Methodological aspects of medical app evaluation: a systematic review – Pubrica

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Writing and Writing Instruction on ReadingMotivations, recommendations, and features of medical app evaluation: a Systematic Review
An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group:  www.pubrica.com Email: [email protected]
In brief
(in the future, "apps").
Some of these applications aren't very useful, and they
don't have a lot of material, so they don't benefit end-
users as much as they should.
This study aims to examine and analyse papers related to
medical app evaluation across various platforms.
It also attempted to explore academic problems, motives,
and suggestions linked to quality evaluations and current
best practices in Systematic Review Writing.
IN BRIEF
recent years.
Their everyday usage has become established in the lives of
people worldwide, with estimates putting the number of
app users at about 2.5 billion in 2019.
Applications built to run on mobile devices are referred to
as mobile apps.
Because of the rapid adoption of smartphones and other benefits, such as their
efficacy, accessibility, and convenience, not only for end-users but also for
developers who are driven to produce apps rather than web-based services to
Conducting a Systematic Review.
The quantity and popularity of these applications are rapidly growing. Because
of their popularity, apps include a wide range of content, including business,
education, medical, gaming, sports, and more.
To evaluate app content, a systematic or quality evaluation is required.
Such evaluations need considerably more than just knowledge and expertise, and
they are frequently time-consuming and technically challenging.
This is a fragmented process that sometimes necessitates continuous subjectivity.
The slow-paced scientific technique for app review, the lack of features that
may assist discover potentially beneficial applications, and the shortage of
available apps that have been empirically examined are all barriers to app quality
evaluations.
Pursuing this assessment domain was urged for various reasons, including the
quality of information in an app or information for an app, which would assist in
creating a quality-based app and the consideration of strategies to ensure the
app's quality.
Apps that require quality control and validation are also called for in the
literature.
drawn to their recognised professions.
Some people are inspired by the importance of themes
such as hot trends in research, new ideas, and special
issues in scientific journals.
or making any contribution.
interest in Systematic App Assessment over mobile
screening process in Clinical Trial Systematic Review
Services.
This choice was judged the best for identifying the most
recent and related items pertinent to the review's assigned
confront are issues and concerns.
Whether or not a challenge is directly connected to a
researcher's field of interest or has an indirect influence, it
necessitates further efforts to address it and progress
science in that domain.
for systematic evaluation of mobile applications, and they
are grouped based on similar qualities to make them easier
to grasp for future researchers and studies.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Much information was gathered, and a researcher's
experience increased. Furthermore, one of the essential
aims for academicians and researchers is to mitigate such
concerns and determine what kind of academic message
should be delivered to other researchers on that subject.
Contd...
proposing future mobile app evaluation studies.
The subsection recognises three critical points: content,
research, and development, and provides good suggestions
to each.
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS
studies on mobile applications and their evaluation.
Various elements are examined and recognised to
enlighten future scholars in this field who have used similar
settings and methodologies in Writing A Systematic Review.
continues to rise. However, despite the relevance of the
prior debate, it still requires further assessment measures.
Mobile app assessment is considered an emerging and
essential topic.
survey and classification of mobile app evaluation and
techniques.
Contd...
In the literature, several patterns have been discovered, and the articles
that have been recognised have been divided into two groups.
Challenges, reasons, and recommendations fall under the first category
related to dialogue.
The second category is concerned with the methodological elements of
app evaluation.
Such contributions would help in a better understanding and progression
of the subject. Then, different applications were focused on other app
evaluation purposes, and various academics were involved.
ABOUT PUBRICA
Scientific and medical research papers that can be
indispensable tools to the practitioner/authors.
Pubrica Medical Writers Help you write and edit the
introduction by introducing the reader to the
shortcomings or empty spaces in the identified research
field.
narrow topic to state the hypothesis.
Tang AK. A systematic literature review and analysis on mobile apps in m-commerce: implications for future research. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2019;37:100885.
Alamoodi, A.H., Garfan, S., Zaidan, B.B. et al. A systematic review into the assessment of medical apps: motivations, challenges, recommendations and methodological aspect. Health Technol. 10, 1045–1061 (2020).
+44 1618186353 UNITED KINGDOM