1 Ethics and Accountability in the Nonprofit Sector
Dec 18, 2015
1
Ethics and Accountability in the Nonprofit Sector
Create a list of all of the ethical scandals (with company names) that have faced corporate America in the last few years.
Divide into teams 5 minute timed activity
2
Create a list of all of the ethical scandals (with nonprofit names) that have faced US nonprofits in the last few years.
Same teams 5 minute timed activity
3
4
Agenda for Seminar
Opening exercises
Why ethics and accountability are important to
nonprofit leaders
Ethics codes/statements/programs
Developing a Nonprofit Ethics Code/Program
Credentialing/Nonprofit Sector Self Regulation
Nonprofit Ethical Issues Case Study Discussion
Questions and Answers
Why should ethics and accountability be important to nonprofit leaders
today?
5
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about
the sector Gaps between expectations and performance
6
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about the
sector Gaps between expectations and performance
7
Legislative and Regulatory Scrutiny at a High Point
US Senate Committee on Finance Hearings and On-going Monitoring/Press on Charity Oversight
and Reform US House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means
Hearings and Committee Meetings on the Tax Exempt Sector Internal Revenue Service
Recent publishing of best practice standards for management and governance, sweeping Form 990 Revisions with added emphasis on how nonprofits are managed and governed
State Attorneys General, proposals in many states
8
Pension Protection Act of 2006
Annual reporting by nonprofits not filing 990 Tighten rules for gifts of façade easements New rules for donor advised funds and supporting
organizations Requires cancelled check or receipt for ALL
donations Limits deductions for donation of “fractional interests”
in artwork Excise tax exemption for blood collector
organizations 9
Pension Protection Act of 2006 continued
Limits donations of clothing and household items, must be good or better condition
Tightens requirements for credit counseling agencies
Increases penalties for valuation misstatements Doubles penalties for “excess benefit transactions” Limits deductions for donations of stuffed trophy
animals—lesser of taxidermy cost or value 990-T disclosure (UBIT)
10
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about
the sector Gaps between expectations and performance
11
Scandals and increased public attention
1988 - PTL Ministries (Jim & Tammy Baker) collapses
among allegations of sexual liaison and payoff with
church funds.
1992 - Aramony defrauds United Way of $1.2 million.
1994 - NAACP executive resigns after disclosure of
payments to employee who was alleging sexual
harassment.
1995 - Foundation for New Era Philanthropy declares
bankruptcy. $100 million lost by 160 charities. 12
Scandals and increased public attention
1998 – 6 charity officials plead guilty or no contest to embezzlement/fraud of $15 million from Goodwill Industries in Santa Clara County, CA.
2001 – American Red Cross criticized for “ignoring intent of donors” in planned use of $260 million in 9/11 donations.
2002 – Clara Hale, founder of Hale House in Harlem charged with stealing $1 million from the charity.
13
Scandals and increased public attention
2005 – Washington Post series questions land transactions
between Nature Conservancy and its board members and
other practices
2003 & 2004 – San Jose Mercury News and Boston Globe
criticize excessive compensation and spending by foundations. “’Maybe the homeless people in Dallas need their soup more than
our trustees need their plane.’ But, he added, ‘I don’t think it’s
valid.’”
2004 – Catholic HealthCare West reported to make $2m
interest free loan to CEO. Majority of repayment waived if
tenure exceeds 5 years.
14
Scandals and increased public attention
2005 – Ameridebt pays $6 million in FTC settlement amid bankruptcy and allegations involving related for-profits.
2005 – Big game hunters alleged to use phony appraisals to net large tax deductions for donations of trophies to museums.
2007 – Inappropriate expenditures and lavish personal spending at Smithsonian Institution
2009 – ACORN 15
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about
the sector Gaps between expectations and performance
16
How many nonprofits are there in the U.S.?
More than a million
18
501(c)(3) 501(c)(4) 501(c)(6)0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
594704
127567
68575
1,014,165
116,539
72,549
1996
2006
Based on numbers available at http://nccs.urban.org/
Why might this dramatic growth in the number of nonprofits spark greater
scrutiny for the whole sector?
