DRAFT 2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received Page 1 of 6 Comment # Category Comment (previous Activity numbers) Response (current Activity numbers) Table 1 or 2 1 Revision Match culvert activities to the new culvert rule Culvert activities 1-C5 through 1-C7 have been revised. 1 2 Revision Streamline vegetation management activities Vegetation management activities have been consolidated from nine activities into four and a definition for vegetation management has been created. Both 3 New Activity Add an activity to cover phragmites and other invasives on public land Activity 2-A17 was added for phragmites work. Also, habitat type “uplands” was added for Activity 2-A16, Target-specific pesticide use. 2 4 Revision Add other habitat types to 2-B35, construction matting Placement and removal of construction matting in agricultural and manicured ROW/UC habitats has been added as new activities 1- B24 and 2-B31. Both 5 Overall comment on tables/ Avoidance Measures For bird EO avoidance, consider incorporating or amending the bird buffers as suggested by Environment Canada. See the following site for their recommendations: https://www.ec.gc.ca/paom- itmb/default.asp?lang=En&n=8D910CAC-1 Since the buffer we’re using needs to cover all listed birds we need to use a more conservative number. All listed bird species are considered “species at risk” by Environment Canada and therefore subject to the following: A larger buffer may be needed to minimize the risk of disturbance caused by industrial operations and for species at risk. Also, please note, some of the recommended buffers suggested by Environment Canada exceed the distance we’re using. Both
62
Embed
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cyclednr.wi.gov/.../Documents/CompleteBITPA_03_09_2016.pdf · 3/9/2016 · 15 New Activity Add Barrel burns as a new general activity This activity
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DRAFT
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Vegetation management activities have been consolidated from nine activities into four and a definition for vegetation management has been created.
Both
3 New Activity Add an activity to cover phragmites and other invasives on public land
Activity 2-A17 was added for phragmites work. Also, habitat type “uplands” was added for Activity 2-A16, Target-specific pesticide use.
2
4 Revision Add other habitat types to 2-B35, construction matting
Placement and removal of construction matting in agricultural and manicured ROW/UC habitats has been added as new activities 1-B24 and 2-B31.
Both
5 Overall comment on tables/ Avoidance Measures
For bird EO avoidance, consider incorporating or amending the bird buffers as suggested by Environment Canada. See the following site for their recommendations: https://www.ec.gc.ca/paom-itmb/default.asp?lang=En&n=8D910CAC-1
Since the buffer we’re using needs to cover all listed birds we need to use a more conservative number. All listed bird species are considered “species at risk” by Environment Canada and therefore subject to the following: A larger buffer may be needed to minimize the risk of disturbance caused by industrial operations and for species at risk. Also, please note, some of the recommended buffers suggested by Environment Canada exceed the distance we’re using.
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Page 2 of 6
Comment # Category Comment Response Table 1 or 2
6 Revision/ Avoidance Measures Document
For 2-B2 through 2-B5, Single pole replacement or removal, various habitats, wood turtle issues have caused numerous remobilizations for projects that are only partially covered by the no/low
A Wood Turtle Avoidance Measures document has been prepared and is linked to Activities 2-B2 through 2-B5 as well as other activities in Table 2.
2
7 Revision For 1-B2 and 1-B3 and 1-B4 Single pole replacement or removal, agricultural and maintained ROW/maintained UC and upland, add “or completed in 1 day” to the additional conditions
This language was added to activities 1-B2 and 1-B3. Single pole replacement, upland, was removed, since it was duplicative with the manicured ROW/UC category.
1
8 Revision For 1-B4, 1-B9 and 1-B11 Bore pit or other minor excavation, maintained ROW/maintained UC, horizontal/directional drilling and vegetation management for access and UC maintenance (selective clearing), limit excluded area for the Hine’s Emerald Dragonfly (HED)
Maintained ROW/maintained UC has been revised to manicured ROW/UC and the definition has been updated to clearly exclude wetlands. With that revision, HED no longer needs to be excluded for this type of habitat. Also, for other habitat types, "excludes wetland/aquatic habitats" has been added to the additional conditions for several activities.
1
9 Forms Add the ability to sign the ER Review Verification Form electronically
The form can now be signed electronically. NA
10 Definitions Hyperlink to definitions The definitions used throughout the tables are now hyperlinked.
Both
11 Revision Change "All activities" to "Any activity not otherwise listed" in 1-A13 and 2-A11
This change was made. Both
12 Revision Add other types of installations to the open cut trenching activity (1-B16)
This activity description (now 1-B17) was revised to: Includes installation, replacement or maintenance of underground utilities.
