This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Acton v Blundell152 E.R. 1223; (1843) 12 M. & W. 324Ex Ct
Peachey v Rowland138 E.R. 1167; (1853) 13 C.B. 182CCP
Hodgkinson v Ennor122 E.R. 446; (1863) 4 B. & S. 229KB
Cases Citing This Case
consideredCammidge v Young[1997] C.L.Y. 3803CC (Birmingham)
appliedDunne v North Western Gas Board[1964] 2 Q.B. 806; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 164; [1963] 3 All E.R. 916; 62 L.G.R. 197; (1963) 107 S.J. 890CA
appliedCambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc[1993] Env. L.R. 116; Times, October 23, 1991QBD
consideredMitchell v Mason(1966) 10 W.I.R. 26CA
consideredRead v J Lyons & Co Ltd[1947] A.C. 156; [1946] 2 All E.R. 471; (1947) 80 Ll. L. Rep. 1; (1946) 62 T.L.R. 646; [1947] L.J.R. 39; 175L.T. 413HL
appliedWeisler, Weisler and Seaboard Enterprises v District of North Vancouver, Delves, British Columbia Elec-tric Co and Christie(1959) 17 D.L.R. (2d) 319
consideredBenning v Wong(1969) 43 A.L.J.R. 467HC (Aus)
consideredPearson v North Western Gas Board[1968] 2 All E.R. 669Assizes (Manchester)
consideredJ Doltis Ltd v Isaac Braithwaite & Sons (Engineers) Ltd[1957] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 522QBD
referred toHolderness v Goslin[1975] 2 N.Z.L.R. 46
appliedHalsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd[1961] 1 W.L.R. 683; [1961] 2 All E.R. 145; (1961) 105 S.J. 209QBD
appliedHome Brewery Co v William Davis & Co (Leicester)[1987] Q.B. 339; [1987] 2 W.L.R. 117; [1987] 1 All E.R. 637; (1987) 84 L.S.G. 657; (1987) 131 S.J. 102;Times, August 13, 1986QBD
consideredHome Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd[1970] A.C. 1004; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 1140; [1970] 2 All E.R. 294; [1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 453; (1970) 114 S.J. 375HL
appliedBarrette v Franki Compressed Pile Co of Canada[1955] 2 D.L.R. 665CJ (Gen Div) (Ont)
consideredTransco Plc v Stockport MBC[2003] UKHL 61; [2004] 2 A.C. 1; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 1467; [2004] 1 All E.R. 589; 91 Con. L.R. 28; [2004] Env.L.R. 24; [2003] 48 E.G. 127 (C.S.); (2003) 153 N.L.J. 1791; (2003) 147 S.J.L.B. 1367; [2003] N.P.C. 143;[2004] 1 P. & C.R. DG12; Times, November 20, 2003; Independent, November 25, 2003; Official TranscriptHL
consideredSochacki v Sas[1947] 1 All E.R. 344KBD
appliedHeintzman & Co v Hashman Construction(1972) 32 D.L.R. (3d) 622Sup Ct (Alta)
consideredRHM Bakeries (Scotland) Ltd v Strathclyde RC1985 S.C. (H.L.) 17; 1985 S.L.T. 214; Times, January 29, 1985HL
appliedCrown River Cruises Ltd v Kimbolton Fireworks Ltd[1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 533; [1996] C.L.C. 1214; Times, March 6, 1996QBD (Comm)
appliedLMS International Ltd v Styrene Packaging & Insulation Ltd[2005] EWHC 2065 (TCC); [2006] T.C.L.R. 6; Official TranscriptQBD (TCC)
consideredPride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd v British Celanese Ltd[1952] 1 All E.R. 1326; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 1013; 50 L.G.R. 488; [1952] W.N. 227; (1952) 96 S.J. 263Ch D
distinguishedLeakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty[1980] Q.B. 485; [1980] 2 W.L.R. 65; [1980] 1 All E.R. 17; 78 L.G.R. 100; (1979) 123 S.J. 606CA (Civ Div)
Blake v Barking and Dagenham LBC(1998) 30 H.L.R. 963; [1999] P.N.L.R. 171; [1996] E.G. 145 (C.S.); [1996] N.P.C. 134; Times, November 1,1996QBD
Westhoughton Coal and Cannel Co Ltd v Wigan Coal Corp Ltd[1939] Ch. 393Ch D
Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)[2003] EWCA Civ 65; [2003] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 327; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 325; (2003)100(13) L.S.G. 27; [2003] Env. L.R. D11; Times, February 27, 2003; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd (The Esso Bernicia)[1989] A.C. 643; [1988] 3 W.L.R. 730; [1989] 1 All E.R. 37; [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 8; 1988 S.L.T. 874; (1988)
Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council[2001] UKHL 55; [2002] 1 A.C. 321; [2001] 3 W.L.R. 1007; [2001] 4 All E.R. 737; [2002] B.L.R. 25; [2002]T.C.L.R. 8; 79 Con. L.R. 39; [2002] B.L.G.R. 1; [2001] 44 E.G. 150 (C.S.); (2001) 98(45) L.S.G. 26; (2001) 151N.L.J. 1611; (2001) 145 S.J.L.B. 259; [2001] N.P.C. 151; Times, October 26, 2001; Independent, December 17,2001; Official TranscriptHL
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No.6)[2002] UKHL 19; [2002] 2 A.C. 883; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353; [2002] 3 All E.R. 209; [2002] 1 All E.R. (Comm)843; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 183; Times, May 21, 2002; Official TranscriptHL
Jan De Nul (UK) Ltd v Axa Royale Belge SA (formerly NV Royale Belge)[2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 700; [2001] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 327; Official TranscriptQBD (Comm)
Blue Circle Industries Plc v Ministry of Defence[1999] Ch. 289; [1999] 2 W.L.R. 295; [1998] 3 All E.R. 385; [1999] Env. L.R. 22; [1998] E.G. 93 (C.S.); [1998]N.P.C. 100; Times, June 16, 1998CA (Civ Div)
Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd (Preliminary Issues)[2004] EWHC 2197 (Comm); [2005] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 669; [2005] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 494; [2005] 2 C.L.C. 617;[2005] B.L.R. 47; 98 Con. L.R. 21; [2005] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 74; [2004] 42 E.G. 160 (C.S.); Official TranscriptQBD (Comm)
Montreal Transportation Co Ltd v King, The(1926) 24 Ll. L. Rep. 242PC (Can)
Fletcher v Bealey(1885) L.R. 28 Ch. D. 688Ch D
Dixon v Metropolitan Board of Works(1880-81) L.R. 7 Q.B.D. 418QBD
News Group Newspapers Ltd v Society of Graphical and Allied Trades (SOGAT) 1982[1987] I.C.R. 181; [1986] I.R.L.R. 337; (1986) 136 N.L.J. 893; Times, August 1, 1986QBD
Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electricity Board[1965] Ch. 436; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 349; [1965] 1 All E.R. 264; (1965) 109 S.J. 12Ch D
Graigola Merthyr Co Ltd v Swansea Corp[1928] Ch. 31Ch D
Cheater v Cater[1918] 1 K.B. 247CA
Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Co Ltd[1923] 1 K.B. 539KBD
Radstock Cooperative & Industrial Society v Norton-Radstock Urban DC[1967] Ch. 1094; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 588; [1967] 2 All E.R. 812; (1967) 131 J.P. 387; 65 L.G.R. 518Ch D
Fletcher v Smith(1871-72) L.R. 7 Ex. 305; (1869-72) L.R. 2 P. & D. 20Ex Ct
Countess of Rothes v Kirkcaldy and Dysart Waterworks Commissioners(1881-82) L.R. 7 App. Cas. 694; (1882) 9 R. (H.L.) 108HL
Lupton (Inspector of Taxes) v FA & AB Ltd[1972] A.C. 634; [1971] 3 W.L.R. 670; [1971] 3 All E.R. 948; 47 T.C. 580; [1971] T.R. 284; (1971) 115 S.J.849HL
Shipsey v British & South American Steam Navigation Co(1936) 54 Ll. L. Rep. 188Sup Ct (Irl)
Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)[2002] EWHC 1095 (Admlty); [2002] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 416; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 123; [2003] Env. L.R. 8;[2003] Env. L.R. D2; Official TranscriptQBD (Admlty)
Rainham Chemical Works Ltd (In Liquidation) v Belvedere Fish Guano Co Ltd[1921] 2 A.C. 465HL
Sturge v Hackett[1962] 1 W.L.R. 1257; [1962] 3 All E.R. 166; [1962] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 626; (1962) 106 S.J. 568CA
Midwood & Co v Manchester Corp[1905] 2 K.B. 597CA
Bartlett v Tottenham[1932] 1 Ch. 114Ch D
Dell v Chesham Urban DC[1921] 3 K.B. 427KBD
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority[1983] 3 W.L.R. 105; [1983] 1 All E.R. 892; 81 L.G.R. 599; (1983) 127 S.J. 426; Times, December 9, 1982QBD
