2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 8 - Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e
Dec 15, 2015
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 1
Operations ManagementOperations ManagementChapter 8 - Statistical Process Control
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7eOperations Management, 9e
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 2
Outline
Statistical Process Control (SPC)Control Charts for VariablesThe Central Limit TheoremSetting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)Using Mean and Range ChartsControl Charts for AttributesManagerial Issues and Control Charts
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 3
Outline – Continued
Process CapabilityProcess Capability Ratio (Cp)
Process Capability Index (Cpk )
Acceptance SamplingOperating Characteristic CurveAverage Outgoing Quality
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 4
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:Identify or Define:
Natural and assignable causes of variation
Central limit theorem Attribute and variable inspection Process control x-charts and R-charts
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 5
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:Identify or Define:
LCL and UCL P-charts and c-charts Cp and Cpk
Acceptance sampling OC curve
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 6
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:Identify or Define:
AQL and LTPD AOQ Producer’s and consumer’s risk
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 7
Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:Describe or Explain:
The role of statistical quality control
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 8
Variability is inherent in every processNatural or common causesSpecial or assignable causes
Provides a statistical signal when assignable causes are present
Detect and eliminate assignable causes of variation
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 9
Natural Variations Also called common causes Affect virtually all production processes Expected amount of variation Output measures follow a probability
distribution For any distribution there is a measure
of central tendency and dispersion If the distribution of outputs falls within
acceptable limits, the process is said to be “in control”
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 10
Assignable Variations
Also called special causes of variation Generally this is some change in the process
Variations that can be traced to a specific reason
The objective is to discover when assignable causes are present Eliminate the bad causes Incorporate the good causes
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 11
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps
(a) Samples of the product, say five boxes of cereal taken off the filling machine line, vary from each other in weight
Fre
qu
ency
Weight
#
## #
##
##
#
# # ## # ##
# # ## # ## # ##
Each of these represents one sample of five
boxes of cereal
Figure S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 12
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps
(b) After enough samples are taken from a stable process, they form a pattern called a distribution
The solid line represents the
distribution
Fre
qu
ency
WeightFigure S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 13
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps
(c) There are many types of distributions, including the normal (bell-shaped) distribution, but distributions do differ in terms of central tendency (mean), standard deviation or variance, and shape
Weight
Central tendency
Weight
Variation
Weight
Shape
Fre
qu
ency
Figure S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 14
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps
(d) If only natural causes of variation are present, the output of a process forms a distribution that is stable over time and is predictable
WeightTimeF
req
uen
cy Prediction
Figure S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 15
Samples
To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps
(e) If assignable causes are present, the process output is not stable over time and is not predicable
WeightTimeF
req
uen
cy Prediction
????
???
???
??????
???
Figure S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 16
Control Charts
Constructed from historical data, the purpose of control charts is to help distinguish between natural variations and variations due to assignable causes
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 17
Types of Data
Characteristics that can take any real value
May be in whole or in fractional numbers
Continuous random variables
Variables Attributes Defect-related
characteristics Classify products
as either good or bad or count defects
Categorical or discrete random variables
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 18
Central Limit Theorem
Regardless of the distribution of the population, the distribution of sample means drawn from the population will tend to follow a normal curve
1. The mean of the sampling distribution (x) will be the same as the population mean m
x = m
s n
sx =
2. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution (sx) will equal the population standard deviation (s) divided by the square root of the sample size, n
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 19
Process Control
Figure S6.2
Frequency
(weight, length, speed, etc.)Size
Lower control limit Upper control limit
(a) In statistical control and capable of producing within control limits
(b) In statistical control but not capable of producing within control limits
(c) Out of control
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 20
Population and Sampling Distributions
Three population distributions
Beta
Normal
Uniform
Distribution of sample means
Standard deviation of the sample means
= sx =s
n
Mean of sample means = x
| | | | | | |
-3sx -2sx -1sx x +1sx +2sx +3sx
99.73% of all xfall within ± 3sx
95.45% fall within ± 2sx
Figure S6.3
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 21
Sampling Distribution
x = m(mean)
Sampling distribution of means
Process distribution of means
Figure S6.4
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 22
Steps In Creating Control Charts
1. Take samples from the population and compute the appropriate sample statistic
2. Use the sample statistic to calculate control limits and draw the control chart
3. Plot sample results on the control chart and determine the state of the process (in or out of control)
4. Investigate possible assignable causes and take any indicated actions
5. Continue sampling from the process and reset the control limits when necessary
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 23
Control Charts for Variables
For variables that have continuous dimensions Weight, speed, length, strength, etc.
