2 0 0 5 I N T E R I M R E S U L T S T R A N S I T I O N TO I A S / I F R S MILANO, Palazzo Mezzanotte - September 15 th , 2005
Jan 03, 2016
2 0 0 5 I N T E R I M R E S U L T S
T R A N S I T I O N TO I A S / I F R S
MILANO, Palazzo Mezzanotte - September 15th, 2005
2
1H 2005 - Results at a Glance
30.06.200530.06.2004 pro-forma
Var.
GROUP NET INCOME 61.6 49.8 23.7%
Total income 598.7 571.3 4.8%
Operating profit 205.7 186.2 10.5%
Pre-tax income 131.1 109.7 19.7%
ROE (adj.) 14.5% 13.7% 80 b.p.
COST / INCOME 63.5% 65.5% -200 b.p.
Tier 1 ratio 5.2% 5.3% -10 b.p.
3
1H 2005 Pre-Tax Income - Breakdown
Pre-tax income, goodwill excluded
*B. CR Firenze, CR Pistoia, CR Spezia, CR Civitavecchia, CR Orvieto, CR Mirandola
RetailBkg.
Consumercred.
Productco.
Serviceco.
Taxcollect.
P-T income
58%
36%
8%2%
-4%
% weight€ 142.4
mn.26% 25%
2%
-17%
16%
-300%
YoY change
RetailBkg.
Consumercred.
Productco.
Serviceco.
Taxcollect.
P-T income
Pre-tax income shows growth in core businesses
Retail banking*: positive contribution mainly thanks to NII and credit quality
Consumer credit: in line with budget but weaker 2Q (-9.6% QoQ)
Service companies: decrease in Infogroup’s income is due to its new repositioning within the Group
Tax collection services: delays in government refunds
4
Net Interest Income
Positive contribution from both retail banking and consumer credit
4.72%4.66%4.70%
4.56% 4.55% 4.53%
2.08%2.07%2.12% 2.16% 2.14%2.13%
181.0179.3
167.1170.6
167.6166.5
1Q '04 2Q '04 3Q '04 4Q '04 1Q '05 2Q '05
360.3
334.1
+7.8%
3 months Euribor Customer spread
Net interest income
mn
5.8%5.4%
-2.6%-3.9%
-4.7%-4.7%
3M '04 6M '04 9M '04 FY '04 3M '05 6M '05
12.0%12.7%13.0%
16.8%19.7%19.4%
3M '04 6M '04 9M '04 FY '04 3M '05 6M '05
Retail banking*
Consumer credit
YoY change
YoY change
* B. CR Firenze, CR Pistoia, CR Spezia, CR Civitavecchia, CR Orvieto, CR Mirandola
5
NII – Customer loans
Increase in average outstandings* leads to higher contribution margin despite mark-up reduction
retail banks: change in portfolio mix (higher mortgage loans weight lower mark-up)
consumer credit: less household spending and stronger competitionYoY
change
Total loans* 14,462 15,709 8.6% (0.17)
Retail banks 11,478 12,392 8.0% 79% (0.14)
Individuals 6,577 7,198 9.4% 46% (0.19)
Corporates 4,901 5,194 6.0% 33% (0.10)
Consumer credit 2,984 3,317 11.2% 21% (0.42)
1H 2004 1H 2005 1H 2005 % Weight
Mark-upchange
* Progressive average outstanding loans
6
NII – Customer deposits
Higher contribution margin due to both volumes* and mark-down
current accounts re-pricing
individuals still lead but corporate mark-down is improving
YoYchange
Total deposits* 14,680 15, 568 6.1% 12 bp
Retail banks 13,939 14,646 5.1% 95% 9 bp
Individuals 11,150 11,597 4.0% 76% 7 bp
Corporates 2,789 3,048 9.3% 19% 11 bp
Consumer credit 740 922 24.6% 5% 87 bp
1H 2004 1H 2005 1H 2005 % Weight
Mark-downchange
* Progressive average outstanding loans
7
Mortgage Loans
