1 Class #3 International Students, Scholars, and Scientific Visitors to the U.S Policy Background and Post 9/11 Issues C. M. Vest.

1

Class #3

International Students, Scholars, and Scientific

Visitors to the U.S

Policy Background and Post 9/11 Issues

C. M. Vest

2

Background (Pre 9/11)

• Legal basis of visitor Visa policies

• Categories of Visas

• SEVIS (Student and Exchange Visitor Information System)

3

Legal Basis of Visitor VisaPolicies

• Sec. 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952– Visitors must prove to the satisfaction of a

consular officer that they will not remain in the United States (Nonimmigrant Status)

– This appears to be the most common reason for denying visitor visas.

– It also is used as a “catch all” when officers want to deny a visa.

4

Categories of Temporary Nonimmigrant Visas

• B Class (Business)• F Class (Student)• J Class (Exchange Visitor)• H Class (Specialty Worker)• Graduate students usually enter with F or J

visas.• Postdoctoral scholars usually enter with J visas,

or much less frequently with H-1b visas.• Short-term visitors for meetings and brief

collaborations usually enter with B visas.

5

SEVIS Student and Exchange Visitor Information System

• A computerized tracking system for foreign students and visitors [F, J, and M (vocational training) visas].

• Purpose: Verify that foreign students are pursuing their intended course of study at certified institutions.

• Most information required was required prior to 9/11.

6

SEVIS Statistics

• Approved Campuses: 10,024

• Active Students: 599,617

• Approved Exchange Programs:1,448

• Active Exchange Visitors: 140,424

Source: Immigration and Customs Enforcement Web Site Oct. 18, 2005

7

Alice in Wonderland

• On one hand: It is our legislation-based policy not to let students and scholars (or anyone else) into the country if we think they might stay here.

• On the other hand: An increasingly prevalent complaint is that students who come here to study “return home” and contribute to other economies rather than ours.

8

Do foreign students stay here?

9

The First Destination of Engineering PhD Graduates in

2004• Engineering PhDs

– 1,274 U.S. citizens earned Engineering PhDs– 97% stayed in the U.S. 3% went to another country.

• Engineering PhDs– 1,683 temporary residents earned Engineerng PhDs.– 73% stayed in the U.S. 26% went to another country.

Source: NSF Survey of earned doctorates 2004

10

The First Destination of Science PhD Graduates in

2004

• Science PhDs– 8,904 U.S. citizens earned Science PhDs– 96% stayed in the U.S. 3% went to another country.

• Science PhDs– 3,785 temporary residents earned Science PhDs.– 72% stayed in the U.S. 28% went to another country.

Source: NSF Survey of earned doctorates 2004

11

U.S. S&E PhD Workforce

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

1990 2000

U.S. Born

Foreign Born

12

Some Post 9/11 Visa Issues

• Review Processes:• Technology Alert List (TAL)• Visa MANTIS• CONDOR

• Statistics– Changes in International applications and

enrollments

13

Technology Alert List (TAL)

• TAL: A list of S&T areas of study and research, and devices

• Basis: Prevent evasion of laws prohibiting export of goods, technology, or sensitive information.

• Use: To flag visa applicants for special security review (Visa MANTIS).

• (A visit with officials.)

14

Visa MANTIS

• A review of a visa applications conducted in Washington when proposed programs of study or work are considered by a consular officer to have national security implications (usually guided by the TAL).

• The issue is to expedite these reviews.

15

Visa CONDOR

• A review for visa applicants whose country of origin is considered by the State Department to sponsor terrorism.

• Other applicant information that raises concerns about terrorism can trigger this review.

16

Students and “Deemed Exports”

• Regulations

• Implementation

• Inspectors General Reports and Proposed Changes

17

Flow of Scholars to U.S. Post 9/11

• Increased Visa Processing Time, Security Reviews, and Rejections

• The Technology Alert List

• Complexity and Hassle

• Risk Averse Decision Making

• Deterioration of Welcoming Image and Reality

18

Very Real Effects of U.S. Visa Policy and its Implementation

• 32% Drop in International Applicants to U.S. Graduate Programs from 2003 to 2004. [Interpretation is complicated.]

• 18% Drop in Admissions to these programs. [Quality?]

• Meetings Moved to Other Countries

• Increased Competition for Students and Faculty

• “Horror Stories”

19

U.S. Visas Issued to High-Skill Visitors

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Student

Exchange Visitor

Other

Source: Science and Engineering Indicators 2004, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

20

The U.S. has serious perceptual problems.

The Pew Research Center recently asked 17,000 people from 16 countries “Suppose a young person who wanted to leave this country asked you to recommend where to go to lead a good life -- what country would you recommend?”

Here are the results …

21

U.S. CANADA AUSTRL. U.K. GERMANY

INDIA 38% 6 13 6 3

POLAND 19 9 8 21 10

CANADA 13 18 7 3

GERMANY 10 11 11 3

CHINA 10 12 10 4 4

RUSSIA 8 8 9 4 22

TURKEY 8 7 12 5 18

LEBANON 9 17 18 6 6

JORDON 8 9 8 6 6

SPAIN 7 2 9 14 6

U.K. 6 9 31 2

FRANCE 5 14 7 4 7

PAKISTAN 5 3 1 6 1

NETHERLANDS 3 16 16 3 3

INDONESIA 2 2 8 5 4

WHO RECOMMENDED THIS DESTINATION “FOR A GOOD LIFE”

% OF PEOPLEFROM HERE

Source: Pew Global Attitudes Survey, quoted in the New York Times, July 3, 2005

22

Discussion Questions• What do you think our basic policies should be

regarding international students and scientific visitors?

• To what extent are your views in this regard affected by the reality of 9/11?

• What sorts of thing should be on the Technology Alert List?

• How do you think about risk and benefit in admitting international students and scholars?

• What sorts of things should be considered to be “deemed exports”?