past 15 years over 6000 works have been published on this topic.The results described are in part contradictory, possibly due either to the use of different 1.5 T MRI equipments or to the different procedures of analysis.
By working with a 3T system, our aim was to study epileptic patients in the hope that the greater power of the magnet could give us more accurate and consistent results..
a statistically significant differences in comparison with controls
…. our results don’t show
•in literature, however, its increase is related to epileptic activity (increase in the epileptogenic focus, mainly in cryptogenic TLE)
of Glx/Cr ratio in both the pathological side and in the contralateral one
Woermann FG Ann Neurol 1999 Petroff OA Seizure 1999 Simister RJ Epilepsya 2002
Riederer F NMR Biomed 2006 Doelken MT Seizure 2008 Simister JR Epilepsy Research 2009
of tCho/Cr ratio in both the pathological side and in the contralateral hippocampus
increased tCho/Cr has been described by other authors, and it was interpreted as a sign of cell membranes damage
Urenjak J Journal Neurosci 1993 Connely A Neurology 1994 Achten E Am J Neuroradiol 1997
Hugg JW Ann Neurol 1993 Cendes F Ann Neurol 1994 Connely A Neurology 1994
Kuzniecky R Neurology 1998 Doelken MT Seizure 2008 SmisterJR Epilepsy research 2009
a decrease of tNAA/Cr ratio on contralateral hippocampus compare to controls
Abnormal functionality (extension of the disease? Prognostic significance? reversibility?)
Woermann FG Ann Neurol 1999 SmisterJR Epilepsya 2002
Mueller SG Epilepsya 2004 Hajek M Eur radiol 2009
…. our results indicate
This finding, if properly confirmed, may help a correct lateralization
in all patients a statistically significant increase (p<0.01) of the mI/Cr ratio as a characteristic feature of the pathological side compared to contralateral hyppocampus and to controls
gliosis (confirmed histologically)
induction of the cotransporter Na+/mI after epileptic activityMueller SG Epilepsya 2003 Wellard Epilepsya 2003 Riederer NMR 2006
…. our next step
tNAAtNAA
tNAA
to study, in patient treated with surgical resection of the pathological hyppocampus, metabolite modification of the
contralateral side, compared to pre-op results
In the drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy 1H-MRS identifies statistically significant
alterations in both the hippocampi
side to be treated surgically
The histological diagnosis reflects the metabolic abnormalities identified
1H-MRS can be used to monitor patients undergoing surgery
Sclerosi corno Ammone, displasia corticale architetturale del polo
STM, sosp. displasia polo sx38, ♀13
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort. architetturale
STMdx41, ♀12
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo globale, microdisgenesia del poloSTMdx27, ♂11
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort. architetturale
STMdx45, ♂10
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, microdisgenesia del polo STM, atrofia polosn36, ♀9
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort. architetturale
STM, Δ segnale sndx44, ♂8
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort.citoarchitetturale
STM sn, Δ segnale dxsn46, ♀7
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort. architetturale
STM, atrofia polosn33, ♀6
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, microdisgenesia del poloSTMdx45, ♂5
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classicoSTM, sosp. displasia polodx44, ♂4
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, microdisgenesia del poloSTMdx35, ♀3
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, displasia cort. architetturale
STM, displasia polodx55, ♂2
Sclerosi corno Ammone tipo classico, microdisgenesia del poloSTMdx45, ♂1
IstologiaRMTLE età, ♀/♂
Pz.
Candidati alla chirurgia:
• epilessia grave (per frequenza e handicap psico-sociale e professionale)
• farmaco-resistente: dopo un minimo di 2 anni di trattamento
• zona epilettogena stabile e unica
• possibilità di exeresi chirurgica che non determini deficit neurologici o neuropsicologici.
12 Maggio 2006
7 Settembre 2007
2 Novembre 2007
9 Ottobre 2007
16 Dicembre 2005
2 Febbraio 2007
16 Marzo 2007
19 Ottobre 2007
25 Gennaio 2008
3 Novembre 2006
13 Settembre 2006
16 Aprile 2008
13 Gennaio 2006
29 Maggio 2008
3 Ottobre 2006
28 Novembre 2007
27 Aprile 2007
2 Ottobre 2007
11 Marzo 2008
13 Dicembre 2007
Data intervento
2b49, ♀20
33, ♀19
36, ♂18
36, ♂17
1b32, ♀16
1a30, ♀15
1a38, ♀14
38, ♀13
41, ♀12
1a27, ♂11
2a45, ♂10
36, ♀9
1a44, ♂8
46, ♀7
1a33, ♀6
45, ♂5
1a44, ♂4
35, ♀3
55, ♂2
45, ♂1
Classeetà, ♀/♂
Pz.
