054a - The errors of the Religions according to the spiritual Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77

Elaborate n°9

The errors of the Religions according to the spiritual Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 1

(Circle Florence 77)

Before copying some pages in which the invisible Teachers of the Circle Florence 77 give

us their teachings we make this premise:

in the Antiquity the Divine Revelations to the peoples of the Earth were drawn by the Celestial

Archetype and therefore they were perfect in the moment in which they were revealed to the

Prophet, but from that moment onwards the Revelations have been in the hands of ordinary men.

As a matter of fact, the Prophet reported the Word of God as he received, but then the Word same

was transmitted by other men and subsequently transcribed, by men not as the Prophet worthy of

receiving God's Word.

The modern Revelations that we know, are been transcribed instead by the Prophets as,

they have received it; They are:

- The Revelation of the Lord Jesus to His Austrian scribe in the 19th century;

- The Revelation of the Lord God to the English Eileen Caddy of the Community of

Findhorn in Scotland in the 20th century;

- The Revelation of the Angels to the Scottish Dorothy Maclean of the Community of

Findhorn in Scotland in the 20th century;

- The Revelation of the Lord Jesus to the Italian Maria Valtorta in the 20th century;

- The Our Lady’s Revelation to the young Clairvoyants of Medjugorje; the text of the

Revelation is dictated by them immediately after having listened to it; this Revelation

had beginning June 24th 1981 and is still in progress in January of 2014;

- The spiritual Teachers' Revelation of the Circle Florence 77 in the 20th century through

the medium Roberto Setti of Florence; how much the medium reported it was recorded

in a recorder; subsequently the recordings were transcribed and published in eight

books, by Edizioni Mediterranee of Rome.

In the Antiquity, from the moment of the Revelation to that of the transcript they spent

centuries, even in the case of the Koran to the prophet Mohammed 2 , during such centuries

the Revelation were transmitted orally by father to son or to others and from these last ones to

others. An exception was the Revelation of the Divine Providence to Saint Catherina from Siena,

been born in 1347 and dead in 1380, which she dictated the Divine Revelation made to her to

1 Books published by Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma 2 Sergio Noja, Maometto profeta dell’Islam, page 115 -125, Oscar Mondadori ; Michael Cook, Il Corano, pages 125-132, pages 133-143 and 144-148, Einaudi Tascabili ; Paolo Branca, Il Corano, pages 53-67, Il Mulino

1

three scribes : Barduccio Canigiani, Stefano Maconi and Neri of Landoccio which alternated them

in to write under dictation 3 . It is therefore " the original work of the Saint 4 ".

Of the oral transmission from father to son there is no certainty, because the Word of God

passed by father to son can have been modified, if nothing else for errors of transmission /

understanding from father to child, or for gaps of memory or for different errors, among which those

related to the translations, or for inaccuracy of memoirs or for similar or other motives, among

which that of the people's interest to become exalted represented from who has fixed or made to

fix in the Writing what it is orally reached him.

If it is kept in mind what above said it can be understood that between the Revelation and

the written transcript there can be some differences, especially for what it pertains to the life of the

Spirit or the Afterlife.

Of it derives that the " Writing must not be confused with the Revelation, must not be

identified literally with the Word of God in real sense. God's word, actually it is first of all Jesus

Christ…. 5. "…The fact that the Church is faithful to the whole canon doesn't mean that every

single proposition or biblical passage, taken for itself expresses in equal measure the Word of

God…6 ".

In his book on the Taoism Matgioi so expressed himself: " A tradition doesn't rigidly keep the

memory alive if it is guarded only in the fund of the thought; it also owes - and in absolute way - to

be kept alive and transmitted in the form in which the teacher dressed it. In the alphabetical

languages, if the ear doesn't remember the assonance of the letters, the individual memory and

the following transmission they deform the text and they transform it with the irresponsible but

inevitable use of synonyms and carelessness. In the language of writing with ideograms, it is not

remembered the word, but the idea and the idea it doesn't have that a way of transcript. The oral

tradition, also through generations it is therefore perfect, and it is so frequently used…7 (note of

ours: it cannot be excluded in absolute that through the ages the original idea in the language of

writing with ideograms has not been altered: as a matter of fact they can have altered the idea. In

our opinion therefore, any religion can affirm that its own Writing be Word of God from the first one

to the last transcribed word or idea; there are then the dogmas and the truths of faith or opinions

and human interpretations, that as we know they are not infallible ).

According to the spiritual Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 (Circle Florence 77 ) the

errors of the religions are quite a lot and sometimes serious and they are underlined in the

followings books:

Cerchio Firenze 77, Da mondi invisibili, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma: we ask all

3 Santa Caterina da Siena, Il Dialogo della Divina Provvidenza in the editing of father Angiolo Puccetti, O.P:, Edizioni Cantagalli 1990, care of father Tito S. Centi, O.P.4 Santa Caterina da Siena, Il Dialogo della Divina Provvidenza in the editing of father Angiolo Puccetti,O.P., note of pages 14-15, Edizioni Cantagalli 1990, care of father Tito S. Centi, O.P.5 Various Authors, Guida alla lettura della Bibbia, page 124, San Paolo 6 Various Authors, Guida alla lettura della Bibbia, page 129, San Paolo7 Matgioi, La via Taoista ( la Via razionale ), page 118, Basaia

2

the religions, us included, to meditate on what the Teacher Kempis said on the Antichrist because

many are the cases in which he hides himself; Satan also hides him anywhere in all the

organizations, in the religions and in the families also. The Teacher Kempis said: << Announced

in advance by the Apocalypse, by prophets of doom and even by newspapers that have

circulation problems it proceeds the Antichrist!...How we could we recognize him for not be

surprised by his arrival? How to distinguish him with his traps, his deceptions? We must look at

him in face this arrogant prince of the darkness. The insidious Antichrist hides him in the tacit

acquiescence of the tyranny, of the error and of the injustice (note of ours: if we also think about

the family tyrannies, to the errors and the injustices of the world we must recognize that at least in

this epoch Satan, the Antichrist is anywhere covered by the anonymousness and by the human

ignorance). Satan reigns when to the clarity of the actions it is replaced the congeries of the words,

of the compromises aiming to hide the incapability. It reigns when liberty is used to selfish

purposes and therefore it becomes unlawfulness. When the sense of the measure is lost and the

intemperance it blinds the men (note of ours: also in the religions). When charity becomes an

empty formality to grow, to deserve ourselves the sky and not for love to the neighbour. When the

moral ideal are abandoned not for improving them, but to give free vent to his/her own cupidity.

The religion that uses the teachings of the Teachers to curse, to condemn its enemies, it is religion

of the Antichrist. Then if everything this is the Antichrist, this apocalyptic enemy of the man, is not

so much away from us, it is not of there to come, but it is in us, children and brothers, it wanders in

us and among us from at least two thousand years (note of ours: that is from the advent of the Lord

Jesus) …if this is the truth a different question we owe it to ask: when it will end the kingdom of the

Antichrist? When only the curse will be accursed, when we will be free from the slavery of the

passions, from the errors of the ignorance, from the punishments of the fear, from the anguish of

the desire :…from our weakness, waiting for this day, how to go on? How to understand what is

the briefest way.

These last words are pronounced with solemn and touched tone more and more: they

follow some moments of silence. A perfume of tuberose and lilies it starts to pervade the room with

increasing intensity. It is perceived that the medium raise himself and it almost goes him to the

center of the room where he remains in state of levitation. The voice that the presents hear doesn't

belong to none of the Entities that usually (note of ours: the voice was certainly that of the Lord

Jesus, as it shows His unmistakable oratorical style 8 ):

" Blessed you are that you can get refined in the education but troubles to whom is not

convinced of nothing to know, because of the humble one is the Kingdom of the Skies.

Blessed you are that don't know the obligation to participate unwillingly in the religious

rites, but troubles to whom doesn't find the time to say a prayer, because of whom God

loves It is the Kingdom of the Skies.

8 Vangelo di Matteo 5, 3-11 ; You see also the ten volumens of the Gospel revealed to Maria Valtorta (CEV srl, Viale Piscitelli 89-91, 03036 Isola del Liri (Frosinone), Italy

3

Blessed you are that you can feed without worry but troubles to whom doesn't give the

superfluous one, because of who nothing possesses it is the Kingdom of the Skies.

Blessed you are that don't know the yoke of the compulsory job but troubles to whom is

not productive, because of whom makes use of his/her existence it is the Kingdom of the

Skies.

Blessed you are that you can move in a greater social liberty but troubles to whom is

enslaved of himself, because of free man is the Kingdom of the Skies.

Blessed you are that on the blood of your predecessors you can dream and to hope in

a best world but troubles to whom wastes the opportunity, because of the pure ones it is the

Kingdom of the Skies.

You have heard that it was you said:

Blessed the hungry ones and the thirsty ones of justice, but I tell you: more blessed still

who nothing desires, not even the justice, because of whom is dead to himself and of

whom does the will of the Father it is the Kingdom of the Skies. The kingdom of the Skies

rests in the internal quietness.

Peace to you…9 ".

Cerchio Firenze 77, Oltre l’illusione, Edizioni Mediterranee - Rome:

page 95: << Answering to a question the Teacher Kempis said: " It is not true that the

<< you grow and multiplied you “ be a peremptory invitation because the man procreates without

considering of the conditions in which must grow his/her children. It is crueller and therefore guiltier

who for a long time makes to suffer, of whom kills >> (note of ours: the poor Islamic ones should

reflect well upon this teaching before procreating up to twenty son ! ).

Cerchio Firenze 77, Per un mondo migliore, pages 21-43, Edizioni Mediterranee -

Rome:

<< The self and his processes of expansion: <<…It has been said to you that when

the individual doesn't find in a conception of life what can durably satisfy him/her, he/she turns

him/her to the opposite conception.

You have heard that the self - that it derives from a limitation – it cannot include what it

is boundless. The self cannot reach the Reality.

You are convinced that the Reality can set term to your pain; for this you would want to

reach it, and feeling that the self is of impediment you would want to put it aside and to act

according to the "not self" But all of this is an illusion: the " not-self” is equally a becoming and not

a being. What does it care if the individual, rather than does to be busy in the social climbing,

surrender the footstep and keep the secret intention to grow somehow? The "not-me" it is thing

wanted and not felt. The "not-me” it is a kept behavior with a purpose and not a spontaneous being

passive to any immediate or remote selfish end.

