100621 LA County Initial Study Checklist (00092018-2).DOC

Page 1 of 9

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

AND SCOPING MEETING

North San Diego Water Reuse Coalition

Regional Recycled Water Project TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties DATE: August 11, 2014

SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report and Notice of Scoping Meeting

Olivenhain Municipal Water District (MWD) will be the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in the preparation of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the North San Diego Water Reuse Coalition’s (NSDWRC or Coalition) Regional Recycled Water Project (Proposed Project). Olivenhain MWD will prepare the PEIR on behalf of the Coalition, listed below:

1. Carlsbad Municipal Water District (Carlsbad MWD)

2. City of Escondido

3. City of Oceanside

4. Leucadia Wastewater District (Leucadia WWD)

5. Olivenhain Municipal Water District (Olivenhain MWD)

6. Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District (Rincon del Diablo MWD)

7. San Elijo Joint Powers Authority (San Elijo JPA)

8. Santa Fe Irrigation District (Santa Fe ID)

9. Vallecitos Water District (Vallecitos WD)

10. Vista Irrigation District (Vista ID)

This PEIR will be a joint document intended to comply with both CEQA and NEPA (see California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15222 and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Sections 1502.25, 1506.2, and 1506.4 (authority for combining federal and state environmental documents).

This PEIR will address the Proposed Project at a programmatic level; the Proposed Project will consist of construction and operation of the pipelines, pumping stations, water treatment plants, and other facilities necessary to produce and deliver 18,728 AFY of recycled and potable reuse water by 2025 and an additional 16,662 AFY of recycled and potable reuse water by 2035. Olivenhain MWD is requesting identification of environmental issues and information that you or your organization believes should be considered in the PEIR.

PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: August 11, 2014 through September 9, 2014

Page 2 of 9

RESPONSES AND COMMENTS: Please indicate a contact person for your agency or organization and send your responses and comments by September 9, 2014 to:

Ms. Kimberly Thorner Olivenhain Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas, CA 92024

Phone: (760) 753-6466 E-mail: [email protected]

SCOPING MEETING: Olivenhain MWD will hold one community meeting to receive comments on the scope and content of the NSDWRC’s Regional Recycled Water Project PEIR. You are welcome to attend and present environmental information that you believe should be considered in the PEIR. The scoping meeting is scheduled as follows:

Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: Olivenhain Municipal Water District

1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas, CA 92024

AGENCIES: Olivenhain MWD requests your agency’s views on the scope and content of the environmental information relevant to your agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project, in accordance with CEQA and NEPA. Your agency will need to use the PEIR prepared by Olivenhain MWD when considering any permits that your agency must issue, or other approvals for the project.

PROJECT LOCATION: The NSDWRC’s Regional Recycled Water Project is located within northern San Diego County, California and includes the collective service areas of the ten north San Diego County agencies that constitute the Coalition as shown in Figure 1. The western boundary of the project area is defined by the Pacific Ocean. The northern boundary of the project area is roughly defined by the boundary with Camp Pendleton and Rainbow Municipal Water District. The eastern boundary of the project is roughly the border with Valley Center Municipal Water District, the City of Poway, and the City of San Diego. To the south, the project area is roughly bounded by the City of San Diego.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The NSDWRC’s Regional Recycled Water Project consists of development of regional recycled water and potable reuse water infrastructure that includes interagency connections to increase the capacity and connectivity of the storage and distribution systems of the Coalition. The Proposed Project includes replacing potable water uses with recycled water components, converting facilities to recycled water service, connecting discrete recycled water systems to one another, increasing recycled water storage capacity, and distributing recycled water to effectively meet recycled water demands. Estimated existing recycled water demands associated with the Proposed Project for the Coalition are 10,110 AFY. Future additional recycled (non-potable) water demands associated with the Proposed Project are anticipated to total 11,888 AFY in 2025 and increase by 10,142 AFY in 2035 for a total of 31,040 AFY in the long-term. Future recycled

Page 3 of 9

water supplies associated with the Proposed Project would serve demands associated with irrigation in housing developments, commercial properties such as business parks, and golf courses. A portion of the recycled water demand would serve agricultural customers, mainly those who would be connected to the Easterly Main Extension through the City of Escondido and the Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District project components.