1
13 Correction In Table 2, the OBT ‘docment’ is misspelled. The correction has been made. 2
DRAFT
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Page 3 of 6
Comment # Category Comment Response Table 1 or 2
14 Avoidance Measures Documents
Add a cricket frog Avoidance Measures Document
A Cricket Frog Avoidance Measures document has been prepared and is linked to certain activities in Table 2.
2
15 New Activity Add Barrel burns as a new general activity This activity has been added as Activity 1-A23. 1
16 New Activity I do think that it would be nice to have a 5th category for cell tower construction and maintenance, since there are so many different variables (i.e. actual new tower construction, new collocations to buildings, water towers, and other non-tower structures) that include many of the Table 1 low impact activities (i.e. excavations, building and tower foundations, fencing, access roads, new AG or BB utilities from the right-of-ways, landscaping, removing trees). This would become really clear and easy to follow the guidelines if we had a Telecommunications Facility [category]
New activities have been added to Tables 1 and 2 for new tower construction and for collocations to buildings/water towers/other existing non-tower structures. The Telecommunications Facility activities have been moved to the end of Section B and a subheading “Utility Activities—Telecommunications Facilities” has been added.
Both
17 Revision Add "maintained ROW/maintained UC" to the pipeline maintenance activities
Manicured ROW/UC has been added as an additional habitat type to the Pipeline Maintenance Activities that previously only covered agricultural habitat, 1-B20 and 2-B25.
Both
DRAFT
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Page 4 of 6
Comment # Category Comment Response Table 1 or 2
18 Definitions The current biggest struggle with the BITP/A is determining and proving that an area is "manicured and maintained" as defined in the BITP/A definitions. This is hard to determine for road shoulders and roadside ditches.
Maintained/manicured has been changed to manicured/mowed to eliminate conflicting definitions. We acknowledge that it can be difficult to know whether the height of the vegetation has been maintained at less than 6 inches. Other definitions were considered; however, it was determined that it is also difficult to determine whether an area has a regular schedule of maintenance. If you are unsure as to whether or not an area qualifies as manicured or mowed, we recommend that you submit a review.
Both
19 Long linear spreadsheet
Merge the two so that only the non-covered taxa groups are in the long linear spreadsheet
All of the species that come up in the Portal need to be addressed in the spreadsheet. The spreadsheet can be skipped and the ER Verification Form used only if all Taxa groups/species are covered by the no/low.
NA
20 Revision Look into adding Access for other habitat types
Agriculture was added as a habitat type to Activity 2-B26.
2
21 Revision Minimize the language for single pole replacement and maybe add back in an average of one pole per mile
Language was streamlined in both Table 1 (1-B1) and Table 2 (2-B2). One pole per mile was not added in order to be consistent with other activities listed in the no/low that are limited by square footage of impact.
Both
22 Definitions Add definition for Project, add "does not include wetlands" to definition of maintained ROW
A definition for project has been added. NA
DRAFT
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Page 5 of 6
Comment # Category Comment Response Table 1 or 2
23 Definitions Look at revising our definition of ‘maintained vs. ‘manicured’ – from a utility’s perspective, a maintained ROW is one that goes through vegetation management on a ~5 year cycle
See response to Comment #18 above. NA
24 New Activity Include PTC monopoles in Transportation section
This activity has been added as 1-C26. 1
25 Revision For the Access activities, change "Off and/or along" to "Within"
This change has been made to Activities 1-B22 and 2-B26.
Both
26 General Comment
A consistent scientific assessment on the species from the SME, would help the outside ER Certified Individuals train field personnel. This would help ensure better compliance when the field personnel would know that the avoidance measures are the same, year in and year out.
Guidance is only changed when necessary based on new scientific evidence. Recent changes that were made to the Wood Turtle guidance document provided for a larger date range for completing projects.
NA
27 Revision For Activity 2-B17, I find it odd that there are such strict restrictions on terrestrial invertebrates, where other more invasive activities such as Vegetation Management and 2-B28 do not have this restriction. What is the reasoning there? Note, this restriction is not under Activity 1-B11 which covers the same activity type, adding to inconsistency.
The restriction on terrestrial invertebrates has been removed from Activity 2-B17.
2
28 Revision Clarify habitat types for the line clearance activity
Urban/residential and manicured ROW/UC were added as habitat types for Activity 2-B18.
