Top Banner
1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER [email protected]
20

1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER [email protected].

Dec 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Clement Burke
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

1

D R . S A S K I A KU N N E N P R O F. D R . PAU L VA N G E E RT

D R . J E R O E N O N S T E N K

DRS. JEANY VAN [email protected]

Page 2: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

2

THE ROLE OF TIME PERSPECTIVE IN STUDY SUCCESS

Page 3: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

3

CONTENTS

• Background research:a longitudinal Phd study of the study choice process

• Theoretical framework

• Preliminary analyses

• Discussion

Page 4: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

4

BACKGROUND RESEARCH

• Study choice, study progress and study succes / dropout

• Diversity in studies• focus on retention• quantitative approach

• Dropout : often linked to a wrong image of the chosen study

• Study choice as a process

Page 5: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

5

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (1)

• A Phd study of the study process starting from the perspective of identity theory.

• Study & career choice: the most central domain of identity formation (Erikson, 1968)

Page 6: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

6

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (2)

• Nurmi (1991): an important review of how adolescents see their future

• Three basic processes involved in orientation to the future: • Motivation• Planning• Evaluation

Page 7: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

7

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (3)

• The role of future time perspective in university students' career development (Simons, Vansteenkiste, Lens & Lacante, 2004; Walker & Tracey, 2012)

• Short and long term time perspective

• The motivational importance of those differences in time perspective (Simons, Dewitte & Lens, 2000)

• Time perspective related to the self-determination

theory of Deci & Ryan (1985)

Page 8: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

8

A LONGITUDINAL PHD STUDY

• Focus : Identity development in the study process

• A qualitative approach:

• Why do students choose for a study in law?• How do they choose? • Do orientation trajectories affect study progress? • Differences between persisters and dropouts?• Differences between induction programs?

Page 9: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

9

Population:

• 89 students

• Bachelor Law studies(of applied sciences)

• Followed before and during their first year

METHOD

Method / instrument: • Semi-structured

interviews, 3 times

• Questionnaire on the topic ‘study choice’, GIDS

• Maxqda & SPSS

Page 10: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

10

ROLE OF TIME PERSPECTIVE

• Interviews

• Differences in time perspective :Interviews revealed that students differ with regard to the time perspective

• How does time perspective affect the study process?

Page 11: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

11

CLASSIFICATIONS

• STT – Short term time perspective

• LTT – Long term time perspective

• IF – Inconcrete future

Page 12: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

12

EXAMPLES DIFFERENT TIME PERSPECTIVES

• Different time perspectives; expectations can be focused on: Short term time perspective – here and now focus• ‘my studies should be interesting’

Long term time perspective – focus on concrete future goals • ‘in the future I want to be a lawyer’

Inconcrete Future – focus on inconcrete future goals • ‘ I am interested in law-related topics because this is a very

broad education so you can eventually choose a direction that fits you’

Page 13: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

13

TIME PERSPECTIVE AND RETENTION(1)

Page 14: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

14

TIME PERSPECTIVE AND RETENTION(2)

• Continuing students focus more on the ‘now and here’• Contents of the

study is more important than the future profession

• Dropouts focus more on the future profession• An abstract image

of that profession

Page 15: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

15

TIME PERSPECTIVE AND INDUCTION

Research on different induction programs:

Page 16: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

16

INDUCTION AND ORIENTATION VERSUS RETENTION

• Significant difference in study progress between groups• Dropout is more

important amongst groups with less preparation or with ‘a history’

Page 17: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

17

IMAGE AND EXPECTATIONS (1)

• A postive image generates more study succes• Starting a study

with doubts carries a greater risk for dropout than students with a ‘negative’image

Page 18: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

18

IMAGE AND EXPECTATIONS (2)

• Doubts or incertitude is more important amongst groups SZ• Confirms our result

that doubt or incertitude is a risk for drop out• No preparation for a

study increases risk dropout

Page 19: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

19

CONCLUSIONS

• Students with short time perspective show more study progress than students with long term time perspective• Orientation programs should not focus too much

on the future profession, but especially on the ‘now and here’• Induction programs can help students to start

their study with a more complete image and with more realistic expectations

Page 20: 1 DR. SASKIA KUNNEN PROF.DR. PAUL VAN GEERT DR. JEROEN ONSTENK DRS. JEANY VAN BEELEN-SLIJPER JEANY.VANBEELEN@INHOLLAND.NL.

20

DISCUSSION

• Choices institutions should make in approching prospects• Sharing best practices