9 Cerchio Firenze77, Dai Mondi invisibili, pagine 54-56, Mediterranee

4

There are many individuals that they believe, withdrawing himself/herself from the world, to

be able to get the sublimation of themselves. This is deceptive. The convents and the monasteries

are not out of the dominion of the self. Each effort that the individual completes in positive or

negative sense to grow, it is in antithesis with the Reality. It is necessary to go over the

appearance and to discover the intention.

The self can conceive a program to its own expansion that apparently it can be in contrast

with the common ambition, and nevertheless to develop it with the intent to grow. This program

can be called renouncement to Satan and his blandishments, hermitage, apostolate, Christianity or

Brahmanism, Anthroposophy or Theosophy, and to serve to bring order in the society, to improve

the individual relationships, but to be incapable to eradicate the egoism of the individual.

The human laws, the uses and the customs establish the order of the society; such an

order needs guardians. The religions aim to make of the individual a guardian of himself/herself;

and this is praiseworthy; but it is not what we intend us. We speak of a felt order of a formed

conscience, for which the guardians are superfluous.

Every organization has a hierarchy being the hierarchy the same strength of the

organization. But the hierarchy inflames and feeds the expansion of the self. You have to free you

from the self instead.

When you will have reached such a liberation, you will be open to the Reality, will

understand entirely the beauty of the Whole. When you will have reached such a liberation you

won't be afraid anymore. Calms you will be, of a serenity that doesn't know uncertainty in front of

the changes of the life, because you won't be bothered by to examine the advantages and the

disadvantages of the self anymore. You will give for that that you will have had and for what you

won't have had, but above all without intention neither aim some, and faith will correspond really to

the tallest expression of the individual conscience, in the action to be cosmic conscience 10 >>.

Teacher Claudio.

Per un mondo migliore, Edizioni Mediterranee - Rome, pages 77 -121:

The organizations to the ends of the spiritual evolution:

<< …Le religions.

To speak of religion in a time in which this term has assumed a meaning that I would dare

to define contrary to progress and to the emancipation of the man, it can seem vain, if not straight

harmful. Nevertheless, also staying in a similar severity of judgment, it cannot be refused to

acknowledge that the religions have constituted a social fabric of great value. Naturally I make

reference to the religions that preach the good relationships among the men, that to those

that limit them to look for a relationship between the man and the Divinity.

The primitive religions, for example, with a succession of rites and prescriptions they try to

establish a relationship between the individuals and the Gods; and also this in a certain measure,

10 Cerchio Firenze 77, Per un mondo migliore, pagine 31-32, Mediterranee

5

constitutes a social support; but not so important as that constituted by the religions that they make

of the love to the neighbour, of the mutual help, of the solidarity, a primary commandment.

This doesn't mean that the religions, in absolute sense, knows a classification of

importance, that certain is more important than others. Everyone has its content that is valid for the

individuals that follow it. Everyone serves to plan in a determined way the experiences of its own

believers.

If we compare the various religions, great points of contact are discovered, but also

appreciable differences of principle. On the personal plan everyone can like more or less, but it is

certain that each of them has a particular content, and it is that which imposes in a certain way the

experiences of its own believers, valid experiences for the spiritual evolution.

The central point of my discourse is that if the practical men, positive, rational, they want to

consider the religions among the things by now old, in a time in which everything must have

sustained from the logic and justified by the practical utility, there is no doubt that that part of those

religions that the love preaches to the neighbour, the solidarity, the mutual help, preserve value still

today: it is still actual in comparison to other parts that limit it to affirm principles of faith. For an

example: the assumption to the sky of the mother of Christ: a Catholic believes it, rather he/she

must believe it , but this doesn't have a direct reflex in the construction of the society, unless the

Catholic doesn't shoulder the rifle to defend his/her faith.

If we speak of principles, to which I have now mentioned instead, of solidarity among the

men, of mutual help, we speak of principles that still preserve a practical utility in today's life.

Therefore the religions that those principles preach of primary importance, must be revalued and,

with them, us that of the same principles we speak to you. But is ours perhaps a to say and to

repeat the things already repeated by hundreds of years?

The whole ethical principles, imposed in name of a spiritual authority and with the threat of

a punishment - that is without making to understand its reason to be for the single one and for the

community - it has determined all the alienations of which the history is full. The " not to fornicate"

of Mosè, imposed without understanding the reason and the limits of it, it has determined the

sexual neuroses that - according to Freud - they are the unique cause of the human cruelty and

ferocity. But the man has the duty to ask himself some logical questions, also in an irrational

subject as that religious, and to wonder really if the whole religious problem, for the individual, it

can reside in an individual choice. Because - you see -. until it deals with doing or not to do

something, then individual will can be conclusive; but when it comes with the desire - as the not to

desire the stuff of others, not to desire the woman of others - will can serve only not to translate in

practice the desire; but the desire remains. Yet we affirm that the man can overcome his/her own

selfish desires. Otherwise from so, the great spiritual destinies to which is called the man should

identify him/her in an external attitude, in a built altruism, artificial, and the man to remain instead,

in his/her intimate, a well of egoism. But the love to the neighbour of the Christ cannot be

understood as a to appear lambs and to remain, in the intimate, fierce wolves.

6

We are unselfish when "we feel" in terms of altruism, not when we behave us as such. The

to behave and not to be creates all those neuroses that torment the single one and the society.

Well, we want to help you to "to be". Today especially, you that you listen to us and that you accept

us , it is not enough that you have "a behavior" altruistic; it is necessary that you transform your

intimate so much "to be" altruist persons. The laws and the impositions from the outside don't

serve to bridle the egoism of the man anymore; therefore it is essential that each modifies

himself/herself, if he/she doesn't want that the society becomes a sad show of indifference, cruelty,

insensibility. But above all it is important that this transformation happens entirely in a simple way

and not alienating. Then, if useful it is to follow the commandment that unites the men, still more

profitable it will be to follow it serenely, in the internal harmony, free from every violence to

ourselves.

The purpose for which we come among you is not that to repeat the too repeated "moral

ideals", but that to bring you a new word, simple, effective and, above all, that it come true for each

one that that, for centuries, it has been conquest of a few .

We want to illustrate you broadly speaking and quoting passages of sacred books, as it

finds themselves again in the religions of the peoples that had a notable civilization those truths

that we have you more times taught. These religions were the basic of every elevated

philosophical- religious thought of the great Teachers, on which then the ignorance of the man has

interwoven fanciful additions.

We reassume these principles, these truths that, with light differences, surface in all

the religions:

- an sole eternal existence, endless, incommensurable, from which the whole Creation

proceeds;

- the triplex manifestation of this existence Trinity also called ;

- the law of cause and of effect, in force in the emanated world, in consequence of the

first cause-effect of the creation: creative will is the cause and the immediate emanation

of the universe is the effect;

- the law of evolution;

- the transmigration of the individualities in more bodies, understood as mean of

evolution.

The Atlantidi had relationships with many peoples inhabitants of neighbouring and distant

lands. Before this civilization finished its evolutionary cycle more not a few they had drawn to the

wisdom of that race. The Turani were among these and on what they took from Atlantide it rose

and it founded it the vast Chinese civilization. The Ching-Chang-Ching, or Classical of purity, that

is unanimously attributed not to the same author as every sacred text of remote date, preserve

ancient and authentic passages in comparison to its first layout of the time of Atlantide.

Let us read some passages to see what idea is reflected of the Divinity:

7

" The true Tao has neither form nor body, but he produces and he sustains every form and

every body. The true Tao doesn't have name but preserve and feeds all the names ( or all

things); it passes and passing becomes remote, and, becoming remote, he returns. The Tao

manifests himself as pure and turbid, and he has motion and rest. Tao produced one, one

produced two, two produced three, three produced all the things; all the things come forward

to embrace the light from which they have emerged. The Tao pervades every thing and he

can be recognized in the smallest things as in the greatest. "

As it regards the evolution it is said:

" The one which frees his/her being from the selfish desire, gets the union aware with the

One; he who have the absolute purity it enters the true Tao ".

The concept of reincarnation is not so clearly found express although, if it was not thought

that the reincarnation and the law of cause and of effect are understood, any logical connection

would be found in the sacred texts of this religion. We find it more clearly expressed in a wise

history where it is asked to a dying person: " What will it now do of you the Creator? Will you be

mouse or bug? This to show you that reincarnation and karma (karma = law of cause and of effect)

they are implied in the whole teaching of this religion, as the condition of the new life is determined

after the death in accordance with the experiences of the departed life.

A lot of additions, mutilations and wrong interpretation count the sacred texts of this

religion; we for example know that, for the law of evolution, who has reached the human

incarnation he/she can never be reincarnated in an animal form; also, to the careful researcher

today they appear still in unequivocal way the bases of the ancient wisdom.

The religion Brahamanica, the greatest of the Aryans, has in itself clearly expressed God's

concept intended as sole eternal existence; likewise the Trinity (Trimurti). The law of evolution and

that of reincarnation make integral part of it and they are expressed and taught exoterically as in

no other religion. There is no need therefore to quote the sacred texts if not to recognize the

beauty and the moral abundance of it, neither there is need to show the sameness of the principles

of this religion with our teaching.

Let us read together some passages of the Mundaka - Upanishad and together we will agree

on it:

" The intellect purified by the knowledge knows and Brahama contemplates. Who Brahama

knows it becomes Brahama ".

And speaking of Brahama, or Tall One:

“He is present every where, great abode within which it relaxes all of this that alive;

thinner than what it is thin; within which are the worlds with their inhabitants. He is the

imperishable Brahama ".

It is in other text:

" Beyond the universes, Brahama the Eternal One, the Indivisible One, the

Unchangeable One, hidden to all the beings inversely to their evolution, the Lord knowing

8

which we become immortal, the only breath of all the worlds, the Young eternal, the Elderly

One of the elderly ones, the soul of the worlds, that He has called Not been born, that He

has called Eternal ".

Noticing the crystalline clarity and truthfulness of these texts, it is done to think that the

belonging ones to this religion are among the more illuminated and evolved. But if people has not

understood this crystalline beauty and it has distorted the truth so much to transform it in

superstition and to become fanatical, we must not marvel us. This also happens in West; on the

contrary while the Hindu guru try to illuminate the minds of the believers, not as much it can be

said of certain religious authorities.