2
DRAFT
2016 No/Low Broad ITP/A Revision Cycle Responses to Comments Received
Page 6 of 6
29 Revision What would be the best activity, either Table 1 or 2, for a site visit of the project team to review engineering and construction scope? Often times teams visit the project site 3 or 4 times to plan for the project. This can involve use of UTV’s, trucks, etc. I see categories under both Table 1 and 2 that sound like it would fit this type of activity, however, their descriptions and restrictions by taxa are inconsistent. I could see the following fitting this type of ‘survey’ work: 2-B31, 2-B30, 2-B26, 1-A3.
Activity 2-B27, Aboveground inspections, surveys, minor maintenance and repair, would be the best fit for the work you’re describing. In reviewing your comment, the activity for Annual Inspections was removed from Table 2 since it was determined to be duplicative with 2-B27.
2
DRAFT
Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization – No/Low Impact Activities
Table of Contents
Page Introduction
Background i Coverage i Process i Reporting ii Definitions of Terms ii
Tables
Table 1 A. General Activities 1 B. Utility Activities 3 Telecommunication Facilities 6 C. Transportation Activities 7 D. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Standard Practices 9
NRCS Standard Practices (A-C) 9-11 NRCS Standard Practices (D-H) 12-14 NRCS Standard Practices (I-P) 15-17 NRCS Standard Practices (R-S) 17-19 NRCS Standard Practices (T-W) 19-22 Notes 22
Table 2
(for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers only)
A. General Activities 1 B. Utility Activities 2
Telecommunication Facilities 5 C. Transportation Activities 5 D. NRCS Activities 6
Appendices (for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers only)
Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization – No/Low Impact Activities
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
INTRODUCTION
Background:
Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin and is therefore proposing to issue this broad incidental take permit (used by non-state agencies and individuals) and broad incidental take authorization (used by state agencies), as provided for under s. 29.604 Wis. Stats, to cover these situations. Examples of activities that are considered to have no impact or a low impact and are incorporated into this permit and authorization include land acquisitions, wetland delineations, sign installations and utility maintenance activities.
An incidental take permit or authorization is typically issued on a project-by-project basis, however a broad incidental take permit and authorization (BITP/A) was created for this situation so that separate applications, permit fees and public notice periods are not required. Coverage:
This BITP/A includes activities within four general categories:
A. General Activities
B. Utility Activities
C. Transportation Activities
D. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Standard Practices Process:
Any individual, organization or agency whose activity meets all of the following components (see below) in Table 1, No/Low Impact List for All Species at All Times of the Year, is covered and does not need to conduct any further review for endangered resources.
Activity
Description
Additional Conditions
Please note, if the activity is part of a utility project that is already broken down into pre-defined segments, please
coordinate with the Utility Liaison to determine if these segments can be considered stand-alone projects.
Table 2, No/Low Impact List by Taxa Group, is designed for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers only. Each
activity is broken down by Taxa Group. If the activity is covered for that particular Taxa Group, a check mark appears in
the column. If the activity is not covered for the entire Taxa Group, additional information is presented in the table, i.e.,
specific species not covered, see Avoidance Measure document, etc. If the activity is not covered for the entire Taxa
Group, “not covered” will appear in the cell.
Avoidance Measures documents have been prepared for the aquatic insect, bird, fish, mussel, and plant Taxa groups as
well as for the Blanchard’s cricket frog, the ornate box turtle and the wood turtle, to allow for an additional method for
a project to be covered by the no/low Broad ITP/A. These documents are included in Appendices A through H.
DRAFT
- Page ii - Last rev. 03/09/2016
If the activity is not covered by Table 1, Table 2 or the Avoidance Measures documents, it will require either an ER
review (for more information on ER reviews please see: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/ERReview/Review.html) or the
submittal of a Proposed Certified ER Review.
If a project covered by the BITP/A requires other DNR permits, an ER Review Verification Form should be completed. The
ER Review Verification Form fulfills the requirement of an ER Review and should be attached to other permits to show
that ER requirements have been met.
Reporting:
Given the diverse nature of the activities, species and environmental conditions to which the BITP/A may be applied,
annual reporting will be required to monitor and verify the use and application of this Permit/Authorization. Reporting
will be required of all commercial, governmental or non-profit entities that conduct projects covered under the BITP/A.
This information will also be used for future amendments or modifications to the Permit/Authorization to ensure that it
achieves its objectives and remains relevant to the covered activities and species.
