Page 1
1
5. Impedance Matching and Tuning• Apply the theory and techniques of the
previous chapters to practical problems in microwave engineering.
• Impedance matching is the 1st topic.
Figure 5.1 (p. 223)A lossless network matching an arbitrary load
impedance to a transmission line.
Page 2
2
• Impedance matching or tuning is important since– Maximum power is delivered when the load is
matched to the line, and power loss in the feed line is minimized.
– Impedance matching sensitive receiver components improves the signal-to-noise ratio of the system.
– Impedance matching in a power distribution network will reduce the amplitude and phase errors.
Page 3
3
• Important factors in the selection of matching network.– Complexity– Bandwidth– Implementation– Ajdustability
Page 4
4
5.1 Matching with Lumped Elements• L-section is the simplest type of matching
network.
• 2 possible configurations
Figure 5.2 (p. 223)L-section matching networks.
(a) Network for zL inside the 1 + jx circle. (b) Network for zL outside the 1 + jx circle.
Page 5
5
Analytic Solution• For Fig. 5. 2a, let ZL=RL+jXL. For zL to be
inside the 1+jx circle, RL>Z0. For a match,
• Removing X
0
1
1/( )L L
Z jXjB R jX
0 0
0
( )
(1 )L L L
L L L
B XR X Z R Z
X BX BZ R X
2 20 02 2
/L L L L L
L L
X R Z R X Z RB
R X
0 01 L
L L
X Z ZX
B R BR
Page 6
6
• For Fig.5.2b, RL<Z0.
0
1 1
( )L L
jBZ R j X X
0 0
0
( )
( )L L
L L
BZ X X Z R
X X BZ R
0
0
0
( )
( ) /
L L L
L L
X R Z R X
Z R RB
Z
Page 7
7
Smith Chart Solutions• Ex 5.1
Page 8
8
Figure 5.3b (p. 227)(b) The two possible L-
section matching circuits. (c) Reflection coefficient magnitudes
versus frequency for the matching circuits of (b).
Page 9
9Figure on page 228.
Page 10
10
5.2 Single Stub Tuning
Figure 5.4 (p. 229)Single-stub tuning
circuits. (a) Shunt stub. (b) Series stub.
Page 11
11
• 2 adjustable parameters– d: from the load to the stub position.– B or X provided by the shunt or series stub.
• For the shunt-stub case, – Select d so that Y seen looking into the line at d
from the load is Y0+jB
– Then the stub susceptance is chosen as –jB.
• For the series-stub case,– Select d so that Z seen looking into the line at d
from the load is Z0+jX
– Then the stub reactance is chosen as –jX.
Page 12
12
Shunt Stubs• Ex 5.2 Single-Stub Shunt Tuning
ZL=60-j80
Figure 5.5a (p. 230)
Solution to Example 5.2.
(a) Smith chart for the shunt-stub
tuners.
Page 13
13
Figure 5.5b (p. 231)(b) The two shunt-stub tuning solutions. (c) Reflection coefficient magnitudes versus frequency for the tuning
circuits of (b).
Page 14
14
• To derive formulas for d and l, let ZL= 1/YL= RL+ jXL.
• Now d is chosen so that G = Y0=1/Z0,
00
0
( ) tan
( ) tanL L
L L
R jX jZ dZ Z
Z j R jX d
2
2 20
20 02 2
0 0
1
(1 tan )where
( tan )
tan ( tan )( tan )
[ ( tan ) ]
L
L L
L L L
L L
Y G jBZ
R dG
R X Z d
R d Z X d X Z dB
Z R X Z d
2 2 20 0 0 0
2 20 0
00
( ) tan 2 tan ( ) 0
[( ) ] /tan , for
L L L L L
L L L LL
L
Z R Z d X Z d R Z R X
X R Z R X Zd R Z
R Z
Page 15
15
• If RL = Z0, then tanβd = -XL/2Z0. 2 principal solutions are
• To find the required stub length, BS = -B.
for open stub
for short stub
1
0 0
1
0 0
1tan for - 0
2 2 2
1tan for - 0
2 2 2
L L
L L
X X
Z Zd
X X
Z Z
1 10
0 0
1 1tan tan
2 2Sl B B
Y Y
1 10 0 01 1tan tan
2 2S
l Y Y
B B
Page 16
16
Series Stubs• Ex 5.3 Single Stub Series Tuning
ZL = 100+j80
Figure 5.6a (p. 233)Solution to Example
5.3. (a) Smith chart for
the series-stub tuners.