Eastern and South African Telegraph Co Ltd v Cape Town Tramway Cos Ltd[1902] A.C. 381PC (Cape)
Shirvell v Hackwood Estates Co Ltd[1938] 2 K.B. 577CA
Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd (No.1)[1957] 2 Q.B. 169; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 770; [1957] 1 All E.R. 894; (1957) 121 J.P. 323; 55 L.G.R. 208; (1957) 101S.J. 338CA
Holliday v Wakefield Borough(1888) L.R. 20 Q.B.D. 699CA
Kiddle v City Business Properties Ltd[1942] 1 K.B. 269KBD
Foster v Warblington Urban DC[1906] 1 K.B. 648CA
Greenock Corp v Caledonian Railway Co[1917] A.C. 556; 1917 S.C. (H.L.) 56; 1917 2 S.L.T. 67HL
Fletcher v Smith(1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 781HL
Knott v London CC[1934] 1 K.B. 126CA
Wing v London General Omnibus Co[1909] 2 K.B. 652CA
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd v British Celanese Ltd[1953] Ch. 149; [1953] 2 W.L.R. 58; [1953] 1 All E.R. 179; (1953) 117 J.P. 52; 51 L.G.R. 121; (1953) 97 S.J.28CA
Postmaster General v Liverpool Corp(1921) 9 Ll. L. Rep. 351KBD
Anderson v Oppenheimer(1879-80) L.R. 5 Q.B.D. 602CA
Snow v Whitehead(1884) L.R. 27 Ch. D. 588Ch D
Phillimore v Watford Rural DC[1913] 2 Ch. 434Ch D
Holliday v Wakefield Borough[1891] A.C. 81HL
Noble v Harrison[1926] 2 K.B. 332; 49 A.L.R. 833KBD
Quebec Railway Light Heat and Power Co Ltd v Vandry[1920] A.C. 662PC (Can)
Malone v Laskey[1907] 2 K.B. 141CA
North Western Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee & Accident Co Ltd[1936] A.C. 108; (1935) 53 Ll. L. Rep. 67; (1935) 53 Ll. L. Rep. 67; [1935] W.N. 176PC (Can)
Howard v Furness-Houlder Argentine Lines Ltd(1936) 55 Ll. L. Rep. 121KBD
Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No.2)[2000] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 1; [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 218; [2000] Lloyd's Rep. Bank. 40; [2000] C.L.C. 133;Times, March 15, 2000; Independent, December 9, 1999; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)
Societe Francaise Bunge SA v Belcan NV (The Federal Huron)[1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 288Sup Ct (PNG)
Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd[2002] EWHC 1131 (TCC); [2002] 3 All E.R. 574; 86 Con. L.R. 74; [2002] N.P.C. 17; Official TranscriptQBD (TCC)
John Young & Co v Bankier Distillery Co[1893] A.C. 691; (1893) 1 S.L.T. 204HL
West Cumberland Iron & Steel Co v Kenyon(1877) L.R. 6 Ch. D. 773Ch D
Baker v Snell[1908] 2 K.B. 825CA
Great Western Railway Co v Owners of the SS Mostyn[1928] A.C. 57; (1927-28) 29 Ll. L. Rep. 293HL
Job Edwards Ltd v Birmingham Navigations Proprietors[1924] 1 K.B. 341CA
Green v Lord Somerleyton[2003] EWCA Civ 198; [2004] 1 P. & C.R. 33; [2003] 11 E.G. 152 (C.S.); (2003) 100(10) L.S.G. 31; [2003]N.P.C. 29; Official TranscriptCA (Civ Div)
West v Bristol Tramways Co[1908] 2 K.B. 16 (Note)KBD
McKendrick v Sinclair1972 S.C. (H.L.) 25; 1972 S.L.T. 110; Times, March 21, 1972HL
Margereson v JW Roberts Ltd[1996] P.I.Q.R. P154QBD
River Wear Commissioners v Adamson(1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 743HL
Watt v Jamieson1954 S.C. 56; 1954 S.L.T. 56OH
Charing Cross Electricity Supply Co v Hydraulic Power Co[1913] 3 K.B. 442KBD
Holgate v Bleazard[1917] 1 K.B. 443KBD
Manton v Brocklebank[1923] 2 K.B. 212CA
Ballard v Tomlinson(1885) L.R. 29 Ch. D. 115CA
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority[1984] A.C. 336; [1983] 3 W.L.R. 707; [1983] 3 All E.R. 273; 82 L.G.R. 207; (1983) 133 N.L.J. 1016; (1983)127 S.J. 713HL
AB v South West Water Services Ltd[1993] Q.B. 507; [1993] 2 W.L.R. 507; [1993] 1 All E.R. 609; [1993] Env. L.R. 266; [1993] P.I.Q.R. P167;(1993) 143 N.L.J. 235; [1992] N.P.C. 146; Times, November 26, 1992; Independent, November 18, 1992CA (Civ Div)
AB v South West Water Services Ltd[1992] 4 All E.R. 574; [1993] Env. L.R. 176; [1992] P.I.Q.R. P224; (1992) 142 N.L.J. 897; Times, May 8, 1992;Independent, May 15, 1992QBD