Responsible parties must place documentation in the project file when the BITP/A is utilized. They also must submit an
annual no/low BITP/A report to the Bureau of Natural Heritage Conservation (BNHC) documenting that their activities
were performed in accordance with the specifications, definitions and conditions defined herein.
For ER Certified Reviewers, the annual no/low BITP/A report can be included as an Attachment to the Certification
Annual Report.
Definitions of Terms:
Above ground facilities—Transformers, pedestals, switch fuse boxes, hand holes, pumping or valve stations or huts
Agricultural—Consists of cropland and farmstead land uses (see below).
Cropland—Fields are actively planted or have been in the previous year, does not include pasture (see below).
Emergency—An actual or imminent threat of significant harm to the environment or to public health or safety exists for
all or a portion of a project. Also includes a customer power or gas outage, or probable equipment failure leading to a
customer power or gas outage.
Farmstead—An agricultural production site which may contain any of the following: livestock production buildings and
associated lots, manure and feed storage structures, machine storage/repair facilities, residences and the site is
routinely disturbed by human and/or domestic animal activity.
Manicured/Mowed—Landscape is mowed, height of vegetation is less than 6 inches between mowings, does not
include wetlands. Typically includes flowerbeds, landscaped areas, residential lawns, golf courses and parks in urban or
residential areas. Could include right-of-ways (ROWs) and utility corridors (UCs) (see below), that meet the above
definition.
Open-cut trenching—Trench width from 12 to 24 inches, only covered by the no/low BITP in agricultural,
urban/residential and manicured ROW/UC land uses. An excavation method where the trench is cut into the ground
from the surface using traditional excavation equipment.
Pasture—Land (and the vegetation growing on it) devoted to the production of introduced or indigenous forage for
harvest by grazing, cutting, or both, currently or within the previous year.
Table 1--No/Low Impact List for All Species at All Times of the Year
Activity Description Additional Conditions Rationale for Additional Conditions
If your activity or practice is not listed in this table, your project requires further review by the Endangered Resources Review Program.
1-D72 Watering Facility NRCS Conservation Practice Standard - Code # 614
Practice is low impact on Cropland and Farmstead;
however, requires further review on Pasture and
Undisturbed/Unmanicured Areas.
Additional requirement for Pasture
and Undisturbed/Unmanicured Areas
is due to the increased species
diversity in these habitats since these
lands are not routinely
maintained/disturbed .
1-D73 Well Water Testing NRCS Conservation Practice Standard - Code # 355 No impact on all landscapes. Not applicable.
1-D74 Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management NRCS Conservation Practice Standard - Code # 644 Low impact on all landscapes.
Only applies to wood duck boxes and
wild rice seeding.
1-D75 Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment NRCS Conservation Practice Standard - Code # 380
Practice is low impact on Cropland and Farmstead;
however, requires further review on Pasture and
Undisturbed/Unmanicured Areas.
Additional requirement for Pasture
and Undisturbed/Unmanicured Areas
is due to the increased species
diversity in these habitats since these
lands are not routinely
maintained/disturbed .
1 ROW: Right-of-Way
2 UC: Utility Corridor
3
4
5
Notes:
Threatened and endangered plants are protected on public land except in the course of forestry or agricultural practices, in the construction, operation, or maintenance of a utility facility, or as part of bulk
sampling activities under s. 295.45. (Wis. Stat. 29.604). "Utility" is defined as including the production, transmission, delivery, or furnishing of electrical power, light, heat, water, natural gas, sewer, or
telecommunication services.
Emergency activities are covered by the fact that it is an emergency. An emergency is defined as an actual or imminent threat of significant harm to the environment or to public health or safety for all or a portion
of a project. Also includes a customer power or gas outage, or probable equipment failure leading to a customer power or gas outage.
This Broad ITP/A covers state-listed species only. It does not cover Federal species or species covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or Golden and Bald Eagle Act. To determine if Federal species are located
within the vicinity of the project site, please refer to the USFWS’ website: www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/lists/wisc-cty.html. If a Federal species is located within the County of the project area, contact the
USFWS Twin Cities Field Office at (612) 725-3548 for further information and guidance.
2-D1 Any activity with no element occurrences (EOs).
Any activity with no element occurrences (EOs) when searched through NHI with
standard 1-mile (terrestrial and wetland species) and 2-mile (aquatic species)
buffers.