Page 17
17
Figure 5.6b (p. 232)(b) The two series-
stub tuning solutions. (c) Reflection
coefficient magnitudes versus frequency for the
tuning circuits of (b).
Page 18
18
• To derive formulas for d and l, let YL= 1/ZL= GL+ jBL.
• Now d is chosen so that R = Z0=1/Y0,
00
0
( ) tan
( ) tanL L
L L
G jB jY dY Y
Y j G jB d
2
2 20
20 02 2
0 0
1
(1 tan )where
( tan )
tan ( tan )( tan )
[ ( tan ) ]
L
L L
L L L
L L
Z R jXY
G dR
G B Y d
G d Y B d B Y dX
Y G B Y d
2 2 20 0 0 0
2 20 0
00
( ) tan 2 tan ( ) 0
[( ) ] /tan , for
L L L L L
L L L LL
L
Y G Y d B Y d G Y G B
B G Y G B Yd G Y
G Y
Page 19
19
• If GL = Y0, then tanβd = -BL/2Y0. 2 principal solutions are
• To find the required stub length, XS = -X.
for short stub
for open stub
1
0 0
1
0 0
1tan for - 0
2 2 2
1tan for - 0
2 2 2
L L
L L
B B
Y Yd
B B
Y Y
1 10
0 0
1 1tan tan
2 2Sl X X
Z Z
1 10 0 01 1tan tan
2 2S
l Z Z
X X
Page 20
20
5.3 Double-Stub Tuning• If an adjustable tuner was desired, single-tuner
would probably pose some difficulty.
Smith Chart Solution
• yL add jb1 (on the rotated 1+jb circle) rotate by d thru SWR circle (WTG) y1 add jb2 Matched
• Avoid the forbidden region.
Page 21
21
Figure 5.7 (p. 236)
Double-stub tuning.
(a) Original circuit with the
load an arbitrary distance from the
first stub. (b) Equivalent-circuit with load at the first stub.
Page 22
22
Figure 5.8 (p. 236)
Smith chart diagram for the operation of a double-stub
tuner.
Page 23
23
Figure 5.9a (p. 238)
Solution to Example 5.4. (a) Smith chart for the double-
stub tuners.
Ex. 5.4 ZL = 60-j80
Open stubs, d = λ/8
Page 24
24
Figure 5.9b (p. 239)(b) The two double-stub tuning solutions.
(c) Reflection coefficient magnitudes versus frequency for the tuning circuits of (b).
Page 25
25
Analytic Solution• To the left of the first stub in Fig. 5.7b,
Y1 = GL + j(BL+B1) where YL = GL + jBL
• To the right of the 2nd stub,
• At this point, Re{Y2} = Y0
1 02 0
0 1
( ) where tan
( )L L
L L
G j B B Y tY Y t d
Y jt G jB jB
222 0 1
0 2 2
2 220 1
0 2 2 2 20
( )10
4 ( )11 1
2 (1 )
LL L
LL
Y B t B ttG G Y
t t
t Y B t B ttG Y
t Y t
Page 26
26
• Since GL is real,
• After d has been fixed, the 1st stub susceptance can be determined as
• The 2nd stub susceptance can be found from the negative of the imaginary part of (5.18)
2 20 12 2 2
0
4 ( )0 1
(1 )Lt Y B t B t
Y t
2
00 2 2
10
sinL
YtG Y
t d
2 2 20 0
1
(1 ) L LL
Y t G Y G tB B
t
Page 27
27
• B2 =
• The open-circuited stub length is
• The short-circuited stub length is
2 2 20 0 0(1 )L L L
L
Y Y G t G t G Y
G t
10
0
1tan
2
l B
Y
10 01tan
2
l Y
B
Page 28
28
5.4 The Quarter-Wave Transformer• Single-section transformer for narrow band
impedance match.
• Multisection quarter-wave transformer designs for a desired frequency band.
• One drawback is that this can only match a real load impedance.
• For single-section,
1 0 LZ Z Z
Page 29
29
Figure 5.10 (p. 241)A single-section quarter-wave matching
transformer. at the design frequency f0.
40
Page 30
30
• The input impedance seen looking into the matching section is
where t = tanβl = tanθ, θ = π/2 at f0.
