BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW 2-3 June 2010 Using social media data to demonstrate brand- building Brad Little, The Nielsen Company VP, Head of BuzzMetrics, EMEA @bradleyjlittle
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Using social media data to demonstrate brand-building
Brad Little, The Nielsen CompanyVP, Head of BuzzMetrics, EMEA
@bradleyjlittle
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
… And Growing Globally!
2
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Source: Nielsen NetView, * Home only
% of Internet Users on Social Networks
68%59%
80%
67%
51%
73% 72% 75%
51%
69% 67%73%
69%
84%
73%
59%
77% 75% 78%
58%
73% 73%
Glo
ba
l
Au
stra
lia
Bra
zil*
Fra
nce
Ge
rma
ny*
Ita
ly
Jap
an
Sp
ain
Sw
itze
rla
nd
*
Un
ited
Kin
gd
om
Un
ited
Sta
tes
Dec-08
Dec-09
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Page 4
The Advantages of Social MediaAre Also Its Biggest Challenges
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
The importance of Valuing Earned & Paid Media
A broadcast-based marketing relationship with consumers
A relationship that more explicitly considers how traditional paid media
drives ‘earned media’
Marketers are evolving
From...
...by adding
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Key Questions
• How do social media impressions impact the effectiveness of a campaign?
• What are the drivers of social media impression distribution?• How can advertisers best manage the combination of reach
and effectiveness of social media campaigns?
+ = BrandLift
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
BrandLift: A Continuous Measurement Service
• 6 months of research
• Consisting in surveys of over 800,000 Facebook users
• And more than 125 individual Facebook advertising campaigns
• From 70 brand advertisers
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Page 8
Facebook’s ad systems automatically generate a small control group of users called a “holdout” who are identical to those targeted by your campaign, except that they were randomly selected to not see your ads.
How “BrandLift” Works
A comprehensive PowerPoint deliverable highlighting study results and brand effect metrics:
1.-Results for up to four standard brand attitude and usage questions via single-question surveys and two custom single/double question surveys2.-Delivered within days of the end of the survey fielding3.-In-depth presentation of findings
1 Ad Displayed to user Automatic, random holdouts
3 4
2
ResultsExample Poll
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Page 9
3 key metrics evaluated
1• “Have you heard of Glitter Hairspray?”
Awareness
2 Message Awareness
• “Which of the following companies uses the slogan
“Shine throughout the day”? or• “Which of the following brands do you associate with
the message ‘Shine throughout the day’?
3 Purchase Intent
• “How likely are you to purchase a Glitter hair product this
month? or• “Would you be interested in trying the Glitter Mousse?”
• Survey collection 24 hours post exposure• Minimum of 3,000 respondents• Studies compared against a normative Nielsen database to determine overall
effectiveness and awareness results.
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Evaluating the Three Forms Execution on FB
1. Homepage Ads
2. Homepage Ads with Social Context
3. Organic impressions
PAID MEDIA EARNED MEDIA
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
What Did We Find?
Understanding the Value of a Social Media Impression
• 14 campaigns representative of more successful campaigns that included:– the “Become a Fan” engagement unit, and – advertisers from a range of categories (CPG, entertainment,
retail…)
• Results were aggregated across the 14 campaigns:–To provide more generalised findings–To ensure the confidentiality of advertiser-specific results
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Impact of Paid Media Exposure on Facebook
Difference between control group and exposed
10%
4%
2%
Ad Recall Awareness Purchase Intent
Delta versus control
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Homepage Paid Ads with Social Advocacy Improve Campaign Performance
Difference between control group and exposed
10%
4%
2%
16%
8% 8%
Ad Recall Awareness Purchase Intent
Home page ad expsoure
Home page ad expsoure with soialadvocacy
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Marked Affect on Brand Metrics if There is an Organic Element
Difference between control group and exposed
10%
4%
2%
30%
13%
8%
Ad Recall Awareness Purchase Intent
Home page ad expsoure
Home page ad + organic
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
More Organic Exposure = Greater Impact
Difference between control group and exposed
15%
7%
3%
32%
13%
10%
33%
28%
15%
Ad Recall Awareness Purchase Intent
1-2 3-9 10+
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
How To Maximise Reach & EngagementStart with engaging
Home Page AdLeads
Tousers interacting with ad
unit in friends feed
Facebook User Reach Index
106
112
100
Reach
Saw HP Ads
Saw Organics Only
Saw HP Ads + Organic
Increased Reach
Facebook User Engagement* Index
124
100
Reach
Engaged with Ad
Engaged with Organics
And Increased User EngagementSource: Facebook * Engagement = click through, video play, RSVP, vote on a poll etc
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
There is a strong relationship between the engagement rate of the ad campaign and the number of ad impressions
0.72correlation
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
BUT...Organic impressions are difficult to scale
Organic Reach
Total CampaignReach
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
As Such You Need The “Right” Mixture of Paid + Earned + Self Created Media
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Since this will maximise success notwithstanding the core principles of good brand management/ authenticity/consumer belief
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
What about another social platform?
