UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 7 25 FUNSTON ROAD KANSAS CITY. KANSAS 66115 May 2, 1991 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Results of TAT Site Assessment of the Turner Seed Company, Burlington, Iowa TO: Mary Jane Wingett PCMS/TOPE FROM: Mark T. Roberts^ EP&R/ENSV I have attached a copy of the TAT Site Assessment report for the Turner Seed Company site at 704-706 Jefferson Street, Burlington, Iowa. Site activities were conducted during the period of December 4 through 6, 1990, and involved the generation of a complete inventory of materials onsite, the containerization of leaking hazardous chemicals, the sampling of unknown materials, and the assessment of the building's structural integrity. A database of inventoried materials was developed following the completion of site activities and is included as attachment 2 in the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) report. The inventory consists of 426 records associated with 275 differ- ent products. Of the 426 records, more than one-third (156) are of products whose active ingredients are classified as suspended, cancelled, or restricted-use pesticides. Twenty-seven such pesticides were identified as ingredients of the inventoried products. Furthermore, 51 records were of products which have been cancelled for all uses. Active ingredients in these products included DOT, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy (acetic acid), 2,4,5-TP, chlordane, dieldrin, toxaphene, aldrin, dicofol, and chloranil. Conditions encountered inside the 4-story warehouse during the assessment remained as described in previous inspection reports. Materials throughout the building were in a state of extreme disarray. Many containers and labels have deteriorated, some beyond recognition; the contents of these containers have partially or completely spilled and, in some cases, have become intermingled with one or more other materials. The extent of the disarray prevents free movement beyond a small area inside the front door. S00080722 SUPERFUND RECORDS RECYCLE
78
Embed
semspub.epa.gov · 2017. 9. 8. · UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 7 25 FUNSTON ROAD KANSAS CITY. KANSAS 66115 May 2, 1991 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Results of TAT
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION 7
25 FUNSTON ROADKANSAS CITY. KANSAS 66115
May 2, 1991
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Results of TAT Site Assessment of the Turner SeedCompany, Burlington, Iowa
TO: Mary Jane WingettPCMS/TOPE
FROM: Mark T. Roberts^EP&R/ENSV
I have attached a copy of the TAT Site Assessment reportfor the Turner Seed Company site at 704-706 Jefferson Street,Burlington, Iowa. Site activities were conducted during theperiod of December 4 through 6, 1990, and involved thegeneration of a complete inventory of materials onsite, thecontainerization of leaking hazardous chemicals, the samplingof unknown materials, and the assessment of the building'sstructural integrity.
A database of inventoried materials was developedfollowing the completion of site activities and is includedas attachment 2 in the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) report.The inventory consists of 426 records associated with 275 differ-ent products. Of the 426 records, more than one-third (156) areof products whose active ingredients are classified as suspended,cancelled, or restricted-use pesticides. Twenty-seven suchpesticides were identified as ingredients of the inventoriedproducts. Furthermore, 51 records were of products which havebeen cancelled for all uses. Active ingredients in theseproducts included DOT, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy (acetic acid),2,4,5-TP, chlordane, dieldrin, toxaphene, aldrin, dicofol, andchloranil.
Conditions encountered inside the 4-story warehouse duringthe assessment remained as described in previous inspectionreports. Materials throughout the building were in a state ofextreme disarray. Many containers and labels have deteriorated,some beyond recognition; the contents of these containers havepartially or completely spilled and, in some cases, have becomeintermingled with one or more other materials. The extent of thedisarray prevents free movement beyond a small area inside thefront door.
S00080722SUPERFUND RECORDS
RECYCLE
Exterior and basic structural components have beensignificantly upgraded since inspections in 1986 and 1987revealed problems associated with the building's structuralintegrity. Broken and missing windows have been repairedor replaced, a sagging upper story north wall has beenreconstructed, and heavy timber reinforcement members havebeen added on the upper floors. These improvements have broughtthe building into compliance with orders issued to the owner,Horace Sutton, by the City Building Inspector's office.Furthermore, the building is currently considered to be incompliance with the City Fire Codes despite the presence of"excessive combustible material" on all floors as noted duringthe most recent inspection by the City Fire Inspector.
At present, the most likely routes of exposure to thehazardous materials onsite and the potential routes of migrationof these materials can be described as follows:
* A potential threat of direct contact exists for peopleentering the building. Although this threat cannot bediscounted, it appears to be of limited magnitude. Duringthe three days of on-site activity in December, human presencein the building was limited to the investigation team andMr. Sutton, who restricted his movements to a chair placedjust inside the front door. The front door is the only meansof access to the building; there are no side or rear entrances,and the first floor rear windows are screened and barred toprevent unauthorized entry.
* The potential exists for exposure via inhalation of fumesemanating from the building during periods of hot weather.The owner of an adjoining business complained of these fumesas well as of spillover of the resident rodent population inthe Turner Seed facility.
* Off-site migration under normal operating conditions appearsto be limited to tracking associated with foot traffic. Again,this traffic is limited in magnitude and the potential forcontact with most materials in the building is largely inhibitedby current conditions which limit ready access to most areas ofthe building. These conditions would change, of course, ifefforts were made to straighten the inventory.
* Off-site migration under abnormal, but conceivable,conditions is mostly associated with that of contaminated-waterdrainage. An apparently functional floor drain is located in thebasement and empties into a combination storm and sanitary sewer.This drain was formerly plugged with sludge formed when waterfrom a fourth floor waterline break percolated through storedmaterials on the upper floors. Standing water was pumped fromthe basement and the drain apparently cleared following asubsequent joint inspection conducted in 1986 by the
Burlington City Building Inspector's Office, the Burlington FireInspector, and the Des Moines County Health Department. There iscurrently little threat of additional drainage through this floordrain as the building is now structurally tight and water servicehas been shut off. The most conceivable, and worst-case scenariofor off-site migration would be that of a fire. This scenariowould involve the spread of contaminants through wind dispersionand contaminated-water runoff associated with fire-fightingactivities.
