This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Synthesis of Pyrrolidine-Fused 1,3-Dithiolane Oligomers by theCycloaddition of Polycyclic Dithiolethiones to Maleimides andEvaluation as Mercury(II) IndicatorsPedro Fuertes, María García-Valverde, Jose V. Cuevas, Borja Díaz de Grenu, Teresa Rodríguez,Josefa Rojo, and Tomas Torroba*
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain
*S Supporting Information
ABSTRACT: The scandium triflate-catalyzed cycloaddition reactionof polycyclic 1,2-dithiolethiones to maleimides is described. Thereaction constitutes an easy approach to linear as well as branchedoligomeric cis-fused dihydro[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6-dionerings interconnected by 3,5-diylidenethiomorpholine-2,6-dithione orylidene-6-thioxo[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-3-one groups. Thepresence of highly colored, highly polarized push−pull α,β-unsaturated thione groups in their structures make these compoundssensitive to the presence of mercury(II) cation in organic or mixedorganic/aqueous solvents.
■ INTRODUCTION
Polyheterocyclic compounds bearing 1,3-dithiole1 and 1,3-dithiolane2 moieties are important donor units in new electronicmaterials and molecular devices such as extended tetrathiafulva-lene derivatives,3 organic superconductors,4 push−pull chromo-phores,5 switchable organic materials,6 receptors,7 shape-persistent macrocycles, and conducting polymer wires.8 Despitethe enormous synthetic efforts in the search for these newmaterials, the number of methods currently used for thischemistry is surprisingly low, being conserved unchanged for along time.9 Less common synthetic methods for the preparationof 1,3-dithiole derivatives include 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of1,2-dithiole-3-thiones and activated triple bonds, which permitmultiple cycloadditions in one pot, thereby giving rise toextended TTF derivatives by very short reaction pathways.10
Despite the rich chemistry shown by these reactions, relatedalternatives are scarce. Thus, the photochemical reactions of 1,2-dithiole-3-thiones and nonactivated alkenes are known to giveunstable adducts that can be trapped by dienophiles such as N-phenylmaleimide.11 Notwithstanding the extensive chemistrydeveloped in the field of 1,2-dithiole-3-thiones,12 their cyclo-addition reactions with classical activated double bonds such asmaleimides are not known. The only loosely related knownreaction is a single example of a thermal cycloaddition of 2,4-diphenylisothiazoline-5-thione and N-phenylmaleimide that wasreported long time ago by McKinnon and co-workers.13
Apparently, the thermal reaction of N-substituted maleimidesand 1,2-dithiole-3-thiones does not work under heating in high-boiling-point solvents. Such a reaction, if it should be possible,would constitute a very good approach to dihydro derivatives of
the 2-methylene-4H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dionesystem, an almost unknown system14 that could be potentiallyuseful in the search for new materials and pharmacological leads.Therefore, in this paper we describe the scandium triflate-catalyzed cycloaddition of polycyclic dithiolethiones to mal-eimides as an unprecedented approach to branched oligomericpolyheterocyclic 1,3-dithiolanes.
■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We selected a suitable catalyst, scandium triflate, which was veryeffective for the 1,3-cycloaddition reactions of polyheterocyclicdithiolethiones and activated alkynes,15 to study the cyclo-addition reaction of the most reactive dithiolethiones we had inhand and commercial or easily synthesized maleimides. Ourstarting materials, 4-alkylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]-thiazin-3-oxo-5-thiones and -3,5-dithiones can be prepared inone-pot reactions from Hunig’s base or N,N-(diisopropyl)-benzylamine in a selective fashion and therefore are fast entries tocomplex heterocyclic chemistry.10a We first selected to use 4-ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione16(1) in catalyzed reactions with commercial maleimides 2a−j. Inthis way, 1 and 2a−j reacted equimolecularly in refluxingdichloromethane for 1 h in the presence of scandium triflate(25% mol) to give, after workup and column chromatography,the corresponding orange solid adducts, 5-substituted 2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5-ylidene)-
Received: January 13, 2014Published: February 11, 2014
dihydro[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6-diones 3a−j, in yields ofup to 88% (Scheme 1).
