Top Banner
1 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia
41

11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

11

Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT)

David G. Lowe

University of British Columbia

Page 2: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2

References

[1] D.G. Lowe, “Object recognition from local scale-invariant features,” in Proc. Seventh IEEE Int’l Conf. Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1150 -1157, 1999.

[2] D.G. Lowe, “Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints,” Int’l J. Computer Vision, vol. 2, no. 60, pp. 91-110, 2004.

2

Page 3: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

33

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm• Applications• Conclusions

Page 4: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

44

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm• Applications• Conclusions

Page 5: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

55

An Example: Build a Panorama

Page 6: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

66

How Do We Build Panorama?

• We need to match (align) images

Page 7: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

77

Matching with Features

• Detect feature points in both images

• Find corresponding pairs

• Use these pairs to align images

Page 8: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

8

An Example: Harris Detector

• It is non-invariant to image scale

8

All points will be classified as edges

Corner

Page 9: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

99

Scale Invariant Detection

• Consider regions (e.g. circles) of different sizes around a point

• Regions of corresponding sizes will look the same in both images

Page 10: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1010

Scale Invariant Detection

• The problem: how do we choose corresponding circles independently in each image?

Page 11: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

11

Laplacian of Gaussian Operator

• Maxima of Laplacian gives best notion of scale:

• Characteristic scale of a local structure

scale

bad

scale

Good !

Page 12: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1212

Introduction

• Generates image features, “keypoints”– invariant to image scaling and rotation– partially invariant to change in illumination

and 3D camera viewpoint– many can be extracted from typical images– highly distinctive

Page 13: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1313

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm• Applications• Conclusions

Page 14: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1414

Algorithm

• Scale-space extrema detection• Keypoint localization• Orientation assignment• Keypoint descriptor

( )local descriptor

detector

descriptor

Page 15: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1515

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm

– Scale-space extrema detection– Keypoint localization– Orientation assignment– Keypoint descriptor

• Applications• Conclusions

Page 16: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1616

Detection of Scale-space Extrema

• Detect locations that are invariant to scale change of the image

• SIFT uses DoG filter for scale space because it is efficient and as stable as scale-normalized Laplacian of Gaussian

Page 17: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1717

DoG Filtering

• Convolution with a variable-scale Gaussian

• Convolution with the DoG filter

( , , ) ( , , ) ( , )L x y G x y I x y 2 2 2( ) / 2

2

1( , , )

2x yG x y e

( , , ) ( ( , , ) ( , , )) ( , )

( , , ) ( , , )

D x y G x y k G x y I x y

L x y k L x y

Page 18: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1818

Scale Space

Page 19: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

1919

Scale Space: an Example

( , , ) :L x y

( , , ) :D x y

Page 20: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2020

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm

– Scale-space extrema detection– Keypoint localization– Orientation assignment– Keypoint descriptor

• Applications• Conclusions

Page 21: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2121

Keypoint Localization

• X is selected if it is larger or smaller than all 26 neighbors

Page 22: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2222

Accurate Keypoint Localization

• Reject the points that have low contrast (and are therefore sensitive to noise) or are poorly localized along and edge

233x189 original image

832 keypoints at extrema

729 keypoints after contrast filtering

536 keypoints after curvature filtering

Page 23: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2323

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm

– Scale-space extrema detection– Keypoint localization– Orientation assignment– Keypoint descriptor

• Applications• Conclusions

Page 24: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

24

Orientation Assignment

• By assigning a consistent orientation, the keypoint descriptor can be orientation invariant

Choose a region around the keypoint

Calculate the magnitude of the gradient

Calculate the magnitude of the gradient

Gaussian kernel

Orientation histogram

2 2

1

( , ) ( ( 1, ) ( 1, )) ( ( , 1) ( , 1))

( , ) tan (( ( , 1) ( , 1)) /( ( 1, ) ( 1, )))

m x y L x y L x y L x y L x y

x y L x y L x y L x y L x y

Page 25: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2525

Orientation Assignment: an Example (1)

Page 26: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2626

Orientation Assignment: an Example (2)

Page 27: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2727

Orientation Assignment: an Example (3)

Page 28: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2828

Orientation Assignment: an Example (4)

approximately 25 degrees80% of peak value

Page 29: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

2929

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm

– Scale-space extrema detection– Keypoint localization– Orientation assignment– Keypoint descriptor

• Applications• Conclusions

Page 30: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

30

Descriptor

• It computes a descriptor in order to get highly distinctive description

• The descriptors are as invariant as possible to remaining variations

30

Page 31: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3131

Keypoint Descriptor (1)

• The best result: 8 orientations x 4x4 histogram array = 128 dimensions

Page 32: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3232

Keypoint Descriptor (2)

• The 128D vectors are normalized to unit length in order to reduces effect of contrast change

• Because of using gradients, the discriptor is invariant to the changes in illumination

Page 33: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3333

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm• Applications• Conclusion

Page 34: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3434

Keypoint Matching

• The best candidate match for each keypoint is found by identifying its nearest neighbor in the database

• Using the ratio of distance (closest/next closest) chooses the correct matches– reject the distance ratio that is greater than

0.8

Page 35: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

35

Results

Page 36: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3636

Object Recognition (1)

• It creates a Hough transform entry predicting the model location, orientation, and scale

• Solution for affine parameters:

1 2

3 4

x

y

tm mu x

tm mv y

1

2

3

4

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 1

x

y

m

mx yu

mx yv

m

t

t

Ax b

Page 37: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3737

Object Recognition (2)

• The LS solution can be determined by solving the corresponding normal equations

-1T Tx A A A b

Page 38: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3838

Recognition examples (1)

Page 39: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

3939

Recognition examples (2)

Page 40: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

4040

Outline

• Introduction• Algorithm• Applications• Conclusions

Page 41: 11 Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) David G. Lowe University of British Columbia.

4141

Conclusions

• The SIFT keypoints are useful due to their distinctiveness

• This approach transforms an image into a large collection of local feature vectors

• It is invariant to image translation, scaling, and rotation, and partially invariant to illumination changes and affine or 3D projection