In summary, there appears to be existing, but limited,conditions at the Turner Seed facility that may warrantconsideration of a removal action. Prior to such consideration,however, there are issues that should be addressed by the variousAgency programs with interest in this site. The following issuesinclude:
1. Have Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)initiatives been exhausted? In particular, have efforts beenmade, or will they be made, to classify the materials as"abandoned materials" and, on this basis, pursue a RCRA closure?
2. If the RCRA program passes the lead to Superfund (SPFD), adetermination must be made as to whether the pesticides can beconsidered hazardous substances and, thus, subject to a Compre-hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Actclean-up action. Input from Counsel (CNSL) may be appropriate.
3. If Superfund SPFD assumes the lead, Notice Letters must beissued to potentially responsible parties, who, in turn, mustdecline to take appropriate action prior to the pursuit of aremoval action. In addition, it may be appropriate for the civilinvestigation team to determine the financial status ofTurner Seed and Mr. Sutton.
Once the various programs have had a chance to review theTAT findings, it would be beneficial to meet and discuss thepreferred course of action.
SITE NAME: Turner Seed CompanySITE LOCATION: Burlington. lovaTDD/PAN No.: T07-9010-069/EIA0208SAA
photoeraoner: Joe Parishlate/Time 12/6/90 - "°22-ens: ~"pe .-.F50mm'sriai .Jo. 1028199Frame Ho. 10Direction 1st Floor. Section nComments Bottles of Dieldrinand Rose Spray containing DOT -caps are partially or completelyrusted off
Photographer: Joe ParishDate/TimeLens: TypeSerial Mo.Frame Mo.DirectionComments
A site assessment conducted by E & E/TAT at the Turner Seed ware-house revealed the pesticide inventory to be in disarray with manycontainers and labels having deteriorated beyond recognition, and theircontents partially or completely spilled. At least 27 suspended, can-celled or restricted-use pesticides were documented as activeingredients in approximately one-third of the inventoried products. Thepotential for persons coming into direct contact with hazardoussubstances exists inside the building. The potential for off-sitemigration of contaminants also exists via foot traffic and a basementdrain.
INTRODUCTION
The Ecology & Environment Inc., Technical Assistance Team(E & E/TAT) was tasked by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Emergency Planning and Response (EP&R) Branch under TDD# T07-9010-069Ato conduct a site assessment of the Turner Seed Company warehouse inBurlington, Iowa, as recommended in the preliminary removal assessment.Specific tasks included: conduct a complete chemical inventory; containspilled or leaking materials; obtain samples of unknown materials; andassess the building's structural integrity. At TAT's suggestion a localbuilding code inspector was consulted for the structural assessment.The objective of the assessment was to evaluate the site for support ofjustification of any removal action deemed necessary. Team memberDurand Reiber was assigned to the project, with Mark Roberts as theEPA's On-Scene Coordinator (OSC).
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
iccycleU paper
BACKGROUND
The Turner Seed Company warehouse is located at 704-706 JeffersonStreet, in the commercial district of Burlington, Iowa, in Des KoinesCounty (Figure 1: site location map). The legal description of the siteis the NE 1/4, NV 1/4, NE 1/4, of Section 5, Township 69N, Range 2U.The active facility is a 4-story brick warehouse used as a storagebuilding for various pesticides, fertilizers, seed, and lawn, garden andapiarian (bee) equipment. Much of the inventory came from the formerTurner Seed Store, 812 Jefferson Street, which was condemned anddemolished sometime since 1987. The owner and operator of Turner SeedCo. is Horace Sutton of Burlington.
Both the warehouse and store have been the focus of several inves-tigations by city officials, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources(IONR), Iowa Department of Agriculture (IDA), and the Region VII EPA. In1986, the Veston/TAT inspected the warehouse and conducted a rough in-ventory of chemicals on all four floors. Samples were taken from sludgein the basement, which had formed due to a broken water pipe on thefourth floor flushing spilled material to the basement. The same year,the IDA conducted a Marketplace Survey at the store. It found severalproducts not registered with the State of Iowa, resulting in theissuance of Stop-Sale Notices. In 1987, the E & E/Field Investion Team(FIT) conducted a limited site investigation in conjunction with aResource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Inspection. FIT collected15 wipe and sweep samples from the walls and floors of the first, secondand third floors. In September 1990, the EPA and the IDA conductedanother inspection of the warehouse, resulting in more officialStop-Sale Notices.
Results of the sludge sampling failed to reveal the presence ofpesticides, however, the possibility exists that some pesticide peaksmay have been masked by the oil envelope. Halogenated compounds includ-ing hexachlorobenzene, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethylester and2-chlorophenol were quantitatively identified in two of the four sam-ples (E & E/FIT data summary for limited site investigation, 1987). TheMarketplace Survey identified two products of concern: ACME Veed No Morewhich contains Silvex or 2-(2,4,5,-Trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid(2,4,5,-TP) and Cull Veed & Tree Killer which contains 2,4,5-Trichloro-phenoxy-acetic acid (2,4,5-T), both of which are commonly associatedwith the presence of dibenzo-p-dioxins (E & E/TAT preliminary removalassessment, 1989).
Results of the 1987 wipe and sweep sampling indicated thatpesticide compounds have been released within the building:
Dioxin was detected only in trace amounts. Gross pesticide contam-ination appeared to be confined to the floors of the building. Ofgreatest concern is the lindane concentration (220 ppm), which exceedsthe acute oral toxicity range of 88 to 125 ppm for male rats (E & E/FITdata summary for limited site investigation, 1987).