Sustainable volume growth, in line with budget
stable spread despite stronger competition improving quality, far better then the system
Continued synergies with Findomestic: all branches operative
0.96%
0.70%
0.36%0.52%
3M '05 6M '05
BCRFItaly
32
10
22
FY '04 3M '05 6M '05
Doubtful loans*
Distributed by Findomestic
5% of
Group flows
mn
10.510.4
10.2
5.85.6
5.3
FY '04 3M '05 6M '05
Tota
l lo
an
s -
bn
+6.3%(13% yearly)
+15.8%
bn
* B. CR Firenze, CR Pistoia, CR Civitavecchia, CR Orvieto. Source: Assofin
8
Non-Interest Income
Stable fees on adjusted basis: positive impact from re-pricing of current
accounts
AUM campaigns: short term negative impact; average customer portfolio still comprises monetary products
100 102 98108
69 70 71 7567 69
1Q '04 PF 2Q '04 PF 3Q '04 4Q '04 1Q '05 2Q '05
206
Fees Fees + other income
202
+2% YoY PF Flat on adj. basis
Fees + Other income
9
Operative costs
Adjusted costs better than business plan. The stated values affected by the merger of Datacentro and the increase of tax stamps:
YoY comparisons throughout 2005 affected by the increase of government tax stamps
Datacentro costs moved from other op. expenses to other administrative costs
1H ‘05 1H ‘04 Var. 1H ‘04 PF Var. Var. stamps
& duty excl.
Admin. costs (365.5) (347.9) 5.1% (356.3) 2.6% 1.5%
Personnel (215.7) (210.3) 2.6% (212.1) 1.7%
Other costs (149.8) (137.5) 8.9% (144.2) 3.9% 0.9%
Depreciation (27.5) (28.8) -4.5% (28.8) -4.5%
Total costs (393.0) (376.6) 4.4% (385.1) 2.0% 1.0%
10
Customer Loans
Total customer loans (+4.2%) in line with budget
Stable quality and stable market share
8.6%8.7%8.4%
5.5%5.3%5.7%
2003 2004 1Q '05 1H '05
1.07%1.09%1.10%1.27%
NPLs/
Net loans
Corporate unit mkt. share* NPLs market share*
10.7 11.212.3 12.7
3.53.32.82.4
2002 2003 2004 1H '05
Consumer CreditCorporate & Retail
Eu
ro b
n
+3.2% banks + 6.0% c. credit
Loans
Market share
* Parent company on business territory
11
Capital ratios
Stable Tier 1 ratio as at 30.06.2005
Findomestic Banca recorded with the equity method will strengthen capital ratios
31.12.200430.06.200
5
Shareholders' equity 1,151.4
Tier 1 capital 993.6 Tier 2 capital 901.4 Regulatory capital 1,805.3
Risk weighted assets 18,597.5
Tier 1 ratio 5.34%Solvency ratio 9.71%
1,152.5
993.8 893.0
1,796.7
19,116.7
5.20%9.56%
I A S / I F R S
F I R S T T I M E A D O P T I O N
13
IAS/IFRS as per EU Commission ratifications released up until January 2005. IAS 32 and 39 are included.*
Value adjustments recognised in the shareholders’ equity (IFRS 1)
First Time Adoption - Criteria
* Modification of the existing standards, new standards and/or changes of interpretation which could arise may vary FTA impact.
Applied the integral version of IAS 39 ratified by EU Commission
Fair value model has been adopted to revaluate investment and instrumental properties
Amortized costs as at 31.12.2004 is equal to face value because transactional costs (up-front) have been reckoned not significant.
