Top Banner
Komandur Sunder Raj Power & Energy Systems Services Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants – A Case Study
16

2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Apr 11, 2017

Download

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Komandur Sunder Raj

Power & Energy Systems Services

Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants – A Case Study

Page 2: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Factors Affecting Last Stage Performance of LP Turbines Case Study – Relationships Between Last Stage, Unit Rating, End Loading & Operating Range of Condenser Last Stage Exhaust Loss Curves Recommendations for Optimum Performance

Objectives

Page 3: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Last Stage Blades (LSB) Historically Specified & Designed by Matching Turbine to Condenser Cooling System for Specified Unit Rating Last Stage End Loadings Vary from 8000 lb/hr-sq.ft to 14000 lb/hr-sq.ft Corresponding Unit Loadings 1.1 to 2.1 Mwe/sq.ft

Background

Page 4: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Several Plants Upgrading/Replacing LP Turbines Considerations Include Efficiency, Reliability, SCC, Power Uprates, Aging, Inspection, Maintenance, etc. New LP Rotors, Blading, Steam Paths, Longer LSB, Redesigned Exhaust Hoods

Background

Page 5: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Condensers Typically Have Not Been Upgraded to Match Turbine Retrofits, Modifications Potential Mismatch Between Upgraded LP Turbine and Condenser/Cooling System

Background

Page 6: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

For LSB Sizes 38” to 52”, Pitch Diameters 10’ to 13’ Blade Velocities 1000-1300 fps for 1800 RPM Last Stage Performance Function of Load & Pressure Ratio Last Stage Output Reaches Maximum at Critical Pressure Ratio (Choked Flow)

General

Page 7: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Exhaust Loss Curve Composite of: Leaving Loss (Kinetic Energy) Pressure Loss in Exhaust Hood Turn-Up Loss Occurring at Low Annulus Velocities

Choke Conditions for Diffusing Hoods Occur at Axial Mach Nos. 0.87-0.90 (Annulus Velocity of ~1058 fps)

General

Page 8: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Figure 1 – Exhaust Loss Curves

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

Annulus Velocity, Fps

Dry

Exh

aust

Lo

ss, B

tu/lb

43" 44"

52"

40"

44"47"

45"

AppoximateChoke Point

Page 9: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Figure 2 – Annulus Velocity for Different End Loadings, Exhaust Pressures

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Exhaust Pressure, in.HgA

Last

Sta

ge A

nnul

us V

elocit

y, fp

s

Condenser Operating Range

52 "LSB

40 "LSB

43 "LSB

47 "LSB

Page 10: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Case Study 1100 Mwe Power Plant (TC6F-43”LSB) Condenser Operating Range 2.0 - 4.0 in.HgA (35.0 F to 80.0 F Circulating Water Inlet Temperature) Design Pressure 2.3 in.HgA at 52.0 F Once-Through Cooling End Loading ~ 11,000 lb/hr-sq.ft

General

Page 11: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Table 1 – Last Stage Performance for 43”LSB

(1) (2) (3) (4) = (3)/(2) (5) (6) (7) (8) = (5) - (7) (9) (10)2.0 4.85 0.98 0.203 1044.2 1.70763 953.0 91.2 967.9 8,093,2332.5 4.89 1.23 0.251 1044.5 1.70726 964.7 79.8 977.3 8,154,1283.0 4.92 1.47 0.299 1044.7 1.70702 974.4 70.3 985.2 8,205,5063.5 4.95 1.72 0.347 1044.9 1.70675 982.8 62.2 991.9 8,250,1724.0 4.98 1.96 0.394 1045.1 1.70643 990.0 55.0 997.9 8,289,834

(11) (12) = (10) x (11)

(13) See Note 1 (14) (15) (16) = {(5) -

(15)}/(8)(17) See Note 2 (18)

(19) = {(17)/(18)} x

100

(20) = (10)/742.8

294.206 2.381E+09 890 21.1 982.5 67.70% 146.4 1128.851 12.97% 10,896239.937 1.956E+09 732 12.5 986.0 73.26% 139.7 1121.771 12.46% 10,978203.160 1.667E+09 623 8.5 991.1 76.20% 128.8 1110.617 11.60% 11,047176.526 1.456E+09 545 7.1 997.0 77.13% 115.9 1097.568 10.56% 11,107156.312 1.296E+09 485 7.2 1003.0 76.47% 102.3 1083.781 9.44% 11,160

NOTES:1. Annulus area per last stage is 123.8 sq.ft. For six exhaust ends, total last stage annulus area is 742.8 sq.ft.

Annulus Velocity, fps = Last Stage Volumetric flow/(742.8 x 3600)2. Last Stage Output, Mw = Last Stage Flow x (Last Stage Bowl Enthalpy - Used Energy End Point)/3412141.63

End Loading,

lb/hr-sq.ft.

