1 iPods and Academia: The Duke First-Year Experience Tracy Futhey, Chief Information Officer Lynne O’Brien, Director, Center for Instructional Technology Educause Live May 17, 2005
Dec 15, 2015
1
iPods and Academia: The Duke First-Year
Experience
Tracy Futhey, Chief Information Officer
Lynne O’Brien, Director, Center for Instructional Technology
Educause Live May 17, 2005
2
Context for the Duke iPod projectiPod project activities so farWhat we’ve learned so farNext year’s Duke Digital Initiative
Overview
3
The Duke iPod Project
How (why) did we did we do this?
4
Context: Before the iPod project
Tech goals in University’s strategic planRelationships with Apple & other
technology companiesExperiments with laptops,
PDA’s, course management systems, streaming media, videoconferencing
5
Context: Timeline for Committing
Feb04 Apple visit to Duke- explore project ideas w/ EVP, Provost, VP Stu Affairs, CIO, faculty
Mar04 brainstorming on campus - students, faculty, tech staff
Apr04 Duke visit to Apple - Provost, CIO, CS prof, student govt pres, senior technology architect
May04 - decision to move forward
6
Context: Pre-launch activities
Pre-loaded content Custom engravingDuke Page on iTunesProject Web siteLab environment for
students who don’t own computers
Identification of possible academic pilot projects
7
Context: Distribution to Freshmen
Distributed 1,599 20 GB iPod devices to first-year students on Aug. 19, 2004
8
Context: Content Delivery Sources
9
The Duke iPod Project
What have we done so far?
10
iPod Project goals
Mostly an experiment, “scattering seeds”Technology innovationStudent life, campus communityNew academic uses of technology
11
Project Participants
Duke University Office of the ProvostOffice of the Executive Vice PresidentOffice of Information TechnologyDivision of Student AffairsCenter for Instructional TechnologyApple Computer, Inc.
12
2004-05 Academic iPod projects
EconomicsEducation EngineeringGerman LiteratureEnvironmental Studies Foreign Languages ISISMusic Writing
Asian/African Language & Literature
Cultural AnthropologyEnglishPublic PolicyReligionTheater StudiesLibrary experiments
Website describes each project
http://cit.duke.edu/about/ipod.do
13
Ipod as study tool
Listening, practice and repetition in performance-based subjects
Specialized vocabulary listsPlaylists of audio material for reviewPortability increases use
Music – Students listened to professional performances of Bach chorales, then removed one vocal line from MIDI files, sang the missing part and re-recorded the chorales with their voice.
14
iPod recording in the classroom
Attachment makes iPod an unobtrusive, every-ready digital recorder
Replace or supplement written notesReview of class contentVerbal feedback
Education course: Students recorded their tutoring sessions to review and evaluate strategies they used.
Intro Economics: Prof. made course lectures available for review before exams.
15
iPod recording outside classroom
Recording interviews, personal field notes, environmental sounds
iPod holds many hours of recordingDigital files can be edited for class
projectsGerman Lit – Students recorded interviews with Americans to see how key events in Berlin’s history are perceived in U.S. and included audio clips in presentations.
Electrical Engineering – Students recorded pulse rates during physical activities and environmental sounds and used files to study digital signal processing concepts.
16
iPods for disseminating course materials
Audio materials (original or commercial) on iPods allow portable use of course content
Content distributed via Duke server, iTunes and Podcasting
Spanish – Instructors recorded Spanish novellas, vocabulary for student download. Students purchased Spanish songs via iTunes & submitted their recorded audio exercises to teacher.
Theater – Students analyzed digital recordings of early radio shows then shared radio plays they created through course podcast.
17
iPods for storing and transferring files
Portability and fast transfer rate Back up or transfer large multimedia files
Information Science & Information Studies – Students used iPods to transfer multimedia files from assignments. They also discussed intellectual property policies and the ethics of new forms of information gathering, processing and transmission.
Music – Students brought music from their personal collections to play and analyze in class.
Engineering – Students brought MP3 files to the lab to analyze waveforms, compression, sample rate and other parameters.
18
The Duke iPod Project
What have we learned so far?
19
Some early, tentative conclusions
Digital audio useful in varied disciplines
Recording devices = key tool
“Fun factor” mattersLittle device made big
ripple in technology infrastructure
20
More early, tentative conclusions
Faculty ideas and interest exceeded expectations.
Innovation with iPodsprompted explorationof other new technologies.
Project increased collaboration among campus IT groups and other departments.
21
Unanticipated outcomes
Extensive global publicity New opportunities for collaborationContent issues made some academic
explorations difficultCopyright complex, even for publishers Multiple places for storing, moving accessing content
frustrates usersAcademic interests vs what’s commercially available
22
Assessment and Challenges
Dimensions of Evaluation-Academic Uses…Feasibility of iPod to support teaching & learningImproving logistics of course deliveryEnhancing student learning and outcomes
…Amid Non-Trivial ChallengesNo baseline info; students had iPod from day1Instructors changing plans along the way; no
strategy for unknown/unsupported projects Correlating iPod use with any improvement (some
using audio for first time)
23
Next year’s assessment
Have more structured, common evaluation strategies across projects with similar goals and activities
Resolve some technical issues that confounded evaluation results this year
24
The Duke iPod Project
What’s next?
25
What’s next: Review process
Initially planned to review at end of academic year
Overwhelming interest in earlier decision from faculty & students for planning
Relied on fall evaluation results from CITConvened ad hoc faculty review groupAssumed options going in where continue,
extend 1 more year (to more fully evaluate), or discontinue
26
What’s next: Why not repeat exactly?
iPods were perfect for most digital audio uses and some others
Not enough courses had such needs to justify giving them to every first year
But for those courses that did, restricting based on class was too limiting
Once we move from class-based to course-based technologies, other useful technologies need to be considered
27
What’s next: Duke Digital Initiative
Build on iPod project; focus on course useAdd other technologies based on faculty
feedback:Digital audio Digital imagesDigital videoTablet/handheld PCsCollaboration tools