1 Twelve Born Alive: Its not all hugs and kisses James F. Lowe, DVM, MS The Maschhoffs, Inc Carlyle, IL, 62231 www.themaschhoffs.com 30 Pigs per Sow per Year
1
Twelve Born Alive:Its not all hugs and kissesJames F. Lowe, DVM, MSThe Maschhoffs, IncCarlyle, IL, 62231www.themaschhoffs.com
30 Pigs per Sow per Year
2
Why 30 PSY - Sow farm economics 101
Fixed costs over timeLabor, facilities, waste hauling, G/A$340/sow space per year
Fixed costs per sowFeed, vet med, replacements$270/ sow per year
Total cost of $610
Effect of productivity20 psy = $30.5022 psy = $27.7524 psy = $25.4026 psy = $23.5028 psy = $21.8030 psy = $20.25
1 pig is about $1.00
All $ in USD
Why 30 PSY - but I can’t handle the pigs….
Fixed space system↑pigs → change in WTM economicsso…↓ sow inventory with = pigs → ↓ cost = ↑profit
Capture sow associated cost savings = $0.44 per ↑ 1 psy
“Large US” systemSpace not fixed↑pigs = ↓ weaned pig cost↑pigs ≠ WTMeconomic change
Each pig has full margin over variable cost value
3
A little math
A sow can have 2.45-2.5 litters per sow per year
30 pigs / 2.5 litter = 12 pigs/ litter
12 pigs weaned ≠ 12 born alive
4
Opportunity: 30 PSY is Real!
27.225.628.27PSY (including gilts)2.322.272.36L/S/Y302929.7Lactation Length (d)
91%79%93%Farrowing Rate75.0%75.8%82.8%Survival of TB11.711.313Weaned per litter13.712.713.7Born Alive15.614.915.7Total Born5307001100Number sows
Farm CFarm BFarm AFarm
Weaned /litter 13 11.3 11.7
PSY (w/ gilts) 28.27 25.6 27.2
Danish Farm’s, Q2, 2006; JFL
OK, “I got lot o’ pigs” now what?
The real world has constraints:Labor, sows, buildings, Sunday, deer season, etc
Genetics are a big deal!Total born, total born, total bornTemperament, pig size/variation
Health is pretty important MANAGEMENT IS A BIGGER DEAL
5
The TMI extra special high corporate secrets to raising pigs
We are not building rock ships here!
Its all about blocking and tackling!
Food, water and a dry place to sleep
How to WE get there?
Pig(Genetic Potential)
People(Management)
Production(Expression of
Genetic Potential)
Production Practices
Pigs responseTo its environment
Changes in behavior responding to farm output
6
What happens in the real world?
Pig(Genetic Potential)
People(Management)
Production(Expression of
Genetic Potential)
Inconsistent implementation of practices
Lower than expected output
Practices are Changed on farm
Review implementationImprove consistency
Improved output
How to WE get there?
Pig(Genetic Potential)
People(Management)
Production(Expression of
Genetic Potential)
Production Practices
Pigs responseTo its environment
Changes in behavior responding to farm output
Inconsistent implementation of practices Those of us in the
room today are in the people business, we just happen to work
with pigs!
Those of us in the room today are in the people business, we just happen to work with pigs!
Keys to Success1.Provide a clear plan that focuses on
long term sustainability2.Set high expectations3.Assume there will be mistakes in
implementation, be prepared to find and fix them
4.Provide accountability though regular feedback to team members
Most business failures are NOT that the PLAN WAS BAD But that the
PLAN WAS NOT EXECUTED
“Execution”,Bossidy and Charan, 2002
7
What do we talk about every day?
Don’t do more harm than good - you are not a sow, let her do her jobFeed her, feed her, feed her!!!!!!! (and don’t forget the water!)Hey that thing on the wall with the “rednumbers” and those holes in the ceiling -don’t forget them.