19
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about
the sector Gaps between expectations and performance
20
Public Opinion
“Who does the best job of providing services to people in need?” (N=1,557)
62% Religious/Charitable/Community Organizations
28% Government
21NPR-Kaiser-Kennedy School Poll May-June 2005
Public Opinion
A Great Deal A Fair Amount Not Too Much None
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
15%
50%
25%
7%
Aug. 2004
22
How much confidence do you have in charitable organizations?
Overall Confidence In Charitable Organizations, 2002-2006
23
A Great Deal
A Fair Amount
Not Too Much
None
September 2002 13% 47% 26% 11% August 2003 12% 47% 27% 10% October 2003 18% 45% 27% 7% January 2004 13% 49% 25% 9% August 2004 15% 50% 25% 7%
July 2005 15% 49% 24% 8% July 2006 20% 49% 20% 9%
Confidence In Charitable Organizations, 2006. August 2006, PAUL C. LIGHT
How good a job do charities do at spending money wisely?
Very Good Somewhat Good Not Too Good Not Good at All0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
11%
51%
19%
7%
Aug. 2004
24Source: Light, Paul. “Fact Sheet on the Continued Crisis in Charitable Confidence,” NYU & Brookings Institution, September 2004.
Public Opinion Mixed
Are Nonprofits on the Right Track?
25These are some of the results of a Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive® among a nationwide cross-section of 1,833 U.S. adults between October 11 and 17, 2005.
%
Wrong Direction 30
Right Track 34
Not Sure 37
Why ethics and accountability are important to nonprofit leaders!
Scrutiny at an all time high National and local scandals Growth in the number of nonprofits Sense of public distrust and confusion about
the sector Gaps between expectations and performance
26
What are some expectations of nonprofit performance that the
public might not feel are being met?
What are some expectations of nonprofit performance that the
public might not feel are being met?
Why does the public have these expectations?
Name some ethical dilemmas that nonprofit professionals face in these areas
Finance
Board Governance
Fundraising and Development
Public Policy/Advocacy
Nonprofit Operations
Human Resources
Grantmaking 29
Existing Ethics and Accountability Systems in the Nonprofit Sector
Ethics Codes, Values Statements, Similar Documents Ethics Education Credentialing: accreditation, certification, licensing,
standardization Other more general ethics and accountability
mechanisms -- Measuring satisfaction of program participants Evaluating staff Program evaluation Evaluating boards
30
“…because nonprofits have an obligation to do the right things-often wrenching choices among competing priorities, and having to ask what choice best fits their mission-they must develop methodologies for analyzing and resolving right-versus-right dilemmas.”
Rushworth Kidder in Leading with Values, 2003
31
Ethics Codes, Values Statements, Similar Documents
Generally: Aspirational, values based Performance or Conduct based
Wide range of topics covered Mandatory/voluntary Developed using varying methodologies
32
What is a code of ethics?
33
What are some of the motivations for developing ethics codes and ethics programs?
For nonprofits: Uphold high standards Shared values Part of organizational culture Ward off people doing bad things
For for-profits See above Reducing risks to the company of employee misconduct (79 %) Ensuring commitment to corporate values (75 %) Establishing a better corporate culture (68%)
Ethics Officer Association Survey (based on 2000 survey, published in 2001)
34
Other Potential Reasons for Developing a Code of Ethics, Ethics Program
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Corporations held liable for misconduct of their employees
Antitrust Bid rigging Buying of influence Collusion Software piracy Truth in advertising Kickbacks Lying Illegal Aliens
Intellectual property etc. 35
“The principal rational for having a code of ethics, regardless of what your business is, is to express a shared vision of the organization’s beliefs, culture and values”
Charles E. M. Kolb, Developing an Ethics Program, BoardSource
36
The Steps to Develop an Ethics Code
Step 1: Recruit a Working Group Step 2: Research Other Codes of Ethics Step 3: Preliminary Decisions about the focus
and structure of Code of Ethics Step 4: Drafting the Code of Ethics Step 5: Testing the Code of Ethics Step 6: Approval by Leadership Step 7: Dissemination and Education Step 8: Maintenance
37
Step 1: Recruit a Working Group
Involve staff, board, other volunteers All levels of the organization including
leadership and front line Ensure ability for involvement of all, even non-
work group members
38
Step 2: Research Other Codes of Ethics
Systematic research Reviewing for targeted content areas Assessing the best and worst features
Informal research Codes from similar nonprofit entities Codes developed by professions in your field Codes from businesses, government
39
Some sources of ethics codes
Independent Sector website
www.independentsector.org (Compendium of
Standards, Codes, and Principles of Nonprofit and
Philanthropic Organizations) with more than 100
codes of conduct for nonprofit organizations
Patrick Murphy’s Eighty Exemplary Ethics Codes
(South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press,
1998).