Reports resulting from these investigations indicated that thebuilding was in deteriorating condition with broken windows and unsafestaircases; a large number of rats was present. The inventory wasreported to be in total disarray, with rusting containers, illegiblelabels, and spilled or leaking materials prevalent.
SITE ACTIVITIES
December 4 through 6, 1990; Site activities commenced at 0800hours on December 4, 1990. E & E/TAT members included Durand Reiber,Tim Tarwater, Joe Parish, and Oarrel Messbarger. OSC Mark Roberts alsowas on site. Site access had previously been arranged between Robertsand owner Horace Sutton, with Sutton unlocking the building for the teameach day. In Level C personal protective gear, TAT conducted asystematic container-by-container inventory of all pesticides in thebuilding. For each pesticide encountered, the following information wasrecorded: chemical manufacturing company, product name, activeingredients, size and type of container, quantity, EPA Regulation numberand EPA Establishment (EST) number if available, location, and conditionof containers. Special note was taken of those containers showing signsof leakage. Those with illegible labels or no labels were set aside forlater sampling.
The first floor of the warehouse was extremely crowded with equip-ment, boxes, newspapers, and general debris piled high, allowing onlysmall paths through which to walk (Attachment 1: photographic record).Due to the large amount of chemicals found on the first floor, the areawas divided into six sections (Figure 2: site map). Although there waselectricity, lighting in the back (north) portion of the building wasmarginal due to lack of lights and windows. A large number of live anddead mice were encountered during the inventory, probably due to theexcessive amount of seed and pesticides spilled throughout thewarehouse.
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
The first floor inventory was completed at 1700 hours on December5, 1990. By that time, a total of 355 pesticide products had beeninventoried and nine 'unknowns' had been staged in a corner for latersampling.
The following day, December 6, 1990, TAT overpacked containersencountered on the first floor that were noted to be leaking, had nolids, or were in seriously deteriorating condition and containedhazardous materials. The following items were contained: severalcartridges of 40% chlordane in solid form, one box of 22 1-ounce bottlesof 45% chlordane liquid, one box of 15 8-ounce bottles of ACME Ploverand Rose Shrub Spray (containing DOT and malathion), one 4-pound bag ofACHE arsenic lead, two cans with missing lids containing DDT powder, andapproximately 95 cardboard cans of Dupont Floral Dust containing 6%chlordane (photographic record). Many other containers with rustingcaps or in deteriorating condition are likely to be leaking in thefuture. In addition, mice continue to chew up labels, bags, plastic andother materials.
A total of nine containers without labels had been staged for sam-pling. However, six of the containers did not contain enough materialto warrant sample analysis. Therefore, only three samples (2 whitepowders and one brownish sludge) were submitted for analysis. Aftersample collection, all nine marked containers were set on a top backshelf of the north wall in section A.
On the afternoon of December 6, 1990, the inventory of the second,third, and fourth floors was completed. The second floor consistedprimarily of seed, feed, fertilizers, metal trash cans mainly full ofseed, trash and equipment, and numerous single containers and boxes ofpesticides. Many of the seed and feed bags had been broken open or weresimply deteriorated so badly that some areas were approximately one footdeep of loose material with mice tunnels and nests throughout.
The third floor had more seed and feed bags piled high along theeast wall as well as areas up to a foot or two deep of loose materialconsisting of at least seed, feed, fertilizers, and perhaps pesticidepowders. There were approximately 10 to 12 broken and scattered bags ofAmchem Ueedone Lawn and Weed Killer containing 2,4-D and Silvex(2,4,5-TP). It's possible that there is more of this herbicide mixedwith other spilled materials on the floor or in the numerous metal trashcans.
The fourth floor consisted primarily of seed and feed bags piled upalong the east wall with a foot of loose, spilled material, but fewsigns of any pesticides (photographic record). At the direction of theOSC, TAT did not attempt to contain the spilled materials on the upperthree floors, due to the excessive spilled amount, and the fact that itwas impossible to visually distinguish the spilled pesticides from thefertilizers, which also were mixed in with substantial seed.
An inspection of the entire building indicated that it was in bet-ter condition than was reported in earlier investigations. The upperfloors were reinforced with large vertical wooden beams and the stair-
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
cases were solid and safe. There were areas where the floor was rottingthrough, however, the floor supporting beams underneath appeared to bein good shape. All broken-out windows on all four floors had beenreplaced with glass. An inspection of the basement indicated that thesludge had been removed, exposing a large drain.
During the course of the site assessment, Roberts had conferredwith several local authorities about the building and its owner. Ac-cording to Hark Hirsbrunner, the Building Code Inspector, the buildingwas in satisfactory structural condition. Complaints filed againstSutton in 1985 and 1987 concerning the instability of the rear wall ofthe building, and the broken-out windows, respectively, had beenaddressed with satisfactory repairs and replacements by the owner.Hirsbrunner also stated that the internal heavy timber construction wasadequate for the loading he had observed at the warehouse. Another in-spector, John Mercer, noted no structural deficiencies when he inspectedall four floors of the warehouse in 1986. In regards to the drain ob-served in the basement, records indicate that it is apparently connectedto a combination sanitary/storm sewer system, and there is no indicationthat it has ever been disconnected. The Fire Inspector had noted thatthere were several fire and combustible hazards in the building due toall the bags, boxes, and debris, but had not cited the owner. Anadjacent business owner had stated to TAT that there were 'bad fumes'emanating from the warehouse in the summer, and that everyone in thearea suffered from mice and rat problems originating at Turner Seed.
