SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Systematic Review Service For Scientific Research Paper - Pubrica
Oct 13, 2021
A systematic review is intended to summarise the
findings of existing research and to give a high level of evidence-based
findings on the effectiveness of treatments.
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/2YLsSVc
Why Pubrica?
When you order our services, Plagiarism free | on
Time | outstanding customer support | Unlimited Revisions support | High-quality
Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us :
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44 1618186353
Welcome message from author
A systematic review is intended to summarise the findings of existing research and to give a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of treatments.
Transcript
Frosted Green and White Wellness Medical PresentationPublication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
A systematic review is designed to summarise the results of available studies and provides a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of interventions.
Our experts can handle any type of research, whether you need systematic review based on controlled clinical trials or review based on observational study designs or community (e.g. psychology) intervention? Our experts at Pubrica, perform a rigorous systematic review by following multi-step process, which includes
Developing a detailed review protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and registering the protocol at different registries such as The Campbell Collaboration, The Cochrane Collaboration, OSF Preregistration, SYREAF- systematic reviews for animals and food, Research Registry, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PROSPERO.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
A systematic literature search of multiple databases (includes PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) in finding relevant references that further requires extensive search and study.
A number of other electronic databases and bibliographic sources will also be searched. Sources we posit for use for the project include:
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Scientific literature databases as described above and others Cochrane Library Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) NHS Economic Evaluation database Material referenced in Publications obtained in the course of research on the topic International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) documents Clinical trials databases, including clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EU), clinicaltrials.gov (US) and others.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
However, using multiple databases to search relevant studies is laborious and time-consuming so that a well-designed search strategy will be developed.
Meticulous study identification using a variety of search terms, checking for a clear outcome (primary and secondary)
Systematic data abstraction, by at least two sets of investigators independently,
Risk of bias assessment with the use of existing different assessment tools (e.g. STROBE). For example, allocation concealment (selection bias), incomplete outcome data addressed (attrition bias), and selective reporting (reporting bias).
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Thoughtful quantitative synthesis through meta-analysis where relevant. Besides informing guidelines, credible systematic reviews and quality of evidence assessment can help identify key knowledge gaps for future studies.
We can help you with the most used qualitative systematic review, as well as, quantitative, health policy and management information and meta-analysis.
Our systematic review at Pubrica is more structured as at every stage of writing, and we ensure to critically check the rigour using standard methodological checklists such as PRISMA, CASP, AMSTAR, and ARIF etc., based on the checklist provided.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Formulate the research question Search for studies Selection of studies Data collection Methodological quality assessment Methods used for presenting results Findings are interpreted. The time required for producing a quality systematic review
Further, the general structure is presented as follows:
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contact Us Work With Us UK: +44-7424810299
[email protected]
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
A systematic review is designed to summarise the results of available studies and provides a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of interventions.
Our experts can handle any type of research, whether you need systematic review based on controlled clinical trials or review based on observational study designs or community (e.g. psychology) intervention? Our experts at Pubrica, perform a rigorous systematic review by following multi-step process, which includes
Developing a detailed review protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and registering the protocol at different registries such as The Campbell Collaboration, The Cochrane Collaboration, OSF Preregistration, SYREAF- systematic reviews for animals and food, Research Registry, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PROSPERO.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
A systematic literature search of multiple databases (includes PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) in finding relevant references that further requires extensive search and study.
A number of other electronic databases and bibliographic sources will also be searched. Sources we posit for use for the project include:
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Scientific literature databases as described above and others Cochrane Library Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) NHS Economic Evaluation database Material referenced in Publications obtained in the course of research on the topic International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) documents Clinical trials databases, including clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EU), clinicaltrials.gov (US) and others.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
However, using multiple databases to search relevant studies is laborious and time-consuming so that a well-designed search strategy will be developed.
Meticulous study identification using a variety of search terms, checking for a clear outcome (primary and secondary)
Systematic data abstraction, by at least two sets of investigators independently,
Risk of bias assessment with the use of existing different assessment tools (e.g. STROBE). For example, allocation concealment (selection bias), incomplete outcome data addressed (attrition bias), and selective reporting (reporting bias).
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Thoughtful quantitative synthesis through meta-analysis where relevant. Besides informing guidelines, credible systematic reviews and quality of evidence assessment can help identify key knowledge gaps for future studies.
We can help you with the most used qualitative systematic review, as well as, quantitative, health policy and management information and meta-analysis.
Our systematic review at Pubrica is more structured as at every stage of writing, and we ensure to critically check the rigour using standard methodological checklists such as PRISMA, CASP, AMSTAR, and ARIF etc., based on the checklist provided.
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contd...
Formulate the research question Search for studies Selection of studies Data collection Methodological quality assessment Methods used for presenting results Findings are interpreted. The time required for producing a quality systematic review
Further, the general structure is presented as follows:
Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing
Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved
Contact Us Work With Us UK: +44-7424810299
[email protected]
Related Documents
