1 Road Pricing: Peñon – Texcoco Mexico Case 18th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference 20-22 October, 2004 Cuidad de México, Mexico Ing. Alfonso Castro Orihuela Cal y Mayor y Asociados S.C
1
Road Pricing:Peñon – Texcoco Mexico Case
18th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference20-22 October, 2004
Cuidad de México, Mexico
Ing. Alfonso Castro Orihuela
Cal y Mayor y Asociados S.C
2
Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de Mexico (ZMVM)
MODEL OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF THE VALLEY OF MEXICO (MAVM)
Road Peñon - Texcoco
3
THE PROJECT
Toll-road
Airport
4
POSSIBLE TRAVELERS
Users that would use the highway, without toll.
assignment method used is “User equilibrium” implemented in EMME/2.
we use the whole network of the Metropolitan Area of the Valley of Mexico.
ijrijr TVP
usednotisroadif
usedisroadIfr
0
1
jibetweentravelersTotalT
rroadtheusethatjibetweenPossibleTravelersVP
ij
ijr
,
,
5
ROUTE CHOICE
Calibrated functions of indirect utility for user's class, we have:
Where: i,j = Trips between zone from i to j, m= user´s class or type of vehicle.
Then, the choice model is:
mmij
mij
mij CTU
ctetollttP m
ijrmijr
mij
mijr
0exp1
1
.´,,
.´,
.´,
tan,
tan
0
msuserrpaththetakejibetweenTolltoll
msuserrpaththetakejibetweenprojectwithTimet
mclasssuserjibetweenprojectwithoutTimet
calibratedtsCons
dispertionoftCons
mijr
mijr
mij
6
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The “Toll”, we determine with an average value for every vehicle type of other similar highways.
We apply variations of the “Toll”, from 50% to 150%.
Again we make the potential travelers of the highway with the different values of “Toll”
mijrmijr
mijr VP.tollPD
7
Assignment without poject.User Equilibrium, multiclass.
Calculate of matrix time and toll
Assignment with project.User Equilibrium, multiclass.
Calculate of matrix time and tollPossible travelers
Calculate of Random UtilityCalibrated parameters
Choice model
Travelers use the project
Variation of toll
GENERAL OUTLINE OF IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2
8
ESTIMATE OF OPTIMUM TOLLDemand Toll Revenue
D1 0.5*Toll I1=D1*0.5*Toll
D2 0.6*Toll I2=D2*0.6*Toll
D3 0.7*Toll I3=D3*0.7*Toll
D4 0.8*Toll I4=D4*0.8*Toll
D5 0.9*Toll I5=D5*0.9*Toll
D6 1.0*Toll I6=D6*1.0*Toll
D7 1.1*Toll I7=D7*1.1*Toll
D8 1.2*Toll I8=D8*1.2*Toll
D9 1.3*Toll I9=D9*1.3*Toll
D10 1.4Toll I10=D10*1.4*Toll
D11 1.5*Toll I11=D11*1.5*Toll
mijrD m
ijrToll
9
CONSTRUCTION OF THE FUNCTION OF OPTIMIZATION
Variation of Toll0.5*Toll 1.5*Toll
Var
iatio
n of
Rev
enue
I1
I11 Maximum revenue
adjusted curve
Good toll
10
RESULTS OF ESTIMATE OF OPTIMUM TOLL
Revenue for Car
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
13 16 18 21 23 26 29 31 34 36 39
Toll $
Re
ve
nu
e $
*10
00
$ 26
11
Revenue truck of 2 and 3 axle
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
21 25 29 34 38 42 46 50 55 59 63
Toll $
Re
ve
nu
e $
*10
0
$ 46.2
12
Revenue truck 4 and 5 axle
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
45 54 63 72 81 90 99 108 117 126 135
Toll $
Re
ve
nu
e $
*10
0
$ 72
13
TDPA in several projects in operation (2003)
y = 0.9899x
R2 = 0.8946
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000
TDPA Real
TD
PA
Est
imat
e
14
CONCLUSIONS
This method is applied in Mexico and other countries.
It has acceptance for Public Sectors and Private, for toll-road operators and risk appraisers.
The forecast obtained in the different studies, have given very reliable results.
Method used intensively in urban networks