The clear exposure of the truth is not conclusive for the individual if not with the purpose to

make him/her understand and assimilate, or rather "to evolve."

In Greece, land where they saw the light wise men, variedly the philosophical-religious

thought was express; but if I several they were the ways to express it, not so the bases on which

every great mind hinged its philosophy.

Also according to the theology of Orpheus, all the things have origin from an immense

divine principle to which us, for our ignorance, we give a name considering him as an extra-cosmic

personality. The existence of the Trinity is also recognized intended as universal Spirit, Soul or

universal Conscience universal Mind.

The Orphicers believe in the reincarnation and in the law of evolution as the man,

potentially having in itself the sum and the substance of everything, through the transmigration it

puts into effect what it has in power.

Pythagoras taught the reincarnation together with the concentric solar motion. We have

explained you other times the mystical mathematics of this Great; we have disclosed you what He

intended for unity, trinity, and so saying. And to reveal other names, Plato, Ammonium Knapsack

with the neoplatonicis and analogisti.

Empedocles taught doctrines of transmigration and evolution. Plotino preached an identical

doctrine to that of the Vedantini, that is that the soul, emanated by a sole divine principle, it will be,

after the pilgrimage on the earth, rejoined to this. Porphyry, besides to have picked up his teacher

Plotinus's writings, were himself author sharing the faith and the thought of it.

Many others we could still quote, if these names were not enough.

Teacher Claudio

The Buddhist religion is separated in a lot of sects, because it is very difficult to

preserve the essence of the ancient belief. If this difficulty didn't exist the Teacher Buddha

would not be come down among us. He was a Hindu and he didn't come for founding a new

religion, but accepting all the fundamental teachings of the Brahmanism purified it, it discarded

ignorant additions so that the ancient wisdom it glowed of its true light.

9

Although a lot the sects Buddhists are, all however they conceive God as Absolute. In the religion

Buddhist is held important that to the creatures, to the disciples, be well taught. Actually Buddha

says:

" Those creatures to which the law has been taught well, and from them it has been

assimilated well, they can reach the other shore of the wide sea of the births and the

deaths, so much difficult to cross ".

The Trinity is not so unanimously taught, but this depends on a degeneration, and

not from the teaching of Buddha. Instead, reincarnation, evolution, law of cause and of

effect or karmica law, they are the fundamental base of the whole Buddhismo. To illustrate

this will be enough quote few footsteps of a sacred text:

" A Brahama is an illuminated that he has set end to the wheel of the births

and the deaths. The wise individual, with the love, the virtue, the purity, makes

himself immune from every attack. Those people that bear grudge against those

that bear grudge, cannot be pure. He who don't bear grudge instead it appeases

those that hate, and since the hate brings to the greatest dire poverties of the world,

the wise man, true distributor of wealth, cannot hate. To win the falsehood with the

purity."

It is understood that that "to win" of the quotation, it is not to repress", but to make to stop

existing to have dominion in you.

Buddha as the other Teachers, have brought the truth and the men they have

distorted it.

Do you want to know, dear brother, who teaches the Truth? You go for exclusion; it starts to

discard he who he/she believes to be the only one to profess it, because who knows the Reality

he/she knows that It doesn't have need neither of defenders neither of barkers.

When one brother of yours is ready to receive it, you can also conceal the Truth, but he/she

will find it and he/she will surely recognize it.

Om Hands Padme Hum.

Teacher Oriental Brother

We turn the look to ancient Egypt to find there another Civilization. Also from the not

plentiful sacred literature of that Civilization that it has remained to us, we can understand the

religious thought of that people. From the documents of most remote date we know that the

Egyptians believed in the Trinity, Rha, Osiride-Iside, Oro. Remembering the hymn to Rha we

understand what idea they had of the Divine one:

" Oh You, Producer of the beings, we adore the soul that You emanate: You produce

us, or Unknowable; You we greet, adoring the spirit that comes down from You and It lives in us ".

From the fragment of the Book of the corpses we know that the Egyptians believed in the

reincarnation according to a law of evolution, that is up to the union of the human soul with the

center of the Whole, through the peregrination on the Earth.

10

Everything this is evident and it is useless to illustrate what that for itself it is already clear.

From the shine of ancient Egypt to its decadence, to the ten sores, through the liberation

from the slavery, up to the premonitory signes of the new Civilization: that Jewish. Let's interest us

of the religious thought of this people according to the particular point of view that allows us this

meeting.

In the exoteric books, from the exoteric writings of the Jewish religion they are not clearly

found express these Truths; let's find it instead in the Kabbala or esoteric book, the study of which

is not held today advantageous. Contrarily, we say, since in it the one doctrine is taught, of the

Trinity.

" The Elderly One of the Elder ones, the Elderly One of the days- it is said - He

doesn't have form, but He also has form: He has form in how much the universe is sustained by

mean of it; He doesn't have form in how much contained cannot be ".

And actually what is endless it doesn't have form. " In name of the One that He takes the

same universe as His form in the generating cycles ", we say, and continuing:

"…when at the beginning of the times tooks form ( or began this cycle of universal

manifestation) they departed from Him ten lights (the three of the Trinity and the seven of the

Septenarii) which all together form the ten sephiroths or divine attributes ".

In the Zohar it is said that all the souls are subject to revolution or metempsicòsi:

" The men don't know as they were judged when they left the world and before they

came ".

The whole esoteric teaching of this religion founds it on those principles taught by every

great Spirit.

On the words of the Teachers the men have founded their Churches, as if on a true work of

architectural art a very bad Baroque had been built. But the careful researcher will know how to

recognize what it is good from what it is useless showing once more the immortality and the

indestructibility of the Reality.

The intuition is a form of knowledge that doesn't reveal of the abstractions but a reality, or,

even, the Reality. The intuition is a form of knowledge for identification.

This discourse however it must not make you believe erroneously that the knowledge of

God be reserved to the only mystical temperaments, because the mysticism - as Hegel affirmed - it

is an attitude irrazionalistic. The intuition is a form of knowledge that is to disposition of every

being.

Another diffused error is that to believe that the intuition happens without any participation

of the subject, while also it is an effect that it produces whenever the subject - knowingly or not,

more often unconsciously - it is set under the fit conditions to receive it; that is he/she moves the

cause that provokes it.

The first action of this process is called to pay attention to, as for every form of knowledge.

The intuitive knowledge that reveals us “ the things that are above of us ", to use the expression of

11

Plotino, is more recurrent in the mysticism that not in the rational temperaments, because the

mystical one looks for a direct and individual relationship with the Divinity, free from the

conditionings of the reason, and in this way it starts that process that concludes itself with the

intuition; in his/her case with the ecstasy.

Rational temperament, rarely turns him/her instead to God in terms of knowledge, therefore

its intuitions concern other realities; this doesn't mean that also rational temperaments can have

some ecstasies. And if ecstatic experience is not exclusive of the mysticism, equally necessarily

the mysticism is tied up not to the religiousness. The one and the other one are different attitudes.

The mysticism and the religiousness are confused instead, in the common consideration, because

so much in the one how much in the other one a relationship is looked for with the Divinity; but

while the mystical one is not tied up to some particular religious belief, in the religious there is an

attachment to the complex of beliefs and of acts of the cult that constitute a religion. Besides, in

the religious, cannot be some true mystical inspiration.

It must not be forgotten nevertheless that the founders and the reformers of the great

religions were essentially of the mystical ones that have tried to translate in the language and in

the concepts their ecstasies; and since these are untranslatable in a similar language, they result

of it of the incomplete and inadequate expressions.

The Being as such it is not characterizable: the Absolute One is not reportable in the

relative world. On these incomplete and inadequate expressions, the men have built their religions

also forgetting, among the other, that who has looked for to translate in words the proper one or

his/her own ecstasies, inevitably it has done it using himself the means that the his/her culture it

made him/her available. That's why the religious doctrines are translations in words - and therefore

in symbols - of an ecstasy. It is clear that an ecstatic conscience, also expressed in the best of the

ways, it loses his/her authentic character; and the authenticity of a such operation can reside only

in the attempt to communicate - and therefore to hand down to posterity - the Truth dressing again

it of words and of symbols for the one who is not able to understand it from himself/herself.

Who approaches to a religion, for how much illuminated can be held, he/she must keep in

mind this initial formulation, to avoid to confuse the symbolic character of the tradition with the

Reality.

The tradition religious they are fables that console, they infuse courage to whom doesn't

have conscience to redeem from the slavery of the changeable one and the contingent. With this I

don't intend to say that nothing valid and of truth there is not in the religions. Besides the utility, to

which I now have mentioned, there is no doubt that every contains a fragment of Truth, shaded

with different formulations, because different they are the cultural environments in which the

religions are developed.

If whoever approaches to a religion it kept in mind everything this, the religions would very

probably stop being cause of incomprehensions and division among the men.

12

Every religious must keep in mind that the religion was not born for the hate among the

men, but for their love. And it must hold it present to avoid that to the consequential negative

aspect from the incomplete character of the religious doctrines, the damage of fanatical promoters

of them is added. I don't certainly intend to speak of the errors of the secular and ecclesiastical

religious, the attitude of which religious it is essentially of two types: in the first type the religion is

considered as something to keep in mind in a small part of the day, or even of the week; the

second attitude, derives instead from the fact, that since the religious doctrines don't interest

themselves in any practical aspect of the life - and it is correct that it be so, because for this there

are particular sciences and disciplines - this is interpreted by certain religious as if the man had

called to hate the world.

I would want to remember - particularly to the religious - that the man must not love more

his/her own opinions of the Truth; and, to the not religious, that the purpose of the life is not that to

enjoy the world, but that to instruct, to educate the individual.

If the religion must have a place and a meaning in today's world, it must teach the union of

the man with the nature, with his similar and with the sole Being.

It must make to understand that what can unite the men, more than a commune origin, is a

commune end. It must make more intimate and more universal, clearing itself of the superfluous

one and bringing itself to the fundamental Truths of the faith. It must affirm the supremacy of the

Spirit on the external forms and on the dogmatic adhesion to a formula. It must welcome all the

men, because the true religious spirit doesn't imprison, it doesn't divide, but, rather it develops a

more meaningful attitude towards the proper similar ones and of the life, that free from the slavery

of the dependence and the ignorance. It must stop boasting the exclusiveness of its own truth.

