Top Banner
DZȂƷ Ǟƥơǂdzơ Ņȁƾdzơ ȄǬƬǴŭơ : ǝƢǘǫ ƱǁƢƻ ƨȈǟƢǼǐdzơ ƩƢLjLJƚǸǴdz ƨȈLjǧƢǼƬdzơ ƩƢȈƴȈƫơǂƬLJȏơȁ ƨLjǧƢǼŭơ ƨȈƥǂǠdzơ DZȁƾdzơ Ŀ ƩƢǫȁǂƄơ ŦœřŪƕŒ : ťƆšƆ žƚż ťŵœŪƆ ŦœřŪŊ / ŻƄŬƃŒ ŗŶƆœŞ ƑƈƍŧřƂƃƗŒ fr . voila @ fellag . mohamed ŻƄŬƃŒ ¾ŒƍŞƃŒ ŻřœƌƃŒ : 00962785218270 ŗƒŪżœƈřƃŒ ŖŨƒƆƃŒ žƒƀšř Ƒż œƋŧƒśŋřƍ ŗżŧŶƆƃŒ ŖŧŒťō ŘœƒƄƆŵ œŮřƙŒ ŗŵƍƆŞƆƃ ŗƃœš ŗŪŒŧť ŗƒƈťŧƕŒ Řƙ . ŭŤƄƆ řŬŔũŧƅŔ ƋŨƍ ŽŧƎś Ƒƅŏ ŽũŸśƅŔ ƑƆŷ Ɛŧƈ ŕƔƆƈŷ ũƔŝōś Ś řžũŸƈƅŔ ŘũŔŧŏ ŘŧœŕŬƅŔ ŘŪƔƈƅŔ ƀƔƂţś Ɠž řƔŬžŕƊśƅŔ Ɖƈ řŬŔũŧƅŔ řƊƔŷ ŚƊƏƄś ) 84 ( Řŧũſƈ řœƔƎƅŔ Ɖƈ řƔũŔŧƙŔ Ɠž řƄũŮ ƛŕŰśƛŔ řŷƏƈŠƈ Ś řƔƊŧũƗŔ Ũƍ ũŕŗśŦŔ Ƈś ŧƁƏ ũŝƗŔ Ŕ ũŔŧţƊƛŔ ¿ƔƆţś ƇŔŧŦśŬŕŗ ƒŧŕţƗŔ ƉƔŕŗśƅŔ ¿ƔƆţśƏ ųƔŬŗƅŔ . ŧƏŠƏ Ƒƅŏ şœŕśƊƅŔ ŚũŕŮŌ ¿ŕŷ ũƔŝōś ƏƍƏ ¿ƂśŬƈƅŔ ũƔżśƈƅŔ ƉƔŗ řžũŸƈƅŔ ŘũŔŧŏ ŚŕƔƆƈŷ ũƔżśƈƅŔ ƉƔŗƏ ŶŗŕśƅŔ řƔŬžŕƊśƅŔ ŘŪƔƈƅŔ Ɠž řƔœŕŰţŏ řƅƛŧ ŚŔŨ ƀƏũž ŧƏŠƏ Ƒƅŏ ŕŲƔŌ şœŕśƊƅŔ ŚũŕŮŌ ŕƈƄ ŕƔƆƈŷ ũƔŝōś Ś řžũŸƈƅŔ ŘũŔŧŏ ŘŧœŕŬƅŔ Ŕ ƀƔƂţś Ɠž řƔŬžŕƊśƅŔ ŘŪƔƈƅ Ƒƅŏ ƐŪŸś řƈŧŦƅŔ Řŧƈ ƀƏũž ƃŕƊƍ ƉƄś Ƈƅ ƉƔţ Ɠž ƐŪŸś Ɔƅ ƓſƔŴƏƅŔ ƑƈŬƈ řŬŔũŧ Ŷƈ ƀſśś ƃƅŨŗ ƓƍƏ (Juran and Mercedes, 2006) řŬŔũŧƏ (Atul and Jonson, 2002) ŗƒšœřŽƆƃŒ ŘœƆƄƂƃŒ : řƔƊŧũƗŔ ŚƛŕŰśƛŔ řŷƏƈŠƈ řƔŬžŕƊśƅŔ ŘŪƔƈƅŔ řžũŸƈƅŔ ŘũŔŧŏ . Abstract This research aims to study the effect of knowledge management on achieving competitive advantage, study sample consisted of (84) Single from the management board at Jordan Telecom Group, The data were analyzed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), depending on the simple regression, analysis of variance. The results of the study assured that there’s an effect for the knowledge management on achieving competitive advantage at Jordan Telecom Group. There are statistically significant differences between knowledge management on achieving competitive advantage according to experience , but there are no differences to functions. The results of this study are consistent with the study of (Juran and Mercedes, 2006), and study (Atul and Jonson, 2002) Key words: knowledge management, competitive advantage, Jordan Telecom Group.
21

عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

Jul 21, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

:

:

/

[email protected]

:00962785218270

.

)84 (

.

(Juran and Mercedes, 2006)(Atul and Jonson, 2002)

:.Abstract This research aims to study the effect of knowledge management on achieving competitive

advantage, study sample consisted of (84) Single from the management board at Jordan

Telecom Group, The data were analyzed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences

(SPSS), depending on the simple regression, analysis of variance.

The results of the study assured that there’s an effect for the knowledge management on

achieving competitive advantage at Jordan Telecom Group. There are statistically significant

differences between knowledge management on achieving competitive advantage according

to experience , but there are no differences to functions. The results of this study are

consistent with the study of (Juran and Mercedes, 2006), and study (Atul and Jonson, 2002)

Key words: knowledge management, competitive advantage, Jordan Telecom Group.

Page 2: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

2

.

.

.

.

.

.

:

)2005 :11(

)2000 :27(.)2004 :709 (

.

.

:

:

Page 3: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

3

1.

2.

3.

)

(

:

1..

2..

3.

.

4..

:

.:

:

.

:

)

(

.

:

)2008 ()2007 (

:

:

.

Page 4: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

4

:

.

)1(

:

:

:

H0 : ) 0.05 (

.

:

:

H0 : ) 0.05 (

.

:

Page 5: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

5

H0 : ) 0.05 (

.

:

H0 : ) 0.05 (

.

:

H0 :) 0.05 (

)

.(

:

•:(Knowledge)

(Sivan, 2001: 182)

.)1999 :125(

.

"

".

•(Knowledge Management):

(Hackett, 2003: 6)

.

:"

".

•:

1.:

Page 6: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

6

)2005 :31("

".

"

1

13".

2.:

)2005 :31 ("

".

"

1424".

3.:

)2005 :32 (

.

"

2534".

•:

.

)2006 :40.(

1. :

3539.

2.:

4043.

3.:

:

4448.

Page 7: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

7

4.:

4952.

5.:

5357.

•:

1996

08/10/1997 .530

1997

.2006

2007

Orange.

.

.

)2006 :2(.

1-1:

Page 8: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

8

,

& Takeuchi)Nonake( (Daft)

)2005 :11(.

)Daft, 2001: 134.(

1-2:

.,

.

"

)

2005 :35.(

1-3 :

)2004:96(

.

•.

•,.

•,

.

•.

1-4:

Page 9: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

9

)2008 :10(:

•.

•.

•.

•)(

.

•.

1-5:

:(Survary, 2005 : 96)

1-5-1:

.

1-5-2 :

.

1-5-3:

.

1-5-4:

.

2-1:

.

(Porter, 2007:96)

.)2001 :104 (

Page 10: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

10

.

2-2:

.

)1998 :79 .(

:

1-.

2-.

3-) .2005 :141(

2-3::

2-3-1:

:

.

2-3-2:

:

.)2007 :87.(

2-4:

.

Page 11: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

11

.

).2001 :143(.

3-:

(Juran and Mercedes, 2006)

:

.

(Atul and Jonson, 2002)

:

.

.

:

.

.

)96 ()84 ()87.5%.(

:

:

1-.

2-.

3-

.

Page 12: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

12

4-)Simple Regression (

.

5-)ANOVA () (

)SPSS.(

:

)02 ()60 (

)71.4(%.

30

)75 ()89.4(%

.

)01 (

)67(%

.)10

()79.9(%

.)37.9.(%

:

.

:

:) :()5 (

.

:

)34 (.

:)23 (

.)01(

Page 13: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

13

:

)()80.7 (%

.

:

:

:

.