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROW: Right-of-Way
8
UC: Utility Corridor
9
10
11 BCF: Blanchard's Cricket Frog
12 SGL: Slender Glass Lizard
13 OBT: Ornate Box Turtle
Dates for herp active periods can be found at: http://wiatri.net/er/nhitraining/docs/HerpCalendar.pdf, with updates based on the current year's weather conditions provided here:
Emergency activities are covered by the fact that it is an emergency. An emergency is defined as an actual or imminent threat of significant harm to the environment or to public health or safety for all or a
portion of a project. Also includes a customer power or gas outage, or probable equipment failure leading to a customer power or gas outage.
Broad Incidental Take Permit for Cave Bats--http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/ERReview/ItBats.html.
A checkmark signifies that all species within this Taxa group are covered for the corresponding activity and an ER Review is not required. If any species within the Taxa group is not covered, additional notes will
appear in the cell.
HED: Hine's Emerald Dragonfly
Threatened and endangered plants are protected on public land except in the course of forestry or agricultural practices, in the construction, operation, or maintenance of a utility facility, or as part of bulk
sampling activities under s. 295.45. (Wis. Stat. 29.604). "Utility" is defined as including the production, transmission, delivery, or furnishing of electrical power, light, heat, water, natural gas, sewer, or
telecommunication services. If your activity is not exempt, see the Plant Avoidance Measures document.
If a species or Taxa group is not covered for an activity that involves ground disturbance, an ER Review will need to be completed or a Proposed ER Review submitted.
This Broad ITP/A covers state-listed species only. It does not cover Federal species or species covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or Golden and Bald Eagle Act. If a Federal species came up in the NHI Portal search for this project, contact the USFWS Twin
Cities Field Office at (612) 725-3548 for further information and guidance. If this project involves Federal funding, please refer to the USFWS’ website: www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/lists/wisc-cty.html to determine if Federal species are located within the
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix A Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Aquatic Insects
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group Aquatic Insects in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected]. Please note, the below avoidance measures are required for aquatic insects listed as Threatened or Endangered and recommended for aquatic insects listed as Special Concern.
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project at least 300’ away from a waterway?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for aquatic insects. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project within 300’ of a waterway, but will not be impacting the streambed or streambank?
YES. Erosion control is required. With appropriate erosion control measures in place the project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
Please note that plastic or polypropylene netting associated with erosion matting (also known as an erosion control blankets or erosion mesh netting) without independent movement of strands can easily entrap snakes and other wildlife moving through the area, and cause dehydration, desiccation, and eventually mortality. Biodegradable
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix A Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Aquatic Insects
jute/twine netting with the “leno” or “gauze” weave (contains strands that are able to move independently) has the least impact on snakes.
If erosion matting will be used for this project, use the following matting (or something similar): American Excelsior “FibreNet” or “NetFree” products; East Coast Erosion biodegradable jute products; Erosion Tech biodegradable jute products; ErosionControlBlanket.com biodegradable leno weave products; North American Green S75BN, S150BN, SC150BN or C125BN; or Western Excelsior “All Natural” products.
NO (the streambed or streambank will be impacted). An ER Review is required, DNR staff—
complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
2. Is the project within 300’ of a waterway, but will not be impacting the streambed or streambank?
Erosion control is required. With appropriate erosion control measures in place the project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form. Please note that plastic or polypropylene netting associated with erosion matting (also known as an erosion control blankets or erosion mesh netting) without independent movement of strands can easily entrap snakes and other wildlife moving through the area, and cause dehydration, desiccation, and eventually mortality. Biodegradable jute/twine netting with the “leno” or “gauze” weave (contains strands that are able to move independently) has the least impact on snakes. If erosion matting will be used for this project, use the following matting (or something similar): American Excelsior “FibreNet” or “NetFree” products; East Coast Erosion biodegradable jute products; Erosion Tech biodegradable jute products; ErosionControlBlanket.com biodegradable leno weave products; North American Green S75BN, S150BN, SC150BN or C125BN; or Western Excelsior “All Natural” products.
NO
1. Is the project at least 300’ away from a waterway?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO (the streambed or streambank will be impacted)
Avoidance measures are met for aquatic insects. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix B Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Birds
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group Birds in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected].
Please note, the avoidance periods and buffer distances referenced below are required for birds listed as Threatened or Endangered and recommended for birds listed as Special Concern. For the following bird species refer to the Grassland and Savanna Protocols for potential additional requirements: Bell’s Vireo, Greater Prairie Chicken, Henslow’s Sparrow, Kirtland’s Warbler, Loggerhead Shrike, Upland Sandpiper, and Yellow Rail.