Greenwell v Low Beechburn Coal Co[1897] 2 Q.B. 165QBD
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound)[1967] 1 A.C. 617; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 498; [1966] 2 All E.R. 709; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 657; (1966) 110 S.J. 447PC (Aus)
Stretton's Derby Brewery Co v Mayor of Derby[1894] 1 Ch. 431Ch D
Cunard v Antifyre[1933] 1 K.B. 551KBD
Hughes v Percival(1882-83) L.R. 8 App. Cas. 443HL
Humphries v Cousins(1876-77) L.R. 2 C.P.D. 239CPD
Filburn v Peoples Palace and Aquarium Co Ltd(1890) L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 258CA
Attorney General v Tomline (Flood Damage)(1879) L.R. 12 Ch. D. 214Ch D
Spiers v Newton-On-Ayr Gas Co Ltd1942 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 2Sh Ct (South Strathclyde)
Long v Hepworth[1968] 1 W.L.R. 1299; [1968] 3 All E.R. 248; (1968) 112 S.J. 485QBD
Collingwood v Home & Colonial Stores Ltd[1936] 3 All E.R. 200; (1936) 56 Ll. L. Rep. 105CA
Darley Main Colliery Co v Mitchell(1886) L.R. 11 App. Cas. 127HL
X v A[2000] 1 All E.R. 490; [2000] Env. L.R. 104; [2000] 1 E.G.L.R. 19; [2000] 01 E.G. 94; [2000] W.T.L.R. 11;(1999) 96(39) L.S.G. 38; Times, October 6, 1999; Official TranscriptCh D
Mundy v Duke of Rutland(1883) L.R. 23 Ch. D. 81CA
Glasgow Corp v Muir1941 S.L.T. 163OH
Love v Bell(1883-84) L.R. 9 App. Cas. 286HL
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty[1978] Q.B. 849; [1978] 2 W.L.R. 774; [1978] 3 All E.R. 234; 76 L.G.R. 488; (1978) 122 S.J. 231QBD
Mason v Levy Auto Parts of England Ltd[1967] 2 Q.B. 530; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 1384; [1967] 2 All E.R. 62; [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 372; (1967) 111 S.J. 234Assizes (Winchester)
Tarry v Ashton(1875-76) L.R. 1 Q.B.D. 314QBD
La Societe Anonyme de Remorquage a Helice v Bennetts[1911] 1 K.B. 243KBD
Duty of care, Economic loss, Farming, Foot and mouth disease, Infectious disease control, Private nuisance,Proximity, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityEnv. L.M. 2009, May, 1-2
More than a nuisance: personal injury under RylandsConsequential loss, Damages, Loss of amenity, Personal injury claims, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityS.J. 2009, 153(15) Supp (Personal Injury Focus), 11-12
Public nuisance in the environmental contextCriminal liability, Environmental liability, Environmental offences, Public nuisance, Statutory nuisance, Tor-tious liabilityJ.P.L. 2008, 11, 1526-1546
The long-term stewardship of carbon dioxide storage sites - who pays, for what and how?Carbon capture and storage, Decommissioning, EC law, Emissions trading, Environmental liabilityE.L.M. 2008, 20(3), 127-132
As the flood water recedes who pays for the damage?Causation, Damage to property, Duty of care, Flood risk, Floods, Foreseeability, Land drainage, Neighbouringland, Nuisance, Professional liability, Protection of property, Remedies, Sewerage undertakersS.J. 2008, 152(28), 12,14
A renaissance in public nuisance?Contaminated land, Damages, Personal injury claims, Public nuisanceP.L.J. 2008, 213, 22-24
Personal injury update (July)Contaminated land, Control, Damages, Employers' liability, Personal injury, Public nuisance, Third parties,Work equipmentN.L.J. 2008, 158(7328), 964-965
Get to the bottom of itAppropriate persons, Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Environmental remediationE.G. 2008, 0807, 138-139
Ordeal by water and fireFire, Floods, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityS.J. 2007, 151(24), 796-797
The widening gap in cover for environmental liabilities in public liability policiesClean-up costs, Environmental liability, Environmental remediation, Insurance policies, Public liability insur-ance, Water pollutionJ.P.L. 2007, Jun, 816-825