x-charts are to control the central tendency of the process
R-charts are to control the dispersion of the process
These two charts must be used together
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 24
Setting Chart Limits
For x-Charts when we know s
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + zsx
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - zsx
where x = mean of the sample means or a target value set for the processz = number of normal standard deviations
sx = standard deviation of the sample means
= s/ ns = population standard deviationn = sample size
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 25
Setting Control LimitsHour 1
Sample Weight ofNumber Oat Flakes
1 172 133 164 185 176 167 158 179 16
Mean 16.1s = 1
Hour Mean Hour Mean1 16.1 7 15.22 16.8 8 16.43 15.5 9 16.34 16.5 10 14.85 16.5 11 14.26 16.4 12 17.3
n = 9
LCLx = x - zsx = 16 - 3(1/3) = 15 ozs
For 99.73% control limits, z = 3
UCLx = x + zsx = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 ozs
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 26
17 = UCL
15 = LCL
16 = Mean
Setting Control Limits
Control Chart for sample of 9 boxes
Sample number
| | | | | | | | | | | |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Variation due to assignable
causes
Variation due to assignable
causes
Variation due to natural causes
Out of control
Out of control
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 27
Setting Chart Limits
For x-Charts when we don’t know s
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - A2R
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + A2R
where R = average range of the samples
A2 = control chart factor found in Table S6.1 x = mean of the sample means
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 28
Control Chart Factors
Table S6.1
Sample Size Mean Factor Upper Range Lower Range
n A2 D4 D32 1.880 3.268 0
3 1.023 2.574 0
4 .729 2.282 0
5 .577 2.115 0
6 .483 2.004 0
7 .419 1.924 0.076
8 .373 1.864 0.136
9 .337 1.816 0.184
10 .308 1.777 0.223
12 .266 1.716 0.284
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 29
Setting Control Limits
Process average x = 16.01 ouncesAverage range R = .25Sample size n = 5
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 30
Setting Control Limits
UCLx = x + A2R= 16.01 + (.577)(.25)= 16.01 + .144= 16.154 ounces
Process average x = 16.01 ouncesAverage range R = .25Sample size n = 5
From Table S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 31
Setting Control Limits
UCLx = x + A2R= 16.01 + (.577)(.25)= 16.01 + .144= 16.154 ounces
LCLx = x - A2R= 16.01 - .144= 15.866 ounces
Process average x = 16.01 ouncesAverage range R = .25Sample size n = 5
UCL = 16.154
Mean = 16.01
LCL = 15.866
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 32
R – Chart
Type of variables control chart Shows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest and largest values in sample
Monitors process variability Independent from process mean
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 33
Setting Chart Limits
For R-Charts
Lower control limit (LCLR) = D3R
Upper control limit (UCLR) = D4R
whereR = average range of the samples
D3 and D4 = control chart factors from Table S6.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 34
Setting Control Limits
UCLR = D4R= (2.115)(5.3)= 11.2 pounds
LCLR = D3R= (0)(5.3)= 0 pounds
Average range R = 5.3 poundsSample size n = 5From Table S6.1 D4 = 2.115, D3 = 0
UCL = 11.2
Mean = 5.3
LCL = 0
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 35
Mean and Range Charts
(a)
These sampling distributions result in the charts below
(Sampling mean is shifting upward but range is consistent)
R-chart(R-chart does not detect change in mean)
UCL
LCL
Figure S6.5
x-chart(x-chart detects shift in central tendency)
UCL
LCL
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 36
Mean and Range Charts
R-chart(R-chart detects increase in dispersion)
UCL
LCL
Figure S6.5
(b)
These sampling distributions result in the charts below
(Sampling mean is constant but dispersion is increasing)
x-chart(x-chart does not detect the increase in dispersion)
UCL
LCL
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 38
Control Charts for Attributes
For variables that are categoricalGood/bad, yes/no,
acceptable/unacceptable
Measurement is typically counting defectives
Charts may measurePercent defective (p-chart)Number of defects (c-chart)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 39
Control Limits for p-Charts
Population will be a binomial distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statistics
UCLp = p + zsp^
LCLp = p - zsp^
where p = mean fraction defective in the samplez = number of standard deviationssp = standard deviation of the sampling distribution
n = sample size
^
p(1 - p)n
sp =^
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 40
p-Chart for Data EntrySample Number Fraction Sample Number FractionNumber of Errors Defective Number of Errors Defective
1 6 .06 11 6 .062 5 .05 12 1 .013 0 .00 13 8 .084 1 .01 14 7 .075 4 .04 15 5 .056 2 .02 16 4 .047 5 .05 17 11 .118 3 .03 18 3 .039 3 .03 19 0 .00
10 2 .02 20 4 .04Total = 80
(.04)(1 - .04)
100sp = = .02^
p = = .0480
(100)(20)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 41
.11 –
.10 –
.09 –
.08 –
.07 –
.06 –
.05 –
.04 –
.03 –
.02 –
.01 –
.00 –
Sample number
Fra
ctio
n d
efec
tive
| | | | | | | | | |
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
p-Chart for Data Entry
UCLp = p + zsp = .04 + 3(.02) = .10^
LCLp = p - zsp = .04 - 3(.02) = 0^
UCLp = 0.10
LCLp = 0.00
p = 0.04
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 42
.11 –
.10 –
.09 –
.08 –
.07 –
.06 –
.05 –
.04 –
.03 –
.02 –
.01 –
.00 –
Sample number
Fra
ctio
n d
efec
tive
| | | | | | | | | |
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
UCLp = p + zsp = .04 + 3(.02) = .10^
LCLp = p - zsp = .04 - 3(.02) = 0^
UCLp = 0.10
LCLp = 0.00
p = 0.04
p-Chart for Data Entry
Possible assignable
causes present
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 43
Control Limits for c-Charts
