1 Process for a Research Grant National Institutes of Health IMPAC II Center for Scientific Review Study Section Institute Advisory Councils & Boards Assign.

1

Process for a Research GrantProcess for a Research Grant

National Institutes of Health

IMPAC II

Center for Scientific Review

Study Section

Institute

Advisory Councils & Boards

Assign to IC & IRG/Study Section

Review for Scientific Merit

Evaluate for Relevance

Recommend Action

Takes Final Action

Commons

Institute Director

University & Research Institution

AwardAllocation of

Funds

Principal Investigator

Submits Application

Initi

ates

Resea

rch

Idea

& Con

duct

s

Resea

rch

Post-AwardAdministration

2

eRA Objective = Full Electronic Grants eRA Objective = Full Electronic Grants AdministrationAdministration

200,000,000 200,000,000 Pieces of PaperPieces of Paper

~ 100,000 Applicants / 2,600 Grantee Institutions Worldwide

IMPAC II – NIH Transactional DatabaseIMPAC II – NIH Transactional Database

2,300 Average Daily Users2,300 Average Daily UsersNote: Extension systems use data from IMPAC II

3

eRA Objective = Full Electronic Grants eRA Objective = Full Electronic Grants AdministrationAdministration

~ 100,000 Applicants / 2,600 Grantee Institutions Worldwide

IMPAC II – NIH Transactional DatabaseIMPAC II – NIH Transactional Database

2,300 Average Daily Users2,300 Average Daily UsersNote: Extension systems use data from IMPAC II

NIH Commons Federal Commons

Assurances Scientific Applications

Certifications Other Support Project Specific

Assurances

Periodic Reports•Progress•Financial

•Inventions•Women/minorities

Final Reports•Progress•Financial

•Inventions

Application Specification

Grants Policy Assignment

Priority Score

Summary Statement

Notice of Grant Award

Post-Award Correspondence

4

Past

IMPAC I

Main

fram

e

Salute and Good Bye to IMPAC 1 Salute and Good Bye to IMPAC 1 Over Thirty Years of ServiceOver Thirty Years of Service

Future

Operational PlatformSoftware Development

Business Process Re-engineeringNIH’s Link to e-Government

eRA

J2EE

NIH’s Partnerships

Past

IMPAC I

Main

fram

e

Present

IMPAC II

/

Comm

ons

Client

Ser

ver

5

Why Is This Important to You – This Why Is This Important to You – This YearYear

Once your organization registers you can register to look up on line: Where your competing grant(s) is in the

process Obtain

Identify the study section it is assigned to and click to the membership

Scores within days of the review Summary Statement when posted Obtain links and identify of the program

officer and grants technical assistant See your grant application And more

Submit your progress report electronically

6

Computer Retrieval of Informationon Scientific Projects (CRISP)

Interagency Edison (iEdison) Application/Award Status X-Train Institutional Profile Professional Profile Institutional Registration

and Accounts Administration FSRs and more E-SNAP – Progress Reports Internet Assisted Peer Review - IAR Competing Grant Applications

* 21 additional framework modules support these applications “behind the scenes”

Commons ModulesCommons Modules**

Production

Target Jan. 03For Production

Target 04For Production

Initial Pilots

7

Commons Home PageCommons Home Page

Click Enter Commons Demo link in bottom left column to enter the demo.

8

Demo Home PageDemo Home Page

Select the demo_PI option from the dropdown box. Click the login button.

9

Demo_PI First PageDemo_PI First Page

Notice the session information in the top right corner.

Next, select Status from the Main Navigation Bar.

10

Status Page DemoStatus Page Demo

Click PI Status in the Sub-Navigation Bar.

This page shows the Proposal Report results for demo_PI.

The user can click on the Grant Number returned from the search to access detailed information.

If a Summary Statement (SS) or a Notice of Grant Award is available the user can view that as well.

13

SBIR’s Need 18 Million for Phase IIsSBIR’s Need 18 Million for Phase IIs

Name Grant TitleResearch Orgs Product Used

Phase 1 Funding

Phase 2 Funding

ERA Software SystemsPI: Dianne Bozler

Enhancements to GAMS to Include XML for the NIH Commons 5 $361,991 $1,416,110

RAMS CompanyPI: William Kirby

Test ERA Software Package with Local Control of Profiles 1542 $295,478 $4,366,273

InfoEd InternationalPI: Edward Johnson, Sr.

Electronic Submission/Response System via an NIH Portal 600 $422,389 $1,470,733

Cayuse, Inc.PI: Chris Harker

GrantSlam eRA: Scalable electronic grants administration 675 $409,584 $1,515,080

Formatta Corp.PI: David Garver

Next Generation eRA: Portable Internet Date Containers 25 $504,698 $3,785,541

Clinical ToolsPI: Brad Tanner

Electronic Submission of NIH Grant Applications 8 $499,153 $5,417,697

Please indicate if

you’re willin

g to

provide funds th

is year…

100,0000 PI’s

The Age of InterdependenceThe Age of Interdependence

2,200 Inst.2,200 Inst.

100,0000 grants100,0000 grants

600,000,000600,000,000transactions /transactions /yryr

2 million 2 million crisp searchescrisp searches

13 million humans in studies