The violence with which certain doctrines and certain religious factions want to impose

themselves in the history constitutes source of big calamities. But the religious disputes would

stop if men understood that at the base of all religions there is a same Truth, as to the root

of all "beings" a same identity is. And it is important that the religious disputes stop, because

this will be to mean that the man has found inside himself/herself the guide to the walk that must

complete, frustrating so all the religious organizations… 11 >>.

Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, Edizioni Mediterranee – Roma , pages 107 -109:

<<The errors of the religions: the world is not a valley of tears:

Someone said: " In the moment that he/she is born him/her they start to die ".

We tell you:" You born to the today, you die to the yesterday and you will be for ever living,

not itinerant dead bodies ".

The greatest gift: the gift of the life!

But you don't agree with me: you are all of the tired ones and discouraged ones of the life,

poor brothers without enthusiasm, timorous to live, timorous to die.

11 Cerchio Firenze 77, Per un mondo migliore, page 85-96, Mediterranee

13

“ The life is a test, is it true brother? There is not here happiness, it needs to only try to stay

in grace of God to deserve the eternal life ": here it is the refrain that from centuries it is singed as

supreme religious comfort to the humanity.

And when the men look for something more convincing, they speak "the spirits" with new

words: " This your world is not the world of the reality; life starts after the death ".

You like these explanations, because they excuse you some with yourselves and with the

others for what you don't have done.

If you question a creature that in his/her life has not done anything, he/she will answer you

that he/she has been prevented him/ her of "to do": illnesses, hits of the destiny, upside-down of

fortune and so saying. As if the man existed for being prevented. They are all escapes and

excuses.

The world is not a valley of tears for divine disposition, it is not land of continuous itself but

part of that All-one that it calls Absolute, in which every subdivision is conventional the Reality

being unique.

Convince yourself of this and the life it will appear you under a different light.

If you think actually that the life is an exile for the man, you are suited to spend it in a way

that is a compromise among what you hold pleasant and what you do with effort, closing you in

this to prevaricate, to the same reality of the life. Every event, every thought they are taken, then,

as pretext for the continuous escape from the life. The same Truth communicated by others is

misunderstood and used as justification to “not to live " that you do in the true sense of the word.

"Brother, do you believe to the law of evolution?". It is comfortable to believe it. You say":

The evolution happens in every way; it will come the time of my liberation anyway."

"Brother, do you believe to the karma? It looks at that creature how much it suffers." "It is

his/her karma", and with this you believe to be exonerated to help him/her. "And the other

creature? Since years it is in the difficulties." "It is his/her good" you say.

It is not so, unfortunately? It is the man that erroneously interprets, that lives among

compromises deluding himself/herself to draw out of them two or more advantages.

It is not important to believe in the law of evolution: if you don't move you, such you are and

such you will stay.

It is not important to believe in the karma, brother that you believe it: rather, if in the fear of

what can revert on you live in constraint, it is better that you don't believe it.

You are not able certain to say to love your brothers if, considering that they in difficulty are

found for the same cause, you believe to be in right to disinterest you to lend them help.

You must intend in their true sense our teachings; you must not escape yourselves to

delude you; but you must exactly be informed of all those "as" and "because" that they determine

your behavior and that they correspond to as many "as" and "because", mysterious uncertainties

of your existence.

14

You must not think that life is a test, that life is a punishment, that it is one and one alone of

the a lot of necessary incarnations to the attainment of the Reality. This way doing, you lookto the

life as to something that needs to bear of good mind and that it is not complete in itself, while really

for this it is the biggest gift.

Life is complete in itself.

Each one takes from it exactly how much him need.

Us, the Teachers, same Christ, nobody can replace the teaching of the life 12 >>.

Teacher Kempis

Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma, pages 119 -125:

The " resurrection of the flesh ":

There is no doubt that a situation, an ideology, a conception of the life they like, they are

freely accepted when give - or at least they promise - something: that is when they make the most

of the person, the self. Equally, a situation, an ideology, a conception of the life they are rejected

when they don't gratify the personal and selfish self.

For this reason the concept of the self that is transcended, of the communion of the beings,

of the identification with God, they leave many - in the best of the hypotheses - indifferent. Think as

the instinct of maintenance of the self is great! In the doubt that the identification in God can bring

to the annihilation of the being, to the annulment of the self, it is preferred to believe that the life of

limitation, only in which can exist the self - this miserable condition after all - continues eternally.

Certainly in the condition of existence of absolute conscience to which every being is

destined the sense of separation on which the self founds him it is not conceivable; but this doesn't

mean that, not feeling in terms of limitation anymore, of separation, there is automatically an

annihilation, it ceases the conscience to exist. Contrarily: the conscience is found to be the Whole.

It is excused if I don't have other to offer you in exchange for the self.

On the other hand, if everything this you don't like it, if it repulses you the idea of the communion of

the beings, if you prefer the integral individualism, there is the marvelous conception of the

resurrection of the flesh that can satisfy you completely.

Questions without answer

You think what wonder: at the sound of the trumpets of the judgment every man

resuscitates from the ash and repurchases his/her characteristics psycho-physics for a time

without end! This at least it has been the unofficial doctrinal reaffirmation, of a Pope that he doesn't

know more what expedient to find to maintain floating a boat full of leaks, and he doesn't

understand that if he still it has a hold over the people it is not for the doctrine, the theology that he

can offer, but for something greater and more truth: the need of the man to turn to the Divine one,

to have help, protection, but above all to believe that his/her own life has a sense.

12 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 107-109, Mediterranee

15

Certainly if that reaffirmation is compared to an emanated law, immediately wanted us after

the rule or at least an explanatory circular, because to oppose to the concept of evolution, of

identification in God, the concept of the man of flesh that he/she remains entire with its

characteristics psycho-physics for the eternity, without explaining a little more, it is certainly not

much.

Which characteristics psycho-physics? Because from the infancy to the old age the

characteristics psycho-physics change not little. Then which they are those that survive? There is

to hope that they are those of the best moment; however even if this was true, it would not be very

reassuring: actually it cannot be said that the being prone to anger, envious, cruel, selfish there are

not characteristic of the personality of a man. And then will the men keep on giving a so pitiful

show of their character for the eternity?

I believe that, without wasting deep philosophical speculations, the simple good sense

prevents from sustaining a similar hypothesis; there is then to believe that the man risen abandons

all of his/her defects and he/she presents only virtues. Certainly, however, it cannot be said that

he/she will preserve his/her personality. And the physical characteristics? Also forgetting the

beauty or the ugliness of the body, that can be opinions, there is no doubt that the somatic defects

as the humpback and similar, they are characteristic somatic of the individual; and then? Do they

remain for once without end? There is to hope that the risen physical body be a revised and

correct copy of that deadly; or that the somatic defects, in the conception of the resurrection of the

bodies, is not included among the physical characteristics. Perhaps, note the characteristics of the

physical body are only the color of the eyes, of the hair, the height, the race…What do you say?,

you are not satisfied of your characteristics and therefore would not you want to preserve for the

eternity your dissatisfaction? There is not then that to hope that automatically you are it, or that for

physical characteristics is understood others; for example the sex.

For charity, what is escaped from me! Sex brings with itself an avalanche of problems,

complications, dissatisfactions. And then, there is to suppose that the life, after the resurrection of

the flesh, is an asexual life as that of the Angels or of Adam and Eva before the expulsion from the

terrestrial Heaven, therefore "sex" understood so simply, as somatic external factor. The usual

verbose could wonder: " But what is that for?". I would answer: " Nothing." There was before and it

is correct that there is later also. It serves to maintain the identity of the person. However, to see

well, would this identity consist in what? In the physical characteristics no, or at least in very

general sense, that is in the sense that all would have two arms, two legs, two eyes and so on; in

short they would have a human body. But this would be so little; so much less in psychological

sense of personality, because if you raise or how much less you modify to a man his/her

inclinations, his/her character, tell me if not you modify his/her way to be and therefore his/her

identity, if for identity it is intended, note, to maintain unchanged his/her own being. Is it in the

concept of the resurrection of the body, that identity must have to be tied to the conservation of the

psycho-physics characteristics tightly, otherwise what sense have preserve such characteristics?

16

Certainly, if the celestial destiny of the man is that to stay an endless time with its

characteristics psycho-physics, it is a miserable destiny, because there is no doubt that such

characteristics condition and therefore they limit the being. Who can affirm the contrary one? Who

can reasonably sustain that our vices, our weaknesses or simply our tastes don't limit us? To the

limit our same virtues are conditioning. Now tell me if it is not foolish and blind who himself boasts

so perfect to desire not to change. In all conscience - physical body, apart for which the answer is

foregone - it doesn't seem you that your psychic characteristics could be best? The opinions don't

certainly make text and therefore we must not be interested in; but I am sure that every man would

want to be already better in every sense even on the Earth, imagining then us in a celestial

kingdom that doesn't know end.

The logical dilemma of the resurrection of the body, belief – you pay attention well - that it is

not exclusive of the Christianity, because it is shared with the Judaism, from which note has drawn

it the Christians, and with the Zoroastrianism, it is a dilemma that is set in these terms: the man

rising again with his/her characteristics psycho-physics would remain conditioned by them. And

then let me say, what miserable future! Or he/she would not be conditioned, enjoying of a perfect

state, but then tell me what is the purpose of such characteristics and above all, as they express

themselves.

Do you imagine you if men, from Adam onwards, would rise again with their human

characters, what collection of samples there would be in the celestial kingdom? The man of the

caverns as it would sustain the psycho-physical approach with the intellectual refined person of the

future?

The true destiny of the man

We affirm a different destiny of the being, in which limitations don't exist; but this is possible

only in a condition of existence in which character doesn't exist and personality; in which

separation doesn't exist and therefore dialectical relationship; but completeness exists to feel,

integral communion, identification with the Whole.

In such condition we survive not as we feel to be in this moment, because our identity is not

tied up to our limits and to preserve and to make to survive the identity is not necessary to

preserve and to make to survive the limits. For us, to preserve our own identity doesn't mean to

remain always as we are, because this is absurd; and then all it takes is examining our own life

from the infancy onward to realize how much every one modifies his/her way to be.

Nobody is never identical, because every instant is different. And it is also so different in

comparison to the others that he/she is identical only to himself/herself, limitedly to every instant.

Only God is identical to himself and always identical, as He never changes.