Too high a burden of proof?Animals, Burden of proof, Personal injury, Strict liabilityP.I.L.J. 2006, 51(Dec/Jan), 13-14
Deconstructing the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityJ. Env. L. 2006, 18(3), 423-442
Liability for the escape of genetically modified organisms.Farming, Genetically modified organisms, Germany, Member States, Private nuisance, Product contamination,Rylands v Fletcher liabilityFarm Law 2005, 114, 15-20
Escape in consequence of non-natural use of land: statutory regulation, insurance considerations and"higher" duties of care.Escape, Fire, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityBuild. L.M. 2005, Nov, 5-9
Civil claims for pollution.Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityE.I.B. 2005, 154, 8-10
Opening the floodgates to stop the fire?Fire, Land use, Negligence, Packaging, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityN.L.J. 2005, 155(7200), 1720-1721
The distinctiveness of Rylands v Fletcher.Foreseeability, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityL.Q.R. 2005, 121(Jul), 421-451
Rylands v Fletcher limps on: Transco plc v Stockport M.B.C. in the House of Lords.Duty of care, Hazardous pursuits, Ireland, Limit of liability, Limitations, Personal injury, Rylands v Fletcher li-ability, Standard of care, Strict liabilityI.P.E.L.J. 2004, 11(4), 158-163
Drains, planes and heavy metal: a new era for the tort of nuisance?Liabilities, Nuisance, Public authorities, Remedies, Right to respect for private and family lifeL.S. & P. 2004, 2(2/3), 163-181
Viewpoint: public participation and environmental law: the role of the courts and the proposal for an en-vironmental tribunal.EC law, Environmental protection, Science, Tribunals
Taking the middle ground.Australia, Rylands v Fletcher liability, United States, UserL. Ex. 2004, Nov, 32-33
Civil liability for GM farming: GM crops and the existing law: Part 2.Corporate liability, Farmers, Genetically modified organisms, Negligence, Nuisance, Reasonableness, Reputa-tion, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Statutory authority, Strict liability, Tortious liabilityEnv. Liability 2004, 12(5), 185-195
The cherries on the cake.Commission, Consent, Estate agents, Professional liability, Property misdescriptions, Residential tenancies, Re-strictive covenants, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityE.G. 2004, 0451, 86-87
Fireworks: the Fireworks Act 2003.Anti social behaviour, Consumer protection, Fireworks, OffencesCrim. Law. 2004, 145, 6-8
Environmental claims and personal injury - an overview.Causation, Causes of action, Civil evidence, Duty of care, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Negligence,Personal injuryJ.P.I. Law 2004, 2, 111-119
Holding back the tide of negligence: Rylands resurgent.Foreseeability, Insurance, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, WatersupplyConv. 2004, May/Jun, 240-251
The long arm of environmental law.Environmental liability, PollutionE.G. 2004, 0420, 162-163
Rylands v Fletcher restated - the House of Lords' decision in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Bor-ough Council.Environmental liability, Environmental remediation, Foreseeability, Local authorities powers and duties, Ry-lands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution, Water supplyE.L.M. 2004, 15(6), 367-369
Current topics (April).Damage to property, Floods, Planning obligations, Planning permission, Private nuisance, Right to respect forhome, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Sewerage undertakers, UtilitiesJ.P.L. 2004, Apr, 373-378
The scope of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supply
The rule in Rylands and Fletcher reconsidered.Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, WatersupplyEnv. Liability 2003, 11(6), 239-241