The Proposed Project would also involve using recycled water for potable reuse, where recycled water is purified via advanced water treatment and mixed back into the water supply system after it is filtered through an environmental buffer such as a groundwater basin or surface reservoir. After the water has been through an environmental buffer, it is then treated at a water treatment facility and added to the potable supply, in the same manner as untreated imported supplies or untreated groundwater. It is anticipated that potable reuse will provide up to 7,940 AFY of water by 2025 and an additional 6,520 AFY of water by 2035 for a total maximum of 14,460 AFY by 2035. Five groundwater basins and two surface reservoir sites have been identified for future potential potable reuse: Mission Basin, San Marcos Basin, San Elijo Valley Basin, San Dieguito Basin, Escondido Valley Basin, San Dieguito Reservoir, and Lake Dixon. These sites are shown in Figure 2; while Figure 2 shows the potable reuse sites (groundwater basins and surface reservoirs), the figure does not show the proposed pipelines or facilities potentially associated with potable reuse as the precise location of those alignments and facilities are not known at this time.

In total, future additional average demands for recycled water and potable reuse water associated with the Proposed Project are anticipated to increase by 18,728 AFY by 2025 to a total of 28,838 AFY, and by another 16,662 AFY by 2035 for a total of 45,500 AFY. The Proposed Project includes detailed information about the short-term (2025) project components, while the long-term (2035) project components are not included in detail as part of the Proposed Project. The short-term (2025) project components associated with the Proposed Project and shown in Figure 2 have been categorized into groups, which are referenced below in Table 1. The groups show the treatment plant that would provide recycled water or potable reuse water (from advanced water treatment [AWT] facilities) as well as the Coalition Member with which the demands are associated.

In order to meet the short-term recycled water and potable reuse demands associated with the Proposed Project, six existing treatment plants (also referred to as water reclamation facilities [WRF] or wastewater treatment plants [WWTP]) will need to be upgraded and three additional treatment plants will need to be constructed. Additional treatment plant upgrades will be required in order to meet the long-term recycled water demands associated with the Proposed Project. Further, in the long-term, any of the treatment plants in the region may be upgraded to include AWT components to supply water for potable reuse.

At various locations along the construction route(s), staging areas would be required to store pipe, construction equipment, and other construction-related material. Staging areas would be established along the route where space is available, such as vacant lots, roadway turnouts, and parking lots. Typical construction activities during construction of the non-potable water system would include site preparation, earthwork, pipe installation, structural improvements (foundations and footings), paving, electrical/ instrumentation installation, startup, and testing work.

Page 4 of 9

Table 1: Existing and Future Average Recycled Water and Potable Reuse Demands for the Proposed Project

Coalition Member

Group Treatment Plant Existing

Demands

Average Demand Increase (AFY)

Total Demand

(AFY) By 2025 By 2035

Carlsbad MWD

A Carlsbad WRF/Gafner WRF 2,150 1,752 1,398 5,300

B Meadowlark WRF 2,000 0 187 2,187

Subtotal 4,150 1,752 1,585 7,487

City of Escondido

C HARRF

771 4,670 3,035 8,476

D Escondido AWTF (Potable Reuse)

0 2,200 0 2,200

Subtotal 771 6,870 3,035 10,676

City of Oceanside

E Carlsbad WRF 0 277 0 277

F El Corazon WRF 0 560 1,130 1,690

G San Luis Rey WWTP/SRTTP 300 1,640 0 1,940

G San Luis Rey WWTP – AWT

(Potable Reuse) 0 2,240 3,360 5,600

Subtotal 300 4,717 4,490 9,507

Olivenhain MWD

N/A Meadowlark WRF*

1,000 0 0 1,000

H San Elijo WRF/Gafner WRF 100 300 0 400

H San Elijo WRF – AWT (Potable Reuse)

0 1,100 1,030 2,130

Subtotal 1,100 1,400 1,030 3,530

Rincon del Diablo MWD

I HARRF 3,279 500 0 3,779

I HARRF – AWT (Potable Reuse)

0 200 0 200

J Harmony Grove WRF 0 220 0 220

Subtotal 3,279 920 0 4,199

Santa Fe ID

K** San Elijo WRF/Gafner WRF 510 40-729 0 550-1,239

K** San Elijo WRF – AWT

(Potable Reuse) 0 0-1,100 1,030 1,030-2,130

Subtotal 510 729-1,140 1,030 2,269-2680

Vallecitos Water District

L Carlsbad WRF 0 0 454 454

M HARRF 0 574 922 1,496

N Meadowlark WRF 0 0 416 416

N Meadowlark WRF – AWT (Potable Reuse)

0 1,100 1,100 2,200

Subtotal 0 1,674 2,892 4,566

Vista Irrigation District

O Carlsbad WRF 0 255 1,880 2,135

P El Corazon WRF 0 0 720 720

Subtotal 0 255 2,600 2,855

Total Additional Demand for Proposed Project** 10,110 18,728 16,662 45,500

Total Cumulative Demand for Proposed Project** -- 28,838 45,500

Page 5 of 9

Coalition Member

Group Treatment Plant Existing

Demands

Average Demand Increase (AFY)

Total Demand

(AFY) By 2025 By 2035

* These connections are not included within the groupings, because while they have existing recycled water demands, which are included in the total recycled water flows for the Coalition, there are no future recycled water demands or associated recycled water facilities for these entities for purposes of the Proposed Project.