The inventory was completed by 1500 hours on December 6, 1990, withTAT departing from the site at this time, and returning to Kansas Citythe following day. The following Monday, December 10, 1990, threesamples were submitted to the EPA laboratory for analysis under activitynumber COX9H. Sample number 001, a white powder, and number 002, abrown sludge, were both submitted for pesticide and herbicide analysis.Sample 003, a white powder, was submitted for herbicides only, as theword "herbicide" could be read on the torn label of the container wherethe sample was collected.
FOLLOU-UP WORK
Due to the large amount of written information accumulated in theinventory, TAT developed a database utilizing dBase 111+ to organize andtrack the specific pesticides on site. More than 500 records wereoriginally entered into the database. The 1988 and 1989 Farm ChemicalsHandbook was used to search for active ingredients or chemicalcompositions of some of the inventoried products.
SAMPLE AND INVENTORY RESULTS
Results of the three samples were received from the EPA laboratoryon February 6, 1991. All three samples were analyzed by gaschromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) scan for pesticides and/orherbicides. No target compounds were found above the detection limit inany of the samples (Attachment 4: data results).
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
More than 500 records of products found on site were originallyentered into the inventory database. After compilation of recordscontaining the same product name (including same manufacturer and activeingredients) and located in the same area, the database size was reducedto 426 records (Attachment 2: database inventory printout). Of these426 records, approximately 275 different products were identified.Products with the same name, uses and active ingredients, but differentmanufacturer, were combined in this total.
To evaluate the regulations associated with these products, TATconsulted Suspended, Cancelled, and Restricted Pesticides, (Office ofCompliance Monitoring, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, USEFA,February, 1990) which lists 81 suspended, cancelled, and restricted(SCR) pesticides. One hundred and fifty-six records in the inventorycontained products with SCR pesticides as active ingredients (Attachment3: Turner Seed pesticides on SCR list). At least 27 of the 81 SCRpesticides listed in the EPA publication were found in the Turner Seedinventory. The EPA booklet does not, however, include allrestricted-use pesticides. Therefore, more products may actuallycontain SCR pesticides than identified.
The inventory contained at least 51 records of pesticides for whichall products have been canceled for all uses — notably, DOT, 2,4,5-TP,2,4,5-T, aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, toxaphene, dicofol, and chloranil.Several products containing one or more of these nine canceled pestic-ides were found in poor, deteriorating and/or leaking containers, pri-marily on the first floor. Twenty-two 1-ounce bottles of liquid technic-al chlordane had very rusted caps. Some caps were totally rusted off.Cartidges containing solid technical chlordane were leaking due torodent damage. Ten-percent chlordane in powder form had spilled fromnine 4-pound bags on the second floor. Powdered toxaphene contained inHess & Clark Drycide product was spilled from 10 9-pound boxes on thethird floor. ACME Rose Shrub Spray containing liquid DOT in 15 8-ouncebottles had deteriorating caps, and one cap was totally missing. Three1-pound cans approximately one-fourth full of DOT powder were found onthe first floor. The cans had no lids, and had paint brushes in them,as though the owner was using the powder around the warehouse. Sixbulging 1-gallon metal cans of Amchem Weedone (contains 2,4,5-T) werefound on the first floor. Eight 1-quart cans of Amchem VeedoneChickweed Killer (2,4,5-T and 2,4-D) were found in poor, rusty andpotentially leaking condition on the first floor. On the third floor,approximately 15 5- and 18-pound plastic bags of Amchem Veedone Lawn andWeed Killer containing 2,4,5-TP and 2,4-D, were broken open andscattered with fertilizers, seed, and other products.
The afore-mentioned products are shown in the attached photographicrecord (Attachment 1). Many other products containing suspended orrestricted pesticides were also found in deteriorating and/or leakingcondition (Attachment 2: database inventory printout).
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
E & E/TAT conducted a site assessment of the Turner Seed Companypesticide warehouse from December 4 through 6, 1990. A container-by-
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
container inventory was conducted to determine the amounts and kinds ofpesticides in the 4-story warehouse. In addition, spilled and leakingmaterials were contained on the first floor. A total of three samplesof unknown materials were submitted to the EPA laboratory for pesticidesand/or herbicides analyses. Upon return from the field, TAT developed adatabase of the complete inventory for ease in retrieving information onspecific pesticide compounds of interest and evaluating the potentialthreat to the public. A total of 426 records were finalized in thedatabase. Utilization of the database indicates there are 156 recordscontaining at least one or more of 27 pesticides that have beensuspended, cancelled or restricted. Several products containing SCRpesticides were found open and/or leaking. Much of the inventory hasillegible labels and is in such deteriorated condition that the contentsare partially or completely spilled. The condition of the inventorywill worsen, if the owner does not take action to clean up the facilityand properly dispose of the SCR products. Old labels continue todeteriorate beyond recognition, and the large mice population iscontinually chewing through containers and labels, potentially creatingmore spills and 'unknowns' in the future.
According to building code inspectors, the 4-story brick buildingis in satisfactory condition, with no structural deficiencies noted.However, TAT observed some of the floor boards on the first floor nearthe back of the building were rotted through, and it is unknown how muchdeterioration the upper floors have undergone under the deep layers ofspilled and rotting fertilizers, seed, pesticides and other debris.
Previous sampling events by FIT have documented that pesticidecontamination exists on all floors, including pesticides on the SCRlist. Considering the disarray the inventory was found in during thissite assessment, and the obvious lack of any housekeeping employed atthe warehouse, it is assumed that gross pesticide contamination foundwithin the building several years ago still exists.