All of the obtained compounds showed a single spot on theTLC silica plates, but their 1H NMR spectra clearly showed twosets of signals, each composed of two doublets at δ 4.5−6.0,corresponding the C3a and C6a protons (the pair of cis-bridgehead protons in the dithiolopyrrole system) for everycompound, in a roughly equimolecular amount, and twocomplex multiplets for the signals of the methylene protons ofthe ethyl group. Therefore, the complex 1HNMR spectra are dueto the slow inversion of the pyramidal nitrogen in the 1,4-thiazinering and consequently to the presence of nitrogen inversionconformers. Two chiral centers at the C3a and C6a positions aregenerated by the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction with themaleimide, causing the α-methylene hydrogen atoms of the N-substituent of the starting substrate 1 to become diastereotopicin the cycloadduct and thus to show magnetic nonequivalence inthe 1H NMR spectra. Therefore, the two protons of thedithiolopyrrole system (H3a and H6a) are structurally non-equivalent. Indeed both the endo- and exo-1,3-dipolar cyclo-addition reactions lead to enantiomeric dithiolopyrrole rings(Scheme 2). In a characteristic example, compound 3f showed aset of two partially superposed sextets centered at δ 3.24 (ddq, J =25.9, 14.2, 6.9 Hz) for one methylene proton and another set oftwo partially superposed sextets centered at δ 3.56 (ddq, J = 24.7,14.6, 7.3 Hz) for the other methylene proton along with fourdoublets, two at δ 5.28 and 5.02 (J = 8.5 Hz) for the pair ofdithiolopyrrole protons of one conformer and two at δ 5.18 and4.81 (J = 9.0 Hz) for the pair of dithiolopyrrole protons of theother conformer.The transformation among the conformational isomers SYN
and ANTI was studied by DFT calculations performed on asimplified model of compounds 3a−j. The SYN/ANTI trans-
formation can be explained as an inversion of the configuration ofthe amine nitrogen atom. In order to avoid complications arisingfrom the simultaneous inversion on the nitrogen atom and therotation of the C−C bond in the ethyl group, this ethyl group wassimplified to a methyl group. In these theoretical calculations, wefound that for this simplified model of 3a−j the SYN and ANTIconformers have similar stabilities, with a free energy differenceof 0.319 kcal·mol−1. This small difference is in good agreementwith the experimental observation of both conformers insolution, and on the basis of the calculated free energy differencebetween the conformers, the statistical distribution of thepopulation at 298 K is 63.2% for the ANTI conformer and36.8% for the SYN conformer (Figure 1). The estimated barrierfor the SYN/ANTI transformation in the simplifiedmodel is 17.6kcal/mol, which is high enough to allow the observation of bothisomers in the 1H NMR experiments at room temperature.17
Similar calculations performed on a nonsimplified structure ofcompound 3a afforded populations of 62.7% for ANTI-3a and37.3% for SYN-3a (61/39 experimental), in good agreementwith the experimental results (Figure 2).All of these compounds decomposed at the melting point in a
cycloreversion reaction followed by thermal desulfuration, givingrise to 4-ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[4,3-b:3′,4′-d]pyrrole-3-oxo-5-thi-one (4), a known product of thermal desulfuration of 116b
(Scheme 3). As a characteristic example, upon slow melting of 3cin a heating chamber under a microscope, yellow crystals of 4were formed by sublimation as 3c melted. Compound 4 wascharacterized by mass spectrometry and compared to a syntheticsample.In the same way, 4-benzylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]-
thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione18 (5) and commercial maleimides 2a−c,e−g reacted equimolecularly in refluxing dichloromethane for2−4 h in the presence of scandium triflate (25% mol) to give,after workup and column chromatography, the corresponding
Scheme 1. Reaction of Bisdithioloketothione 1 andMaleimides 2a−j
aIsolated yields.
Scheme 2. Mechanism of the Reaction betweenBisdithioloketothione 1 and Maleimides and NitrogenInversion of the 1,4-Thiazine Ring
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252214
orange solid adducts, 5-substituted 2-(4-benzyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5-ylidene)dihydro[1,3]-dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6-diones 6a−c,e−g, in yields of up to74% (Scheme 4). In this case, the inversion of the pyramidalnitrogen in the 1,4-thiazine ring was evidenced in the 1H NMRspectra by the presence of two pairs of doublets, one for each ofthe benzyl methylene protons, and two sets of signals, eachcomposed of two doublets at δ 4.5−6.0, corresponding to thepair of cis-dithiolopyrrole protons for every compound, inamounts from equimolecular to 2:1. In a characteristic example,the 1H NMR spectrum of 6f showed two pairs of doublets at δ4.40/4.12 (J = 14.1 Hz) and δ 4.37/4.19 (J = 14.1 Hz) in a 2:1proportion for the two benzyl methylene protons and two pairsof doublets at δ 5.83/5.58 (J = 8.9 Hz) and δ 5.66/5.35 (J = 9.2Hz) in a 2:1 proportion for the two pairs of dithiolopyrroleprotons.On the other hand, 4-ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]-
thiazin-3,5-dithione16 (7) and 2 equiv of commercial maleimides2b,f,g reacted in refluxing dichloromethane for 1−2 h in thepresence of scandium triflate (25% mol with respect to 2b,f,g) togive, after workup and column chromatography, the correspond-ing orange solid adducts, 5,5′-disubstituted 2,2′-(4-ethyl-2,6-
dithioxothiomorpholine-3,5-diylidene)bis(5-methyl{or aryl}-dihydro-4H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione)s 8b,f,g, inyields of up to 67% (Scheme 5). In this case, several conformers
are expected, therefore complicating the otherwise simple 1HNMR spectrum of every compound. In this way, the 1H NMRspectrum of 8b showed four sets of signals (eight doublets) forthe dithiolopyrrole protons (δ 5.0−6.0) in different proportions,whereas 8f showed only twomain equimolecular conformers andtraces of two others and 8g showed only onemain conformer andtraces of two others in the same region of the 1HNMR spectrum,probably for steric reasons.Moreover, bisdithioloketothione16 1 reacted with commercial
bismaleimides 9a and 9b and the synthesized bismaleimide 9c19
in refluxing dichloromethane for 1 h in the presence of scandiumtriflate (25% mol) to give, after workup and columnchromatography, the corresponding orange solid monoadducts
Figure 1. DFT-calculated structures of the SYN and ANTI conformersand of the transition state (TS) for the SYN/ANTI transformation of amodel compound.
Figure 2. DFT-calculated structures of the ANTI and SYN conformersof 3a.
