Top Banner
1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central and Eastern Europe eAccessibility in Television Broadcasting in Central and Eastern Europe 3-4 December 2013HRT Academy, Zagreb, Croatia
69

1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Erick Thornton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

1© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

The case for introducing access services by broadcasters

Peter Olaf LOOMS

Looms Consulting

ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central and Eastern Europe eAccessibility in Television Broadcasting in Central and Eastern Europe

3-4 December 2013HRT Academy, Zagreb, Croatia

Page 2: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

2© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Programme

About the speaker: Who I am and what I do

About the talk: 1. What is the challenge?

How is TV changing in the 21st century?Is TV ‘accessible’?

2. What are the options? What can broadcasters do to make a difference?

3. How can broadcasters make TV accessibility a reality?

How we we put together the business case for action?

Page 3: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

3© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

How is TV changing in the 21st century?

Page 4: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

4© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

1. What is the nature of the challenge?

1. What is the nature of the challenge?

It’s about...understanding how TV is changing understanding how TV users are changing andIt’s also about breaking down barriers to match supply and demand!

It’s about...understanding how TV is changing understanding how TV users are changing andIt’s also about breaking down barriers to match supply and demand!

Source: http://www.herasreadyfence.co.uk/barriers.html 4

Page 5: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

5© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV viewing in Denmark 2012average 3 hours 46 minutes/day

Source: Statistical Yearbook [Denmark] 2013. Culture & National Church. Page 4.

Viewing of on-demand video and TV is growing <10% of TV viewing (15-20 mins./day)

Page 6: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

6© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

The technologies we use are changingDanish Household ownership 2002-12

Page 7: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

7© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

€ million

Advertising revenue is changing Advertising spend 2004-2011 in Denmark

Page 8: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

8© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Media Consumption is Changingminutes per day - Danes in 2012

Page 9: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

9© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Expectations of TV are changingExpectations of TV are changing

Content on the devices Content on the devices viewersviewers want want

Page 10: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

10© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

At least 1 in 6 encounter major barriers

Demographics are changingDemographics are changing

Not everybody benefits from TV on these devicesNot everybody benefits from TV on these devices

Page 11: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

11© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

A further 2 in 6 encounter minor barriers

Demographics are changingDemographics are changing

Not everybody benefits from TV on these devicesNot everybody benefits from TV on these devices

Page 12: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

12© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Main take-aways

TV operates in a world in which technologies, revenues and audiences change

Broadcasters to keep their traditional audiences happy

Broadcaster need a multiplatform strategy to stay in contact with young demographics and...

Page 13: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

13© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

At some point in our lives nearly all of us will encounter accessibility problems,barriers that make us feel excluded

At some point in our lives nearly all of us will encounter accessibility problems,barriers that make us feel excluded

Main take-aways

Page 14: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

14© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Is TV “accessible”?

Page 15: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

15© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

“Accessible” means different things

Page 16: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

16© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

“Accessible” means different things

Page 17: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

17© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Accessibility & Usability?Accessibility & Usability?

Source: http://justincaseyouwerewondering.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/UsabilityTest.png

Developer watching video of usability test

Page 18: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

18© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Digital Literacy?Digital Literacy?

Source:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-13338249

NUCA film makers inspire offlinersto take first click

Page 19: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

19© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

“Accessible” means different things

AccessibilityAccessibilityAccessibilityAccessibility

Page 20: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

20© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

What do we know about the needsof viewers with disabilities?

DeafDeaf

Blind

Page 21: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

21© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

What do we know about the needsof viewers with disabilities?

DeafDeaf

Blind

Impaired Hearing

Impaired Sight

Page 22: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

22© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

What do we know about the needsof viewers with disabilities?

DeafDeaf

Blind

Impaired Hearing

Impaired Sight

BrainDamage

Impaired Cognition

Impaired Dexterity

Chair-ridden

What is needed?

Page 23: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

23© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

ViewerTV

Page 24: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

24© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

Watching TV aloneor with someone...

Page 25: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

25© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Accessibility and Age

Viewers all have different needs...