As the building owner has replaced all broken windows in thebuilding and site access is limited to the front door, migration ofcontaminants out of the building via windows is not a problem. However,Sutton is apparently still open for business, allowing the public topotentially come into direct contact with hazardous substances withinthe building, as well as bringing contaminants outside via foot traffic.In addition, a release of materials via the basement drain may alreadyhave occurred as the reported sludge in the basement is no longerevident. Potential releases of pesticides into this drain couldadversely impact the city's sewage treatment process. This open drainalso poses a threat to surface water via the storm sewer system. Inaddition, a high fire hazard has been observed within the building.Should a fire break out, and water be used to fight it, pesticides wouldbe flushed to the basement drain, posing a major threat of release.
The printout of the inventory database will be turned over to theRegion VII EPA Office of Pesticides and Toxics for further evaluationand determination of action to be taken. TAT has completed all tasks ofthe site assessment.
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1: Site Location MapFigure 2: Site MapPhotographic RecordDatabase Inventory PrintoutTurner Seed Pesticides on SCR ListData Results
jh
EIA0208SAA/9010069A/F
^ 2 A ^ : ,
TTr .4 i; -= — — * • ' • !!,'_ ^— • » <M! V
— ClPfe^^i! \I i| H I 1 .h
frVNttui
TURNER SEED SITEBURLINGTON, IOWA
WASTE TRACKING NO.: IA0208PREPARED BY: C. WILLIAMS
Preparad by Ourmd RaUxrEcology * Env<raniMal/IAr Jonuwy. 1081
TDD I: TO7-goi(H)6aAPAN •: BAOaOBSAA
FK3URE Z. SITE MAP-f IRST FLOOR
ATTACHMENT 2
DATABASE INVENTORY PRINTOUT
§ o
M
(l«
e s
aap 3
'. _L P
i
§M
O
- a
2Q
a1/1 O
t/i
3S
3S
I 3
ID
*r ^
a«
~ H
-i O
ul .<
— X
—
u.
a
1§
3H
O
Q I
~ AS,
— 5 5 i
9
§9
S =3 35
HO
<
C O
M
h «
^
wH
•• Q
H
K H
M
>«
n
M
V) M
KS
3aa
*n aa
•-« V
H^
"» w
„ n« »^ i
-H
-§
S --i
IN <<
ui 5 3
r< m i
ui3
g S OS
Mf B
"u « v
-a
H «
H •
S:
8u
3
i2a
• -H
B> X•
INa, e
<* u-1
V
IU
O
<J
CO
VI
rH V
I ^
H24V M
**
Mo
u
in U
<N o (M
in
gHG
M2
fcI""
Uo» —
O
—•-«
»»> Q
*-* '
— —
O —
§E
ai
oH
<i
QuQU
auo.U
)
tP V
41 CM
0. O
§
f*1 tfl
^-uvt
M
M
m in
in M
C
*^
w
-IE
§lf
P
Ml
78S ?
r-i T O
«
«—•
« —
p* *-* M
tn>-* «
<
at—
— U
, —
0a
~<
S2
2—
o.
stPJas
— fc.
oi
Ku
QId
§MH
«2
•8 ia I§;§O
Q v>
H§
Pg
Kli
Vt t*
HM
• J
f M
8S S
>0U
.S
u •* udapH
U
P* hi
ui in a, u
u
in
u.>,ui S§
sg°psg
gn sc
• C
O V
i U
(B
M
M
s?s; &| ?|±
2
TO
a O
U P
« M
^
(3 » Z
S
«
— Q
2
g p
—
w
IN g
iC
ZH
Q
>T
t«< <
-*Q
J O
</> Z —
fc. —
O
JS?SH
i-»
U
w M
B 3
sa ^G
35
N
Z £
O
2O
O
Q
X
I Oj,s
b J.a
di -*
B
-i§ -S
8s
~5
^55
(MB
oa -.3
» g
8
aMUM
'
K:a;aa«
o
t* •a
a:H
S
U
-J
J
8u
CS306u
gu
0< X*
IN0. O
§K
u.£?
S,op!
K8MLQ
W
O
10
tJ
Od z
H z
p M
z
9A
Z
Z
2
Z
DO
P P
Y
H
U) I/)
_1 -3
d
9 3
S gS
M
Q
MM
^ ^
2 C9
§
HH10
I u
in •
«
u •
^- «
Q
u §
u I
8u
a a
a a
M
a £ ME
g
8
v> u>
Si5
E§§i b is
ss
2 J?55
n.
Q3«M
IN
O
•<—
</l U.
VI
3 §
s-
O
(M
S5
t-t -Jt *•
<-H U
« H
-ifi -I
M
M X
<
N M
|N
M<
t/)
r-* rH r-
tA^ vJ h* a
«*-*-.*-—
-»
—
— H
—
t-4 rH r^ m
< «P
ao.5a
tU
) a
H f
sO
k. OX
s8
-38
s?
saY
M 0
K
<0 U
H U
U.
o
f
U
• t->
0-X.
feU
VI
>•Us
gMBQU
SH
— *
(K3— «£
2—
« —
t-* —
— M
r-
rt »
•»• ^
rt
3 C
2 p
9XT
-t 4
I I
s M
H 1
33
V)5<<I
o5S
B"
t-t V
- »
«•O
H
a a;
Or I
fi s a ft
-a8u3a
uMa
O1 X
« M
a. o
y o
u H
o
N M
N
3
-•
MO
?§ Jg
35
d §
H
§H
-J V
)
8 3
i
s sg
gg eg
52
5;
31 3
IOIfl3O
«N *n
— «
« as
_ :
•H 3 w 2
M 2
«i i
HMUtaI
IO
09
I I
CQ A
I I
t3 a
8w
I
b.O
g i
§ §
a a
• ,-!