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project occurring outside of the avoidance period for all listed birds (from October 1st through February 28th)?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for birds. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental
Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project occurring outside of the avoidance period for the specific bird species encountered?
Refer to the Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory to determine the dates for the particular bird species encountered.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix B Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Birds
Page 2 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
YES. Avoidance measures are met for birds. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 3.
3. Does the project site overlap the specific bird species EO or is it within 300 feet of suitable
habitat, which is the buffer distance that may cause nest abandonment?
YES. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO. If the project does not overlap a nest site or occur within the buffer distance, the project
will likely not impact the specific bird species. Avoidance measures are met. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix B Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Birds
Page 3 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Taxa Group—Birds, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
YES
1. 2. Is the project occurring outside of 2. the avoidance period for the 3. specific bird species encountered?
Avoidance measures are met for birds. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO
NO
1. Is the project occurring outside of the avoidance period for all listed birds (from October 1st through February 28th)?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
Avoidance measures are met for birds. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
4. 3. Does the project site overlap the specific bird species EO or is it within 300 feet of suitable habitat, which is the buffer distance that may cause nest abandonment?
If the project does not overlap a nest site or occur within the buffer distance, the project will likely not impact the specific bird species. Avoidance measures are met. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix C Avoidance Measures—Blanchard’s Cricket Frog
Page 1 of 2 Last rev. 02/12/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Blanchard’s Cricket Frog in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected]. Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 23 m (75 ft) from a lake,
pond, stream, river, wetland or other standing water?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for the Blanchard’s Cricket Frog. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 15 m (50 ft) from a lake, pond, stream, river, wetland or other standing water, and during the inactive period for the Blanchard’s Cricket Frog (from December 1st through March 14th)? YES. Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad
Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a
Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
4. 2. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 15 m (50 ft) from a lake, pond, stream, river, wetland or other standing water, and during the inactive period for the Blanchard’s Cricket Frog (from December 1st through March 14th)?
5.
6. 7.
8.
Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO
1. 1. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 23 m (75 ft) from a lake, pond, stream, river, wetland or other standing water?
2.
3.
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix D Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Fish
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group Fish in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected]. Please note, the avoidance periods referenced below are required for fish listed as Threatened or Endangered and recommended for fish listed as Special Concern.
Avoidance Measures for Work within a Waterbody/Waterway (work outside of waterbodies/waterways can be covered by implementation of erosion and runoff prevention measures)
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project occurring during the non-spawning period for all listed fish (from January
through mid-April or from September to October)? YES. Avoidance measures are met for fish. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental
Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project occurring during the non-spawning period for the specific fish species
encountered?
Refer to the Wisconsin Fish Spawning Calendar for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory to determine the dates for the particular fish species encountered.
YES. Avoidance measures are met for fish. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental
Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix D Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Fish
Page 2 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
NO. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--
submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program with information for the specific fish species.
Contacts Sport fish requirements may also be necessary for water permits. If a project cannot be conducted due to the limitations of the combined dates, or for other questions regarding the review process, please contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix D Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Fish
Page 3 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Taxa Group—Fish, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
1. 2. Is the project occurring during the 2. non-spawning period for the 3. specific fish species encountered?
Avoidance measures are met for fish. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO
1. Is the project occurring during the non-spawning period for all listed fish (from Jan. to mid-April or Sep. to Oct.)?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
Avoidance measures are met for fish. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix E Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Mussels
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group Mussels in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected]. Please note, the below avoidance measures are required for mussels listed as Threatened or Endangered and recommended for mussels listed as Special Concern.
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project at least 300’ away from a waterway?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for mussels. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project within 300’ of a waterway, but will not be impacting the streambed or streambank?
YES. Erosion control is required. Please note that plastic or polypropylene netting associated
with erosion matting (also known as an erosion control blankets or erosion mesh netting) without independent movement of strands can easily entrap snakes and other wildlife moving through the area, and cause dehydration, desiccation, and eventually mortality. Biodegradable jute/twine netting with the “leno” or “gauze” weave (contains strands that are able to move independently) has the least impact on snakes.
If erosion matting will be used for this project, use the following matting (or something similar): American Excelsior “FibreNet” or “NetFree” products; East Coast Erosion biodegradable jute products; Erosion Tech biodegradable jute products;
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix E Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Mussels
Page 2 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
ErosionControlBlanket.com biodegradable leno weave products; North American Green S75BN, S150BN, SC150BN or C125BN; or Western Excelsior “All Natural” products.