Scheme 3. Thermal Decomposition of 3c
Scheme 4. Reaction of Bisdithioloketothione 5 andMaleimides 2a−c,e−g
aIsolated yields.
Scheme 5. Reaction of Bisdithiolodithione 7 and Maleimides2b,f,g
aIsolated yields.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252215
10a and 10b or the diadducts 11a−c in yields of up to 55%(Scheme 6). The structures of compounds 10a−b and 11a−c are
represented in Figure 3. The expected compound 10c was notisolated, probably because of a lack of stability; therefore, in thiscase only compound 11c was obtained. The presence of twodithiolopyrrole heterocycles in 11a−c was evidenced in the 1HNMR spectra by again the presence of four sets of signals (eightdoublets) for the heterocyclic protons (δ 4.5−5.5). In contrast,the presence of only one dithiolopyrrole system in 10a and 10bwas evidenced in their 1H NMR spectra by the presence of onlytwo sets of signals (four doublets) for the heterocyclic protons (δ4.5−5.5).In the case of monoadducts 10, the presence of a maleimide
nucleus makes the products suitable for a second cycloadditionreaction. Therefore, bisdithiolodithione16 7 and 2 equiv ofmaleimide 10a reacted in refluxing dichloromethane for 6 h inthe presence of scandium triflate (25%mol) to give, after workupand column chromatography, the corresponding orange solidadduct 12 in 74% yield (Scheme 7). Some traces of thecorresponding monoadduct were also recovered from thecolumn, but the compound was not sufficiently stable for acorrect characterization. Compound 12 possesses a remarkablestable structure in which all of the spectroscopic characteristicsfound in the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 3f−h and 8f−g arepreserved, showing a complex mixture of conformers.
Furthermore, 1, 2, or 3 equiv of bisdithioloketothione16 1 andtrismaleimide 1320 reacted in refluxing dichloromethane for 4 hin the presence of scandium triflate (25% mol with respect to 1)to give, after workup and column chromatography, thecorresponding orange solid monoadduct 14, diadduct 15, ortriadduct 16, respectively, in yields of up to 41% (Scheme 8).Variable amounts of the starting materials and adduct wererecovered in each case, and the yields given in Scheme 8 are onlyfor the main product obtained in each reaction. In this case, theyields were lower because of the lack of selectivity, but thecompounds were reasonably stable and could be characterized byspectroscopy and microanalysis as in the previous cases.All of these compounds were obtained within a small window
between the reactivity of the starting materials and the stability ofthe products; this series of reactions was possible because of thepresence of scandium triflate as the catalyst of the hithertounknown 1,3-cycloaddition reaction between dithiolethionesand maleimides. The catalysis permitted the reaction to beperformed at a suitable temperature to allow the formation andrecovery of the obtained products in almost all cases. These newcompounds are thermally sensitive, undergoing a cycloreversion
Scheme 6. Reaction of Bisdithioloketothione 1 andBismaleimides 9a−c
aIsolated yields.
Figure 3. Structures of 10a−b and 11a−c.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252216
reaction followed by thermal desulfuration at the melting point.All of these compounds hold in their structure at least one α,β-unsaturated thione group, which is a well-known heterodienesystem that is frequently used for hetero-Diels−Alder cyclo-addition reactions with activated alkynes.15 In the present case,all of the attempted reactions under uncatalyzed or catalyzedconditions gave the product of sequential 1,3-dipolar cyclo-reversion (presumably to give the starting material 1) followedby the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of dithiolethione 1 and the newdipolarophile. In a characteristic example, compound 3f wassubjected to reaction with dibenzoylacetylene (17) under diverseconditions15b but only the known compound 1815b was obtainedwith no traces of the expected compound 19 (Scheme 9).On the other hand, the highly polarized push−pull α,β-
unsaturated thione group is responsible for the color exhibited bythese compounds. Compounds 3a−j display an orange color insolution that may undergo changes in the presence of the mostcommon cations or anions. All of them behaved similarly whentested with the same cations or anions, independently of the N-alkyl or N-aryl group, and therefore, the behavior of two of themost representative examples, 3f and 8f, is reported. Addition of1 equiv or more of Hg2+ to 10−4 M solutions of 3f (λmax = 394 nm,ε = 10 946 M−1 cm−1) in MeCN resulted in a dramatic change ofcolor from yellow to maroon. This response was selective forHg2+, and addition of several equivalents of other cations (Ag+,Ni2+, Sn2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Sc3+, and Al3+) as theirperchlorate or triflate salts resulted in no appreciable changes(Figure 4).A quantitative UV−vis titration of a 10−4 M solution of 3f in
MeCN with Hg2+ (added as the perchlorate salt in MeCN)showed that as Hg2+ was added (up to 2 equiv), the originalabsorption maximum bands centered at 394 and 345 nmdecreased and some new bands appeared at 550, 430, and 310nm, generating isosbestic points at 290, 333, and 402 nm (Figure5a). After the addition of more than 2 equiv of Hg2+, the newbands slowly decreased with the disappearance of the isosbesticpoint at 402 nm. The titration profile fitted nicely to a 1:1 bindingmodel (Figure 5b),21 and the association constant was calculated