Now, if, despite the changes each remains himself/herself, that is preserve the self-

awareness, the awareness to exist, this means that identity is not tied up to his/her own

characteristics psycho-physics, to his/her own limits. For us identity means to maintain unchanged

17

his/her own unity through the to change of the attributes; and what in the being remains through

the mutations, what unites a theory to feel, the one different from the other, common point of each,

is the to feel to exist the conscience to be.

The true survival

But, you mind well, neither the to feel to exist remains or it persists unchanged. Quite the

opposite. To convince us it doesn't need to be able to examine moments of the existence of a

being belonging to different incarnations; yourselves, examining you instant for instant, you can

realize it: yours to feel to exist - the so-called self-awareness of the man - in a moment it can be

excited from the good mood, from the enthusiasm, in another moment instead, it can reveal

tiredness, unwillingness, abandonment; nevertheless beyond what the conscience to exist reveals,

it makes to perceive, there is no doubt that it not fails never and that it remains in the most different

states of feelings: therefore it is of nature independent from them.

I say of independent nature and not only independent, because in effects, when the to feel

of conscience is not sufficiently ample the conscience to exist it is tied up to the stimulus that they

come from the environment and that they reverberate in the individual through the coarse bodies.

That is the individual feels to exist because he/she has, at least, sensations; so that, after the

death of the physical body, since the conscience to exist can never fail neither to have a solution of

continuity, happens that the being has, in short-term, a new incarnation really to have the

necessary stimulus to make to manifest his/her conscience to be. Instead then, little by little that

the conscience becomes larger through the experiences, the to feel to exist, the self-conscience

also subsists in a way completely disengaged by the feelings, emotions, thoughts. Therefore the

true survival, the true resurrection, is the conscience to exist, the to feel to be that doesn't fail also

when they fail the psycho-somatic characters.

This conception, to be accepted, it doesn't need an act of faith because it finds support in

the logic and in the univocal affirmations of whom has experimented such a condition of

conscience.

The logic of the Truth

If I were Pope, I would avoid to set the accent on argue doctrinal that can be approved only under

dogmatic imposition and silencing the faculty of reason with the convenient affirmation that " The

divine things cannot be understood by the human mind! " I solemnly contest this affirmation!

Certainly God is a state of conscience that it can be understood only testing it, feeling it;

nevertheless if He is the All-One-Absolute this it means that every aspect of Him it is not

independent, but it is even a succession. Therefore the consequentiality that ties up every virtual

part – point of God - if it is not the same essence of the logic, tell me what it is; and if it is logical,

then the faculty of reason, if it cannot make it feel, it can make at least understand it. Certain it

must be discovered. However, when we affirms that such a concept is the Truth, it Truth is given

18

for discovered and then it must to be logical and so to remain not only in itself but also in front of all

the consequent implications and developments.

If I were Pope, I would also avoid to face the human problems on the easy ground of the

affirmations that all can undersign. As, for instance, that every man justly has right to a profitable

job, that it must not be exploitation, injustice and that the hunger in the world it must disappear.

Actually, cheering crowds of believers and not they are delighted of these words. " Also the Pope

has told it !". I would want really to know why a Pope should say the contrary one! So much more

than the only to say this way doesn't cost anything. I am sure that also you, without being popes,

seeing someone in economic straits you would feel you to say: " Poor guy, you would need really

some more money!". And, if you would not tell it, it would be just for the fear to be beaten, admitted

that who listened to you it was intelligent.

Naturally, every reference to facts and people is purely casual 13 .

Teacher Kempis

Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma, pagine 127 -131:

The ideology of the survival

Survival: problem unquestionably open to the scientific search.

Who doesn't agree and he/she affirms that the scientific search must act in other fields,

keeps in mind that to limit the field of search of the science means to limit the same science. While

the true science must not know aprioristic preclusions. Certainly, on the other hand, if the means of

investigation of the scientific search call them only microscope, it is clear that they are not

appropriate to the purpose.

In other words, extending the problem, who tells you that what you observe it be the

Reality? Does what the man knows, discover, is it the Reality or does what appear of it? I believe

that nobody has difficulty to admit, also without making an act of faith, that given the means

through which the man knows, given the human mechanism of the "to know ", that it founds on the

perception, surely what the man reaches to know it is only an appearance of the Reality.

On the other hand, the knowledge based note on the perception it cannot give that this

result. The cold scientific instrumentation, conceived so that to gain what it escapes the

possibilities penetrative of the man and to turn him/her into collectable signals from one of the five

human senses, is not convincing in absolute that what is observed be the Reality and not instead

an appearance of it. Actually the scientific instrumentation doesn't constitute a growth of the

number of the senses of the man, while only other categories of senses could show a different

reality.

13 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 119-125 ( “La resurrezione della carne“), Mediterranee

19

We must agree, for example, that the thin wake nebula that is observed in a room Wilson is

not the direct observation of the Reality but a phenomenon provoked by that reality hypothesized

by the scientist; or rather a test at least indirect; if proof , therefore, it can be.

There is any test scientifically tried, valid in absolute, showing that reality is that that seems

to be and that it is hypothesized by the observation of what it appears. Not only: philosophically,

above the knowledge, the problem " is if the Reality were knowable "; dilemma, this, on which the

philosophers are broadly as one pleases them up to deny, with the idealism post-Kantian, the

objective existence of the Reality.

Sure, if the Reality, in itself, it doesn't objectively exist, it is not possible to know it.

Now, admitting that the survival exists, it is must be a part of the Reality - not of the

appearance - otherwise the problem of its existence would not subsist; but if the survival does it

part of the Reality that doesn't appear, that escapes that is the investigation of the five human

senses and of the tools built in operation of that senses, then the scientific search, that doesn't

enumerate other possibilities of knowledge that go over those sensory ordinary among its means

of investigation, cannot give then never a certain answer. Therefore it is necessary to watch

carefully, because it could be deduced that the investigation has given negative result, that is the

survival doesn't exist, when instead the means were not had for investigating.

But more than to enter the heart of the problem, we desire to turn to all those that are

interested in the problem of the survival and, to the respect, they have an opinion.

The correct way to believe

You, that believe that the survival is a shown fact and demonstrable, be careful not to build

on this certainty another religion, in the inferior sense of the word.

Be the to believe in certain way to the survival a motive to fraternally run into the men,

because this is the to feel that the certainty in the survival must bring along with it.

Also the to believe in the survival can have some negative aspects: it can, for example, to

make to lose to the man the sense of the importance of the terrestrial life; or to condition him with

the fear of the divine punishment so much to do a tepid of him; worse still, so much to put him in

the hands of those people that of the invisible one, middlemen they say they are for plagiarizing

him/her and to exploit him/her.

The correct way to believe in the survival is that which gives serenity, desire to live, to

operate; it is that makes to now realize himself/herself same, in the present, in the life that is living.

You that you think, instead, that the survival is an uncertain fact, indemonstrable, or that

you don't believe at all to it, you know that in the economy of the things you are as very useful as

the more ardent supporters of the immortality of the being; but not felt you authorized to stamp

your life to the blindest materialism, to the most inclined sensuality, giving importance to the only

material goods and the only physical feelings.

20

The correct way to act

The not to believe in the survival can be a positive fact when it serves to concentrate all the

efforts on the deprived investigation of conditioning taboos, but with the alone intent to improve the

conditions of life of the terrestrial world. The to believe that nothing exists after the death of the

body it can be extremely useful if it pushes the men to unite their strengths, to be on somebody

side in the bad luck that - according to the materialistic interpretation - the case blind and cruel

turns upside down on them; when it pushes them to fill that void, that "nothing" that there would be

in the place of the spirit, with something that gives a meaning to the life, makes it deserving of

being lived, it ransom it to be only a pollution of the matter.

To believe that the man dies with the death of the body it can be positive, when, also

without the hope that life has a transcendental meaning; that is in the conviction to finish existing;

equally he/she succeeds in working for a best world, for those that will come and that there won't

be thankful of their welfare.

The materialistic conception, that that nothing gives to the man to fill his/her loneliness,

becomes the most spiritual conception that is when it makes of the man a being that he/she lives,

that feels, in terms of rectitude also not having the hope to be compensated in future lives. It is in

truth I tell you that the most radiant examples of this true spiritualism are found among the

materialists.

An invitation to the responsibility

To all of you, that believe and you don't believe, we say: you do not be convinced to be the

depositaries of the absolute truth, and therefore you are not intolerant; you are always prepared to

listen who is not of your same opinion. Troubles to whoever he/she believes that there is not

nothing else that can make him/her to revise his/her convictions again; or, worse still, to whoever

he/she believes that there is not anything more important than what he/she knows.

You don't make of your convictions a pretext to distinguish you and to divide you from who doesn't

think it as you. Not join forces with the intent to oppose who is not with you, but you are aware that

every one represents a part of an Whole multiform and that every one is useful and unrepeatable

in the Cosmos.

As in an organism multicellular every organ has one function of its that distinguishes it from

the others and all together they are not fought but they cooperate and they interact for the vital

equilibrium of the same organism, so you don't do of other people's difference in general sense -

that is not only of the difference of opinion - motive for antagonism, of sentence; but you know how

to see in who is different from you a complement of yourselves, because in reality every one

belongs to a Whole inseparable.

You try to represent in the best possible way the part that you have called to represent, so

not to create obstacles to whom wants to recognize in what you believe. To each his/her

21

assignment, and it is important that everyone develops it with the only purpose to enrich the

knowledge of the man and to make it the most adherent possible to the objective Reality.

To all of you, believers and not believers, we wish to be especially in good faith; don't be

carriers of factious and selfish affairs; to awaken the best qualities of whom approach; to have

such a clarity of ideas to constitute a point of reference for the thought of the man; to come there

where you have attended and necessary; to be docile tools of the divine to want that all it drives to

the amplification of the individual conscience; to understand that in reality there are not neither

they must be among you defeated or winning but only people that with their work, with their

commitment, in good faith, they work for ransoming the man from the ignorance, from the fear,

from the dependence and from the exploitation and they do of him a new being of it with a new

marvelous to feel.

Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma, pages 157 -159:

The man and his/her mirrors, the religions of the fear

Question: Which it was and which is it, in reality, the function of the religions?

