1 European benchmarking European benchmarking with the CAF with the CAF ROME ROME 17-18th of November 17-18th of November 2003 2003
Mar 28, 2015
1
European benchmarking European benchmarking with the CAFwith the CAF
ROMEROME
17-18th of November17-18th of November
20032003
2
Table of contentsTable of contents
1. CAF Diagnosis : identification of the 1. CAF Diagnosis : identification of the improvement areasimprovement areas
2. Action plan and priorities2. Action plan and priorities
3. Choice of the improvement action: 3. Choice of the improvement action: benchmarkingbenchmarking
4. Choice of type of benchmarking4. Choice of type of benchmarking
5. Compose the benchmarking team5. Compose the benchmarking team
6. Plan6. Plan
7. Identify potential partners7. Identify potential partners
3
Table of contentsTable of contents
8. Develop the screening questionnaire8. Develop the screening questionnaire
9. On-site visit9. On-site visit
10. Result analysis10. Result analysis
11. Improvement plan11. Improvement plan
12. Implementation12. Implementation
13. Project review13. Project review
14. A new CAF diagnosis14. A new CAF diagnosis
4
1. The CAF diagnosis1. The CAF diagnosis Identification of improvement areas Identification of improvement areas
following the CAF applicationfollowing the CAF application
2. Action plan and priorities2. Action plan and priorities Draft of action planDraft of action plan Priorities setting by the management:Priorities setting by the management:
e.g: crossing the strategic weighting(given e.g: crossing the strategic weighting(given by the management)of the CAF criteria by the management)of the CAF criteria with the scoringwith the scoring
5
Action plan - priorities CAF
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
0 1 2 3 4 5
Weight of the criteria
CA
FSco
ring
5,2
4,1
4,4
3,2
4,5
5,1
less important and bad
scores:leave temporarily
Less important and good scores: divest?
Important good scores : status quo and "quick wins"
Important but bad scores: priorities
2,2
5,3
4,6
3,1I
I
II
II
III
IV
6
3. Choice of the improvement 3. Choice of the improvement actionaction
Improvement team
internal benchmarking
external benchmarking
external consultant
7
4. Choice of type of 4. Choice of type of benchmarkingbenchmarking
Definition 1
The continuous process of comparisons The continuous process of comparisons and measurements with other and measurements with other organisations everywhere in the world in organisations everywhere in the world in order to obtain information about order to obtain information about philosophies, politics, practices and philosophies, politics, practices and measurements which will help our measurements which will help our organisations to undertake actions to organisations to undertake actions to improve its performance.improve its performance.
8
4. Choice of type of 4. Choice of type of benchmarking (2)benchmarking (2)
Definition 2Definition 2
« Benchmarking is simply about
making comparisons with other
organisations and then learning the
lessons that those comparisons
throw up »
9
4. Choice of type of 4. Choice of type of benchmarking(3)benchmarking(3)
Definition 3Definition 3
« Improving ourselves by « Improving ourselves by
learning from others »learning from others »
« Not reinventing the wheel »« Not reinventing the wheel »
10
Benefits from benchmarkingBenefits from benchmarking
Improvement of performance, quality, Improvement of performance, quality, performance measurement performance measurement
InnovationsInnovations Culture change: learning from the others, Culture change: learning from the others,
openess, collaborationopeness, collaboration Involvement of staff (motivation)Involvement of staff (motivation) Substitute for competition inside public Substitute for competition inside public
sectorsector Guidance tool to improve processes for the Guidance tool to improve processes for the
public sectorpublic sector
11
Types of benchmarkingTypes of benchmarking
What do we compare:What do we compare: ResultsResults11.11. Which organisation shows the best results? Which organisation shows the best results?
In which area?In which area?
12.12. How does this organisation perform these How does this organisation perform these good results? Which is (are) the enabler(s)?good results? Which is (are) the enabler(s)?
Process Process StrategyStrategy
12
9.Key performance
results
7. People results
6. Citizen/
customer results
8. Society results
5. Process and
change manageme
nt
3.HRM
2. Strategy
&
Planification4.
Partnership&
Resources
1.Leadership
Performance
or competitive Benchmarking
Process
Benchmarking
Strategic benchmarking
Genericbenchmarking
13
5. The benchmarking team5. The benchmarking team
Form the benchmarking team: Form the benchmarking team: the self-the self-assessment group? Some members? assessment group? Some members? With an expert?With an expert?
Criteria:Criteria: Knowledge and experience of benchmarkingKnowledge and experience of benchmarking General skills: project management, oral and General skills: project management, oral and
written communication, gathering and data written communication, gathering and data analysis, change management, team work,...analysis, change management, team work,...