• n
O. O
« J
5 S
S 8S
3 a
U1
O
M
s s
< p.
a P.
sMH
8<nS
tf) a
Ml
/]
2
£<
§3 S
1
2
a
o
H O
<
O
ft
H
C *"
*
M
^9
W ^
Q
Q
N
Q
T B
K
i f i
9 i
s *
M~"O
Q
— J u
i<
NM
&
rH
UM
—J
o —
P a
S
vj
™ sK
^a ^
asH
5
M
O4
§ 3
auN
s is
u I
V^ W
T
--SS
-^
in p
<
rf
S *§
"12•<i
8'MU
-g
8u£o6u3GI
18O M
.8 feU)MQU
) —
« r>.
Jj-V
I
vj
•—
i-si
8- 3-
M
V)
sg
sEM 5*
sB
-5
-!
•H •<
m
<
5sg
8Sg
3 2
5 28
2|
8
I E
SB" W
J
6L
Q
C
O
O03 g
2 O
H
S
3 g
?8
?S
?Q
8
JL
8r-(
r-l M
,H
M
—— S
—
R
——
5§
rjfi
ro
<
rH
a
™*
1Q
^
X—
h. —
06 —
J 8
— k.
•1 «
VI O
eMa3QI
ai
60S!
ge~a
w V
-
•• «• •
t" »
•D
- ; u
H •
c 1 i
u
K •
K
U •
3 S 5 ft *
a</t ^§
OMBO
a -
ueu
fc:0
0X
«l
8pgS
3Sau u
aMU
int-<a
ufeMV)
s
ii
sI gCM
5 IS
9 §
4- E
\ e
SE£I
*M
v*
M S
SU
] M
J
-3 s
°7
M,?
to
a j
s s;M
tS
N
O
!£ ?
S ?
g2
ro f
r>
H
gS S
io
J
yi o
Q a
s i
- « f* D
H I
^3!
-3—
PS
—
i
2 5
£ i:la= aS
8IM</>
%•tI
H5.
S . K~
auu
5 O
!-•
' a
a
8u
8E£
gai
QMa
H3Su
iU
l
uou
83
Bg;
8H
23!
O
M H
B
M
i* i
*-» Q
O
1
0 lO
D
M*
S
a
SZ
v\ Z uj as
E<
U H
O
pn
M
A
M
9
-as - 1v
Q X
rM
NT
o <
N
3-8
§"BE5 C
N
s~i --S
o
-in O
« «
— ft m —
I I
a, «
uItN
m
f|5
MX
- O
—
•<a
•O
H
•
H u •
I
i i £ *
u S 5 a «
8u
SiMI
Hz
SB
3 z
53 z
S z
2
2 z
z K
XB
SB
Do
08
uo
Do
Do
8
Do
3D
Do
us
at• «-«tP V• M
0. O
10aH
'
I!HI
M at
CD«•Id
V)
Xu u
m k. in
I"
V)
u
gE
rl Q
t^
£?§ ?
§EM?
*~ r^ K
4 T
S
H
-«r«
^1 X
M
15 5
M
— —
fc. —
4k
. —
2
HC
o
x O
f n
H
—
rtf«
<
-*O
- fc
a?«
8 fi= a
~?2
Iina
O
In •
U]
vlpj
bl •
•< e *
8u
S 35
B«
5S
<r *«
ro. <
S
gMBI 2
B *
3 §
9•H
M
O
•»
•
u> 5 (5 »
rH B
3
-I
i ^S
»
SIE is Isfi
el
ni
ioo
EW
o 0
*0rtO
1
0
10
r<*
XI o
O
I-~
—. pj
-. OS
«—
— H
$an »
as
i
HHinQI
gMUO
H
•^
a g:
« £
§£
:Q
u
SI U
•
8
8u
1C
r>
6 581
3
VI
V) K
U
Ou
t!
U B
. u
g w
v>
W S
SMUMcu
ein
« a
|8
S8
OH
Q
MaC
bB
3g 3gX^a
1 '
' 29B
£3e
d??J ?:::ie :EIN
M
15
«
«>
3
3§U H
UU
E°
3 o
b f
*«
«"O
H
J
H.
» w
O
H
!»l?«
M?
9e *
H *
E 5i
£t-l
r-*
r^ p
i M
^^
« —
«
b Q LO
—«
"-H m
•— M
—
& O vi
o»M
—voX
«-to*<< ^
^iQ
ti fs*<
<N— 2
— —
k. —
3 o 2 —
». —
J S Bh
J
H^
O
M
!;^ra _i
-i •< •» i
E3COI
<I•<I
<I
l|5u M
V
- —
» «
a i vo
•M
»
1 o
H •
ys 1! ' a
S:a
gggli|8i8u
j,fN•HeN
H8
1a
V*
HaSo
2uJ5Si;
O
a a
u
u
5(3
3QH
9 a§ h
1/1 JE
V)
0&
sMS
rf
nii V>s
SS
8o
H
N M
H
OH
II I N
O
10 s
SgB
MM
H
^i si8
g §
38M
<
M
<
C
MH
0
H
3
H
— o S B
-15 ^
mv
ep
X
--"
V?
M
^- —
^A
k.
— &
k.
—
|s I
si ?
Iai
<iO
0
I I
ft:u •
fii
§G
§ §
§s* iSi
o «SB
V
8n*
r* VI
rn m
t&
m
vi v> n
QaV)
Bi8;
!38
Z "I
£ ">
&
«5 3
r K
6g i I s
1 * | |p
MO
gU
-g
OM
M
'<
r-*
M <
*-*
*^
Q
*~
t O
<
S
^^
M-h
i —
J
C
— 1
-4 O
—
«A
fc*
—' *.
U
s a
&§
o3
ta
DO
-<
ID
CQ
u.