The Production CircleFarrowing
Breeding
Weaning
Lactation
Gestation
Protein Loss
Egg Development
Ovulation
Fetal Development
Protein Gain
Ovarian Activity
Preweaning Mortality
Stillborn Pigs
Feed Intake
Low
Low
High
High
Low
High
8
Lactation Feeding Starts in Gestation
Optimum body weight at Optimum body weight at farrowing farrowing (420 lb)(420 lb)Predisposed for feed intakePredisposed for feed intake
Significant protein deposition in late gestationSignificant protein deposition in late gestation2x increase in 2x increase in conceptus conceptus growthgrowth
3x increase in mammary development3x increase in mammary development
Energy intake increase or fat is mobilizedEnergy intake increase or fat is mobilized
Protein requirement met or body tissue Protein requirement met or body tissue mobilizedmobilized
Transition from Gestation to Farrowing
Supporting Supporting OptimalOptimal Feed IntakeFeed IntakeRoom Temperature (68Room Temperature (68°° F)F)
Water Accessible ( > 0.5 gallon/ minute) Water Accessible ( > 0.5 gallon/ minute)
Multiple Feedings (twice)Multiple Feedings (twice)
Feed kept freshFeed kept fresh
OptimalOptimal Feed Intake for Feed Intake for ThreeThree Days Prior Days Prior to to FarrowingFarrowing
4 lb of feed/ day (2 lb/ feeding)4 lb of feed/ day (2 lb/ feeding)
Avoid significant catabolic stateAvoid significant catabolic state
Avoid glucose loadingAvoid glucose loading
9
Effect of Lactation Feeding Frequency andvolume on Sow and Litter Performance
Treatment 1: Scaled early feeding program Treatment 1: Scaled early feeding program according to unit protocol.according to unit protocol.
Treatment 2: Sows fed four times per day to Treatment 2: Sows fed four times per day to appetite.appetite.
Treatment 3: Sows fed twice per day to appetite.Treatment 3: Sows fed twice per day to appetite.
Results – Study #1
NS2.9315.614.814.1Lactation BW loss (%)
NS6.50158.6157.5154.7Total lactation feed intake (lbs)
NS0.399.69.59.3Average daily feed intake (lbs)
NS4.5676.773.669.6Lactation BW loss (lbs)
NS4.88414.2421.3420.8BW at weaning (lbs)
NS3.57490.9494.9490.4BW at entry (lbs)
--323232No. of sows
Sig.1SEMTrt 3Trt 2Trt 1
Item
10
Results – Study #1Sow average daily feed intake
02468
101214
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3
Effect of Lactation Feeding Curve on Sow and Litter Performance
Treatment 1: Scaled early feeding program according to unit proTreatment 1: Scaled early feeding program according to unit protocol.tocol.
Treatment 2: Sows fed four times per day to appetite.Treatment 2: Sows fed four times per day to appetite.
Treatment 3: Sows fed according to a gradually increasing but Treatment 3: Sows fed according to a gradually increasing but restricted curve for the first ten days of lactation and then ferestricted curve for the first ten days of lactation and then fed to d to appetite for the remainder of the trial.appetite for the remainder of the trial.
11
Results – Study #2Sow average daily feed intake
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17
Trt 1 Trt 2 Trt3
Conclusions
Scientific evidence does not strongly support Scientific evidence does not strongly support one lactation feeding strategy over anotherone lactation feeding strategy over another
Evidence does suggest the need to maximizing Evidence does suggest the need to maximizing lactation feed intake to reduce negative energy lactation feed intake to reduce negative energy balance in later lactation balance in later lactation
Circumstantial evidence suggest early feeding Circumstantial evidence suggest early feeding strategy is critical to later feed intake in strategy is critical to later feed intake in commercial practicecommercial practice
12
Practical Realities of Over-Feeding In Early Lactation
Limit sow’s voluntary feed intake in later lactation when needs are greatest
Predisposes to MMA
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Day of Lactation
Optimized lactation feeding curveFULL FEED
Gradual increase in feed intake over first 5 days to match feed intake, milk output and milk consumption
Limited feed intake prior to farrowing
13
Berry (Intak) Sow Self Feeder
Results -use of self feeder
Y0.249.79.0Average daily feed intake (lbs)
N4.10164.5154.0Total lactation feed intake (lbs)
Sig.1SEMSelf feederHand fedItem
Feeder Type
14
Sow feeding
Gestation management drives farrowing performance
Sow body condition adjustment is critical!More is not better!Get a system, get it in place and “trust but verify”
Body Condition Management
Body condition changes (metabolic state) influence the productivity of sows
Body condition management is included in one of the eight factors for achieving a 90% farrowing rate1.