** Santa Fe ID will implement either 1,100 AFY of potable reuse at the San Dieguito Reservoir or 689 AFY of recycled water to meet demands in the eastern service area for Group K. Both projects will not take place in the short-term, so total demands for Group K and total demands associated with the Proposed Project are shown as ranges assuming only one of the Group K projects will move forward.

POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: A PEIR will be prepared to evaluate the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and analyze project alternatives. The topic areas anticipated to be discussed in the PEIR are listed and checkmarked in the following table and described further below. This PEIR will be a joint document intended to comply with both CEQA and NEPA; accordingly, topic areas specific to NEPA, such as Environmental Justice, will also be evaluated with respect to the Proposed Project.

X Aesthetics Agricultural Resources X Air Quality

X Biological Resources X Cultural Resources X Geology and Soils

X Greenhouse Gas

Emissions

X Hazards and Hazardous

Materials

X Hydrology and Water

Quality

X Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources X Noise

Population and Housing X Public Services X Recreation

X Transportation and

Traffic

X Utilities and Service

Systems

Environmental Justice

X Mandatory Findings of Significance

Aesthetics – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would have an adverse impact on scenic vistas, degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, or create any new sources of light or glare. It is anticipated that new non-potable water facilities and potable reuse facilities would generally integrate with the existing surroundings; however, in some instances their installation would potentially alter the visual character of the site and the need for mitigation such as visual screening or other measures will be considered.

Agricultural Resources – Although such impacts are not anticipated, the Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would impact farmland, conflict with zoning for agricultural use, forest or timberland, or Williamson Act contracts, or result in the loss of forest land.

Air Quality – The Proposed Project will be analyzed as compared to applicable air quality plans and its potential to violate air standards or contribute to existing violations, increase criteria pollutants, expose sensitive receptors, and generate odors. Potential air quality impacts from the proposed project would primarily relate to construction-related emissions and odors.

Biological Resources – The Proposed Project will be analyzed for its potential effects on sensitive or special status species, riparian habitat or natural communities identified by the

Page 6 of 9

California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife, wetlands, or migration of species; and local policies and conservation plans protecting biological resources will be reviewed to determine if conflicts are present. If necessary, the need for mitigation measures to reduce impacts to protected species will be considered, such as focused monitoring surveys, restrictions on construction schedules during nesting seasons, and a tree inventory and protection measures.

Cultural Resources – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would have any substantial, adverse changes in the significance of historic or archaeological resources; directly or indirectly destroy a unique cultural resources feature; or disturb any human remains. If necessary, the need for mitigation measures will be considered, such as compliance with standards for rehabilitation, focused assessments, and monitoring and construction restrictions.

Geology and Soils – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects through seismic movement, shaking, landslides, or liquefaction; result in substantial erosion, be located on an unstable or expansive soil, or have soils incapable of infiltration if required for wastewater disposal.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions compared to existing conditions or conflict with plans or policies adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine impacts to the public or environment (including nearby schools) from the transport, use or encounter of hazardous substances; analysis of special safety hazards near airports or airstrip; review of potential interference with emergency response plans; and review of exposure to wildfires.

Hydrology and Water Quality – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in impacts to water quality, waste discharge requirements, water supplies, drainage patterns, and increased exposure to flood hazards and inundation.

Land Use and Planning – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in land use or planning impacts such as the physical division of an established community, or conflicting with applicable land use or conservation plans.

Mineral Resources – Although such impacts are not anticipated, the Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in the loss of mineral resources.

Noise – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in exposure of persons to excessive noise or ground vibrations, either temporary or overall increases in ambient noise levels. Potential noise and vibration impacts are anticipated due to construction activities and the need for mitigation including noise control measures and preconstruction noticing will be considered.

Page 7 of 9

Population and Housing – Although such impacts are not anticipated, the Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in population growth inducement or displace housing or people.

Public Services – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would result in impacts to government facilities or otherwise impact public services such as fire or police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities.

Recreation – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional park facilities that would accelerate deterioration of the facility, or require construction of a facility that would adversely impact the environment. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to increase the demand for or require construction or expansion of recreational facilities; however, use of facilities may be temporarily disrupted due to construction activities.