Knowledge of the activity or process in Knowledge of the activity or process in question; its role within the organisationquestion; its role within the organisation
14
6. Plan the benchmarking 6. Plan the benchmarking projectproject
Develop realistic objectives (Develop realistic objectives (SMARTSMART),),
SSpecific: pecific: avoid misunderstandingavoid misunderstanding
MMeasurable: easurable: achieved or notachieved or not
AAction oriented: ction oriented: focused on improving a focused on improving a specific specific process or activity process or activity
RRealistic:ealistic: can be tackled with the can be tackled with the available available time and resourcestime and resources
TTime related: ime related: can be carried out within can be carried out within reasonable period of timereasonable period of time
15
7. Identify a potential partner7. Identify a potential partner
Essential to succeed with benchmarking will depend on a combination of factors
such as the: type of benchmarkingtype of benchmarking activities or process in questionactivities or process in question availability of time and resourcesavailability of time and resources information neededinformation needed sources of information (likely sources of good sources of information (likely sources of good
practices)practices) level of experience with benchmarkinglevel of experience with benchmarking
16
Internal ou external?Internal ou external?
Internal:Internal: with another unit inside the with another unit inside the organisation itselforganisation itself
ExternalExternal: : with a similar organisation (or not- if with a similar organisation (or not- if
functional or generic benchmarking) functional or generic benchmarking) national or foreign organisation national or foreign organisation
(international benchmarking)(international benchmarking) Advice: firstly internal then external if Advice: firstly internal then external if
possible to increase the benchmarking possible to increase the benchmarking experienceexperience
17
Internal benchmarkingInternal benchmarking
AdvantagesAdvantages access to sensitive access to sensitive
data and data and information, information,
less time and less time and resources resources consuming, consuming,
easy to transfer easy to transfer across the same across the same organisationorganisation
disadvantagesdisadvantages lacking of real lacking of real
innovation, innovation, best in class best in class
performance performance likely to be likely to be externalexternal
From units located in different areas
18
External benchmarkingExternal benchmarking
AdvantagesAdvantages
Seeking outside Seeking outside best in class best in class organisationsorganisations
DisadvantagesDisadvantages transfer sometimes transfer sometimes
difficult (« not invented difficult (« not invented here » syndrome!), here » syndrome!),
more time and resources more time and resources needed to ensure the needed to ensure the comparability of data comparability of data and informationand information
LanguageLanguage
19
How to find a partner in Europe?How to find a partner in Europe?
EIPA - MaastrichtEIPA - Maastricht http:\\www.eipa.nlhttp:\\www.eipa.nl European databank of CAF European databank of CAF
applications in the public sectorapplications in the public sector National databank in Spain and National databank in Spain and
BelgiumBelgium
20
Components of a CAF databankComponents of a CAF databank
Organisation (contact)Organisation (contact) Sector of activitySector of activity Level of authority (central, regional,local)Level of authority (central, regional,local) External EvaluationExternal Evaluation Other quality tools usedOther quality tools used Strengths (N° of CAF sub-criteria)Strengths (N° of CAF sub-criteria) Good practice descriptionGood practice description National and/or international selection for an National and/or international selection for an
awardaward
21
Methodology: following Methodology: following stepssteps
8. 8. Develop theDevelop the screening questionnaire screening questionnaire (common indicators)(common indicators)
9. 9. Manage theManage the on-site visit on-site visit
10. 10. Analyse the resultsAnalyse the results: What they achieve and : What they achieve and how? Compare the resultshow? Compare the results
11. 11. DevelopDevelop improvement plans improvement plans
12. 12. ImplementImplement good practice in the organisation good practice in the organisation
13. 13. Hold aHold a project review project review
14. 14. Apply the CAF againApply the CAF again
22
1. Plan
2. Measure
3. Compare/Analyse
4. Implement5. Control
benchmarking in 5 stepsbenchmarking in 5 steps
Source: R. CAMP
23
Progress with benchmarking in an Progress with benchmarking in an organisationorganisation
« industrial » Tourism
Performance measures developed as basis of comparisons
Rigourous application of benchmarking
Formal structure to support benchmarking activities
Good practice shared as part of knowledge management system
24
Conditions for success of Conditions for success of BenchmarkingBenchmarking
Senior managers support benchmarking and are Senior managers support benchmarking and are committed to continuous improvementcommitted to continuous improvement
Objectives are clearly defined at the outsetObjectives are clearly defined at the outset Scope of the project aligned with objectives, resources, Scope of the project aligned with objectives, resources,
available time and the experience level of the teamavailable time and the experience level of the team To have a clear picture of the organisation’s To have a clear picture of the organisation’s
performance before approching partners for performance before approching partners for comparisonscomparisons
Benchmarking team have competencies or supportBenchmarking team have competencies or support Staff kept permanently informed of progress madeStaff kept permanently informed of progress made Realistic recommendationsRealistic recommendations
25
Pitfalls to avoid Pitfalls to avoid
Benchmarking for the sake of itBenchmarking for the sake of it Focusing entirely on comparisons of performance Focusing entirely on comparisons of performance
measures rather than the process that enables good measures rather than the process that enables good practicepractice
Expecting benchmarking to be quick or easyExpecting benchmarking to be quick or easy Spending too long time on one part of the processSpending too long time on one part of the process Expecting to find benchmarking comparable in all Expecting to find benchmarking comparable in all
respects to your organisationrespects to your organisation Asking information without sharing its own information Asking information without sharing its own information
(see the European Benchmarking Code of Conduct)(see the European Benchmarking Code of Conduct)
26
Jean-Marc DOCHOTJean-Marc DOCHOT
0477-32.98.790477-32.98.79
E-mail: [email protected]: [email protected]