as log K = 4.94 ± 0.09. The Job’s plot analysis of the UV−vistitration carried out in MeCN revealed a maximum at a molefraction of 50% (Figure 5c), in accordance with the proposed 1:1binding stoichiometry. The Hg2+ detection limit of a 10−4 Msolution of 3f in MeCN, calculated in UV−vis absorption by theblank variability method,22 was 3.69 × 10−6 M.The selective sensing action of a 10−4 M solution of 8f in
MeCN and 1 equiv or more of Hg2+ in MeCN or water was alsovery effective, in contrast to the lack of effect of adding 1 equiv or
Scheme 7. Synthesis and Structure of 12 Scheme 8. Reaction of Bisdithioloketothione 1 andTrismaleimide 13
aIsolated yields.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252217
more of other cations (Ag+, Ni2+, Sn2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cu2+,Fe3+, Sc3+, and Al3+) in MeCN. In this case, a striking colorchange from yellow to maroon only in the presence of Hg2+ wasobserved (Figure 6).A quantitative UV−vis titration of a 10−4 M solution of 8f in
MeCN with Hg2+ (added as the perchlorate salt in MeCN)showed that addition of Hg2+ resulted in the decrease of theoriginal absorption maximum bands centered at 390 and 417 nmand the appearance of a large absorption band from 300 to 600nm (responsible for the observed color) with no appearance ofisosbestic points (Figure 7a). Related titrations performed inacetonitrile/water mixtures showed a similar tendency, but aclear isosbestic point at 365 nm was observed (Figure 7b), thusconfirming the appearance of a unique equilibrium complex. Thetitration profile fitted nicely to a 2:1 binding model (Figure 7c),21
and the association constants were calculated as log K1 = 3.42 ±0.14 and log K2 = 4.56± 0.17. The Job’s plot analysis of the UV−vis titration carried out in MeCN revealed a maximum betweenmole fractions of 0.60 and 0.70 (Figure 7d), in accordance withthe proposed 2:1 binding stoichiometry. The Hg2+ detectionlimit of a 10−4 M solution of 8f in MeCN, calculated in UV−visabsorption by the blank variability method,22 was 3.16 × 10−7 M,so 8f showed better performance than 3f.In agreement with previous related chromogenic probes for
mercury(II) cation, we assumed that in both cases complexationwas probably effected through the thione group, leading to theformation of complexes in which Hg2+ extends the conjugationbetween the 1,3-dithiolane and thione groups, causing in bothcases bathochromic shifts of themainUV−vis absorption band inUV−visible. As a representative example, the structure of thecomplex 3f[Hg2+]·MeCN was obtained by DFT calculations(Figure 8). The model found with ligand 3f and a mercury(II)cation showed a preference for coordination of the mercurycation to the thione sulfur and a preferred orientation throughthe sulfur atom of the thiomorpholine moiety.
Comparison of the HOMOs and LUMOs of 3f and 3f[Hg2+]·MeCN showed that the HOMO of 3f is a nonbonding orbitalspread through the 5-(1,3-dithiolan-2-ylidene)[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-6-thione moiety and the LUMO is anantibonding orbital spread through the 2-(1,3-dithiolan-2-ylidene)dithiocarboxylate moiety. In contrast, the HOMO of3f[Hg2+]·MeCN is a nonbonding orbital on the N-phenyl-
Scheme 9. 1,3-Dipolar Cycloreversion/Cycloaddition of 3f
Figure 4. Color changes of 10−4 M samples of 3f in MeCN in thepresence of 1 equiv of various cations.
Figure 5. (a) UV−vis titration curves, (b) titration profile (λmax = 312nm), and (c) Job’s plot (λmax = 393 nm) for a 10−4 M solution of 3f inMeCN titrated with Hg2+.
Figure 6. Color changes of 10−4 M samples of 8f in MeCN in thepresence of 2 equiv of various cations.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252218
pyrrolidine-2,5-dione moiety and the LUMO of 3f[Hg2+]·MeCN is an σ antibonding orbital spread through the 2-(1,3-dithiolan-2-ylidene)dithiocarboxylate−Hg2+ moiety (Figure 9),thus proving that the extension of the conjugation between the1,3-dithiolane group and the complexed thione group isresponsible for the bathochromic shift in the UV titration.
■ CONCLUSIONWe have described the scandium triflate-catalyzed cycloadditionof polycyclic dithiolethiones to maleimides. The reactionconstitutes an unprecedented approach to linear as well asbranched oligomeric cis-fused [1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole ringsinterconnected by 3,5-diylidenethiomorpholine-2,6-dithione orylidene-6-thioxo[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-3-one groups.Both the 1,4-thiazine core and the cis-fused [1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole ring are nonplanar nonaromatic rings that display thepresence of inversion conformers of the 1,4-thiazine nitrogen.The presence of highly colored, highly polarized push−pull α,β-unsaturated thione groups in their structures make thesecompounds sensitive to the presence of mercury(II) cation inorganic or mixed organic/aqueous solvents with remarkableselectivity, as shown for two simple derivatives. Therefore, themore structurally complex compounds are good candidates inmercury removal schemes, as absorbants for mercury(II) salts,and as selective indicators. This is due to the enormous numberof sulfur heteroatoms (in either acceptor or donor positions) thatthese new molecular systems display, such as the 1,3-dithiolanesand the conjugated thione groups.