<I
I i
i i
l I
I
O
H •
U
K •
«
U •
aiaiI
i£8
Q J
l Q
Jl
eu
cuUl
0.V)
cuuinX
uu
312
gbb.« s
|i:S ^
NH
O
7i
H
•*M
"
UI
«Qt*»•
r-t r»
g 2
gB
~
H
* <*•
y
-8
-1
88
-« X
rH
O
O M
^
gg
aiai
a
H •
3 S:
8U
5 Ia in
M
I -
N
*.-. 3
a,4
asu
M
B
gMbII:
§CH
JI R ~
>-<
OTr+
*O
<0
k.
x— h.
— i
8§
£5e 9-S
B
_a
_:
*nc =2
-!
SgI
8
aj.-a ^r
<M
X
-1 I".
V)
a
§o
|S
H M
S „•
* - •
B«fi.B£:
< e < •o. E
ft «u 3 C
«
-a
ainD
G201U
u*I
8
iiB
§ Sg
8
2E !
d3-"
r"f
H Jl
? 9^
P <
~
t M '
—'
O*
b« —
»4
I
£i a*<d
HMO3ca
m CQ
> I
i
M V
-
f »
0*1
.
acEI
V)
3
0§u
cus
egO
C
BuggHu
-J
VI
<4 Q
<•»3
2
£ Z
J 2
a o
— o
h
oP
H
Q H
Q
HQ
H
AM
&
itH
^a ^a
^—
U
. —
k. —
i
?e
^8
^a
S§
=3
§
H S
N
S
M
P4 M
n
< C
a14
pa
5EGH u
m
a
= 39 s|—
a. k. ~- ft
3i5
*SN
: I
5|88
2^8 ?g~a
a «~g _I6
-Ss ==S i3S
<\
H •
*/> *
u *
8u
r^
r^
H H
o o
a 6. a
•J J
J
J
S 8!!!
uo.inI Lie
D
u. D«
Ew
v) S
vi
Uft
n K
«i a. «n
in io
IS
8uSQ
§EB8M <3
i -i S
f«o 2
^U
O
5 g ^ i s
—
W
H
H
M
fe s
s s
a K
K ""* j
£
Q
•-• 6 Q
r
MU
O
**^
Q Q
g^
.HII:— Q
!§
T10
nU
-H
§ s . «sH
M
O
Z H
Z
M s*
Be 3
? |g
j8 J
5 o <
"* oe, ^
r* pc o w
w
> 2 ^
2 z
«-g
*5
§ 1
J
M
MM
J
ffi
I H
Q
H
o«
H
r* M
T M
•-< 2 vo
Q
•-« p
M
(JM""
a
s §
3 I
BJlI-o P
U M
V
-
»
«• «
a
H «
•
M
- (S
O
f-i •o s B i
g g j
* -jo
x:
fi £
;!&:
Y?
Y f
•H
rH
l-<
T i 7 «
Ik.OS 3 K
a a
rx* 3 J
S
8
< a
ui
g
k* r*
(/l
0U
3M
S
8
I
°J
- i^
3HS
a ^
s e
H
U5
S01
R
ii II
u0, —fW—
O,MS
M g
j M
3 2
g Q
23
03H
i ISI
S3
?I
I IN
8s
ss2
fcM
O
N
__ sa
_|e _s
_^ -«
r-^
•'•P
!*
rt^
"-1
6§ |s
IM
M
M
? i fi IJ§§ ig 5
s:
SM.g~~
0 «" S i
H •
In «u
•
aI<I
0I
aM
a u
*
S P
st §§
2
•Jt
D 0
• aW)
M
-8u 5IO
8Uga
*§E
2B(N H
~- H
±3 ^S
SCM
O § Q
— Q
P
.
S 5s
: 2
2
«
«
«H
—
H
~<
t3
-ox
-i X2
— h.
— h.
O• 3:S
g IB
HCU
MU) HM
<S «
— H
—
H«
2
i- •«
8R
«
sa«I!
inaUI
QI
U M
Sssi§^
aE ,.
Si Si
M
JO
J
U
Sisso y03 OT
5U
cU
VIa i
a.aVI
QU
V) •B:
1
g
i EI
Q O
Q
:gssn i 5 &
PSH <
9 3u
V
E •
!-5at3I O= *9— -i a
8= ?8S:
s9
— k.
—
o>IIDI
.<8U
^ 53
SMs
g P
E i
B0.
o
a9
QU
~
— *B
^
» O
O
rt
— o. K
—
g
§P
G a G
p
& o
CN
I-t—
4
B 3|
-Is -i
M?Q
5g
5 S
gI : 3
i
BI/Ia*n
fN
t T
8u
g g
g
I 1
Iina
8^
M
MM
H
O
s» eg
in M
vi 5
a<>•.AxMV
IHB
l
sM8
VI&t-4
M
— • J
S SS
-«, S
HTp
N5
.5
8
II
T O 0
in
r^ i
X! 5E?o
§ gs
J.S'
5pG
--« »
«n«HQ
^o—
— O
—
?l ?»-l
•-»
=g =9— 2
— S
H •
5:
8u
mIai
aiY
T
r^
r^
r* t^
33
33
1 I
a
o
•J J
u u
u u
u u
o* Pt a* a<
o* OtVI
M
W
Ul
VI
VI
U U
D. B
.V
I V
>a,in
g|
gv) O
">
§tM
™<£
— 2
— ». —
a. a —
us
UH
"* Q
<N
H8
9
o
oi
iai
u.I
J,<M1O
l
7VO
8X
u.OOng
QIai
r* (N
r*
<N
I103k.
§
0 ll
<n n M
Q ..