Transportation/Traffic – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would cause an increase in traffic (temporary or long-term), result in a change in air traffic patterns, increase hazards due to a design feature, result in inadequate emergency access or parking capacity, or conflict with plans or policies supporting alternative transportation. Temporary impacts to transportation/traffic are anticipated due to construction activities and a contractor-led traffic management plan will be included as mitigation if necessary.

Utilities and Service Systems – The Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would exceed regulatory wastewater treatment requirements; require new or expanded wastewater or stormwater facilities; have sufficient water supply entitlements, sufficient treatment capacity, and disposal facilities; and comply with solid waste regulations.

Environmental Justice – Although such impacts are not anticipated, the Proposed Project will be analyzed to determine if it would disproportionately impact minority or low-income populations.

Mandatory Findings of Significance – The Proposed Project will be analyzed in the appropriate sections, above, to determine if it would degrade the quality of the environment including species reduction or adverse effects on human beings, or have impacts that are cumulatively considerable in combination with other projects (current or future). The need to implement mitigation measures to address such impacts will be considered as part of the analysis.

DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY: The Notice of Preparation can be viewed on Olivenhain MWD’s website at: https://www.olivenhain.com/about-us/projects-and-facilities

This NOP is also available for review during regular business hours at Olivenhain MWD’s offices located at 1966 Olivenhain Road, Encinitas, CA 92024. If you require additional information please contact Kimberly Thorner at (760) 753-6466.

§̈¦5

§̈¦15

¬«56

¬«78

¬«76

Oceansid

e

Vista

Carlsbad

San M

arcos

Escondido

Powa

y

San Diego

Del M

ar

Solana Beach

Encinitas

Santa Fe Ave

Centre City Pky

Mission Rd

Espo

la Rd

Vista

Way

Via de la Valle

Valley Center Rd

Palomar Airport Rd

Highway 101

Del Dios Hwy

Valley Pky

Carlsbad Blvd

Coast Hwy

Champagne Blvd

Poway Rd

Mission Ave

San Marcos Blvd

Coast Hwy 101

Old Hi

ghwa

y 395

Lina d

el Cielo

Twin

Oaks

Valley

Rd

County Highway S11

El Camino Real

La Granada

el Camino Real

La Bajada

Main St

Valle

y Pky

Del D

ios H

wy

El Camino Real Escondido Creek

San Luis Rey River

San Dieguito River

Agua Hedionda Creek

Buena Vista Creek

Lusardi Creek

Santa

Marg

arita

River

0 2 41Miles

¯

Partner's Service AreaCamp PendletonCarlsbad MWDCity of EscondidoCity of OceansideOlivenhain MWDRincon Del Diablo MWDSanta Fe IDVallecitos WDVista IDLeucadia Wastewater DistrictSan Elijo JPA

Other FeaturesMajor RoadsWaterwaysWater BodyStudy AreaCity Boundaries

Santa Fe ID

Olivenhain MWD

Vallecitos Water District

Vista Irrigation District

City of Escondido

Rincon del Diablo MWDCarlsbad MWD

City of Oceanside

Leucadia Wastewater District

San Elijo JPA

Figure 1 Coalition Partners

Camp Pendleton

Page 8 of 9

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

UTUT

UT

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

"CD

""CD

""CD""CD

""CD

""CD

Encina WPCF

Meadowlark WRF and AWT

C Tank

Mahr Reservoir

La Salina WWTP

San Luis Rey WWTP and AWT

Rancho Santa Fe WRP

Oakcrest Tank

Lomas Santa Fe Tank

Carlsbad WRF

San Elijo WRF and AWT

Whispering Palms WPCF

Carlsbad Segment 9 Users (91 AFY)

Carlsbad - Segment 8 UsersLa Costa Resort Group (20 AFY) Wanket Tank

ECWRF - Phase 4 (230 AFY)

Calavera Hydro Tank

Bressi Hydro Tank

Gafner WRPHarmony Grove Meadows Development (80 AFY)

Hale Ave. RRF and AWT

Wild Animal Park (447 AFY)

Escondido East Ag Block (4,350 AFY)

Twin D Tank

Leslie Lane Reservoir

Fairbanks Ranch WPCF

Southern Regional TTP

Rancho Santa Fe Golf Course (285 AFY)

Village Park (285 AFY) Bridges Golf Course/Cielo Development

Harmony Grove (220 AFY)

VID 2 (950 AFY)

VID 4 (490 AFY)

Ocean Hills CC (277 AFY)

VID 5 (440 AFY)

VWD 5 (150 AFY)