Transco ruling refines test for strict liability.Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supplyE.I.B. 2004, 136, 6
Health and safety.Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, WatersupplyC. McK. Env. L.B. 2004, Jan, 53-54
Property law update (February).Completion, Contract for sale of land, Deposits, Forfeiture, Natural user, Real propertyN.L.J. 2004, 154(7117), 309-310
Problems of liability for historical land contamination under Irish law.Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Ireland, NuisanceI.P.E.L.J. 2003, 10(4), 112-118
Liability insurance: the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supplyIns. L.M. 2004, Feb, 10-12
Exceptionally dangerous.Local authorities powers and duties, Risk, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supplyE.G. 2004, 0402, 91
Rylands v Fletcher.Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supplyEnv. L.M. 2003, 12(12), 7-11
House of Lords rules on strict liability.Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supplyENDS 2003, 347, 65-66
New Zealand - sale of goods - statutory implied warrant - whether purpose for which water purchasedmust have been communicated to seller.Crops, Foreseeability, Herbicides, Implied terms, New Zealand, Sale of goods, Water supplyC.L.B. 2000, 26(2), 867-868
Rylands v Fletcher re-stated.Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supplyS.J. 2003, 147(47), 1413-1414
Legal liability for GM crops.Consumer safety, Crops, Environmental health, Genetically modified organisms, Negligence, Nuisance, Strict li-abilityFarm Law 2003, 87, 23-28
Environment: radioactive pollution.Contaminated land, Damage to property, Economic loss, Measure of damages, Radioactive substancesP.L.B. 1997, 17(8), 58-59
Environmental law: notions of strict liability.Environmental liability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water pollutionJ.B.L. 1995, Jan, 93-101
The return of Rylands v Fletcher.Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityL.Q.R. 1994, 110(Oct), 506-509
Requiem for Rylands v Fletcher.Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionConv. 1994, Jul/Aug, 309-316
Australia - negligence: acts of independent contractor.Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityI.C.C.L.R. 1994, 5(7), C134-135
Scope of Rylands v Fletcher is reduced.Negligence, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityPost Mag. 2005, Nov 24, 27
Who will the courts find liable for spread of fire?Foreseeability, Negligence, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityL.L.I.D. 2005, Oct 28, 5
Australia - strict liability/negligence: Rylands v Fletcher.Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityInt. I.L.R. 1994, 2(6), G87-88
The return of Rylands v Fletcher.Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionL.Q.R. 1994, 110(Apr), 185-187
Who says ignorance is no excuse?Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionP.E.L.B. 1994, 3(7), 56
Environmental: Rylands v Fletcher - foreseeability of harm.Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionI.C.C.L.R. 1994, 5(2), C42-43
No liability for historic pollution.Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionP.L.B. 1994, 14(7), 49,53
Lords judgement limits ruling scope.Intention, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liabilityPost Mag. 2003, Dec 4, 29
Groundwater pollution and strict liability at common law under Rylands v Fletcher.Environmental liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollutionConv. 1992, Nov-Dec, 451-457
Project financing and the environment: lender liability for environmental damage in Australia.Australia, Environmental liability, Lender liability, Project financeJ.I.B.L. 1996, 11(1), 7-17
The rule in Rylands v Fletcher revised in Australia.Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liabilityInt. I.L.R. 1994, 2(10), 390-392