Q
Si Q
si §
u$a
QId
gE§E
Ul
Zuj
<5•1C
MJ
Iri
23
_ _
U1
<<
-H
N. M
^-( oo
tiM
§
O
o o
' s
$C
3
U)
S!Y
VaI
-I 01
8u
ir4M>a
13oI
a a
rS
feS S
8g 8
au
oedw in
Bu
SO
S
Ovi M
w
in
V)
uV
I
U
88
§ S
I M
s
§?n»
UIm
vo fr«
u. ft
o;o
p
§ 8
??ae
h^
Q •<
n
rt
N H
o E
g Eg
M
b M
i «i -4
i o
i A
S S OS
M
if W
-"u
r*
SM
Cc
•5 O
H*
a i
tJ v) •
c K
u •
<I•tI
aIr<
r>
8u
IoI
IztHU.
U U
M N
Ia
d
a a
I
s ^s
gH
VI&w
^™
'
-SiVO
•< >N
— fcl
—
I
3!
K
IN
—
PS
8MU
Su
M£H
9fiQ
O
Wn
Fo o
8 «
i-« m
at—
a.
a p
MM
—
— o
*)^.2
n -<
o u
spg
3M
•<
M
O
&dagHI
fci
--Sg
fl -
in ia N H
•<
» I
g =
US
8u
ao
ai
aiM
P
4
ii
uSiVIM
IMoN
5QS w-a8Id
II3o
8*Kg
Hi
55 I
SSH I gtA
rH
I
-9
-;(N
«<
IN
|
§E"r* O
<N
9?
COIa>I
mICOI
COI
N| 3
SM
V
-
< <0
SH S -
Im
aiI ? ,
en•
••<0- V« INa. o
asg
% cM
S S
a8
auau
VI
8
28
Ǥ
gg
< g
Z
M
O
M
M
lJ G
M
9 § q i
38
to
IJ p
i
am
O
I
O
<H O
_^Q
—
«33
s: ;•H
*S
C
T>
" g
g
T z i T
p 8 i O
i a
*H
M
*-t
r-«
U
r*
**
ti
>« 5 «
o«
nM
< ao <<
*° *1
3 g
2 B
W
r-( i
S i!
g £5
--58
B
-itn
F
* t-l
M <
r-l
•* «
! •*•fi
-g
8UI
t-f
iS
QI<I
Sa
&d
fN
ir* c*
r^
VS
H
??i ?iM
r*
Q
r*4 M
c c
J
Jr»
i~
01 V
I
§MB
I O
«"Psi g
JH f
13 4§
1 ?
lU
—
Q
g a
5 »s-e
-•» 5
- 1
*A O
BiVI
3mi
S« a.S
H
va0
*1 .
£ui << •ft:
-a
f-4
f?
S
I -
^ ^
04 d
I CM
Q
VI
VI
?•ai
S3
SS
S £
euSeu
0< V• r*B
. OU
E
USS
S
&M
; isd
Sg
B £
i£S
SSiM
sEPI 8
* 2
3 *
S m
Eg §
§ £8
Q 8 K
S H
dp5
C
u G
o K
B.U
—«
"Q«
"* «O
M
>N
H
~Z
M
~M
KM
^H
*< >
-*Q«<
^r<<5
D
— h.
— &
k. —
h.
aiVI
af
f f
iSn-
*' I«s§
>K:u •
°§-a§
ia<4i.i
asuM
K x
<na
a s
38-U
U
Bs
2VI
ATTACHMENT 3
TURNER SEED PESTICIDES ON SCR LIST
Suspended, Cancelled, and Restricted (SCR) PesticidesPrepared by the Office of Compliance Monitoring,
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances,U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
This booklet has been compiled for the purpose of summarizing and clarifyingactions taken by EPA for pesticides that the Agency has suspended, cancelled, orotherwise restricted because of concern for potentially adverse effects.*
The following have been excluded from this booklet:
a) Pesticide registrations that have been cancelled for failure to pay the annualregistration maintenance fee required by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended in 1988;
b) Cancellations on pesticide use patterns that were cancelled by PesticideRegulation Notices based on "residue," "no residues," and "zero tolerances";
c) Pesticides that have been cancelled by some, but not all, registrants; and
d) Pesticides that have been suspended as the result of Stop, Sale, Use, orRemoval Orders as defined under Section 3(C)(2)(B) of FIFRA.
This listing identifies the current status and references the regulatory history of eachpesticide, as well as the criteria of concern for which the chemical was reviewed by theAgency. This booklet was designed to provide EPA inspectors with a quick referenceguide, as well as to provide other government agencies, both domestic and foreign, withcurrent information on these pesticides. This guide should also prove useful to anyoneinterested in pesticides or involved in pesticide regulatory work.
This publication was compiled in conjuction with technical, legal, and scientificdivisions within the Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. It represents the fifthedition of the Suspended, Cancelled, and Restricted Pesticides booklet and replaces theprevious edition published in January 1985. The material in this edition was compiled asof February 1990. Future Agency actions will necessitate updating this publication, andinserts will be published periodically.
* The term restricted applies to pesticide uses that have been limited, revised, or restricted tocomply with specific label changes mandated by the Agency and does not include all restricted-usepesticides, which require application by or under the direct supervision of a certified applicator asdefined under Section 3(d) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). To obtaina separate list of these restricted-use pesticides, please contact the EPA Registration Support Branch,Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs (703) 557-7700.
Pesticides List February 1990
INDEX
- PESTICIDES FOUND IN TURNER SEED INVENTORY
Alar
-Jf Aldrin
Amitraz
Arsenic Trioxide
Benomyl
BHC
Bithionoi
Bromoxynil
Bromoxynii Butyrate
Cadmium
Calcium Arsenate(& Calcium Arsenite)Captafol
Captan
Carbon Tetrachioride
Chloranil
<v- Chlordane
See Daminozide
Hexachlorohexahydro-endo, exo-dimethanonaphthaiene95 percent, and related compounds 5 percent (CAS No.309-00-2)