Aug 15, 2015
Privacy MattersThe EU regulatory challenges aheadWednesday 10th June 2015
Géraldine Proust – EU Affairs ManagerMathilde Fiquet – EU Affairs Manager
FEDMA aims to:
FEDMA represents:Promote
ProtectInform
Develop
Uphold ethical values
(Article 29 working party approved Codes of Conduct)
the European direct and interactive marketing industry
EuropeanDirect
Marketing Associations
Companies with multinational
businesses (list brokers, communications agencies, mailing houses, printers, postal operators, etc.)
Federation of European Direct & Interactive Marketing
Offline
Direct Mail
Door drop
Federation of European Direct & Interactive Marketing
Online
Telemarketing Mobile marketing Fax marketing Email marketing Online Behavioural
Advertising Search marketing Social Media
FEDMA covers all channels in B2B & B2C
Digital Single Market Package
Consumer affairs focus
Data Protection and e-privacy focus
Legal Affairs – Digital Single Market package
Published by the European
Commission on the 6th of May 2015
• Digital Single Market Package – Quotes from introduction by Mr Juncker• “ensure teat European citizens will soon be able to use their
mobile phones across Europe without having to pay roaming fees”
• “ensure that consumers can access services, music, movies and sports events on their electronic devices wherever they are and regardless of borders”
• “create a level playing field where all companies offering goods and services in the EU are subject to the same DP and consumer rules, regardless of where their server is based”
Better online access for consumers and businesses across Europe
Cross-border parcel delivery
Preventing unjustified geoblocking
Better access to digital content
Reducing VAT
Topic Issue Solution
ecommerce rules - Minimum harmonisation for tangible goods and legal void for intangible goods
- Enforcement
- Amended proposal 2015 (proposal for simple and effective cross border contract rules)
- Revision Consumer Protection Coop
Parcel delivery Lack of information, transparency, excessive costs and interoperability
Measures to improve price transparency and enhance regularity oversight 2016
Unjustified geo-blocking Consumers not being able to buy online, are denied access to websites based in other MS or pay a geographical adapted price (e.g. through rerouting)
- Legislative proposals (e.g. targeted change to Ecommerce D and art 20 of the Services D) 2015
- Competition sector inquiry 2015
Better access to digital content Lack of portability due to copyright Legislative proposals 2015
Reduce VAT related burdens many different national systems Legislative proposals 2016
Creating the right conditions and level playing field for advanced
digital networks and innovative servicesTopic Issue Solution
Making the telecom rules fit for purpose
Isolated national markets, lack of regulatory consistency and predictability, lack of investment
Proposals 2016
Fit media framework On-demand services are subject to lower obligations
Revision AVMS Directive 2016
Fit purpose regulatory environment for platforms and intermediaries
Enormous amount of data and use of algorithms to turn this into usable information. Control access to online markets and significant influence on remuneration of players
Comprehensive assessment of the role of platforms 2015New regulatory questions addressed in up-coming Internal Market Strategy
Reinforcing trust and security in digital services and handling of personal data
- Violation fundamental rights and economic loss to due cyber criminality
- Exclusion of internet service providers, tracking and geo-location
- Public-Private partnership on Cybersecurity 2016
- Revision e-privacy directive 2016
Maximising the growth potential of the digital economy
Topic Issue Solution
Building a data economy Technical and legislative barriers to BigData, cloud services and Internet of Things (e.g. data location)
Free flow of data initiative 2016 European Cloud initiative 2016
Boosting competitiveness through interoperability and standardisation
Standardisation must keep pace with technology and standards decided outside EU
Integrated standardisation planRevision and extension of the European Interoperability Framework 2015
E-inclusive society Lack of digital skills and e-government E-government action plan 2016-2020
Legal Affairs - Consumer Affairs• Strategy: ensure the right balance between consumer and business interests-keeping
the channels open
• Misleading and Comparative Directive: revision of the Directive before end 2015• Consumer Rights Directive implementation report 2016• Fitness check of the Consumer Acquis 2016• Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: revision of the guide and possible revision 2016-
2017
Legal Affairs - Data Protection
The General Data Protection Regulation
EC ProposalCommissioner Reding
2012
January 2012
G D P R Timeline
DAPIX JHALIBE +
Opinion giving Committes
Rapporteur: Albrecht