Findomestic Banca (JV with BNP Paribas Group) has been accounted for the equity method (IAS 31)
In the collective assessment of performing loans, Basel II recommendations have been optimized
Perimeter of consolidation comprises companies active in business sectors other than that of the parent company (i.e. Centrovita - bancassurance)
Put options have been accounted following IAS 32
14
> Impatto della FTA sul Patrimonio netto e sul Patrimonio di Impatto della FTA sul Patrimonio netto e sul Patrimonio di vigilanzavigilanza
15
Nota
L’impatto della prima applicazione dei principi IAS/IFRS sul Patrimonio di vigilanza consolidato e sui coefficienti prudenziali è stato stimato considerando i filtri prudenziali indicati dal Comitato di Basilea sul trattamento dei valori IAS.
15
> Impatto della FTA sulla qualità del creditoImpatto della FTA sulla qualità del credito
16
16
FTA - Impact at a glance
No material impact on shareholders’ equity
1.1
32.560.8
47.6
26.024.2 1.7
150.3
1.1
2.1
27.831.1 30.9
2004 NET EQ
UITY
Total lo
ans
Fin. A
ssets H
FT
Fin. A
ssets A
FS
Sec. &
hedging d
erivat.
Fixed Asse
ts
Intangib
les
Shareholdin
gs
Allowanc
es
Fin. Lb
lts-HFT
Put option
s
Other im
pacts
Fiscal
effect
s
Minorities
IAS 2004
NET EQUITY
1,151
1,193
+ € 42
million
Euro million
17
> Raccordo tra Patrimonio netto contabile civilistico e IAS (1/2)Raccordo tra Patrimonio netto contabile civilistico e IAS (1/2)
(1) La valutazione ha tenuto conto degli accantonamenti a Fondo rischi su crediti (voce 90 del passivo) esistenti al 31 dicembre 2004, pari a 24,7 milioni di euro, che sono stati imputati in diretta diminuzione di tali crediti. 18
18* The evaluation takes into account provisions for risks and charges as at 31.12.2004
FTA - Impact Breakdown
A P P E N D I X
20
FTA – Impact on balance sheet
31.12.2004
Fin. Assets held for trading (HFT) 712.8 24.2 17.6 754.6
Fin. Assets valued at fair value (FV Option) 0.0 0.8 1,781.1 1,781.9
Fin. Assets available for sale (AFS) 1,935.4 60.8 712.7 2,708.9
Fin. Assets held to maturity (HTM) 15.6 0.0 (15.6) 0.0
Amounts owing by banks 1,209.4 0.0 339.5 1,548.9
- doubtful loans 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
- in bonis loans 1,209.4 0.0 339.5 1,548.9
Customer loans 15,581.0 (47.6) (3,290.9) 12,242.5
- doubtful loans 372.7 (41.3) 0.0 331.4
- in bonis loans 15,208.3 (6.3) (3,290.9) 11,911.1
Hedging derivatives 46.3 95.4 0.0 141.7
Tangible assets 311.9 150.3 6.7 468.9
- instrumental assets 268.9 130.7 25.2 424.8
- investment assets 43.0 19.6 (18.5) 44.1
Intangibles assets 304.7 (0.7) (3.8) 301.6
- goodwill 268.2 (1.1) 0.0 269.3
- other intangible assets 36.5 (0.4) (3.8) 32.3
Fiscal assets 225.7 51.3 22.5 299.5
Partecipating interests in Group companies 45.8 11.3 252.7 309.8
Partecipating interests in affiliated companies 81.9 (9.2) 0.0 72.7
Other assets 894.1 (5.9) (72.1) 816.1
TOTAL ASSETS 21,364.6 332.1 (249.6) 21,447.1
IFRS adj. New
perimeter
adj.
31.12.2004
IFRS
21
FTA – Impact on balance sheet
31.12.2004 IFRS adj. New
perimeter
adj.