Answer: The religion has been for the man a shelter and a consolation. It is innate in the man the

need to believe in "something" that it is beyond what the senses they make to perceive. Every

people is always turned, in forms suitable to the common mentality, to an invisible Being

responsible of the good or bad fate of the same people, to beg to him, to be privileged of it, and, in

forms some most advanced of religion, to take comfort and help some of own misfortune.

The religion is understood so, in the common sense as an institution entrusted of to answer

to the innate mystical sense of the man and, at the same time, to a demand of practical character:

the need to beg to a powerful Friend, the need to shelter him in this Friend to have relief of him

and help to his/her own problems, to his/her own adversities.

At the beginning, this talk between the man and the Supreme Being is set in simple terms:

there is neither more and neither less, a sort of bargaining that has everything of the human one,

as speaking about this and that, as it could agree terms with a monarch, with any chief.

Little by little as people evolves, the religion assumes tones some most refined, we say,

and the talk between the man and the Supreme Being, while it is raising itself of tone, it also

refines itself in the exposure of the facts and in the form of the negotiations. The man doesn't

sacrifice anymore then for having a good crop, to be facilitated at his/her own commercial affairs

and so saying, but he/she sacrifices his/her own instincts, his/her own desires to earn him a

reward not so much in the world, where such reward could be transitory, but in a world where the

reward is eternal; and therefore, with little, he/she thinks about purchasing a lot.

Still the religion is understood today as a shelter from all the sufferings that they bother the

man in the life of every day, a consolation for its disappointments, a hope of revenge for the

suffered failures or for the suffered injustices.

22

That is why that teaching given by the religions, not to hurt the proper similar, it is

understood as hope only that who hurts us it will suffer the effect of this evil that has made us

suffer. It is invoked therefore that is done justice there to us; we are convinced to be in the correct

one and, admitted that really we are in the correct one, it wishes us that the divine punishment

strikes reprobates and wicked ones; it is invoked that justice be done forgetting that, in front of the

Supreme Being, we are really all equal ones. In front of the Tall One each of us the other is worth.

The errors committed against the other ones will be yes paid, by us, but when we will be

ready to understand. This is the great mercy of God: the punishment is not an end in itself but it is

a correction, a way to make to understand to the creatures what it must be done and what it must

not be done, a way to cure a deficiency of the individual conscience.

Not sheltered you, therefore, in the mystical sense to invoke justice, not you pray that

justice is done you: this way doing you show that your pride has accused the hit. You think that in

front of the Tall One each of us is equal to the other: that that will be the correction of our errors will

come, for us as for all the creatures, to the opportune moment, when these creatures and

ourselves we will be ready to understand.

You don't do as many orthodox thinkers, or as you say bigots, which are sure that the

punishment of God will strike their enemies. God doesn't have need to defend some principle,

neither one some idea, neither one some religion, because it is not said indeed that this principle,

that this idea and that this religion mirrors the Truth.

God doesn't even defend that that is the Reality. Rather, as I have told you, the effect of the

moved causes fall down to the opportune moment, when the individual is ready to understand, and

it must not be therefore understood as a quick revenge of God towards who has gone against His

principles and His laws.

You try to find in you the truth and pure and crystalline mystical sense abandoning what is

the error of every religion.

Barriers of ideology don't exist, neither least of all of race or civilization; we are really all

equal ones and all beloved ones equally in front of the Tall One.

Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo (The great truths sought by the man) pages 160 -174, Edizioni

Mediterranee - Roma: The errors of the religions

1. The "return" of the Christ

Question: It cannot be said that the Christian principles have become, in this whole time

conscience! Some have said, or they say, rather, that the work of the Christ is nearly bankrupt. As it

is been possible this to happen? What responsibility do they have the Churches ?

Answer: Where it is seen that it has not been the Principle that has transformed the man but the

man that he/she has suited for himself/herself the Principle….

23

It is not certain with to create a religion and to put oneself under its insignia, that is to act

and to think as this religion teaches, that he/she changes his/her own feeling; that in other words

he/she evolves.

What are today's ecclesiasticals? Political men in priestly dresses; rapacious wolves in

dresses of sheep; false prophets.

In spite of this we would fall in the them same error if we didn't objectively recognize that

not all re-enter in this little flattering definition.

Let's bring us to the first Christianity, to the primitive ardor, when hidden they were the

reunions because the fire blazed more intense, when that that seemed the weakness of the

Christians was in reality their strength…

You fears to lose proselytes when value is given to the organization, and value is given to

the organization to manage an authority that, however you call, it is always of temporal nature,

because that spiritual is not conferred certain with an investiture neither it is subordinate to the

affiliation to an any religion.

Christ will rise in the intimate of every man 14 , belongs to the one or to the other religion to

the one or to the other political faith.

The man is called Christian when he/she loves his/her neighbour.

To believe to change the man bathing him or circumcising him is equal to believe to be able

to change him changing him the suit.

But the work of the Christ is not bankrupt. Christ - the Charity, the brotherly love - it will rise

in the intimate of every man and not already for the recognition of an any religious organization

that was named or not after his name… 15 .

2. The Spirit is not born

Question: When does it begins the spiritual birth of the man ?

Answer: Your religion teaches that God creates each time the souls and tries them . That is, this

man been already born spiritually (with all that that we intend with these words) makes a testing.

While we are telling you that the man during the life, in general sense, it is spiritually born.

It is of secondary importance to want to fix the exact point in the evolution of this man that

corresponds to his/her spiritual birth. We say that for spiritual birth we intend the whole process

that happens, during the manifestation of a Cosmos, for every Individuality 16 .

We use " spiritual birth" in general sense, pointing out that is that period during which the

individual 17 is intent to organize his/her vehicles, which once organized they will properly give the

said spiritual birth, or they will properly be used for forming the conscience of the individual.14 Eileen Caddy, Le porte interiori, Messages of December 24th and 25th , Amrita15 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 160-161 (“Il ritorno” del Cristo, Mediterranee16 Cerchio Firenze 77, Per un mondo migliore, page 208 ( Individualità), Mediterranee17 Cerchio Firenze 77, Per un mondo migliore, page 208 (individuo) and page 209 (Centro di coscienza e di espressione), Mediterranee

24

The whole manifestation of a Cosmos 18 has this purpose this root: the spiritual birth.

The Spirit is not born; you don't owe therefore to intend "spiritual birth" as birth of the Spirit.

The Spirit is not created and It is participating of the nature of the Absolute one: It is therefore

complete, immortal, unchangeable, endless, eternal and so on. Spiritual birth means "

manifestation of this Spirit in the conscience of the individual ".

According to your religion, you should believe that the man was spiritually born already

and, in the life, he/she is testing his/her Spirit. It is not this way: you are spiritually being born 19 .

3. The Earth, school of "races" in evolution

Question: It is difficult to ascertain that from the beginning of the times up today really it has been

there a continuous evolution in the behavior and in the conscience of the men; rather, some,

judging from this world, they speak of regress… .

Answer: Looking at the things of the Earth could seem that some evolution has not been there in

the men. The comparisons with the great civilizations of the past seem, and perhaps they are,

unfavourable to today's men.

But it needs to keep in mind that various "races (1) " cyclically follow them on the Earth. It is

not that all the men that were at the beginning of the human incarnations on the Earth are the

same of today; it is not that how many they started their evolution in human form at the beginning

of the Manifestation they are advanced up to today and you are since that time substantially that

same: in such case the doubt on the evolution would be legitimate looking around ourselves. But it

needs to keep in mind, note, the to follow cyclical of different "races": for which when one "race" it

has reached its maximum evolution it leaves the Earth; and before this happens, already at halves

its cycle embodies a new that starts its evolution; not only, but when the first one "race" it has

finished its evolution, from the point in which it doesn't embody more it starts to become incarnate

another "race" still for which is a further lowering of the general level .

Looking at the earth, then it can be said that it is a kind of environment that serves to the

evolution, as a school serves to give education. If one looks from the outside the school, without

realizing of which the individuals are they frequent it, it will say: "But these men never learn, they

are always at school!". And so, looking from the outside, it can be said: " But these men never

evolve!".

(1) Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 162-163, Mediterranee: << The word “race” is here used not in its common meaning biological and anthropologic rather in the esoteric sense to indicate a group of souls, a whole of individualities which are tied among them by or for certain reasons and that in a period of time – beyond fifty thousands years of ours – conducts its own evolution on the planet Earth from the stage of man up to threshold of the superman. Of the intersection of the “races” we speak broadly in the volume Oltre l’illusione from page 185 and further on, Mediterranee >> (Note of the Compiler)

The fact is that they are not the same men, as they are not always the same pupils that

attend the same school.

18 Cerchio Firenze 77, Dizionario del Cerchio, page 65 (Cosmo), Mediterranee19 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, page 161, Mediterranee

25

The evolution is not seen for this reason, and it is not subject to statistic. They see every

now and then some great spirits, and they are those that have begun their evolution different

thousand of years ago; and then men of average evolution are seen; and then men are seen at the

primitive state, not as civilization, but from the spiritual point of view, whose evolution is initiated

from not too long.

The Earth is an admixture of all these races and underraces that alternate them and they

intertwine, it is a kind of gym where us men we come on purpose for evolving and that, when we

have reached a certain evolutionary stadium, we abandon it for continuing the evolution in other

dimension 20 “ .

4. The Soul of the Earth and the expansion of the "to feel"

Question: How does it explains that this moment of crisis almost extends it to the whole world

almost dragging the men?

Answer: In this particular moment, there is a situation of general change and, it seems, of great

confusion. Also the most isolated tribes, also the most hidden primitive societies don't succeed in

holding them isolated, disconnected, and they suffer the consequences of the atmosphere of what

that is producing on the Earth.

It has already been you said that every being incarnate contributes with his/her thoughts,

with his/her life, with the psychic atmosphere that creates around itself, to compose, to constitute a

psychic atmosphere that has called from the occultists "the Soul of the Earth."

It unites all the minds of the men and it addresses them toward what is the common

interest. It is as a sort of temptation something that drags. Naturally are more dragged those that a

will has weaker, that are pushed to do that that the greatest part of the men does .

They explain with it, for an instance, the various fashions, that cannot exclusively be based

on external signs, but that they are justified and they are understood only, note, if it is admitted a

sort of general psychism that drags and it addresses the will of the men. That some contribute to

create is picked up by others that accept the new ideas and they remain subjugates by them.

