Top Banner
2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental Defense Fund
39

2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Avery Catts
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study

Presented by

Sarah DiJulio, M+R

Karen Matheson, M+R

Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International

Mathew Grimm, Environmental Defense Fund

Page 2: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

2

INTRODUCTIONS

Page 3: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

3

Page 4: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

4

Methodology

• 21 Major Nonprofit Organizationso Civil/Legal Rights

o Environmental

o International

o Health

• January 2006 – December 2007 Datao 12,000 Email Messages

o 6.5 Million Subscribers

o 14 Million Email Advocacy Actions

o $100 Million Dollars in Online Donations

Page 5: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

5

KEY FINDINGS

Page 6: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

6

Page 7: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

7

Page 8: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

8

Page 9: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

9

Page 10: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

10

POSSIBLE FACTORS

Page 11: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

11

Page 12: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

12

Page 13: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

13

Page 14: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

14

Page 15: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

15

DIGGING DEEPER

Page 16: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

16

2007 NUMBER OF ONLINE GIFTS BY GIFT SIZE

Page 17: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

17

2007 AMOUNT RAISED ONLINE BY GIFT SIZE

Page 18: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

18

Page 19: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

19

2007 ACTION TAKERS vs. ACTIONS TAKEN

Page 20: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

20

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE

Page 21: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

21

EDF’s Use of Benchmarks

• Our open and click rates have declined sharply in the past year

• Problem with our messaging?• Benchmarks are vital in putting our efforts into

perspective• We’re not experiencing anything that others aren’t

Page 22: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

22

Page 23: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

23

Page 24: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

24

Year-end Testing: Why Do It?

• 40% of online dollars come during December. Perfect time to test.

• 55% of those dollars come via EDF.org website – many prompted by our email

• Two previous December tests showed that those getting fewer messages gave at statistically the same rate as those getting more messages.

Page 25: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

25

Year-end Message Quantity Test

A random 15% of the list

received only the three messages in red. The rest

of the list received the full compliment of

messages listed to the left.

Page 26: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

26

Year-end Message QuantityTest Results

• Those that received fewer messages had a 0.59% giving rate over the course of the campaign.

• The others gave at a rate of 0.91%. So much for the previous findings?

• Further tests will be structured to find the “sweet spot” between 3 and 13 messages!

• Why take the time and effort to message unnecessarily, risking unsubscribes when you don’t have to?

Page 27: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

27

Page 28: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

28

Year-end Homepage Test Results

• Donation form won - brought in 8% more gifts (number of gifts)

• Raised 8% more dollars in donations $1,000 and under

• Raised 10% more dollars in donations $500 and under

• Did not hinder homepage interaction – bounce rate for the homepage stayed relatively unchanged

Page 29: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

29

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Page 30: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

We Publish Our Stats• We send meaningful stats to all staff and provide analysis to

encourage them to focus on:

– List growth: requires extraordinary efforts (paid marketing, SEO)– Current events and personal stories: actions perform better w/

either element– Syndication: web traffic and RSS feeds are email alternatives– Search rankings: dependent on good writing– Fundraising: everyone contributes to our fundraising success

• By publishing comprehensive meaningful stats for the entire organization, we spark curiosity and competition among staff.

Page 31: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.
Page 32: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Action Web Confirmation

• By comparing ourselves to other NGOs, we get good ideas to test.

• Changing the web confirmation to donation form raised $46,000+ since December and tells us which issue inspires donors.

• Top issues: torture, Tibet, Darfur.– Our Tibet action went to 450K+ and raised $15K+ via

the web confirmation donation page.• Loser issue: death penalty

– Best performing action in Feb., raised $0.

Page 33: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

EXAMPLE ANALYSIS SENT TO STAFF:

Fundraising: - We continue to monitor actions that inspire our activists to donate. Darfur consistently tops the list of actions garnering the most donations. This month, the Shi Tao action and war on terror related actions also performed well. The death penalty, although it brought in the most actions, did not prompt people to give. We’ve seen similar results in direct mail.

Page 34: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Multivariate testing

• Make the most of your web traffic by testing variations of your design.

• Tiny changes can have profound affects.• Doesn’t require you to use precious email

capital and improves overall usability of your website

• Improved usability leads to greater confidence in your organization and less frustrated supporters

Page 35: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Big red button

• By changing the standard grey “submit” on our donation form to a large red “submit”, we got a 29% lift in our conversion rate.

Page 36: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Utility nav tweak

• changing the order of the utility nav items and changing “donate” to a bold, green “donate now” provided a:– 70% lift in overall traffic to the donation form– 83% lift in total $ raised

Page 37: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

Right pointing arrows

• Adding some right pointing arrows to the word “Donate” on our homepage donate button provided a: – 5% lift in overall traffic to the donation form– 55% lift in total $ raised

Page 38: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

38

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.

Winston Churchill

Page 39: 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study Presented by Sarah DiJulio, M+R Karen Matheson, M+R Steve Daigneault, Amnesty International Mathew Grimm, Environmental.

39

Q + A