NO (the streambed or streambank will be impacted). An ER Review is required, DNR staff—
complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix E Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Mussels
Page 3 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
Taxa Group—Mussels, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
3. 2. Is the project within 300’ of a 4. waterway, but will not be impacting 5. the streambed or streambank? 6.
Erosion control is required. With appropriate erosion control measures in place the project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No or Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form. Please note that plastic or polypropylene netting associated with erosion matting (also known as an erosion control blankets or erosion mesh netting) without independent movement of strands can easily entrap snakes and other wildlife moving through the area, and cause dehydration, desiccation, and eventually mortality. Biodegradable jute/twine netting with the “leno” or “gauze” weave (contains strands that are able to move independently) has the least impact on snakes. If erosion matting will be used for this project, use the following matting (or something similar): American Excelsior “FibreNet” or “NetFree” products; East Coast Erosion biodegradable jute products; Erosion Tech biodegradable jute products; ErosionControlBlanket.com biodegradable leno weave products; North American Green S75BN, S150BN, SC150BN or C125BN; or Western Excelsior “All Natural” products.
NO
1. 1. Is the project at least 300’ away 2. from a waterway?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO (the streambed or streambank will be impacted)
Avoidance measures are met for mussels. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix F Avoidance Measures for the Ornate Box Turtle
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Ornate Box Turtle in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of ER Reviews or Proposed ER Reviews that are required to be prepared.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected].
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions. 1. Does the project involve only above-ground activities that do not disturb the soil?
YES. Continue to Question 2. NO. Skip to Question 3.
2. Is the project occurring during the inactive period for the Ornate Box Turtle (from October 21st to March 31st)? YES. The project is covered for any unintentional take that may occur and avoidance
measures are met for the Ornate Box Turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to Question 3.
3. Does the project involve only restoration or management activities and can the Grassland and Savanna Protocols be followed?
YES. The project is covered for any unintentional take that may occur and avoidance measures are met for the Ornate Box Turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix F Avoidance Measures for the Ornate Box Turtle
Page 3 of 3 Last rev. 02/02/2016
Ornate Box Turtle, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
3. Does the project involve only restoration or management activities and can the Grassland and Savanna Protocols be followed?
1.
The project is covered for any unintentional
take that may occur and avoidance measures are met for the Ornate Box Turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
1. Does the project involve only above-ground activities that do not disturb the soil?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
2. Is the project occurring during the inactive period for the Ornate Box Turtle (from October 21st to March 31st)?
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix G Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Plants
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
Introduction
Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group Plants in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by ER Certified Reviewers and DNR staff. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected].
Please note, the avoidance periods and buffer distances referenced below are required for Threatened and Endangered plants on public lands and recommended for Threatened and Endangered plants on private land and for Special Concern plants on any land type.
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization for No or Low Impact Activities, proceed through the following questions.
1. Is the specific plant species encountered a tree or a shrub?
YES. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project occurring during frozen ground conditions with no impacts to the plant’s rootsystem?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for plants. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 3.
3. Is the project crossing a public right-of-way or swale?
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix G Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Plants
Page 2 of 3
Last rev. 03/09/2016
NO. Continue to Question 5.
4. Is one of the following plant species within the NHI buffer areas: Dotted Blazing Star, Dwarf Lake Iris, Dwarf Milkweed, Floating Marsh Marigold, Pale Green Orchid, Pale Purple Coneflower, Purple Milkweed, Sand Violet, Seaside Crowfoot, Small Yellow Water Crowfoot, or Wild Hyacinth?*
YES. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO. Avoidance measures are met for plants. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental
Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
5. Where frozen ground conditions are unreliable, is the project occurring late in the growing season after the specific plant species has gone to fruit, with no impacts to the plant’s root system?
Refer to the Biodiversity Pages for Wisconsin’s Rare Plants to determine the dates of the growing season for the particular plant species encountered.
YES. Avoidance measures are met for plants. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental
Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--
submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
*Note: The plants listed in Question 4 are Threatened or Endangered. The following Special Concern species could also be encountered when crossing public right-of-ways or swales and are recommended to be considered: Cleft Phlox, Clustered Poppy-mallow, Clustered Sedge, Forked Aster, Grassleaf Rush , Hair-like Sedge, Hoary Tick-trefoil, Large-flowered Ground-cherry, Long-leaved Aster, Northern Bur-reed, Pale Beardtongue, Purple Meadow-parsnip, Round-fruited St. John’s-wort, Scarlet Loosestrife, Silky Prairie-clover, Silvery Scurf Pea, Small-flowered Woolly Bean, , Straw Sedge, Tea-leaved Willow, Vasey’s Rush, Virginia Meadow Beauty, Waxleaf Meadowrue, Wild Licorice and Yellow Giant Hyssop.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix G Avoidance Measures by Taxa Group—Plants
Page 3 of 3
Last rev. 03/09/2016
Taxa Group—Plants, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
2. Is the project occurring during frozen ground conditions with no impacts to the plant’s root system?
1.