All this could make to think to a sort of fatalism about something of superior to that the men

push toward determined behaviors; while it is becoming more comprehensible when we calculate

that the purpose of every individual, through his/her incarnations, it is to find inside him/her a to

feel and such a conscience to withstand the stimuli coming from the environment.

The man that within himself/herself has his/her think, a his/her to desire, a his/her to place

himself/herself and to be in the world, a his/her "to feel" he/she is not certainly dragged by the

collective psychic atmosphere. The conscience that he/she has developed through the various

incarnations makes him/her man in the true sense of the word, it intimately makes him/her mature,

so that he/she won't do enslaved of the "Soul of the World", but he/she will be one of that beings

that, they can finally address really from himself/herself same their life.

20 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 162-163, Mediterranee

26

Others instead that they don't have this developed conscience yet, they will follow all the

tides. But the to follow constitutes such a stimulus that, now bumping in this and now in that

experience, it strengthens, their internal being, it strips him/her of certain veils and of certain

wrappers, of it makes to bloom the most intimate and truest essence: in other words it makes yes

that the intimate "to feel" it grows. And also the man that didn't have enough conscience is found,

in such way, to be matured, to have developed and constituted his/her own conscience 21 .

5. The ending of the times and the duties of the man

Question: It always speaks more often of the beginning of one "new age." What does it exactly

mean? Which changes will they be?

Answer: There is a Truth old as the Time but that, being not appropriate to the limitations that the

man has in the first stages of his/her evolution, it has been set aside. The man has it "known" but

not "understood", and for so many centuries a whole of words has remained that has not aroused

in the man any internal discovery.

This is the Truth that speaks of the intimate world of the man and it is the Truth that

predominates, that characterizes the whole epoch that you will live, from now on.

The period called by somebody of the Holy Spirit is the period in which the man will move

his/her own attention from the world around him/her to concentrate it in his/her intimate; and to the

light of this new to observe everything it happens it acquires another meaning: a true and real

meaning because it is the meaning that is behind every thing; it is the Reality of the things

themselves; it is what it is, and not what appears.

This Truth that will characterize the whole epoch is that that, It can finally give us the key

that opens a realization of works to the society, that up to today they have been at times the ideal

of the few, at times the people's utopias.

To speak of the intimate world of the man means to speak of his/her Reality of his/her

essence. And we will never get tired there to stimulate you to that your attention is turned to this

intimate world; to dig under how much it happens in your society, where they reside the true

reasons that push the men to move, to act, to represent all that acts that you can observe or they

are you said for news, that they are not in effects anything else than an external manifestation, at

times deceptive, of what is in the intimate instead, in the secret, in the hidden one.

When the man will have understood that is important to change his/her intimate, he/she will

also have understood that, till to today, everything it has been done (also of what represents the

most elevated level of a society as the humanitarian works, the meetings among the peoples to

improve the mutual relationships, the charities laws and so saying) it is not, in effects that a jail, a

forced walk that the man is wanted to create himself/herself. Him/Her man will discover that,

turning his/her own attention to his/her intimate, trying to find in this intimate of his/her what alone

21 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 163-164, Mediterranee

27

It can stand in for all the institutions of the society, he will have demolished these jails these forced

walks.

Welcome are the accords, the social institutions, the charitable laws and everything that

that you want, but that intimate "to feel" comes above all for which every law, every institution,

every form of assistance that recalls to a duty of the individual, becomes useless.

Above all well comes this intimate to feel of the man that, by oneself, it is able of to bring

the peace among the humanity, It is able of to totally change the human society without need of

reforms or worse still, of revolutions.

You that the gift you have had to know this essential Truth, you know how to apply it, you

do of it your norm of life, since I tell you that it is the intention that that counts; and for intention we

don't intend that something of which is said be paved the Hell; for intention we intend the true

reason that animates a man, the Truth of his/her being; for intention we intend what a lot of times

the man it hides to himself/herself not to appear to his/her same eyes what he/she is in Reality; for

intention we intend, in a few words, the essence and the Reality of the man.

They can your intentions to be, there is no need that I say the tallest and the noblest, but

the most brotherly, loving, thoughtful, towards yours similar. You can speak, to act or also to keep

silent (towards your Reality the action it doesn't matter) always animated by the intention to be

useful to your brothers, by the intention to help them, of draying every tear before the sun dries

them.

The esoteric science, the last Truth, same God and everything how much more elevated

and divine can exist, it is not patrimony of some occult societies, of some secret organization: it is

contained in few words, in this concept, in this Truth that, as so many others, have been always

within everybody reach, but that it is necessary to understand for being able to enjoy of it to be

from it freed.

It is in your intimate the explanation and the reason of every thing; it is in your intimate the

why of yourselves; and it is to this intimate that you owe at first to lend ear, to know, and then to

lend work, for acting 22 .

6.The destination of the evolution for the freed humanityQuestion: How it can be spoken of "new age" today, in a moment in which every value appears in

crisis?

Answer: It seems that every defined value be in crisis; it seems that how much it constituted a

point of reference and support for yesterday's men is overwhelmed; what a destiny of confusion, of

great chaos comes to the humanity.

This situation has a lot of reasons to be, among which that to let to the men to understand

what they have not understood, and another not less important it is that to make to find, to those

22 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, page 164-166, Mediterranee

28

people that are ready to understand, in themselves and only in themselves the strength to have a

straight life, correct, open toward the others.

Till today it is tried in various ways not only to exploit the men but also to hold subjugates

them or with the fear of the Hell or with the fear of a human punishment, according to what type of

powers it is spoken. From now on, the man must release himself/herself from every form of

suggestion, of submission, and he/she must find his/her own individual conscience; he/she must

learn to be man in the true sense of the term without fear of the Hell or of the power that doesn't

humanitarianly act; he/she must learn to walk alone with the alone strength of his/her being and

his/her conscience of man.

This is, naturally, a destination to be reached, but it is the destination that attends today's

humanity.

It is very difficult to know how to walk without crutches, without points of support, without

aids, without helps or supposed such: it is very difficult. If the man had not needed a help, of a

support, of a crutch, ecclesiastical powers and temporal powers would not have existed, each

would have found in himself/herself the correct law. But really for an evolutionary fact the man is,

initially, as mislaid and he/she has need that someone, through the fear, point out him a way to act

and to behave him/her.

The evolution is such now that the man must free from these cages, that have been in

certain measure necessary in the past, but they would be harmful today. It is necessary that its

individual conscience is freed by these influences, from all the conditionings and the impositions

coming from remnants of systems by now old.

You that you listen to us you are in the forefront of this new phase of the evolution that

attends the humanity. You be therefore conscious and deeply aware of yourselves, of what you

must not only do in the respects of the others but also in the respects of your internal being. You

are conscious that life cannot be reduced to a continuous fun, but it must be something more

important, more constructive; and with this I don't intend to say that the fun, that the relaxation is

not in certain measure necessary to bring the equilibrium, to lift from the tiredness and to interrupt

the monotony; but I say that everything must have done with temperance. As there is the time to

amuse and to relax, so it must be the time to devote to the others and the time to devote to his/her

own intimate looking for the true reasons for the actions that they reside in the intimate of each.

I wish you that our communications there are useful to this goal: this is the true purpose for

which they happen 23 .

7. From the Illusions of the world to the knowledge of the Reality:Question: I would want to understand better because it is more important the intention of the

action. To do "the evil", then, in what does it consist really ?

23 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 166-168, Mediterranee

29

Answer: The man is convinced to be able to make some evil to his/her similar but in reality, as you

already knows, nobody unjustly suffers the evil caused him/her by another creature.

The evil that the man does exists only and entirely in his/her to conceive this evil, in his/her

to imagine or to desire: and even if to this to imagine or to desire achieves and follows a malefic

action, it is not that the evil: the evil is what it has been thought, conceived.

In terms of realization, the creatures that suffer or they seem to suffer from this evil

conceived against them, in effects they don't suffer that of the evil from them same conceived in

anterior times.

The whole world of the individual, that seems to be realized in the works and in the external

world, in effects it exists only in the intimate of the man; there only we can say that it has a certain

reality.

That is why it has been said that important it is the intention: because it is in the intimate of

the man the reality of his/her being.

That an action thought, imagined or desired, be then or not be effected, it doesn't have any

importance, because the action exists and it already subsists in the intimate, in the intention of the

man. And it is there that really it exists and it subsists, not in the realization. The realization other is

not that a to complete something that can never fall by mistake on who is innocent.

Other is the appearance, other is the essence.

When we teach you to invoke that soon you can pass from the illusion to the Reality,

repeating ancient mottos of wisdom, this we want to mean: that your acuteness of analysis and

investigation pushes so much beyond to include the same Reality of the things, to include where

and because what falls under the senses, that it is around you and that it can seem you Reality, it

is not in effects that an illusion, that a transitory to appear.

Afar from me, nevertheless, the to say that all of this that is currently in you and around you

it doesn't have any importance: everything is of extreme importance for you, everything it has a

precise sense, an essential because. It is from the illusion that the individual is born and knows the

Reality 24 .

8. The death's fear:

Question: we Know that, after abandoned the physical body, the man subsequently abandons the

astral body and that mental. I would want to know: also for the death of these vehicles the

individual will be afraid, as he/she is afraid of his/her physical death?

Answer: How is the fear of the death born?

The child grows and he realize and noticed that the people, after a while they die; that all

of us we die. In front of him there is this inexorable ghost that makes him/her to think: “I will end, I

will stop also existing me, I won't feel anymore of being. That will it be of me after the death?".

The fear is born really to know that everybody, indiscriminately, one day we will die.

24 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 168-169, Mediterranee

30

When then you are deceased and you realize that death doesn't exist, you cannot be

afraid of the death anymore. When the passing happens from the astral plan to that mental, when

that is we leave the astral body to pass in the mental dimension (and "to pass" it is a way to say

figured, because in effects it is not that we make some trip: we change only possibility of receipt)

this happens in a very simple way, very calm, full of beatitude and of lightness, without any

anguish.

The leaving of the physical body begins instead sometimes in a distressing way, because it

is a to get sick, a to suffer, a to foresee the end of this body having present that dreadful question

(" what it will be of me after the death? ") that even if it has persecuted us the whole life. This

doesn't happen as it regards the abandonment of the astral plan and, as much mental; because

often the corresponding exit of the physical body is suffering, illness, weakening; while as it

regards the astral body, it is a sense of liberation, of lightness, of expansion. As much it is said for

the of the mental body. It does not exists no anguish.