Follow-UpClassification of seizure outcomeSeizure freedom outcome was assessed at the lastfollow-up with at least 1 year elapsing before the finalevaluation and according to Engel’s classification (Engel,1987).The first subgroup, Engel’s class Ia, consisted of patientswho reported no seizures after their surgery. The second subgroup, Engel’s class I, included both seizure free patients and those who have experienced simple partial seizures, or “brief auras” and “neighborhood” seizures and drug-withdrawal seizures. The third subgroup, Engel’s class II patients, included patients who were not seizure-free but had a substantial improvement, exhibiting still only rare seizures. The fourth subgroup, Engel’s class III–IV patients, included patients with frequent seizures and a truly unsatisfactory outcome.We separated four categories of patients according to– the seizure freedom with two definitions:o patients who were completely seizure-free aftersurgery (Engel’s class Ia patients)o those that had been free from seizures for atleast 1 year at the time of assessment– the persistence of seizures and the importance ofthe reduction in seizure frequency: o patients who had rare seizures (i.e., Engel’s class II patients)o patients with frequent and disabling seizures(i.e., Engel’s class III–IV patients).
Engel J Jr. (1987) Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In Engel J Jr (Ed) Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, pp. 553–571.Engel JJ,Wiebe S, French J, Sperling M,Williamson P, Spencer D, Gumnit R, Zahn C,Westbrook E, Enos B. (2003) Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology 60:538–547.Engel JJ. (1996) Surgery for seizures. New England Journal of Medicine 334:647–652.
Ippocampo controlaterale
Ippocampo patologico
Controlli
2084,51299,53572,55913,5
22051062363,53,201063,5
2382,5996,53443,371198,5
Glx/CrmI/CrtCho/CrtNNA/ChotNAA/Cr
2.2 +/- 0.4
2.2 +/- 0.5
2.2 +/- 0.8
Glx/Cr
1.1 +/- 0.2
1.4 +/- 0.2
1 +/- 0.3
mI/Cr
0.3 +/- 0.04
0.3 +/- 0.05
0.3 +/- 0.06
tCho/Cr
3 +/- 0.5
2.7 +/- 0.6
3.6 +/- 0.9
tNNA/Cho
1 +/- 0.2
Ippocampo controlaterale
0.9 +/- 0.2
Ippocampo patologico
1.2 +/- 0.2
Controlli
tNAA/Cr
Media +/- SD
Mediana
Controlli
2,4620,0252,1511,866
7,6670,06810,91
74,575
Media +/- DS
80,076109,9
50,096104,6
90,076124,9
60,067114,3
130,067124,3
60,115154,4
70,03372,8
60,043102,6
50,057145,3
110,067113,9
70,029104,6
90,08693,3
S/NFWHMLWvolume
Media +/- DS
1,9970,0211,3161,011
5,9000,0658,7892,680
50,06792
90,05793,2
70,067103,6
80,04882,8
40,04871,7
100,04893,4
60,086102,4
60,05772
80,05793,1
40,0171,4
30,09692,4
80,07694,2
40,05781,9
70,05782,3
40,06781,7
50,05782,8
40,07692,2
40,086 1,6
70,076115,5
50,105123,4
S/NFWHMLWvolume
patologici
Media +/- DS
2,6340,0192,6681,153
6,9000,0659,6842,695
60,06781,8
70,06792,9
70,05794,2
100,067102,8
40,04881,3
100,057103,4
60,07682,4
70,06792,3
100,06793,1
50,05781,4
60,096113,8
130,067104,2
40,05781,9
90,057112,3
50,04871,7
70,05782,8
40,07692,2
40,076 1,6
100,019195,9
40,115131,9
S/NFWHMLWvolume
Controlaterali
NNmI/Cr
Ippocampo patologico
VsIppocampo
controlaterale
Ippocampo controlaterale
Vs controlli
Ippocampo patologico
Vs controlli
NNtNNA/Cho
NNNNNN tCho/Cr
NNNNNNGlx/Cr
tNAA/Cr
Analisi statistica
0.00066508 (p<0.01)
0.2220644770.00278617 (p<0.01)
mI/Cr
Ippocampo patologico
VsIppocampo
controlaterale
Ippocampo controlaterale
Vs controlli
Ippocampo patologico
Vs controlli
0.1164948830.030525889 (p<0.05)
0.003564292 (p<0.01)
tNNA/Cho
10.9964017480.996623558 tCho/Cr
0,8488647090,8267393770,917377921Glx/Cr
0.0904444860.005160921 (p<0.01)
0.000196105 (p<0.01)
tNAA/Cr
Analisi statistica: Test t di Student
ATTenzione su 12 pazienti
Analisi Statistica: dati significativiMisura di sintesi adoperata per ogni parametro: MEDIANA
Test usato: two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test (equivalente al Mann-Whitney test)
PATOLOGICO
p < 0.001 (p = 0.000762)
NORMALE
p < 0.001 (p = 0.000253)
p < 0.001 (p = 0.000256)
NAA+NAAG/Cho
NAA+NAAG/Cr
mI/Cre
913.5 1198.5
2.55 3.37
1299.5
996.5
CONTROLATERALE NORMALE
p < 0.05 (p = 0.04824)NAA+NAAG/Cr 1063.5
1198.5
Analisi Statistica: dati significativiMisura di sintesi adoperata per ogni parametro: MEDIANA
Test usato: two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test (equivalente al Mann-Whitney test)
Analisi Statistica: dati significativiMisura di sintesi adoperata per ogni parametro: MEDIANA
Test usato: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test