Ethics Resource Center website, www.ethics.org 40
“None of our experience has shown that two organizations, regardless of their similarities, can use each other’s codes. Ethics codes, are, or ought to be, culturally driven, and they must take into account each organization’s unique product line, management structure, founding vision, and culture.”
Stuart Gilman, Former President, Ethics Resource Center
41
Step 3: Preliminary Decisions about the focus and structure of Code of Ethics Aspirational (values based) or Performance or Conduct based Combination of values and conduct based
42
Aspirational Values
Results of Shared Values Exercise involving People of diverse backgrounds Honesty Responsibility Respect Fairness Compassion
Leading with Values, Institute for Global Ethics
43
Sample values based statements that can be found in a code of conduct:
“Teamwork: We believe in teamwork and that everyone has a valuable contribution to make. . . (Channel Marker, Core Values)
“Respect and seek out the truth and avoid misrepresentation . . .” (United Way of America Code of Ethics)
“Always be open and honest in your interactions. No games. No hidden agendas.” (Northwest Hospital Center Foundation Management Team Code of Conduct) 44
Some sample statement focused on conduct that can be found in a code of ethics
“A nonprofit should have information systems in place that provide timely, accurate, and relevant information…” (Minnesota Council of Nonprofits, Principles and Practices for Nonprofit Excellence)
“Members shall not accept compensation that is based on a percentage of charitable contributions; nor shall they accept finder’s fees” (Association of Fundraising Professionals Code of Ethical Principals and Standards of Professional Practice)
45
46
Step 4: Drafting the Code of Ethics
Small groups of two or three work group members draft different sections
Do not copy other codes of conduct--There is nothing worse than a
plagiarized ethics code.
Allow for a few rounds of revisions
Content should: Reflect the culture of an organization
Cover areas that employees or volunteers may encounter as part of their
work with the agency
Consistent level of detail
Allow for separate complimentary documents for special, in-depth
treatment of certain content areas (accepting gifts from vendors, conflict
of interest policy, whistleblower policy)
Step 5: Testing the Code of Ethics
Roundtables Small group discussions Provide an opportunity for all individuals to
have input Make adjustments Create final draft
47
Step 6: Approval by Leadership
Board approval of the document
48
Step 7: Dissemination and Education
Ethics codes, values statements and similar documents are rarely
self executing
Written materials
Web sites
Training Programs Peer learning
Role Playing
Discussions of hypothetical scenarios
Provide to all employees, volunteers and board members at their
initial affiliation and annually thereafter
May request or require a “sign off” on the commitment to the ethics
code of all employees, board, and volunteers 49
Dissemination/Education
Enforcement mechanisms Ombudsman service Ethics officer hotline Informal educational opportunities Confidential means to report improprieties
One source of nonprofit ethics case studies Institute for Global Ethics www.globalethics.org
50
Step 8: Maintenance
Develop a way to review and revise the code on a
periodic basis
Collect suggestions on an on-going basis or at distinct
time periods
Periodic/perhaps annual review of the content of the
code
Test to make sure the language in the code of conduct
addresses the day to day needs of the organization
Make sure the code is a living, breathing document
51
Credentialing
“to assure professional competence/establish standards”
“to enhance the prestige of the profession or industry”
Policies and Procedures in Association Management, 1996.