All the fears have the power to take you away from the Reality. All, not only those of the

death. If one, as soon as it starts to have some ratiocination, it started to think about the death, to

the fear of the death, all its life would be conditioned from this terror and he/she would not live its

life that in this key of fear. This would be and it is deleterious.

You don’t be distressed for what can happen you: if it must happen you, to what it serves to

distress ourselves? And if it must not happen you distressed yourself for nothing. You be serene,

live the real problems that life sets you not those that you imagine. " Enough to every day its worry

"; wise evangelical motto 25 .

9. The evolution and the deaths

Question: Why it must exists the death of the physical body, of the astral body and of that mental?

Answer: The death of the physical body, and then of the astral body, and then of the mental body, it

is not a casual event (as nothing is ever done at random), but it is a deep reason to be as it always

allows the individual new experiences with renewed personalities.

If an individual had only a physical body, that lasted hundreds of years, he/she would end

with not to learn anything anymore; the experiences that it would do would always be had by a

same point of view, with a same and an only way to intend, with a same character.

The to grow old, the to die they are essential for the evolution.

When the man succeeded (or he will succeed) in continually to renew himself again - you

mind well continuously – his/her body would not grow old, because it is really the necessity of

experiencing from new points of view and with new personalities that make short-lived, perishable,

deadly the coarsest part of the being.

This is the discourse of the "glory of the body", that it reconnects to the discourse of the

Alchemy. If there were a continuous transformation, a continuous renewal of his/her own thought,

25 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 169-170, Mediterranee

31

of his/her own desires, of his/her own way to feel, then that necessity also to continually renew

would also be performed and satisfied through this new way to exist, for which it would come to fall

the necessity to change vehicles.

But this, you will say, it means to bring again the body to the value that it was given it by the

pagans; thing that it was then completely disowned by the Christianity, which centred in the eternal

life the true life of the man.

As always, from an extreme it passes to the other. And the correct way finally it is found,

the balanced way.

There is no doubt, the body, the physical life has its importance; it cannot be said that the

existence that is conducting be important to come in operation only of that that it will be the life of

the After Life: it would be an error to think and to believe in this.

The life that you are conducting is important not as an end in itself but because it

transforms you, it makes you bud, it starts you toward that marvelous transmutation of which it

speaks, note, the Alchemy of the "Great Work 26 ".

10. The recall of the life

Question: Can it happen that in the space among two incarnations a being fears the return on the

Earth, that he/she doesn't desire to be reincarnated?

Answer: we can ask us if, in the space among two incarnations, an entity fears the "return" on the

Earth, sometimes, or instead the life it is always a great recall.

It is always a great recall, you believe. Now you see the life with human eyes and you are

saturated of certain experiences, tired of certain contrarieties that you would not want to accept

and that they have a load of teaching instead, they bring a message that you can fully appreciate

only subsequently. For this you can think that the to have to revive be, or can be a kind of

sentence, and it can dishearten you the idea to have to begin all over again.

The fact to feel heavy the to have to again return on the Earth can be also due to the fact to

have had a childhood or a youth sad, fatiguing, painful. To this it can associate the thought to

revive to that whole suffering and therefore the desire not to revive anymore.

But this is a vision that is had only by incarnate, because later, when it is abandoned the

body, when it sees the past life again and can be connected it with the others, but mainly with

those that have just brought karma to the last one concluded (and this is important), then so many

things are understood, is understood, the beauty, the wonder that is the gift of the life. And from

that moment it is forgotten what has been the load of suffering and it starts to desire again to

revive and to go on and to evolve 27 .

11. The role of the body

26 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 170-171, Mediterranee27 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 171-172, Mediterranee

32

Question: Is it possible, as does someone affirms, that the evolution also happens without

the need, for the individual, to become incarnate on the Earth?

Answer:

The Teachers have always said that the evolution happens in the physical plan. They exist

some doctrines according to which, instead, the evolution of the being can happen in the Life after

Death also, without the reincarnation in the physical plan.

We must intend us: you know that, after a while, in the evolution of the man, the physical

plan is abandoned. In that point physical life is not more necessary and the evolution continues in

dimensions, very, very thinner, more spiritual. Between to say this, that is true, and to say instead

that there are beings which conduct their evolution without never becoming incarnate the footstep

it is huge. And I can categorically assure you that anybody, I say any being he/she can conduct

his/her evolution if he doesn't initially embody, if it doesn't depart from the physical plan.

It is said, in these doctrines, that the evolution that happens beyond the incarnation in the

physical plan is very longer; not only, but also that the being would be free to choose an evolution

on the Earth, in the matter, or outside of the matter, to follow the briefest way and most fatiguing

rather than the longest and the lightest. Also these are lies! The being as us we intend (call it spirit,

individual or as you want) it draws its origins from the matter, from the mineral, vegetable, animal

and human kingdoms. This way it is for everybody.

There is difference, certain, between the material density of the Earth and the material

density of another planet, of another solar system. This, yes. In another solar system it can be

there a planet that accommodates some forms of life that have as physical matrix a thinner matter,

more rarefied: but always physical matter is, always!

The fact that the beings are in the physical plan to conduct their evolution is not a matter of

choice, but of necessity. For everybody it is so, there is no doubt.

The vision according to which the spirits would be created, brought out by God perfect in

power for then to become it in action, and with the possibility to choose, it is an anthropomorphic

vision of everything that that exists.

Rather than this, seems me very more adherent the vision according to which reality has

shown in pantheistic way. What can we observe with human eyes, simply human, looking at the

nature? We see that it almost proceeds for attempts. In this moment we are simply of the

materialists that look as the life it proceeds on the Earth, as the biological evolution proceeds. The

biologist will tell you, observing what each of you can observe if of it he/she has the desire and the

patience, that the evolution proceeds for attempts.

For an instance: if you set a seed in a ground where it be some rock also, you can observe

that the roots, advancing for attempts, they direct them in a direction, they find the rock and they

divert. This would be to demonstrate it shows that the nature doesn't follow a sketch that avoids it

to have to make some attempts; there is not plan, that is, thanks to which the root it goes directed

where the rocks there are not, but rather it goes almost blindly where they are not the rocks, but

33

rather it goes almost blindly and when one it is found against an obstacle, it diverts for looking for

the correct road.

This small example confirms us, somehow that a more correct vision, in comparison to how

much it was said before, it is that pantheist, that is of a "anything" that it includes everything how

much it exists in the world broadly speaking, note also the physical plan as an accessory as

something that it can be taken or not taken, but as doing part of an Everything and rather

indispensable to the completeness of the Whole.

When we think to an experience that the following day we must do, we can also imagine it

in the least details, and we can think of not to be afraid, to be strong and to act in the best way; but

until to when we don't really do it, that experience, we will never know how we will do it, we will

never live it.

If so it was not, then they would have really reason those that they affirm that the life on the

Earth has a non material alternative, not in the Earth. But since this really it is not, the fact that until

we don't physically live an experience we don't acquire it, it shows us that the physical plan is

something of essential, of absolutely necessary and irreplaceable.

Is it now possible to reach the understanding through the mind, with the reasoning, or it

must do necessarily the direct experience? Yes, it is possible, sometimes, to understand with the

mind; other times it is not possible. For some things there is this possibility to choose, that for other

ones it is not. When it is that there is this possibility of not to have to do the direct experience?

When it follows the teacher Claudio's teaching, when that is we do some introspection, it is tried to

analyze and to understand itselves, our own internal motions, our own intimate intentions. When

we make this type of introspective reasoning with a certain constancy, then we have the possibility

to understand through the mind. But he who don't reflect on what he/she does, he/she can never

avoid the direct experience, that is always painful 28 .

12. You see also other teachings of the Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 (Circle Florence

77) in the pages 175-189 in the book "Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo", Edizioni Mediterranee

– Roma:

page 175: 1. La liberazione dall’irreale (The liberation from the unreal);

pages 175-176: 2. La purificazione del piano astrale (The purification of the astral

plan;

pages 176-177: 3. I paradise del piano mentale (The paradises of the mental plan);

pages 177-179: 4. I plastici del desiderio (The plastic ones of the desire (Note of mine:

The Teacher of the Cerchio Firenze 77 explain that the matter of the astral plan is mouldable by the

thought-wish of man );

pages 179-180: 5. Il mondo degli ideali sognati (The world of the dreamed ideals).

28 Cerchio Firenze 77, Le grandi verità ricercate dall’uomo, pages 172-174, Mediterranee

34

13. You see also the following other teachings of the Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77

( Circle Florence 77) :

o In the book “Oltre il silenzio”, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma

pages 123 -124: “Che cosa insegnare ai figli” (“What to teach to children")

pages 124 -126: “La vostra vita non ci è sconosciuta “ (“Your life there is not

unknown to us";

pages 130 -131: “Desiderio di rinnovamento“ ("Desire of renewal);

pages 131 -132: “Necessità della conoscenza” ("Necessity of the knowledge") ;

pages 132 -133: “ Perché tutto è così” (" Because everything is so");

o In the book “Maestro perché?”, Edizioni Mediterranee - Roma:

pages 237 -252: “Le religioni dell’uomo” (“The man's " religions") ;

pages 253 -259: “Il ritorno di Cristo” ( "The return of Christ ".

Good reading!

I make to notice a strangeness: the spiritual Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 - of

which I have the maximum consideration and admiration - they have spoken of everything, but they

have not said a word on the Islam and on the violence that pervades it, despite that is one of the

great Evils of the world, if not the greatest. known to God since the times of the Genesis 29 . The

Islamic religion is pervaded of violence since a little bit after the death of the prophet Mohammed;

therefore it is the Religion or better the Antichrist's Antireligion, of Lucifer – Satan. The spiritual

Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 have spoken of the Antichrist; this to speak of them it is more

than enough to understand the Islam and not only the Islam 30 .

For me the silence on the Islam of the Teachers of the Cerchio Firenze 77 it is a silence

that a lot of noise does because Satan lords over the Islam, as we have shown in the Elaborate 4

and 4bis of this Catechism; you will find above quoted Elaborates in the folder of the Islam among

the Documents of the Religions.

29 Genesi 16, 11-1230 Cerchio Firenze 77, Dizionario del Cerchio, page 30 (Anticristo), Mediterranee

35