)02(

71.4% 60

28.6% 24

2.3% 2 2225

8.3% 7 2630

46.4% 39 3140

43% 36 40

8.5% 7 5

11.6% 10 610

79.9% 67 10

23.7% 20

67% 56

7.1% 6

2.2% 2

30.8% 26

31.3% 27

37.9% 31

Page 14: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

14

013,19,81023,13,86033.301,20043,45,50053,74,44063,75,43073,50,81083.41,45093.05,43103,32,47113,48,46123,02,01133,15,21

3.34,55

143,31,46

153,30,45163,01,01173,44,49183,46,50193,44,49203,75,43213,44,49223,44,48233,45,49243,31,46

3.39.43

253,31,46263,30,46273,56,49283,55,49293,54,5030 3,91,27313,69,46323,62,47333,65,4834

3,25,43

3.53.45

3.42.45

Page 15: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

15

:

:)3.53. (

:)3.39.(

:)3.34.(

)3.42 .(

.

:

:

H0: ) 0.05 (

.

)03(

.

)f()f(

)R2()R(

,9903,330149.6322.7180.000

,17680,002

1,16683

0.8490.921

*)0.05(

)03(

)f()149.632 ()2.718 (

)380 ()0.05 (

.

(f))0.000()0.05 (.

Page 16: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

16

)0.849=R2(

) (84.9 %). (

:

:

H0:) 0.05 (

.

)04(

.

)T()T( H0

)R2()R(

4.4511.990.0000.3990.446

*)0.05(

)04()T()1.99 (

)0.446(

(T))0.000()0.05 (.

)0.399=R2 (

) (39.9 %).(

:

H0: ) 0.05 (

.

)05(

)T()T( H0

)R2()R(

7.2110.0000.3880.623

*)0.05(

)05()T ()1.99 (

Page 17: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

17

)0.623(

(T))0.000()0.05 (.

)0.388=R2 ()

(38.8 %).(

:

H0:) 0.05 (

.

)06(

)T()T( H0

)R2()R(

11.4460.0000.6150.784

*)0.05(

)07()T ()1.99 (

)0.784(

(T))0.000()0.05 (.

)0.615=R2 ()

(61.5 %).(

:

H0:) 0.05 (

)

.(

)07 (

)f ((0.05))f (

)3,381 ()0.009 .(

) 0.05 (

Page 18: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

18

.

)07 (

.

)07(

(ANOVA)

).(

)f(

,1282,046

1,55081,019

1,67883

3,381,009

,0092,004

1,63281,020

1,64183

,220,803

*)0.05(

:

:

:

.

.

:

::

-:

• ) 0.05 (

.

Page 19: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

19

)0.849=R2 () (

84.9 %). (

•) 0.05 (

.)0.399=R2 (

) (

39.9 %).(

• ) 0.05 (

.)0.388=R2 (

) (

38.8 %).(

•) 0.05 (

.)0.615=R2 (

) (

61.5 %).(

-:

.

:

:

1-) (

.

2-

.

3-)

Page 20: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

20

4-

)(

.

5-

.

:

)2005( :.

)2005( :.

)2007(

.

)2005()33(.

)2008( "

9 2.

)2000( :.

)1999( :.

)2004(:.

)2008(

.

)2006(

:.

)2005(

.

)2002(

.

.

)2004( :.

)1998( :.

)2001( :.

)2008( :

.

Page 21: عمليات ادارة المعرفة وتاثير

21

- Atual,G. & Janson. M (2002), Creating competitive advantage bu effectively managing

knowledge, Journal of knowledge management, vol 06,no 02.

- Hackett, B. (2003) Beyond Knowledge: New Ways to Work and learn. The Conference

Board.

- Daft, R.( 2001), Organization Theory and Design, 7th ed, Jack W. Calhoun, New York.

- Juan, C. & Merceds (2006), Strategic knowledge transfer and its implication for competitive

advantage, Journal of knowledge management, vol 10,no 04.

- Peter, S. (2000), Systemic Knowledge Management, Managing Organizational Asset for

Conpetitive, Vandage WWW. Article. Com.

- Porter, M.( 1985) , Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior

Performance, The Free Press, New York, NY.

- Sivan ,Y.( 2001) , Nine Keys To Acknowledge infrastructure : A proposed Analytic

Framework For Organizational Knowledge management , center For Information Policy

research , Harvard University .

- Survary, M. (2005) Knowledge Management and Competition in Consulting Industry.

Management Review, Vol. 41, No2.

- www.jordantelecomgroup.jo