Avoidance measures are met for plants. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO
1. Is the specific plant species encountered a tree or a shrub?
NO
YES
3. Is the project crossing a public right-of-way or swale?
2.
4. Is one of the following plant species within the NHI buffer areas: Dotted Blazing Star, Dwarf Lake Iris, Dwarf Milkweed, Floating Marsh Marigold, Pale Green Orchid, Pale Purple Coneflower, Purple Milkweed, Sand Violet, Seaside Crowfoot, Small Yellow Water Crowfoot, or Wild Hyacinth?*
3.
5. Where frozen ground conditions are unreliable, is the project occurring late in the growing season after the specific plant species has gone to fruit, with no impacts to the plant’s root system?
NO
YES
YES
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
YES
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
NO
Avoidance measures are met for plants. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix H Avoidance Measures—Wood Turtle
Page 1 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
Introduction Endangered resources (ER) reviews are conducted and/or approved by the DNR for a wide variety of projects each year, ranging from large development projects to small maintenance projects. However, the Department recognizes that some of these projects will have no impact or a very low impact to endangered resources in Wisconsin. Therefore, we have prepared this Avoidance Measures document for the Wood Turtle in association with the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization in order to reduce the number of Proposed ER Reviews or ER Review Requests that are required to be submitted.
This document is intended for use by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers. It provides limited avoidance measures, for additional avoidance measures contact the Endangered Resources Review Program, [email protected].
Avoidance Measures
In order to determine if your planned activity is covered under the Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization, proceed through the following questions. 1. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 300 m (984 ft) from a
stream?
YES. Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. Continue to question 2.
2. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat and during the inactive period for the
wood turtle (from November 1st through March 14th)? YES. Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad
Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix H Avoidance Measures—Wood Turtle
Page 2 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
3. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 75 m (246 ft) from a stream and between March 15th and May 14th or between October 15th and October 31st? YES. Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad
Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO. An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--
submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
Contacts For questions regarding the review process, contact Endangered Resources Review Staff at [email protected].
For use with Table 2 of the No/Low Broad Incidental Take Permit/Authorization and by DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
Appendix H Avoidance Measures—Wood Turtle
Page 3 of 3 Last rev. 03/09/2016
Wood Turtle, Avoidance Measures Flow Chart
YES
4. 2. Is the project occurring in non- 5. shoreline, upland habitat and during 6. the inactive period for the wood 7. turtle (from November 1st through 8. March 14th)? 9. 10.
11.
Avoidance measures are met for the wood turtle. The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
NO
1. 1. Is the project occurring in non- 2. shoreline, upland habitat, greater 3. than 300 m (984 ft) from a stream?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers--submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
YES YES
3. 3. Is the project occurring in non-shoreline, upland habitat, greater than 75 m (246 ft) from a stream and between March 15th and May 14th or between October 15th and October 31st?
Overall Flowchart No/Low Impact Broad Incidental Take Permit For DNR Staff and ER Certified Reviewers Only
NO
YES
ES
YES
2. Is the project listed in Table 2—No/Low Impact List by Taxa Group, and are the Additional Conditions able to be met?
NO
YES
1. Is the project activity listed inTable 1—No/Low Impact List for All Species at All Times of the Year, and are the Additional Conditions able to be met?
Proceed through the steps listed in the Avoidance Measures document(s) to determine if the activity is covered by the No/Low BITP/A.
YES
The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
3. For the EOs listed within thePortal buffers of the project site, are the Taxa Groups covered in Table 2?
NO
2. 4. Is there an Avoidance Measures document for the Taxa Group(s) of the EO(s) listed for the project?
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers—submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.
NO
YES
The project is covered by the Broad Incidental Take Permit for No and Low Impact Activities. Complete the ER Review Verification Form if applying for other DNR permits. Also, add the project to the Annual Report Form.
An ER Review is required, DNR staff—complete an ER Review, Certified Reviewers—submit a Proposed ER Review to the ER Review Program.