1 High Noon: The urgent Need for New Global Problem-solving Approaches 2003
Jan 18, 2016
1
High Noon: The urgent Need for New Global
Problem-solving Approaches
2003
2
The Urgent Need for New Approaches toGlobal Problem-Solving
Key Messages
1. Two big forces of change are running ahead of our ability to respond to them
2. In that context, there are about 20 urgent global issues
3. The current global problem-solving setup has not been up to the task
4. There are several families of ideas on alternative global problem-solving approaches
5. Time has come for starting an international discussion on the methodology of global problem-solving
6. The events of September 11 have made all this even more urgent
3
A Beleaguered Planet
Population increase New economy
4
New Economy
Population Increase
Human Institutions
A Dangerous Gap . . .
5
Inherently Global Issues
Deforestation
Greenhouse gas emissions
Fisheries depletion
Biodiversity loss
Poverty
Information age taxation
Water shortages
Financial stability
…mostly failures
A few examples...
Exception that proves the rule: The Montreal Protocol
6
Sharing our Planet: Issues involving the global commons
• Global warming• Biodiversity and ecosystem losses• Fisheries depletion• Deforestation • Water deficits• Maritime safety and pollution
Sharing our humanity: Issues whose size and urgency requires a global commitment• Massive step-up in the fight against poverty • Peace-keeping, conflict prevention, combating terrorism• Education for all• Global infectious diseases • Digital divide• Natural disaster prevention and mitigation
Sharing our rulebook: Issues needing a global regulatory approach• Reinventing taxation for the 21st century• Biotechnology rules• Global financial architecture• Illegal drugs• Trade, investment and competition rules• Intellectual property rights• E-commerce rules• International labor and migration rules
20 years, 20 issues
7
The current international set up for solving Inherently Global Issues (IGIs) is essentially not up to the task . . .
Treaties and conventionsToo slow for burning IGIs
Intergovernmental conferencesToo short on follow-up mechanisms
G7/8, G-X type mechanismsFour limitations:
1. Methodology2. Exclusiveness3. Knowledge limitations4. Distance to the people
Global multilateral institutionsNot able to handle IGIs alone
8
Two major tracks...
Current Setup
World Government
AlternativeApproaches
Covering all issues
One global issue at a time
9
A world government ?
EU
A case study... …not functioning at world level
In the next 20 years, there is not a chance that we will see a «world government» concept emerging as a solution.
10
Alternative approaches: three families of ideas
G20-type Groupings
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
New Diplomacy and Expanded aid concepts
• Inter-governmental• Not permanent
• New diplomacy• New sources of funds
• Tripartite: public sector, business, civil society
• Permanent
• World Bank and other experiments: forestry, dams
• Recent development in the field of aid (global public goods + UNDP ideas)
• Recent G7 experiments
Main features: Main ideas originating in:
11
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
• Permanent Networks for various global issues- launched by a multilateral as facilitator- tripartite (public, private, civil society)
• Three phases- Startup- Norm Production- Rating, naming-and-shaming
• GINs don’t legislate, but put pressure on countries to enact conforming legislation (reputation effects)
• Partial examples: Dams, Forestry
12
Phase 1 - The constitutional phase
Parties in each GIN:• Government• International civil society organizations• Business
Facilitators/conveners:• One global multilateral (as lead facilitator)• One from civil society• One from the business world
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
1 year
13
Modus operandi:• Discipline and substance, no posturing• Deliberative polling through Electronic Town Meetings (ETM) • Rough consensus
Structured work on a specific IGI:• What is the problem?• How much time do we have?• Where do we want to be 20 years from now?• How do we get there?• What are the options?• What should the norms be?
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
Phase 2 - The norm-producing phase
1 year 2-3 years1 year
Detailed norm packagesOther recommendations
14
New tasks:• Rating countries and players against norms, creating
reputation effects• Observatory and knowledge exchange roles
1 year 2-3 years1 year 2-3 years 10 years?
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
Phase 3 - The implementation phase
15
Global Issues Networks (GINs)
GIN
1 year 2-3 years 10 years?
Membership: 101 102 103
104
102
ETM Electronic Town
Meeting
IEP Independent Expert Panel
16
Country 1 2 3… 200 Horizontal cross border legitimacy
Issue-by-issue
Vertical legitimacy
All issuesGove
rnm
ent
s
Elect
ed
Repre
senta
tives
People
Global Issue Network 1
Global Issue Network 2 …
…Global Issue Network 20
Vertical and Horizontal: A new interplay
17
G20-type Mechanisms
• Example: G20, FATF, Financial Stability Forum
• Create one G20 group for each global issue
• Membership would depend on the issue
• G20s’ work would feed into:
• G7/8
• Treaties and conventions
• National legislation
18
• National issues experts also become diplomats
• National sector ministries with 2 budgets:
- Domestic budget
- Global action budget
• ODA (C) and ODA (G)
• Global Participation Fund to help poor countries
- Participate
- Implement
Expanded Concepts of Aid and Diplomacy
19
A possible outcome
New Diplomacy and Expanded Aid
Concepts
G20sCurrent International Setup
• Treaties
• Intergovernmental conferences
• G7/8 type groups
• Global Multilaterals
+ GINs
20
There is an urgent need for leadership in getting these methodological questions discussed.
• A new “Bretton Woods conference”?
• Special heads-of-state brainstorming?
• Other venues?
The point is...
21
Basic Books
New York, 2002