Top Banner
1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst, Univ. Nebraska Lincoln, Univ. Maryland and NSF
13

1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

1

“Broader Impacts”:NSF Changes &

SE Researcher Strategies

Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Univ. Nebraska Lincoln, Univ. Maryland and NSF

Page 2: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

2

History

• 1981 – 1996: 4 NSF Merit Review Criteria– Competence– Intrinsic merit– Utility or relevance– Effect on infrastructure of science and engineering

• 1997 – 2011: 2 NSF Merit Review Criteria– Intellectual merit– Broader Impacts: 5 BI (sub)criteria

• 2011: National Science Board reviewing current criteria– Both Merit and BI

Page 3: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

3

NSF has been increasing BI Criteria here and there

• Science/Technology Centers and Engineering Research Centers– Diversity plan and Education plan

• NYI, Career Awards: Education plan

• CISE CE21: Broadening participation plan

• All proposals since Jan. ’11: Data mgt plan

• All proposals with a postdoc:– Mentoring plan

Page 4: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

4

This Activity is in Response toThis Message:

• The people, through its elected officials, want the researchers that it funds to have impact on society.

Page 5: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

5

But ... Some Conflicts

• Good research is speculative; it may not, in itself, have societal impact.

• CS researchers may not have:– time, know-how, or $ set aside

to make effective BI by themselves.

in itself

$by themselves

Page 6: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

by themselves

• Grantees participate in research-related activities that directly address some of the broader impacts 8 societal goals. – Funding: These activities are funded by the

grant.– Infrastructure: Departments, colleges, and

universities provide infrastructure that researchers can plug into.

– Accountability: Activities are reported in the annual and final reports.

6

Possible Resolution

in itself

$

by themselves

in itself$

Page 7: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Congress Steps in...

• On January 4, 2011 Pres. Obama signed into law the – “America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully

Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science (America COMPETES) Reauthorization Act of 2010”

• Broader Impacts Criterion were explicitly listed

7

Page 8: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

8

America COMPETES Act:The New BI Criteria

• The Act directs the NSF to apply these Broader Impacts review criteria: 1. Increased economic competitiveness of the United States.2. Development of a globally competitive STEM workforce.3. Increased participation of women and underrepresented

minorities in STEM.4. Increased partnerships between academia and industry.5. Improved pre-K-12 STEM education and teacher

development.6. Improved undergraduate STEM education.7. Increased public scientific literacy.8. Increased national security.

Page 9: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

9

America Competes Act:Furthermore...

• Deadline: – “Not later than 6 months after the date of

enactment of this Act, the Director shall develop and implement a policy for the Broader Impacts Review Criterion...”

– It became law on January 4, 2011• July 4, 2011 is the deadline

• NSF Program Director/panel education:– “provides for educating professional staff ...,

<grant> review panels, and applicants”

Page 10: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Where Do I Start?

• Broader Impact (BI) activities don’t have to be novel (except for BI-focused grants).

• You don’t have to cover all categories.• Build your track record.• You don’t have to do it alone!!!

10

Page 11: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Anti-Patternsand why they’re anti-patterns

• No broader impact:– I’ll train my grad students.– I’ll teach it in a grad course.

• Open question: Need it be responsive to the “message” of the research having an impact?– I’ll mail some money to NCWIT.– (See Bill’s discussion of “sidecars”.)

11

Page 12: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

Who Can Help?

• Collaborators in CS, in Education, ….• Department/University support and

infrastructure• Organizations for underrepresented groups: NSF

BPC Alliances, CRA-W, CS/AMP, ….• NCWIT’s “In-a-box” kits

12

Page 13: 1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,

The Big Picture: Why Do Such BI Activities

• They make the world better• BIs can lead to better science

– New ideas, researchers, collaborations, etc.

• They pay the bills– American taxpayers fund our research

• NSF won’t fund without them– It’s the law

13