Animal welfare implicationsSow retention in the herd
Voluntary vs. involuntary cullingImprove feed efficiency
15
Body Condition can be managed systematically!
Have to have buy-in to be successful
No quick fixes“Set it and forget it”
But…What are the challenges for success?
Why aren’t we optimizing body condition today?
Lack of system-wide protocols for managing sow body conditionBody condition management is not always a high priority.There is a lack of basic understanding of the sows nutritional needsThere is a lack of objective body condition data
16
1 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5P2 >10 mmP2 >10 mm P2 11P2 11-- 15 mm15 mm P2 16P2 16--18 mm18 mm P2 19P2 19-- 22 mm22 mm P2 < 22 mmP2 < 22 mm
FATFATTHINTHIN NORMAL 2.5NORMAL 2.5--3.53.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 4.03.0 3.5
Breeding Farrowing
Optimum: 3 – 3.25
1 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5
FATFATTHINTHINIDEAL IDEAL
3.0 3.0 -- 3.253.25
Breeding Farrowing
EXAMPLE - Gestation Feeding ScheduleFirst 5 days (minimum) post mating – 2.25 pounds 2X/day regardless of parity and condition
Adjustment by Body Condition – week post mating, 30 and 60 days bred
90 Days Bred: BCS<3 Add 1.5 pounds to feeder settingBCS>3.5 No adjustment needed
P ≥ 6
P2-5P1P0
+10+10+1010
109.258.57.75
7.256.755.75
5
76.255.54.75
17
Is 6 pounds really 6 pounds?Weigh gestation feedboxes!Correlate box setting to actual pounds delivered
Bible 3 Actual Feed Delivered vs Settings
y = 0.767x + 0.402R2 = 0.9795
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Feed Box Setting
Act
ual
Po
un
ds
Del
iver
ed
Actual vs Expected Feed Delivery
Box delivers what it is set at
Reality
Difference of 0.3 lbs
Difference of 1.3 lbs
TAKE HOME:Precise feeding requires that
each type of feeder be weighed at all possible feeding levels to
insure that the correct amount of feed is delivered
18
TMI Body Condition System
SCORE AND RECORD all sow’s BCS at Weaning, 30 days, 60 days and Farrowing
Weigh feed boxes and develop STANDARD FEEDING CHART for each farmAdjust feeders ACCORDING TO PARITY AND BCS at day:
7, 30 and 60 of gestationMonthly Audits of Farm Progress (TMI Staff)
Score sows at the key intervalsTrack BCS loss though lactation (BCS entry vs. exit)
1 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5
FATFATTHINTHINIDEAL IDEAL
3.0 3.0 -- 3.253.25
Breeding Farrowing
EXAMPLE - Gestation Feeding ScheduleFirst 5 days (minimum) post mating – 2.25 pounds 2X/day regardless of parity and condition
Adjustment by Body Condition – week post mating, 30 and 60 days bred
90 Days Bred: BCS<3 Add 1.5 pounds to feeder settingBCS>3.5 No adjustment needed
P ≥ 6
P2-5P1P0
+10+10+1010
109.258.57.75
7.256.755.75
5
76.255.54.75
19
Does it work???