Last Stage Annulus

Velocity Van, fps

Dry Exhaust Loss EL,

btu/lb

Used Energy

End Point UEEP, btu/lb

Last Stage UEEP

Efficiency, %

Generator Output,

Mwe

Last Stage Specific

Volume v, cft/lb

Last Stage

Exhaust Flow W,

lb/hr

Cond. Press., in.HgA

Expansion Line End

Point ELEP, btu/lb

Last Stage Press. Ratio, PSh/PB

Last Stage Output, % of Gen. Ouput

Last Stage Bowl Press.

PB, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Entropy SB, btu/lb

Last Stage Available

Energy AE, btu/lb

Isentropic Enthalpy

HISEN, btu/lb

Last Stage Shell Press.

PSh, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Enthalpy HB,

btu/lb

Last Stage Volumetric Flow Wv,

cft/hr

Last Stage Output,

Mw

Page 12: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Table 2 – Last Stage Performance for 52”LSB

(1) (2) (3) (4) = (3)/(2) (5) (6) (7) (8) = (5) - (7) (9) (10)2.0 4.85 0.98 0.203 1044.1 1.70753 953.0 91.2 967.9 8,093,6672.5 4.89 1.23 0.251 1044.4 1.70716 964.6 79.8 977.3 8,153,8343.0 4.92 1.47 0.299 1044.7 1.70695 974.4 70.3 985.2 8,204,9123.5 4.95 1.72 0.347 1044.9 1.70670 982.7 62.1 991.9 8,249,4844.0 4.98 1.96 0.394 1045.1 1.70643 990.0 55.0 997.9 8,289,181

(11) (12) = (10) x (11)

(13) See Note 1 (14) (15) (16) = {(5) -

(15)}/(8)(17) See Note 2 (18)

(19) = {(17)/(18)} x

100

(20) = (10)/1055

294.190 2.381E+09 627 10.0 974.7 76.10% 164.6 1146.978 14.35% 7,672239.924 1.956E+09 515 10.5 984.6 75.00% 143.0 1125.284 12.71% 7,729203.151 1.667E+09 439 12.0 993.6 72.68% 122.8 1104.932 11.12% 7,777176.522 1.456E+09 383 13.7 1001.6 69.67% 104.7 1086.645 9.63% 7,819156.310 1.296E+09 341 15.2 1008.7 66.18% 88.5 1070.27 8.27% 7,857

NOTES:1. Annulus area per last stage is 175.8333 sq.ft. For six exhaust ends, total last stage annulus area is 1055 sq.ft.

Annulus Velocity, fps = Last Stage Volumetric flow/(1055 x 3600)2. Last Stage Output, Mw = Last Stage Flow x (Last Stage Bowl Enthalpy - Used Energy End Point)/3412141.63

End Loading,

lb/hr-sq.ft.

Last Stage Annulus

Velocity Van, fps

Dry Exhaust Loss EL,

btu/lb

Used Energy

End Point UEEP, btu/lb

Last Stage UEEP

Efficiency, %

Generator Output,

Mwe

Last Stage Specific

Volume v, cft/lb

Last Stage

Exhaust Flow W,

lb/hr

Cond. Press., in.HgA

Expansion Line End

Point ELEP, btu/lb

Last Stage Press. Ratio, PSh/PB

Last Stage Output, % of Gen. Ouput

Last Stage Bowl Press.

PB, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Entropy SB, btu/lb

Last Stage Available

Energy AE, btu/lb

Isentropic Enthalpy

HISEN, btu/lb

Last Stage Shell Press.

PSh, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Enthalpy HB,

btu/lb

Last Stage Volumetric Flow Wv,

cft/hr

Last Stage Output,

Mw

Page 13: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Table 3 – Impact of 15% Power Uprate on Last Stage Performance for 43”LSB

(1) (2) (3) (4) = (3)/(2) (5) (6) (7) (8) = (5) - (7) (9) (10)2.76 6.01 1.36 0.226 1039.5 1.67891 953.8 85.7 968.1 9,576,7362.85 6.02 1.40 0.233 1039.5 1.67871 955.5 84.1 969.5 9,588,8143.25 6.07 1.60 0.263 1039.5 1.67783 962.0 77.5 974.7 9,637,1863.95 6.14 1.94 0.316 1039.4 1.67649 971.9 67.5 982.6 9,711,3705.00 6.24 2.46 0.394 1039.3 1.67488 984.1 55.2 992.4 9,804,425

(11) (12) = (10) x (11)

(13) See Note 1 (14) (15) (16) = {(5) -

(15)}/(8)(17) See Note 2 (18)

(19) = {(17)/(18)} x

100

(20) = (10)/742.8

215.802 2.067E+09 773 14.5 978.0 71.79% 172.7 1268.413 13.62% 12,893209.450 2.008E+09 751 13.4 978.6 72.49% 171.3 1266.769 13.52% 12,909185.840 1.791E+09 670 9.9 981.5 74.81% 163.7 1258.675 13.01% 12,974155.439 1.510E+09 565 7.3 987.7 76.60% 147.2 1241.382 11.86% 13,074125.309 1.229E+09 459 7.6 997.7 75.32% 119.6 1212.802 9.86% 13,199

NOTES:1. Annulus area per last stage is 123.8 sq.ft. For six exhaust ends, total last stage annulus area is 742.8 sq.ft.