VWD 4 (257 AFY)

Shadowridge GC (255 AFY)

VWD Future Development (300 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 2 Users (71, 853 AFY)

Carlsbad - Cust. along Ex.RW line (878 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 11 Users (120 AFY)

Wiegand Tank

SFID Private Customers (404 AFY)

OMWD Private Customers (15 AFY)

Valiano Development/Agricultural(200 AFY)

Harmony Grove WRP

VWD 3 (454 AFY)VWD 7 (196 AFY)

VWD 6 (220 AFY)

VWD 8 (147 AFY)

ECWRF - Phase 3 (110 AFY)

ECWRF - Phase 1 (560 AFY)

El Corazon WRF

Carlsbad Segment 7 Users (114 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 5 Users (454 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 12 Users (41 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 1A Users (99 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 18 Users (25 AFY)

New RW Reservoir

R1 Reservoir

New Tank

Escondido AWT

SLRWRP - Phase 1 (660 AFY)

Oak Hill Memorial Park (220 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 14 Users (58 AFY)Carlsbad Segment 3 Users (333 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 15 Users (22 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 10(82 AFY)

Long Term IPR Project (Location to be determined)

Carlsbad Segment 13 Users (32 AFY)

Carlsbad - Segment 16 Users (10 AFY)Carlsbad Segment 17 (85 AFY)

Carlsbad Segment 6 (20 AFY)

ECWRF - Phase 5 (420 AFY)VISTA ID

VWD 9 (63 AFY)

VID 3 (100 AFY)

SFID HOAs (40 AFY)

SLRWRP - Phase 2 (590 AFY)

VWD 2 (305 AFY)

VWD 1 (274 AFY)

VID 1 (620 AFY)Escondido North Ag Block (2,250 AFY)

Rincon Business Park (150 AFY)

Escondido Country Club (70 AFY)

Escondido Users - South (100 AFY)

Eagle Crest Golf Course (338 AFY)

Morro Hills Development (390 AFY)

ECWRF - Phase 2 (370 AFY)

OCEANSIDE

SANTAFE ID

ESCONDIDO

RINCON DELDIABLO MWD

CARLSBAD MWD

OLIVENHAINMWD

VALLECITOS WD

VISTA ID

SanDieguito

Res.

WhelanLake

Santa Ysabel Creek

San LuisRey River

SanMarcos

Creek

San Dieguito River

SanMarcos

Creek

Lusardi Creek

San Dieguito River

Santa

Marg

arita

River

Buena Vista Creek

AguaHediondaCreek

San Luis Rey River

Escondid

o Cree

k

SouthLake

SquiresLake

San DieguitoGroundwater

Basin

San Elijo ValleyGroundwater

Basin

SanMarcos Basin

EscondidoValley Basin

LakeDixon

Group O

Group P

Group N

Group M

Group LGroup I

Group J

Group H

Group H

Group H

Group G

Group F

Group E

Group C

Group D

Group B

Group A

Group K

Group I

Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTomL:\Pr

ojects

GIS

\Nort

h San

Dieg

o Cou

nty R

W\MX

Ds\Fi

g 5-1

Short

Term

Proj

ect 2

013-1

0-30 p

oster

.mxd

¯0 1.5 30.75

Miles

Figure 2:Short-Term and Long-Term Projects

Potential Long Term RW Demand!( 0 - 100!( 101 - 500

!( 501 - 1000

!( Greater than 1,000Potential Short Term RW Demand!( 3 - 100!( 101 - 500

!( 501 - 1000

!( Greater than 1,000Conceptual Future RW Pipelines

Short TermLong Term

Existing Recycled Water PipelineLess than 12"12" and Greater

Facilities"CD WWTP/WRP

""CD WWTP/WRP with LT Expansion

UT Existing Reservoir/Hydro Tank

UT Potential Reservoir/Hydro TankPotential Seasonal Storage Site

Potential Potable Reuse SiteSurfaceGroundwater

Water Agency Service AreaCarlsbad MWDCity of EscondidoCity of OceansideOlivenhain MWDRincon Del Diablo MWDSanta Fe IDVallecitos WDVista ID

Wastewater AgenciesLeucadia WWDSan Elijo JPACamp Pendleton

Short and Long Term Potable Reuse Projects

Escondido Valley Basin (200 AFY)Lake Dixon (2,200 AFY)Mission Basin (5,600 AFY)San Dieguito Reservoir (2,130 AFY)San Dieguito Basin (1,065 AFY)San Elijo Valley Basin (1,065 AFY)San Marcos Basin (2,200 AFY)

Page 9 of 9