■ EXPERIMENTAL SECTIONGeneral. The reactions were conducted under dry nitrogen. The
solvents were previously distilled under nitrogen over phosphoruspentoxide, calcium hydride, or sodium filaments. Melting points werenot corrected. Infrared spectra were registered in potassium bromidetablets. NMR spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6, CDCl3, CD3CN, orCD3OD. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million with respect toresidual solvent protons,23 and coupling constants (JX−X′) are reportedin hertz. DEPT experiments from selected samples permitted theassignment of 13C NMR chemical shifts. Elemental analyses of C, H, andN were performed for all new products. High-resolution mass spectrawere taken in a quadrupole mass spectrometer by electron impact, FAB,or LSIMS. 4-Ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione16 (1), 4-benzylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione18 (5), 4-ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3,5-dithione16 (7), bismaleimide 9c,19 and trismaleimide 1320 wereprepared following the reported methodologies. Analytical TLC wasperformed on silica gel 60 plates. Flash column chromatography wascarried out on silica gel (0.040−0.063 mm).
General Procedure for the Catalytic Cycloaddition of 4-Ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione(1) and Maleimides 2a−j. Maleimide 2a−j (1 equiv) and Sc(OTf)3(19 mg, 0.038 mmol) were added under nitrogen to 1 (50 mg, 0.15mmol) dissolved in dry dichloromethane (10 mL), and the mixture wasrefluxed for 1 h. Then the solvent was evaporated under reducedpressure, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica230−400mesh, eluting with light petroleum/dichloromethane 60/40 todichoromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures) to get 3a−j. Analytical samples
Figure 7. (a, b) Hg2+ UV−vis titration curves of (a) 10−4 M 8f in MeCNand (b) 5 × 10−4 M 8f in MeCN/water. (c) Titration profile (λmax = 390nm). (d) Job’s plot (λmax = 295 nm).
Figure 8. DFT-calculated structure of the complex 3f[Hg2+]·MeCN.
Figure 9.HOMOs and LUMOs of 3f and the 3f[Hg2+]·MeCN complex.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252219
were obtained by thin-layer chromatography (glass plates, silica 20 cm×20 cm × 0.1 cm, eluting with dichloromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures).(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-2-(4-Ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]-
+, 433.9016. Anal.Calcd for C13H10N2O3S6: C 35.92, H 2.32, N 6.45. Found: C 35.98, H2.36, N 6.39.(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-5-(tert-Butyl)-2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-
+, 475.9482. Anal. Calcd for C16H16N2O3S6: C 40.32, H3.38, N 5.88. Found: C 40.26, H 3.46, N 5.92.(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-5-Butyl-2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-
[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5(6H)-ylidene)dihydro-4H-[1,3]-dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dione (3d). 65 mg (88%), orangesolid, mp 92−93 °C (dec.) (DCM), 52/48 ratio of conformers. IR(KBr): ν = 2955, 2927, 1782, 1705, 1666, 1639 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3,
C24H16N4O3S6: C 47.98, H 2.68, N 9.33. Found: C 48.11, H 2.73, N9.22.
General Procedure for the Catalytic Cycloaddition of 4-Benzylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione(5) and Maleimides 2a−c,e−g. Maleimide 2a−c,e−g (1 equiv) andSc(OTf)3 (19 mg, 0.039 mmol) were added under nitrogen to 5 (60 mg,0.16 mmol) dissolved in dry dichloromethane (10 mL), and the mixturewas refluxed for 2 h (for 2a,c), 3 h (for 2b,e,f), or 4 h (for 2g). Then thesolvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue waspurified by column chromatography [silica 230−400 mesh, eluting withlight petroleum to dichoromethane (or a dichloromethane/ethyl acetate95:5 mixture for 6a,g)] to get 6a−c,e−g. Analytical samples wereobtained by thin-layer chromatography (glass plates, silica 20 cm × 20cm × 0.1 cm, eluting with dichloromethane or dichloromethane/ethylacetate mixtures).
+, 537.9642. Anal. Calcd for C21H18N2O3S6: C 46.82, H3.37, N 5.20. Found: C 46.69, H 3.46, N 5.12.(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-5-Benzyl-2-(4-benzyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-
+, 557.9329. Anal.Calcd for C23H14N2O3S6: C 49.44, H 2.53, N 5.01. Found: C 49.33, H2.61, N 4.92.(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-2-(4-Benzyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]-
C23H13IN2O3S6: C 40.35, H 1.91, N 4.09. Found: C 40.44, H 1.83, N,3.98.
General Procedure for the Catalytic Cycloaddition of 4-Ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3,5-dithione (7)and Maleimides 2b,f,g. Maleimide 2b,f,g (2 equiv) and Sc(OTf)3(37 mg, 0.075 mmol) were added under nitrogen to 7 (50 mg, 0.15mmol) dissolved in dry dichloromethane (10 mL), and the mixture wasrefluxed for 1 h (for 2b,g) or 2 h (for 2c). Then the solvent wasevaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified bycolumn chromatography [silica 230−400 mesh, eluting with lightpetroleum to dichloromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures (95:5 for 8b,g,90:10 for 8f)] to get 8b,f,g. Analytical samples were obtained by thin-layer chromatography (glass plates, silica 20 cm × 20 cm × 0.1 cm,eluting with dichloromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures).
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): δ (for the main conformer)199.9, 172.7, 172.2, 172.0 (Cq), 137.8 (CHAr), 134.4, 131.1 (Cq), 129.0(CHAr), 95.2 (Cq), 60.5 (CH), 51.5 (CH), 34.31 (CH2), 13.0 (CH3).MS (FAB+):m/z (%) 938 (M+ + 1, 1). Anal. Calcd for C28H17I2N3O4S7:C 35.87, H 1.83, N 4.48. Found: C 35.96, H 1.75, N 4.36.