• The reflection coefficient
• Since Z12 = Z0ZL,
11
1
Lin
L
Z jZ tZ Z
Z jZ t
20 1 0 1 0
20 1 0 1 0
( ) ( )
( ) ( )in L L
in L L
Z Z Z Z Z jt Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z Z jt Z Z Z
0
0 02L
L L
Z Z
Z Z j t Z Z
Page 31
31
• The reflection coefficient magnitude is
01/ 22 2
0 0
1/ 22 2 2 20 0 0 0
1/ 22 2 2
0 0 0 0
1/ 22 2
0 0
4
1
/( ) 4 /( )
1
1 4 /( ) 4 /( )
1
1 4 /( ) sec
L
L L
L L L L
L L L L
L L
Z Z
Z Z t Z Z
Z Z Z Z t Z Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z t Z Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z
Page 32
32
• Now assume f ≈ f0, then l ≈ λ0/4 and θ ≈ π/2. Then sec2 θ >> 1.
0
0
cos , for near / 22
L
L
Z Z
Z Z
Page 33
33
• We can define the bandwidth of the matching transformer as
• For TEM line,
• At θ = θm,
22 m
2
02
0
0
20
211 sec
2or cos
1
Lm
m L
Lmm
Lm
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
0 0
2
4 2p
p
vf fl
v f f
02 mm
ff
Page 34
34
• The fractional bandwidth is
• Ex. 5.5 Quarter-Wave Transformer Bandwidth
ZL = 10, Z0 = 50, f0= 3 GHz, SWR ≤ 1.5
0
0 0 0
01
20
2( ) 42 2 2
242 cos
1
m m m
Lm
Lm
f f ff
f f f
Z Z
Z Z
Page 35
35
Figure 5.12 (p. 243)Reflection coefficient magnitude versus frequency for a single-section quarter-wave matching transformer with
various load mismatches.
Page 36
36
5.5 The Theory of Small ReflectionSingle-Section Transformer
2 1 21 2 1 3
2 1 2
2 121 1 12 2
2 1 2 1
2 2 41 12 21 3 12 21 3 2
212 21 3
1 22 3
, , ,
2 21 , 1
1
L
L
j j
j
j
Z Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z
Z ZT T
Z Z Z Z
T T e T T e
T T e
e
21 3
21 31
j
j
e
e
1 3 1 2
1 3je
Page 37
37
Figure 5.13 (p. 244)Partial reflections and transmissions on a single-section
matching transformer.
Page 38
38
Multisection Transformer
• Assume the transformer is symmetrical,
1 0 10
1 0 1
, , ,n n L Nn N
n n L N
Z Z Z Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z Z Z
2 4 2
0 1 2( ) j j jNNe e e
0 , 1 1, 2 2, etc.N N N
Page 39
39
• If N is odd, the last term is
while N is even,
( 1) ( 1)0 1( ) { [ ] [ ] }jN jN jN j N j Ne e e e e
( 1) / 2 ( )j jN e e
/ 2N
0 1
/ 2
0 1
( 1) / 2
( ) 2 [ cos cos( 2)
1], for N even,
2
( ) 2 [ cos cos( 2)
1cos ], for N odd,
2
jN
N
jN
N
e N N
e N N
Page 40
40
5.6 Binomial Multisection Matching Transformer
• The response is as flat as possible near the design frequency. maximally flat
• This type of response is designed, for an N-section transformer, by setting the first N-1 derivatives of |Γ(θ)| to 0 at f0.
• Such a response can be obtained if we let2( ) (1 )j NA e
2( )
2 cos
Nj j
NN
A e e e
A
Page 41
41
• Note that |Γ(θ)| = 0 for θ=π/2, (dn |Γ(θ)|/dθn ) = 0 at θ=π/2 for n = 1, 2, …, N-1.
• By letting f 0,
0
0
(0) 2N L
L
Z ZA
Z Z
0
0
2 N L
L
Z ZA
Z Z
2 2
0
( ) (1 ) ,
!where
( )! !
Nj N N jn
nn
Nn
A e A C e
NC
N n n
2 2 4 20 1 2
0
( )N
N jn j j jNn N
n
A C e e e e
Page 42
42
• Γn must be chosen as
• Since we assumed that Γn are small, ln x ≈ 2(x-1)/(x+1),
• Numerically solve for the characteristic impedance Table 5.1
Nn nAC
1 1
1
1 0
0 0
1ln
2
ln 2 2 2(2 ) 2 ln
n n nn
n n n
N N N N Nn L Ln n n n
n L
Z Z Z
Z Z Z
Z Z Z ZAC C C
Z Z Z Z
Page 43
43
• The bandwidth of the binomial transformer
• Ex. 5.6 Binomial Transformer Design
1/
1
0
0 0
1/
1
2 | | cos
1cos
2 | |
2( )2 4
4 12 cos
2 | |
N Nm m
N
mm
m m
N
m
A
A
f ff
f f
A
Page 44
44
Figure 5.15 (p. 250)Reflection coefficient magnitude versus frequency for
multisection binomial matching transformers of Example 5.6 ZL = 50Ω and Z0 = 100Ω.