Page 26: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

26© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Accessibility and Age

Kids also have needs when they watch TV

Page 27: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

27© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

ViewerTVA change of perspective:

from disabilitiesto inclusion

Page 28: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

28© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

TV - Action is needed on 5 fronts:

1 2 3 4 5

Page 29: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

29© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 30: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

30© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Main take-aways

We have many interpretations of what accessibility is

The focus is increasingly on what people want to do

Access services are an important part of making TV

There are other things that broadcasters can do to make TV accessible

Some important things cost almost nothing!

Page 31: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

31© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

2. What are the options?

What can broadcasters do to make a difference?

Page 32: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

32© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 33: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

33© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Why do actors mumble on Danish TV?

1

Page 34: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

34© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

This goes forThis goes forboth DR and TV2both DR and TV2

“ “The Eagle” - a DR crime series.The Eagle” - a DR crime series.

1 Intelligibility (audio & pictures)Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Page 35: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

35© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)1

The World Cup (Soccer) 2010

Page 36: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

36© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)1

Page 37: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

37© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)1

Page 38: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

38© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)1

Page 39: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

39© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 40: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

40© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Access services

Inter- and subtitles (1903)

Visual signing (1929)

Audio Description (1981)

2

Page 41: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

41© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Subtitles in the TV picture2

Page 42: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

42© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Subtitles - 1st generation2

Teletext

Page 43: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

43© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Subtitles - 2nd generation2

Subtitles (DVB)

Page 44: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

44© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Subtitles - 3rd generation2

Subtitles (HbbTV)The viewer can adjust the colour, contrast and size

Page 45: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

45© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Spoken subtitles2

Subtitles Viewers with cognitive disabilities, dyslexia, immigrants

Page 46: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

46© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Audio Description2

Also for viewers with cognitive impairments

Page 47: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

47© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Visual Signing2

The Signing Channel (DVB)

Page 48: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

48© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Visual Signing2

Viewer control (HbbTV)The viewer can customise the intepreter size & position

Page 49: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

49© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 50: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

50© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Meta-content3

Page 51: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

51© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Meta-content3

Page 52: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

52© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Meta-content3

Page 53: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

53© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Meta-content3

Page 54: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

54© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 55: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

55© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

What does the viewer have to do to find a programme she wants to watch?

Page 56: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

56© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

Elders find it difficult to move fromon - off to

“point-and-click” paradigmIBB / Connected TV is also a problem

Page 57: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

57© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 58: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

58© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

TV Accessibility

How does the TV receiver work with other devices

the viewer needs to use?

Page 59: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

59© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Media Accessibility - action on 5 fronts

Intelligibility (audio & pictures)

Access services

Meta content

TV interfaces

Interfaces to 3rd party assistive technologies

1

2

3

4

5

Page 60: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

60© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Page 61: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

61© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

3. How can broadcasters make TV accessibility a reality?

How we we put together the business case for action?

Page 62: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

62© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Carrots and sticks

Cost-benefitIncreased capital and development costs smallCases from BBCLeads to... Improved viewer satisfactionReduced churn (Pay TV)

Page 63: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

63© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Sticks

Legal & regulatory obligationsRisk of sanctions from government and general public

Page 64: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

64© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Celebrate human diversityA

Page 65: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

65© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

B Focus on accessibilitynot disabilities

Page 66: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

66© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

Media as end-to-end servicesC

Page 67: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

67© Peter Olaf Looms 2013 24 Peter Olaf Looms Carrots and Sticks – The European Case for Accessible Media 24

Media AccessibilityMedia Accessibility- a shared responsibility...- a shared responsibility...

Media AccessibilityMedia Accessibility- a shared responsibility...- a shared responsibility...

Source: Hemmati, Minu. (2002) Multi-Stakeholder Processes - Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. London: Earthscan.

D

Page 68: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

68© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

“Nothing for us without us”

Page 69: 1 © Peter Olaf Looms 2013 The case for introducing access services by broadcasters Peter Olaf LOOMS Looms Consulting ITU & EBU Regional Meeting for Central.

69© Peter Olaf Looms 2013

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

Barrier-Free Digital Television 25 May 2011 European Commission

Contact details:

FG AVA website:http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ava/Pages/default.aspx

FG AVA secretariat:

Alexandra Gaspari

[email protected]

Former chairman:

Peter Olaf Looms

Ellesvinget 25DK-2950 VedbækDENMARKE: [email protected]: +45 51 56 75 46

Thank you for listening