General Procedure for the Catalytic Cycloaddition of 4-Ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione 1and Bismaleimides 9a−c. Bismaleimide 9a−c (1 equiv) andSc(OTf)3 (19 mg, 0.038 mmol or 37 mg, 0.075 mmol) were addedunder nitrogen to 1 equiv (50 mg, 0.15 mmol, method A) or 2 equiv(100 mg, 0.30 mmol, method B) of 1 dissolved in dry dichloromethane(10 mL), and the mixture was refluxed for 1 h. Then the solvent wasevaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252222
column chromatography (silica 230−400 mesh, eluting with lightpetroleum/dichloromethane 60:40 to dichloromethane/ethyl acetate90:10) to get 10a−b and 11a−c. Analytical samples were obtained bythin-layer chromatography (glass plates, silica 20 cm × 20 cm × 0.1 cm,eluting with dichloromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures).(3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-5-(4-(4-(2,5-Dioxo-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-1-
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252223
1702 (M+ + 1, 58), 1552 (70), 1389 (78), 1341 (100). HRMS (LSIMS):m/z 1701.7826; calcd for [C66H43N7O10S19 + H]+, 1701.7838. Anal.Calcd for C66H43N7O10S19: C 46.54, H 2.54, N 5.76. Found: C 46.54, H2.54, N 5.76.Catalytic Cycloaddition of 4-Ethylbis[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b:4′,3′-
e][1,4]thiazin-3-oxo-5-thione (1) and Trismaleimide 13. Trisma-leimide 13 (60 mg, 0.15 mmol) and Sc(OTf)3 [19 mg, 0.038 mmol(method A)/37 mg, 0.075 mmol (method B)/56 mg, 0.11 mmol(method C)] were added under nitrogen to 1 [50 mg, 0.15 mmol(method A)/100 mg, 0.30 mmol (method B)/150 mg, 0.45 mmol(method C)] dissolved in dry dichloromethane (10 mL), and themixture was refluxed for 4 h. Then the solvent was evaporated underreduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column chromatog-raphy (silica 230−400 mesh, eluting with light petroleum todichloromethane/ethyl acetate 50:50) to get monoadduct 14, diadduct15, or triadduct 16. Analytical samples were obtained by thin-layerchromatography (glass plates, silica 20 cm × 20 cm × 0.1 cm, elutingwith dichloromethane/ethyl acetate mixtures).1,1′-(((2-((3aR,6aS)(Z/E)-2-(4-Ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-
yl)ethyl)(2-((3aR,6aS)(E/Z)-2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5(6H)-ylidene)-4,6-dioxotetra-hydro-5H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrol-5-yl)ethyl)amino)ethyl)-2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5(6H)-ylidene)dihydro-4H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dione (15). 15 mg (19%) by method A or 61 mg (38%) by method B or32 mg (20%) by method C, orange solid, mp 240−241 °C (dec.)(DCM/EtOAc 50:50), mixture of conformers. IR (KBr): ν = 1783,1706, 1655, 1532, 1404, 1342 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ6.65 (s, 2H), 5.49−4.79 (m, 4H), 3.56−3.13 (m, 10H), 2.68−2.45 (m,6H), 1.12−1.08 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 200.5, 199.9,184.8, 184.7, 184.5, 173.7, 173.4, 172.8, 172.7, 171.3, 171.2, 170.8, 170.7,170.5, 166.6, 164.5, 164.4, 151.3, 150.5, 150.2, 135.0, 133.9, 133.0, 132.7,132.4, 132.3, 124.8, 60.3, 60.2, 59.5, 59.2, 52.0, 51.2, 48.6, 37.7, 35.6,35.5, 13.2, 13.1, 13.0. MS (FAB+):m/z (%) 1033 (M+ + 1, 49), 923 (25),586 (38), 445 (18). HRMS (LSIMS): m/z 1032.8699; calcd for[C34H28N6O8S12 + H]+, 1032.8690. Anal. Calcd for C34H28N6O8S12: C39.52, H 2.73, N 8.13. Found: C 39.64, H 2.82, N 8.02.(2Z/E)(2′Z/E)(3aR,3a′R,6aS,6a′S)-5,5′-(((2-((3aR,6aS)(E/Z)-2-
(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5(6H)-ylidene)-4,6-dioxotetrahydro-5H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]-pyrrol-5-yl)ethyl)azanediyl)bis(ethane-2,1-diyl))bis(2-(4-ethyl-3-oxo-6-thioxo-3H,4H-[1,2]dithiolo[3,4-b][1,4]thiazin-5(6H)-ylidene)dihydro-4H-[1,3]dithiolo[4,5-c]pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dione)(16). 7 mg (10%) by method A or 28 mg (20%) by method B or 90 mg(43%) by method C, orange solid, mp 197−198 °C (dec.) (DCM/EtOAc 50:50), mixture of conformers. IR (KBr): ν = 1781, 1710, 1670,1540, 1404, 1340 cm−1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.73−4.72 (m,6H), 3.67−3.07 (m, 12H), 3.07−2.16 (m, 6H), 1.16−1.05 (m, 9H). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 199.2, 185.1, 174.3, 164.4, 151.3, 133.4,132.4, 60.7, 59.9, 52.3, 51.8, 51.6, 50.8, 49.0, 37.3, 13.3, 13.2. MS(FAB+):m/z (%) 1356 (M+ + 1, 24), 1005 (27), 923 (41), 682 (34), 433(22). HRMS (LSIMS): m/z 1355.7396; calcd for [C42H33N7O9S18 +
H]+, 1355.7385. Anal. Calcd for C42H33N7O9S18: C 37.18, H 2.45, N7.23. Found: C 37.07, H 2.55, N 7.16.