BCS1 BCS2 BCS3
0.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.752.002.252.502.753.003.253.503.754.004.254.504.755.00
Borgic BCS - Weaned sows
BCS
Sampling PeriodBCS1 = Weaning, BCS2 = 30 days, BCS3 = 60 days of gestation
Weaning 30 days 60 days
No active BCS Management
TMI SystemImplemented
Period 1 Period 2
1. 75% of sows <= BCS 32. 50% 2.75 to 3.03. No sows over 3.25
1. 75% of sows >= BCS 3
2. 50% 3.0 to 3.253. No sows over
3.5
1. 75% of sows <= BCS 3.0
2. 50% of sows between 2.5 and 3.0
3. Range of 1.75 to 3.75
1. 75% of sows <= BCS 3.02. 50% of sows between 2.5 and
3.03. Range of 1.75 to 3.75
1. 75% of sows <= BCS 32. 50% 2.75 to 3.03. No sows over 3.25
TAKE HOME:Body Condition can be SYSTEMATICLLY managed though routine tracking of BCS and utilizing that information along with sow parity to determine the amount of feed to deliver daily.
Optimizing Long Term Productivity of Sow Farms
Retention of young sows
Optimize lactation length
20
Retention of Sows to P2
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%
0 1 2 3 4
Parity
Perc
ent o
f Inv
ento
ry R
emov
ed
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+
Parity
Perc
ent o
f Inv
ento
ry R
emov
ed
Farm AFarm B0.0%
2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%
0 1 2 3 4
Parity
Perc
ent o
f Inv
ento
ry R
emov
ed
Parity 2-4 are almost 2x!
1.211.19.9
PWM
3.810.16.3SB
1.310.011.3PW
12.77+0.8Diff.
13.52-5TBParity
Keeping them in the herd
BODY CONDTION management to minimize involuntary culling
Optimize lactation feed intake – INTAK feedersImplement gilt management plans
Estrus stimulation, Culling with no heat at 30 days, Minimize use of PG600
Food, WATER and a DRY PLACE to sleepDaily water availabilityPhysical facility management
21
Optimization of Lactation Length
Part of long term strategy to increase system robustness Minimum weaning age of 21 days
Increased TB in subsequent litters – 0.1 pigs per day increased LLRetention of P1 sowsPerformance of Pigs in WTF system
Letting the sow do the workWarming pigs after birth
Split milkings with survivability boxes
Limited fostering
22
Warming pigs after birthPigs can be come chilled, starve and die all in the same dayGetting pigs warmed gives them a head start
When pigs are born they have a temperature of 102F. After
farrowing, this temp can drop 4 degrees. It can take 4 days to get
back to normal.
23
Management tipsSurvivability boxesTowels
Split SucklingTechnique which can reduce variation and decrease the amount of pigs in the less viable categorySeparate the larger pigs within 12 hours after birth.
Little pigs can suckle for 1-2 hours without competition.
24
BenefitsReduces variation
55% reduction in pigs weighing less than 8 lbs at weaning
Gives smaller pigs a chance to get colostrum
Management tipsGreatest economic benefit from litter sizes >9Separate pigs off for no more than 2 hours
prevent low blood sugar
25
Limiting fostering techniquesValuable tool !!! - THIS IS THE TICKETGoal is to keep as many pigs on the birth sow as possible
Limiting fostering techniquesContinuous crossfostering can depress growth rate by 20% and reduce variation by 40% yielding a “highly uniform group of small pigs (Straw 1998.”
26
Management tipsLimit cross fostering to the first 12 hoursPrior to farrowing, count the number of functionalteats on each sowAt birth place number of pigs on sow equal to teats by removing all pigs from some sowsUse the “empty sows” for fallback pigsDO NOT replace pigs on litters!
Bump Weaning TipsJUST SAY NO to bump weaning!!
Use weaned sows if late nurse sows are needed; they can handle 5 day old pigs
27
How do we get it done?
Nothing new here
Daily priorities and organization
The little things
What have we talked about?
If we want to be competitive in a world market, highly efficient farms are necessaryHigh PSY = High Born Alive = change in managementManagement = BLOCK AND TACKLE
Sow body conditionLactation feedingGet pigs warmDon’t move pigs
28
Thank you
Questions?