Page 1
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012
3a. Making television accessible – what is in scope and out of scope?
Peter Olaf LOOMSChairman ITU-T FG AVA
[email protected]
Tutorial on Audio Visual Media Accessibility (New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012)
1
Page 2
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Check list Target Groups
Value Proposition
Access Options
Proposed Approach
Work Flows & Resources
Costs
Incentives, Sanctions
Business Models
2
Page 3
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Check list Target Groups
Stakeholders
Access Options
Proposed Approach
Work Flows & Resources
Costs
Incentives, Sanctions
Business Models
3
Page 4
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
ContentWhat does this tutorial cover?
4
MediaApproaches for TV usabilityApproaches for TV Access services
Page 5
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
OutcomesWhat will I be able to do?
5
Answer some of these questions:What does the term “media” mean?What can we do to improve TV usability?How can we improve accessibility by offering access services?
Page 6
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
6
It depends on who we ask...
Page 7
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
7
Media = STORAGE media
Page 8
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
8
Media = RECEIVERS or DEVICES
Page 9
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
9
Media = DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
Page 10
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
10
Media = RECORDED WORKS
Page 11
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What do we mean by media?
11
Media = Content
Page 12
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Media
12
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Page 13
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content
Work in pairs.Discuss the accessibility of the following 5 examples.In each case is accessibility......Need to Have?...Nice to Have?
13
Page 14
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV content” mean?
14
content(“work”)
What about accessibilityhere?- Need to have?- Nice to have?
TV series
EPG
Parental guide
Emergencyalert
Advert
Page 15
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content
15
Content category Need to have
Nice to have
TV series
Electronic Programme GuideParental guidance screen
Emergency alert
TV advertisement
Page 16
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content
What are your conclusions?
What points are worth noting?
16
Page 17
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
17
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Page 18
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
18
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
TV setComputerLap-top
SmartphoneComputer tablet
Main screen/second screen
Remote controlKeyboard
Touch interfaceSpeech recogition
Eye tracking
Page 19
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
19
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Page 20
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
20
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Digital TVTerrestrial
CableSatellite
Hybrid Broadcast/InternetInternetFixed lineWirelessMobile
2.5 G3 G4 G
Page 21
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
21
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Page 22
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
What does “TV” mean?
22
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
productionand exchange
reception(decoding)
use
DiscoveringSelectingWatchingEnjoying
being......aware
... informed...educated
...entertainedSharing
CritiquingMashing up
Creating
Page 23
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
TV: the metaphor of a fruit machine
23
content(“work”)
distribution(transmission)
production& exchange
reception(decoding)
use
Page 24
24© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
InternationalTelecommunicationUnion
#1. Focus on tv usability
Get editorial and production teamsto review their current practices
with a specialist
Page 25
InternationalTelecommunicationUnion
25© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
#1. Focus on tv usability
The programme was givena make-over in 2011
Page 26
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012 26
#1. Focus on tv usability
TV drama aims to be more naturalDiscuss intelligibility
Page 27
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
InternationalTelecommunicationUnion
Barrier-Free Digital Television 25 May 2011 European Commission
#1. Focus on tv usability
Get editorial and production teamsto review their current practices
with a usability specialist27
Page 28
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
#1. Focus on tv usability
28
CRTC tells broadcasting industry to turn down the volume on loud television commercials
OTTAWA-GATINEAU, September 13, 2011 — Today, the Canadian Radio, television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announced that broadcasters must control the loudness of TV commercials by September 1, 2012.
If action is possible in countrieslike Canada and Belgiumwe can do it elsewhere.
Page 29
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
InternationalTelecommunicationUnion
Barrier-Free Digital Television 25 May 2011 European Commission
#1. Focus on tv usability
29
Is radio the key pilar of disaster management?
What about TV and mobiles when there is a natural disaster?
Massive destruction after factory explodes
Page 30
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Discuss the way in which disabilities are portrayed in the media
30
A programme for children about a boy who could live more or less like his sighted friends
Page 31
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
A Janela da Alma/Window of the Soul A brazilian doc also on the Internet
31
Page 32
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Usability checklists for TV programmes
32
Page 33
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Usability checklists for TV programmes
33
Page 34
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Usability checklists for TV programmes
34
Page 35
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Usability checklists for TV programmes
35
(this is for the UK)
- ISL in India
Page 36
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Usability checklists for TV programmes
36
Page 37
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: TV usability
Work in groups.After each example, use the relevant checklist from Tiresia to discuss what can be done to improve TV usabilityReport back to plenum on your findings
37
Page 38
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: Examples
38
Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”
Page 39
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: Examples
39
Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”
Page 40
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: Examples
40
Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”
Page 41
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: Examples
41
Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”
Page 42
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: Examples
42
You can then check the intelligibility of the audio by using the sample of this programme on YouTube!
Page 43
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: TV usabilitypostscript
We can use “the Exclusion Calculator”We can use eye-tracking to see how different viewers cope with a given TV programmeWe will soon be able to simulate different kinds of viewers and identify where they have difficulty when watching TV (Dr. Pradipta Biswas, University of Cambridge).
43
Page 44
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Original web pageIndian Railways Passenger Reservation Enquiry
Page 45
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Visual Impairment Simulation(Early Wet Macular Degeneration + Colour Blindness)
Problem: Insufficient Fontsize for links on left hand side
Page 46
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Motor Impairment Simulation(Movement time prediction for elderly user)
Problem: links are too close Users may click the wrong one.
Page 47
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Design Optimization
Original Optimized
Page 48
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Simulation to developbetter interfaces
Users Clusters Simulation
Page 49
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Cambridge Simulator
Dr. Pradipta BiswasUniversity of Cambridge
[email protected]
Page 50
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012
Activity 4: TV usability
What are your conclusions?
What points are worth noting?
50