Top Banner
Concept 25.3: Phylogenetic systematics informs the construction of phylogenetic trees based on shared characteristics Maggie, Will, Namroo, Austin, Rex
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 25.3

Concept 25.3: Phylogenetic systematics informs the construction of phylogenetic

trees based on shared characteristics

Maggie, Will, Namroo, Austin, Rex

Page 2: 25.3

Cladistics

-Cladogram: shows patterns of shared characteristics

-Clade: a group of species including ancestral and descendants in the tree

Page 3: 25.3
Page 4: 25.3

Groupings in Phylogenic Trees

I. Monophyletic: regular clade II. Paraphyletic: ancestor is present, but

not all descendants III. Polyphyletic: descendants are

present, but no ancestor

Page 5: 25.3

D

C

E G

F

B

A

J

I

KH

Page 6: 25.3

D

C

E

B

G H

F

J

I

K

A

Page 7: 25.3

D

C

B

E G

F

H

A

J

I

K

Page 8: 25.3

Shared primitave and shared derived characters

“Character” refers to any feature that a particular taxon process

Shared primative character – A character that is shared beyond the taxon we are trying to define

Shared derived character – An evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade

Page 9: 25.3

Outgroups

Outgroup comparison is used to differentiate between shared derived characters and shared primitive characters

Ingroup – The various species we are studying

Outgroup – A species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup.

Page 10: 25.3

Phylogenetic Trees and Timing

Phylograms – present sequences of events relative to each other.

Ultrametric Trees – Present sequences based on the actual times they occurred.

Page 11: 25.3

Phylograms

Length of branch corresponds to the amount of changes that occurred.

A long branch means more changes in DNA.

Page 12: 25.3

Drosophila

Lance

let

Amph

ibia

n

Fish

Bird

Human

Rat

Mou

se

Page 13: 25.3

Ultrametric Trees

The lengths of the branches are the same lengths for each lineages.

The tree draws information from the fossil record.

Page 14: 25.3

Droso

phila

Lanc

elet

Amph

ibia

n

Fish

Bird

Hum

an

Rat

Mou

se

Cenozo

ic

Meso

zoic

Pa

leozo

ic

Pro

tero

zoic

54

2

25

1

65

.5

Mill

ions

of

years

ago

Page 15: 25.3

Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood

Systematists:› Can never be sure of finding the single best tree in a

large data set.› Narrow the possibilities by applying the principles of

maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood.

According to the principle of maximum parsimony, we should first investigate the simplest explanation that is consistent with the facts.

The principle of maximum likelihood states that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of evolutionary events.

Among phylogenetic hypotheses› The most parsimonious tree is the one that requires the

fewest evolutionary events to have occurred in the form of shared derived characters.

Page 16: 25.3

Human Mushroom Tulip

40%

40%

0

30% 0 Human

Mushroom

Tulip

(a) Percentage differences between sequences

0

Figure 25.14 (a)

Page 17: 25.3

Tree 1: More likely

(b) Comparison of possible trees

Tree 2: Less likely

15%

5%

15% 20%

5%

10%

15%

25%

Figure 25.14 (b)

Page 18: 25.3

Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses

Phylogenetic trees represent a possible way of how the species in it are related.

Phylogenetic hypotheses can change with new evidence.

Usually the most parsimonious tree is most likely

Analogy-Homology issue The more matching base pairs the less

probability they evolved independently

Page 19: 25.3

Parsimony more reliable if with longer segments.

Accidentally mistaking an analogy for a homology is less likely to affect the tree if the clades are defined by several defined characters.

Strongest hypotheses are supported by lots of morphological and molecular evidence and fossil evidence.

Pg.502-503

Page 20: 25.3

APPLICATION In considering possible phylogenies for a group of species, systematists compare molecular data for the species. The most efficient way to study the various phylogenetic hypotheses is to begin by first considering the most parsimonious—that is, which hypothesis requires the fewest total evolutionary events (molecular changes) to have occurred.

TECHNIQUE Follow the numbered steps as we apply the principle of parsimony to a hypothetical phylogenetic problem involving four closely related bird species.

SpeciesI

SpeciesII

SpeciesIII

SpeciesIV

I II III IV I III II IV I IV II III

Sites in DNA sequence

Three possible phylogenetic hypothese

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

A G G G G G T

G G G A G G G

G A G G A A T

G G A G A A G

I

II

III

IV

I II III IV

A G G G

GG

G

Bases at site 1 for each species

Base-changeevent

1 First, draw the possible phylogenies for the species (only 3 of the 15 possible trees relating these four species are shown here).

2 Tabulate the molecular data for the species (in this simplified example, the data represent a DNA sequence consisting of just seven nucleotide bases).

3 Now focus on site 1 in the DNA sequence. A single base-change event, marked by the crossbar in the branch leading to species I, is sufficient to account for the site 1 data.

Species

Page 21: 25.3

THE END.