Annulus Velocity, fps = Last Stage Volumetric flow/(742.8 x 3600)2. Last Stage Output, Mw = Last Stage Flow x (Last Stage Bowl Enthalpy - Used Energy End Point)/3412141.63

End Loading,

lb/hr-sq.ft.

Last Stage Annulus

Velocity Van, fps

Dry Exhaust Loss EL,

btu/lb

Used Energy

End Point UEEP, btu/lb

Last Stage UEEP

Efficiency, %

Generator Output,

Mwe

Last Stage Specific

Volume v, cft/lb

Last Stage

Exhaust Flow W,

lb/hr

Cond. Press., in.HgA

Expansion Line End

Point ELEP, btu/lb

Last Stage Press. Ratio, PSh/PB

Last Stage Output, % of Gen. Ouput

Last Stage Bowl Press.

PB, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Entropy SB, btu/lb

Last Stage Available

Energy AE, btu/lb

Isentropic Enthalpy

HISEN, btu/lb

Last Stage Shell Press.

PSh, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Enthalpy HB,

btu/lb

Last Stage Volumetric Flow Wv,

cft/hr

Last Stage Output,

Mw

Page 14: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Table 4 – Impact of 15% Power Uprate on Last Stage Performance for 52”LSB

(1) (2) (3) (4) = (3)/(2) (5) (6) (7) (8) = (5) - (7) (9) (10)2.74 6.01 1.35 0.224 1039.5 1.67891 953.5 86.1 967.8 9,574,5762.84 6.02 1.40 0.232 1039.5 1.67873 955.2 84.3 969.3 9,587,7243.26 6.07 1.60 0.264 1039.5 1.67782 962.1 77.4 974.7 9,637,5993.98 6.14 1.95 0.318 1039.4 1.67646 972.2 67.1 982.9 9,713,2045.05 6.24 2.48 0.398 1039.3 1.67483 984.6 54.7 992.8 9,807,062

(11) (12) = (10) x (11)

(13) See Note 1 (14) (15) (16) = {(5) -

(15)}/(8)(17) See Note 2 (18)

(19) = {(17)/(18)} x

100

(20) = (10)/1055

217.219 2.080E+09 548 10.1 974.7 75.29% 181.8 1277.477 14.23% 9,075210.288 2.016E+09 531 10.3 976.3 75.04% 177.8 1273.083 13.96% 9,088185.559 1.788E+09 471 11.2 982.5 73.63% 161.0 1256.005 12.82% 9,135154.451 1.500E+09 395 13.3 992.1 70.42% 134.6 1229.071 10.95% 9,207124.251 1.219E+09 321 16.0 1003.9 64.63% 101.7 1195.266 8.51% 9,296

NOTES:1. Annulus area per last stage is 175.8333 sq.ft. For six exhaust ends, total last stage annulus area is 1055 sq.ft.

Annulus Velocity, fps = Last Stage Volumetric flow/(1055 x 3600)2. Last Stage Output, Mw = Last Stage Flow x (Last Stage Bowl Enthalpy - Used Energy End Point)/3412141.63

End Loading,

lb/hr-sq.ft.

Last Stage Annulus

Velocity Van, fps

Dry Exhaust Loss EL,

btu/lb

Used Energy

End Point UEEP, btu/lb

Last Stage UEEP

Efficiency, %

Generator Output,

Mwe

Last Stage Specific

Volume v, cft/lb

Last Stage

Exhaust Flow W,

lb/hr

Cond. Press., in.HgA

Expansion Line End

Point ELEP, btu/lb

Last Stage Press. Ratio, PSh/PB

Last Stage Output, % of Gen. Ouput

Last Stage Bowl Press.

PB, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Entropy SB, btu/lb

Last Stage Available

Energy AE, btu/lb

Isentropic Enthalpy

HISEN, btu/lb

Last Stage Shell Press.

PSh, psia

Last Stage Bowl

Enthalpy HB,

btu/lb

Last Stage Volumetric Flow Wv,

cft/hr

Last Stage Output,

Mw

Page 15: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

Figure 3 – Performance of 43”LSB & 52”LSB Before and After Power Uprate

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Exhaust Pressure, in.HgA

Last

Sta

ge A

nnul

us V

eloc

ity, f

ps

Original Range for 52 "LSB

Power Uprate Range for 43 "LSB

Original Range for 43 "LSB

Power Uprate Range for 52 "LSB

Original Operating RangePower Uprate Operating Range

Page 16: 2006 ASME Power Conference Last Stage Performance Considerations in LP Turbines of Power Plants - A Case Study Sunder Raj Presentation

For Optimum Last Stage Performance, Evaluate Performance Over Entire Operating Range Consider Mods if Evaluation Reveals Mismatch or Less than Optimum Performance For Power Uprates, LP Turbine Mods with Different LSB Offerings, Evaluate Performance Over Entire Operating Range Consider Condenser/Cooling System Mods to Properly Match LSB

Recommendations