31.12.2004
IFRS
Trading financial liabilities 1,286.9 0.0 292.1 1,579.0
Fin. Liabilities recognized at amortized cost 17,160.5 97.8 (1,164.3) 16,094.0
Trading derivatives 0.0 31.1 0.0 31.1
Hedging derivatives 10.6 (0.7) (1.8) 8.1
Provisions for staff severance pay 172.7 23.1 (8.0) 187.8
Provisions for pensions 170.4 7.9 0.0 178.3
Tax provisions and other fiscal liabilities 126.0 83.7 (39.2) 170.5
Other provisions for risks and charges 77.7 (3.2) (3.4) 71.1
Put options owned by minority shareholders' of consolidated companies 0.0 174.7 0.0 174.7
Other liabilities 999.8 20.7 651.8 1,672.3
LIABILITIES 20,004.6 435.1 (272.8) 20,166.9
Share capital and share premium 704.0
Minority interests 208.6 (144.9) 23.1 86.8
0.1 0.0 704.4
Revaluation reserves 0.0 39.5 0.0 39.5
FTA reserve 0.0 (23.8) 0.0 (23.8)
Other reserves 345.1 (11.1) 0.2 334.2
Net profit for the period 102.3 37.4 (0.6) 139.1
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY + Minority interests 1,151.4 41.9 0.1 1,193.4
TOTAL LIABILITIES 21,364.6 332.1 (249.6) 21,447.1
22
IFRS 1 – Sharehold. equity reconciliation statements 1)
Consob Regulation no. 11971 - Art. 81 bis, paragraph 1b
23
IFRS 1 – Sharehold. equity reconciliation statements 2)
Consob regulations no. 11971 - Art. 81 bis, paragraph 1b
24
IAS/IFRS - Reconciliation Statements 1)
Consob Regulation no. 11971 - Art. 81 bis, paragraph 1a
25
IAS/IFRS - Reconciliation Statements 2)
Consob Regulation no. 11971 - Art. 81 bis, paragraph 1a
26
> Prospetto di riconciliazione dei saldi (art. 81 bis, 1°comma, Prospetto di riconciliazione dei saldi (art. 81 bis, 1°comma, lettera a), del regolamento CONSOB): Conto economicolettera a), del regolamento CONSOB): Conto economico
27
27
Customer loans – Evaluation Criteria
In bonis loans: expected losses (EL) have been estimated on the basis of PD and LDG of loans residual duration as per the following criteria:
40 risk categories: 5 classes x 8 segments PD: risk category adjusted – LGD: 18%
Problem loans: time-discounted recovery value has been determined as follows
AMOUNT LOAN RATEAVG. MATURITY
Mortgage loans Initial rate 5.0 years
0 - 2,500 1.1 year2,501 - 15,000 3.5 years15,001 - 50,000 5.8 years50,000 - 250,000 7.2 years
> 250,000 7.1 years
Weighted
average 6 years
with repayment scheme
as per
expiry date
without repayment
scheme
10 months
Initial rate
NON PERFORMING LOANS
DOUBTFUL and RESTRUCTURED
LOANS
Unsecured loans Initial rate
28
Put Options
In the consolidated annual report these instruments are classified as a financial liability. Based on this classification, put options pertaining to minority interests, have been recorded with a value equal to the present value of the put options themselves. In the future, any change in the fair value of the financial liability will be accounted for in the P&L.
29
Financial assets - HFS
MAIN ADJUSTMENTS TO HFS FINANCIAL ASSETS
Revaluation Depreciation
Fondiaria-Sai 14.9
CR Forlì (28.6)
Firenze Parcheggi 2.0
Engineering (1.7)
Brain Technology 1.1
Sì Holding 2.3
Sanpaolo IMI 34.2
Others 1.0 (0.1)
TOTAL 55.5 -30.4
Net revaluation 25.1
2 0 0 5 I N T E R I M R E S U L T S
T R A N S I T I O N TO I A S / I F R S
MILANO, Palazzo Mezzanotte - September 15th, 2005