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Effectively Measuring Advertising
REACH RECEPTIVITY RESONANCE REACTION
Did the campaign reach the brand’s target?
Did the media placement deliver engaged viewers?
Did the campaign generate the desired results?
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Paid Impressions Open the Door, but Advertising Still Needs to Spark Brand Engagement & Connection
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
France [5mn] UK [8mn] Germany [9mn]
US [43mn] Japan [8mn] Canada [6mn]
Evian Dancing Roller Babies
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
26
“It is the first time in Danone’s history that we said that the
heart of this campaign will be viral and web based.
“We thought we would hit 2 million worldwide…”
Evian Case Study: Extending Reach & Engagement Virally
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
How many people did your campaign reach?
Exposed to Paid Ad 6,327,000
Exposed to YouTube Evian Watch Pages
3,037,000
Period: 1st – 31st July 2009Paid for + Watch Pages: 9,067,000
Paid for Ad
Duplication
YT Evian Watch Pages
6,030 297 2,741
Sample Size: 10,522
Evian Campaign: 11,956,000
Includes those that conducted brand
searches and those that viewed the sites
other than YT
000s
Earned Media
extended the reach, with
little overlap
Earned Media
extended the reach, with
little overlap
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
116
158
Average time spent with brand
Paid ad Total campaign
Paid for Ad vs. Total campaign
84%
160%
36%
Was your target engaged? Very significant
uplift in time spent with brand and in
amplification generated from paid
activity
Very significant uplift in time spent with brand and in
amplification generated from paid
activity
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Did your target remember your brand?
45%
83%
59%
69%
56%
89%
68%
77%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
First Mentions(Awareness)
Brand Favourability Brand Preference Purchase Consideration
Control Test
Significant brand uplift seen across all metrics through the purchase funnel.
Significant brand uplift seen across all metrics through the purchase funnel.
Significant difference at 95% confidence limit
Regular Bottled Water Drinkers, Not Exposed vs. Exposed
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Did your target react by buying, talking or searching?
Drive to ‘Evian’ Exposed to Paid for Ad
Exposed to Paid for Ad who visited ‘Evian’
Percentage of those Exposed to Paid for Ad who visited ‘Evian’
745k
25k
3.4%
Period: 3rd July 2009
30 times higher than the average click through metric (0.18%, Ad Tech)30 times higher than the average click through metric (0.18%, Ad Tech)
Exposed to the Paid + Natural Evian Campaign
Exposed to the Evian Campaign who visited ‘Evian’
Percentage of Evian Campaign who visited ‘Evian’
1.3m
69k
5.4%
Paid-For Media:
Paid-For Media:
Paid-For + Earned Media:
Paid-For + Earned Media:
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
• Buying social media is different than buying standard online media
• Critical to understand advertising both in terms of – Paid media and– How earned media & social advocacy contribute to campaigns
• Social advocacy and earned impressions can impact consumers in 3 important ways – By making them more likely to notice an ad (Recall)– To take away its message (Awareness)– To increase their interest in making purchase (Intent)
• The next step is to expand this understanding to offline sales and long-term brand value
BRANDING ONLINE: THE TIME IS NOW2-3 June 2010
Thank You!
Brad Little, The Nielsen CompanyVP, Head of BuzzMetrics, EMEA
@bradleyjlittle