Hearings +Consultation + Stakeholders meetings
No agreement
Albrecht’sAmendmentsNo agreement
DK
CY
EU legislative Process
2013
2014
Proposed text is a good basis for
work
No agreement. Legal service opinion
Chapter I-IV
One Stop Shop
IE
LT
More than 3000 Amendments fromMEPS
21th October LIBE vote
The rapporteurs work oncompromised amendments
12th March Plenary Vote
Official position of EP 1st reading
621 votes in favor10 votes against
22 abstentions
Hoping for a common position
Agreed onChapter V
GR
2
0
1
4
ITHoping fortrialogue
EP elections New majority
New MEPs
Nomination of new rapporteur and shadow
rapporteurs for the GDPR2
0
1
5
LV
Closing theremainingchapters
LUX Trialogue
Preparing the Trialogue
Status of negotiations
Chapter I General Provisions Agreement on Territorial scope and public sector provisions
Definitions - Remain to be agreed in June
Chapter II Principles Agreed on (March 2015)
Chapter III Rights of the data subject Remain to be agreed in June
Chapter IV Controllers and processors Agreed on (December 2014) - the so called risk based approach
Chapter V Transfer of personal data to a third country or international organisation
Agreed on (June 2014)
Chapter VI Independent supervisory authority Agreed on (March 2015) – The so called One Stop Shop
Chapter VII Cooperation and consistency Agreed on (March 2015) – The so called One Stop Shop
Chapter VIII Remedies, liability and sanctions Remain to be agreed in June
Chapter IX Provisions relating to specific data processing situation
Agreed on (December 2014)
Chapter X Delegated and implementing acts Remain to be agreed in June
Chapter XI Final provisions Remain to be agreed in June
?
Reach a commonposition
TRIALOGUE
Representativesof the European
Commission
Council presidency
Rapporteurs & shadow
rapporteurs
Negociated text
European Parliament foradoption within 4 months
Council for adoptionwithin 4 months
Risks for the Direct Marketing industry:
Limited access to data
Strengthened rules on profiling
Consent will become explicit
More information to provide to the individual
Burden of proof and documentation for the controller
Broader scope for the individual to object to the processing of data
Consent
'the data subject's consent' shall mean any freely given specific and informed indication of his wishes by which the data subject signifies his agreement to personal data relating to him being processed.
'the data subject's consent' means any freely given specific, informed and explicit indication of his or her wishes by which the data subject, either by a statement or by a clear affirmative action, signifies agreement to personal data relating to them being processed;
EC proposal + EP position95/46/EC Directive
Relationship with the E-privacy Directive?
Legitimate interest
The balancing test:
Legitimate interest of the
controller
Interests and fundamental rights of the data subject
Safeguards: specific right to object from direct marketing (article 14)
(f) processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by the third party or parties to whom the data are disclosed, except where such interests are overridden by the
interests for fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection under Article 1 (1).
Today’ situation:
Balancing test in the Parliament’s position:
Alternative legal grounds for marketers: consent or contract which bring the situation to an opt-in
processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or in case of disclosure, by the third party
to whom the data is disclosed, and which meet the reasonable expectations of the data subject based on his or her relationship with the controller, except where such interests are overridden by
the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data
The European Parliament’s position:
Article 29 Working Party recent opinion on the Controller’s legitimate interest to process data
Legitimate interest
Profiling
European Parliament’s position Council current proposal Opposition of Member States on this position
(Opt-out) Right to object to
profiling
(Opt-in)
Profiling which produces legal effect or significantly affect the data subject should be
based on:
-Entering a contract
-Data subject’s Consent
-national law
(Opt-out)
Right not to be subject to a decision based
solely on automated processing, including
profiling, which produces legal effects or severely affects the
data subject
Implementation of the GDPR and the role of self regulation
Helping companies to implement the Regulation
Translate legal text in concrete rules for the direct marketing industry
Updating of the codes of conduct
Development of guidance
Legal Affairs- e-privacy Directive
The European Commission plans on reviewing the e-privacy Directive as soon as the General data Protection Regulation is adopted
New rules on cookies
New rules on unsolicited communication
@fedma
Sébastien Houzé Channel
facebook.com/theDMway
[email protected]@fedma.org+32 2 779 4268www.fedma.org
Questions?