Top Banner
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015
23

1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

Sherman Neal
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

1Research

go bus Impact StudyTRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference

Atlantic City, May 2015

Page 2: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

2Research

Background

In 2008, NJ TRANSIT introduced an enhanced bus service called go 25 along the 4.8-mile corridor between Newark Penn Station and Irvington Bus Terminal

In 2009, NJ TRANSIT introduced go 28, which serves a 12.1-mile corridor connecting Bloomfield Train Station, downtown Newark, and Newark Airport

Page 3: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

3Research

Branded Buses and Shelters

Page 4: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

4Research

Traffic Signal Priority

Page 5: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

5Research

Enhanced Interiors

Page 6: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

6Research

Additional go bus Features

Frequent service Extended hours Fewer stops

Board in Front, Exit in Rear

Page 7: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

7Research

Project Goals

Identify and understand shifts in travel patterns and customer satisfaction

Understand how the enhanced service affects customers’ perceptions of time savings

Identify which features of go bus service customers value the most

Understand the characteristics of customers utilizing go bus services and how they compare to our traditional local bus markets

Page 8: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

8Research

Methodology Overview

Literature Review

Onboard Survey

Focus Groups

Web-based Maximum Difference Scaling (MaxDiff) Survey

Page 9: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

9Research

Methodology: Onboard Survey

Surveys were administered onboard go 25 and go 28, as well as on parallel local routes 25, 11, 28, and 72

All inbound and outbound trips btwn 6AM-3PM

Response rate of 19%

Surveys were weighted by route, time of day, and direction using ridership counts from the farebox

Page 10: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

10Research

go bus Customers Perceive Greater Time Savings Than Exist

go 25 - 16 min

91%Yes, I save time

85%Yes, I save time

go 28 - 19 min

Page 11: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

11Research

go bus Customers Express Higher Satisfaction

Condition of Shelter

Wkdy Peak Bus Freq

Wkdy Off-Peak Bus

Freq

Info about the Bus

On-time Perfor-mance

Trip Time Overall Sat-isfaction

0123456789

10

Page 12: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

12Research

67%

25%8%

No Other Way Best Choice Occasional Use

go bus Attracts More “Choice” Riders

23%

61%

16%

go bus local bus

Page 13: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

13Research

go bus Provides Crucial Links to Employment Centers

Nearly 8 in 10 go bus customers were traveling to or from work

About 25% of go 25 customers transfer to or from the PATH train at Newark Penn Station

<10% of local route 25 customers do the same

Approximately 64% of go 28 customers were traveling to or from Newark Liberty International Airport for work

Page 14: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

14Research

Methodology: Focus Groups

7 focus groups held at NJ TRANSIT Headquarters with go bus and local bus customers

Midway through each group, participants were asked to complete a web-based MaxDiff survey, which involved ranking 24 attributes of service through a series of exercises

Page 15: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

15Research

go bus Branding Raises its Visibility

Easier to identify bus stop locations

Customers can see go bus coming

Shelters seem cleaner, better maintained

Page 16: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

16Research

Customers Like Enhanced Interiors

go buses seem cleaner and more comfortable

Customers enjoy features like overhead lighting, high-back seats, and luggage racks on go 28

Page 17: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

17Research

More Education Needed about “Exit from Rear” Policy

Customers agree that entering through the front and exiting through the back is effective at speeding trip times

However, policy is not always enforced and can actually slow things down when a rider is unaware of the rule

Page 18: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

18Research

Customers Unaware of Signal Priority

Customers were unaware of the traffic signal priority

However, did notice that the bus seemed to move faster down Bloomfield Ave

Page 19: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

19Research

Methodology: MaxDiff Scaling

Determines the magnitude by which certain attributes are valued in comparison to others by forcing respondents to make trade-offs

Page 20: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

20Research

Travel and Frequency Valued Twice as High as Branding Attributes

go bus has deluxe seats, hand holds, baggage racks, lighting.

Buses arrive every 15 mins in the peak and every 30 mins all day.

Buses arrive every 10 mins in the peak and every 20 mins all day.

Using go bus takes 10 minutes less travel time than the local bus.

go bus makes fewer stops than the regular bus route.

77

82

85

90

100

Top 5 Rated Attributes

Page 21: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

21Research

Branding and Fare Payment Options Rank Lower in Importance

go bus drivers have a unique uniform that is easily identifiable.

Fare payment for go bus is available by tapping your cell phone.

A regular bus costs 25 cents less than the go bus.

go bus stops have nicer shelters than regular bus routes.

Bus is identifiable with a well-known name, “go bus.”

0

19

31

38

44

Bottom 5 Rated Attributes

Page 22: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

22Research

Conclusions

Travel time, frequency of service & convenience are most valued

Perceived time savings were greater than actual time savings on go bus

While less valued by customers, branding and visibility play a large role in garnering interest and awareness about the go bus

Page 23: 1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

23Research

Conclusions

go 25 and go 28 customers report higher customer satisfaction

go 25 and go 28 took some cars off the road

Opportunities exist to use go bus service to improve trans-Hudson travel