52
Selected different types of accreditation programs for nonprofits
Accreditation required for membership In a National NPO Subsector Association
Accreditation voluntary for membership In a National NPO Subsector Association
Accreditation voluntary for membership In a Statewide NPO Association
State level watchdog rating organization National watchdog rating organization
53
Evangelical Council of Financial Accountability (ECFA)
Nearly 1400 members members demonstrate compliance with the
Standards of Responsible Stewardship condition of membership est. 1979
54
ECFA cont…
Field Review On site or distance reviews of over 12% of its
membership each year Standards Committee www.ecfa.org
55
American Assoc. of Museums (AAM)
Assoc. of 3,000 institutions Plus 15,000 museum professionals, 300
corporate members est. 1906 Offers:
Accreditation Museum Assessment Program
www.aam-us.org
56
American Assoc. of Museums cont…
779 accredited institutions Apply to participate in Accreditation Program
1 year of self study Questionnaires covering all aspects of
operation Interim approval Onsite review Accreditation
57
Maryland Nonprofits// PANO Standards for Excellence
Organization est. 1992// 1984 Standards released 1998// 2002 1500+ members// 800+ 85 certified organizations in state // 55
58
Maryland Nonprofits// PANO Standards for Excellence cont…
Initial 3 year review cycle, then review every 5 years
Staff assisted, peer review process www.marylandnonprofits.org // www.pano.org
59
Watchdog Organizations
Created to inform donors Generally develop a set of criteria by which
organizations are judged Most focus on financial management,
fundraising percentages, ratios Most do not focus on program outcomes,
missions, or effectiveness
60
Watchdog Organizations
NCIB and BBB PAS merged to form BBB Wise Giving Alliance
American Institute of Philanthropy National Center for Responsive Philanthropy Charity Navigator Minnesota Charities Review Council Local BBB chapters
61
Charities Review Council- Minnesota
Est. 1946 Database on 4,000 organizations More than 394 reviews through their
“accountability wizard”
62
Charities Review Councilcont…
Voluntary compliance Organizations that do not reply with requested
information are reported in Giving Guide www.smartgivers.org
63
Duration of Accreditation
ECFA 1 year AAM 10 years Maryland Nonprofits 3 years, then 5 Charity Review Council 3 years Wise Giving Alliance annual
64
Publicity for Accredited Groups
ECFA Website, hard copy/directory, individual org. reports, help certified
groups promote achievement, seal
AAM Website, newsletter, help certified groups promote achievement
Maryland Nonprofits Website, help certified groups promote achievement
Charity Review Council Website, hard copy, individual reports, meet Standards seal for
accredited
Wise Giving Alliance Website, hard copy, individual reports, pay for seal
65
Assistance with Compliance
ECFA One on tech. assist., Mentorship project provides one time consultation with a
retired exec
Training programs
AAM Resource kits, video
Planning guide, online resources (fact sheets, glossaries, books)
Maryland Nonprofits One on one technical assistance, list of certified consultants
Written education packets, trainings
Charity Review Council Some general training opportunities
Wise Giving Alliance An interpretive document
66
Publicity for Noncompliance
ECFA Public listing of terminations, suspensions
AAM Omission from list of certified organizations
Maryland Nonprofits Only publicize names of certified organizations
Charity Review Council Public listing of non-compliance, non-response
Wise Giving Alliance Public listing of non-compliance, non-response
67
Topics Generally Covered in Accreditation Programs
Industry/field specific standards Governance/ boards of directors Financial issues Fundraising Conflicts of Interest Human Resources Legal Requirements
68
Other more general accountability mechanisms
Program evaluation Measuring satisfaction of program participants Evaluating staff, leadership of organization
69
Su Casa Case Study
Divide into two teams
Read the case study
List all of the ethical dilemmas faced by this organization
Team 1 reviews the situation from Betty’s point of view
Team 2 reviews the situation from the board’s point of
view What actions could the organization have taken ahead of
time to prevent this situation?
What steps do you take to handle this difficult situation?
70
Final Questions and Answers
71
[Your name and contact info here]
72