Calculations. DFT calculations were performed with the hybridmethod known as B3LYP, in which the Becke three-parameter exchangefunctional24 and the Lee−Yang−Parr correlation functional25 are used,as implemented in the Gaussian 03 (revision C.02) program suite.26
Geometry optimizations and the nitrogen inversion barrier for thesimplified model 3 and geometry optimizations for compounds 3a, 3b,and 3f were calculated using the 6-31G(d) basis for all the atoms,whereas for the complex 3f[Hg]2+·MeCN the effective core potentials(ECPs) of Hay and Wadt with a double-ζ valence basis set(LANL2DZ)27 were used to describe Hg and the 6-31G(d) basis setwas used for the rest of the atoms. Energy values for structures related tomodel 3 and compounds 3a and 3b were calculated by punctualcalculations on the obtained geometries using the same functional andthe 6-311+G(2d,p) basis set for all atoms. The transition state of thesimplified model for 3 was confirmed by a vibrational analysis (oneimaginary frequency) and an IRC calculation.28
■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT*S Supporting InformationCopies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the products andcoordinates of all stationary points for the calculated structures.This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Ministeriode Economia y Competitividad, Spain (Project CTQ2012-31611), Junta de Castilla y Leon, Consejeria de Educacion yCultura y Fondo Social Europeo (Project BU246A12-1), and theEuropean Commission Seventh Framework Programme (Proj-ect SNIFFER FP7-SEC-2012-312411).
■ DEDICATIONThis paper is dedicated to Dr. Stefano Marcaccini, who passedaway on October 1, 2012.
■ REFERENCES(1) (a) Brunetti, F. G.; Lopez, J. L.; Atienza, C.; Martin, N. J. Mater.Chem. 2012, 22, 4188−4205. (b) Mas-Torrent, M.; Rovira, C. Chem.Rev. 2011, 111, 4833−4856.(2) (a) Zhang, J. Y.; Kong, L. B.; Zhan, L. Z.; Tang, J.; Zhan, H.; Zhou,Y. H.; Zhan, C. M. J. Power Sources 2007, 168, 278−281. (b) Aitken, R.A.; Hill, L.; Massil, T.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Malik, K. M. A. Tetrahedron1997, 53, 10441−10450. (c) Aitken, R. A.; Aitken, K. M.; Lambert, S.;Playfair, R.; Wilson, N. J. Heterocycles 2012, 84, 1113−1122.(3) (a) Frere, P.; Skabara, P. J. Chem. Soc. Rev 2005, 34, 69−98.(b) Christensen, C. A.; Batsanov, A. S.; Bryce, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007,72, 1301−1308. (c) Priego, E. M.; Sanchez, L.; Herranz, M. A.; Martin,N.; Viruela, R.; Orti, E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1201−1209.(4) (a) Saito, G.; Yoshida, Y. Chem. Rec. 2011, 11, 124−145.(b) Misaki, Y. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2009, 10, No. 024301.(5) (a) Hopf, H.; Sherburn, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,2298−2338. (b) Kato, S.; Diederich, F. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46,1994−2006. (c) Frank, B. B.; Kivala, M.; Blanco, B. C.; Breiten, B.;Schweizer, W. B.; Laporta, P. R.; Biaggio, I.; Jahnke, E.; Tykwinski, R. R.;Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Diederich, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010,2487−2503. (d) Shoji, T.; Ito, S.; Okujima, T.; Morita, N. Org. Biomol.Chem. 2012, 10, 8308−8313. (e) Andreu, R.; Cerdan, M. A.; Franco, S.;
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252224
Garin, J.; Marco, A. B.; Orduna, J.; Palomas, D.; Villacampa, B.; Alicante,R.; Allain, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4963−4966. (f) Guo, K.; Yan, K.; Lu,X.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Sun, J.; Yan, F.; Guo, W.; Yang, S.Org. Lett. 2012, 14,2214−2217. (g) Bouit, P.-A.; Villegas, C.; Delgado, J. L.; Viruela, P. M.;Pou-Amerigo, R.; Orti, E.; Martin, N. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 604−607.(6) (a) Canevet, D.; Salle, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, D. Chem.Commun. 2009, 2245−2269. (b) Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.;Xiang, J.; Zhu, D. Chem.Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5680−5686. (c) Martin, N.;Sanchez, L.; Herranz, M. A.; Illescas, B.; Guldi, D. M. Acc. Chem. Res.2007, 40, 1015−1024. (d) Kusamoto, T.; Takada, K.; Sakamoto, R.;Kume, S.; Nishihara, H. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 12102−12113. (e) Naito,T.; Karasudani, T.; Mori, S.; Ohara, K.; Konishi, K.; Takano, T.;Takahashi, Y.; Inabe, T.; Nishihara, S.; Inoue, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,134, 18656−18666. (f) Santos, J.; Illescas, B. M.; Martin, N.; Adrio, J.;Carretero, J. C.; Viruela, R.; Orti, E.; Spanig, F.; Guldi, D. M. Chem.Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2957−2964.(7) For example, see: (a)Massue, J.; Bellec, N.; Guerro, M.; Bergamini,J.-F.; Hapiot, P.; Lorcy, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4655−4662.(b) Dolder, S.; Liu, S.-X.; Le Derf, F.; Salle, M.; Neels, A.; Decurtins, S.Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3753−3756.(8) (a) Chen, G.; Wang, L.; Thompson, D. W.; Zhao, Y. Org. Lett.2008, 10, 657−660. (b) Chen, G.; Mahmud, I.; Dawe, L. N.; Daniels, L.M.; Zhao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2701−2715.(9) (a) Yamada, J.; Akutsu, H. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5057−5083.