Page 45
45
5.7 Chebyshev Multisection Matching Transformer
Chebyshev Polynomial
• The first 4 polynomials are
• Higher-order polynomials can be found using
1
22
33
4 24
( ) ,
( ) 2 1,
( ) 4 3 ,
( ) 8 8 1.
T x x
T x x
T x x x
T x x x
1 2( ) 2 ( ) ( )n n nT x xT x T x
Page 46
46
Figure 5.16 (p. 251)The first four Chebyshev polynomials Tn(x).
Page 47
47
• Properties– For -1≤x ≤1, |Tn(x)|≤1 Oscillate between ±1
Equal ripple property.
– For |x| > 1, |Tn(x)|>1 Outside the passband
– For |x| > 1, |Tn(x)| increases faster with x as n increases.
• Now let x = cosθ for |x| < 1. The Chebyshev polynomials can be expressed as
More generally,
(cos ) cosnT n
1
1
( ) cos( cos ) for | | 1,
( ) cosh( cosh ) for | | 1.
n
n
T x n x x
T x n x x
Page 48
48
• We need to map θm to x=1 and π- θm to x = -1. For this,
• Therefore,
1cos cos( ) cos (sec cos ) cos coscos cosn m
m m
T n n
1
22
33
44
2
(sec cos ) sec cos ,
(sec cos ) sec (1 2cos ) 1,
(sec cos ) sec (cos3 3cos ) 3sec cos ,
(sec cos ) sec (cos 4 4cos 2 3)
4sec (cos 2 1) 1.
m m
m m
m m m
m m
m
T
T
T
T
Page 49
49
Design of Chebyshev Transformers• Using (5.46)
• Letting θ = 0,
0 1( ) 2 [ cos cos( 2)
cos( 2 ) ]
(sec cos )
jN
N
jNN m
e N N
N n
Ae T
0
0
0
0
(0) (sec )
1
(sec )
LN m
L
L
L N m
Z ZAT
Z Z
Z ZA
Z Z T
Page 50
50
• If the maximum allowable reflection coefficient magnitude in the passband is Γm,
0 0
0 0 0
1
1 0
0
1
0
1 1 1(sec ) ln
2
cosh( cosh (sec ))
1 1sec cosh cosh
1 1cosh cosh ln
2
L L LN m
L m L m
m
Lm
m L
L
m
Z Z Z Z ZT
A Z Z Z Z Z
N
Z Z
N Z Z
Z
N Z
Page 51
51
• Once θm is known,
Ex 5.7 Chebyshev Transformer Design
Γm = 0.05, Z0 = 50, ZL = 100
Use Table 5.2
0
2 4 mf
f
Page 52
52
Figure 5.17 (p. 255)Reflection coefficient magnitude versus frequency for
the multisection matching transformers of Example 5.7.
Page 53
53
Figure 5.18 (p. 256)A tapered transmission line matching
section and the model for an incremental length of tapered line. (a) The tapered transmission line matching section.
(b) Model for an incremental step change in impedance of the tapered line.
Page 54
54
Figure 5.19 (p. 257)A matching section with an exponential
impedance taper. (a) Variation of impedance. (b) Resulting reflection
coefficient magnitude response.
Page 55
55
Figure 5.20 (p. 258)
A matching section with a
triangular taper for d(In Z/Z0/dz. (a) Variation of impedance. (b)
Resulting reflection coefficient magnitude response.
Page 56
56
Figure 5.21 (p. 260)
Solution to Example 5.8.
(a) Impedance variations for the
triangular, exponential, and
Klopfenstein tapers. (b) Resulting
reflection coefficient magnitude versus frequency for the
tapers of (a).
Page 57
57
Figure 5.22 (p. 262)
The Bode-Fano limits for RC and RL loads matched with passive and lossless networks (ω0 is the center frequency of the
matching bandwidth). (a)
Parallel RC. (b) Series RC. (c)
Parallel RL. (d) Series RL.
Page 58
58
Figure 5.23 (p. 263)Illustrating the Bode-Fano criterion. (a) A possible reflection coefficient response. (b)
Nonrealizable and realizable reflection coefficient responses.