(b) Fabre, J. M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5133−5150. (c) Gorgues, A.;Hudhomme, P.; Salle, M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5151−5184. (d) Lorcy,D.; Bellec, N.; Fourmigue, M.; Avarvari, N. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253,1398−1438. (e) de Bonneval, B. G.; Ching, K. I. M.-C.; Alary, F.; Bui, T.-T.; Valade, L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 1457−1467.(10) For a review, see: (a) Garcia-Valverde, M.; Torroba, T. Eur. J. Org.Chem. 2006, 849−861. Many examples are referenced in: (b) Andrada,D. M.; Granados, A. M.; Sola, M.; Fernandez, I. Organometallics 2011,30, 466−476. For recent examples, see: (c) Fuertes, P.; Moreno, D.;Cuevas, J. V.; Garcia-Valverde, M.; Torroba, T.Chem.Asian J. 2010, 5,1692−1699. (d) Granados, A. M.; Fracaroli, A. M.; de Rossi, R. H.;Fuertes, P.; Torroba, T. Chem. Commun. 2008, 483−485.(11) (a) Okazaki, R.; Sunagawa, K.; Kotera, M.; Kang, K.-T.; Inamoto,N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 243−246. (b) Okazaki, R.; Sunagawa,K.; Kang, K.-T.; Inamoto, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 496−501and references therein.(12) Fischer, G. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2013, 109, 1−90.(13) Chauhan, M. S.; Hassan, M. E.; McKinnon, D. M. Can. J. Chem.1974, 52, 1738−1743.(14) For one example, see: (a) Rudorf, W.-D.; Augustin, M. PhosphorusSulfur 1981, 9, 329−335. For another example, see: (b) Swincicki, K.;Degener, E.; Grewe, F. (Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, Brussels, Belgium).BE623104 (A), 1963. For another example, see: (c) Takekatsu, S.;Hirotaka, M.; Masanobu, T. (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Tokyo).JP2002189295 (A), 2002.(15) (a) Barriga, S.; Fuertes, P.; Marcos, C. F.; Torroba, T. J. Org.Chem. 2004, 69, 3672−3682. (b) Barriga, S.; Fuertes, P.; Marcos, C. F.;Rakitin, O. A.; Torroba, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6439−6448.(16) (a) Marcos, C. F.; Polo, C.; Rakitin, O. A.; Rees, C. W.; Torroba,T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 281−283. (b) Rees, C. W.;White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J.; Rakitin, O. A.; Marcos, C. F.; Polo, C.;Torroba, T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2189−2196.(17) Campolo, D.; Gastaldi, S.; Roussel, C.; Bertrand, M. P.; Nechab,M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8434−8466.(18) (a) Marcos, C. F.; Rakitin, O. A.; Rees, C. W.; Torroba, T.; White,A. J. P.;Williams, D. J.Chem. Commun. 1999, 29−30. (b) Konstantinova,L. S.; Obruchnikova, N. V.; Rakitin, O. A.; Rees, C. W.; Torroba, T. J.Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3421−3427.(19) (a) Kim, Y. H.; Stites, W. E. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 8804−8814.(b) Alhakimi, G.; Klemm, E.; Gorls, H. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.Chem. 1995, 33, 1133−1142. (c) Alhakimi, G.; Gorls, H.; Klemm, E.Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1994, 195, 1569−1576.(20) (a) Cheronis, J. C.; Whalley, E. T.; Nguyen, K. T.; Eubanks, S. R.;Allen, L. G.; Duggan, M. J.; Loy, S. D.; Bonham, K. A.; Blodgett, J. K. J.Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 1563−1572. (b) Chen, X.; Dam, M. A.; Ono, K.;
Mal, A.; Shen, H.; Nutt, S. R.; Sheran, K.; Wudl, F. Science 2002, 295,1698−1702.(21) (a) Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry, 2nd ed.;Schneider, H. J., Yatsimirsky, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester,U.K., 2000. (b) Bourson, J.; Pouget, J.; Valeur, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97,4552−4557.(22) Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A; Massart, D.L., Vandeginste, B. G. M., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J.,Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Eds.; Data Handling in Science and Technology,Vol. 20, Part A; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; Chapter13, pp 379−440.(23) (a) Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.;Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw, J. E.; Goldberg, K. I.Organometallics 2010, 29, 2176−2179. (b) Gottlieb, H. E.; Kotlyar,V.; Nudelman, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512−7515.(24) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648−5652.(25) Lee, C. T.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785−789.(26) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa,J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.;Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.;Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.;Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels,A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham,M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;Johnson, B.; Chen,W.;Wong,M.W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.Gaussian03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.(27) Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299−310.(28) Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 2154−2161.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Article
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo500076c | J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2213−22252225