Population will be a Poisson distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statistics
where c = mean number defective in the sample
UCLc = c + 3 c LCLc = c - 3 c
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 44
c-Chart for Cab Company
c = 54 complaints/9 days = 6 complaints/day
|1
|2
|3
|4
|5
|6
|7
|8
|9
Day
Nu
mb
er d
efec
tive
14 –
12 –
10 –
8 –
6 –
4 –
2 –
0 –
UCLc = c + 3 c= 6 + 3 6= 13.35
LCLc = c - 3 c= 3 - 3 6= 0
UCLc = 13.35
LCLc = 0
c = 6
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 45
Patterns in Control Charts
Normal behavior. Process is “in control.”
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 46
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Patterns in Control Charts
One plot out above (or below). Investigate for cause. Process is “out of control.”
Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 47
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Patterns in Control Charts
Trends in either direction, 5 plots. Investigate for cause of progressive change.
Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 48
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Patterns in Control Charts
Two plots very near lower (or upper) control. Investigate for cause.
Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 49
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Patterns in Control Charts
Run of 5 above (or below) central line. Investigate for cause. Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 50
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Patterns in Control Charts
Erratic behavior. Investigate.
Figure S6.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 51
Which Control Chart to Use
Using an x-chart and R-chart:Observations are variablesCollect 20 - 25 samples of n = 4, or n =
5, or more, each from a stable process and compute the mean for the x-chart and range for the R-chart
Track samples of n observations each
Variables Data
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 52
Which Control Chart to Use
Using the p-chart:Observations are attributes that can
be categorized in two states We deal with fraction, proportion, or
percent defectivesHave several samples, each with
many observations
Attribute Data
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 53
Which Control Chart to Use
Using a c-Chart:Observations are attributes whose
defects per unit of output can be counted
The number counted is often a small part of the possible occurrences
Defects such as number of blemishes on a desk, number of typos in a page of text, flaws in a bolt of cloth
Attribute Data
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 54
Process Capability
The natural variation of a process should be small enough to produce products that meet the standards required
A process in statistical control does not necessarily meet the design specifications
Process capability is a measure of the relationship between the natural variation of the process and the design specifications
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 55
Process Capability Ratio
Cp = Upper Specification - Lower Specification
6s
A capable process must have a Cp of at least 1.0
Does not look at how well the process is centered in the specification range
Often a target value of Cp = 1.33 is used to allow for off-center processes
Six Sigma quality requires a Cp = 2.0
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 56
Process Capability Ratio
Cp = Upper Specification - Lower Specification
6s
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutesProcess standard deviation s = .516 minutesDesign specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 57
Process Capability Ratio
Cp = Upper Specification - Lower Specification
6s
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutesProcess standard deviation s = .516 minutesDesign specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
= = 1.938213 - 2076(.516)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 58
Process Capability Ratio
Cp = Upper Specification - Lower Specification
6s
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutesProcess standard deviation s = .516 minutesDesign specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
= = 1.938213 - 2076(.516)
Process is capable
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 59
Process Capability Index
A capable process must have a Cpk of at least 1.0
A capable process is not necessarily in the center of the specification, but it falls within the specification limit at both extremes
Cpk = minimum of ,
UpperSpecification - xLimit
3s
Lowerx - Specification
Limit3s
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 60
Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inchesProcess standard deviation s = .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit = .251 inchesLower Specification Limit = .249 inches
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 61
Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inchesProcess standard deviation s = .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit = .251 inchesLower Specification Limit = .249 inches
Cpk = minimum of ,(.251) - .250
(3).0005
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 62
Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inchesProcess standard deviation s = .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit = .251 inchesLower Specification Limit = .249 inches
Cpk = = 0.67.001
.0015
New machine is NOT capable
Cpk = minimum of ,(.251) - .250
(3).0005.250 - (.249)
(3).0005
Both calculations result in
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 63
Interpreting Cpk
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
Figure S6.8
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 64
Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for incoming materials or finished goodsTake samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items Inspect each of the items in the sampleDecide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection results
Only screens lots; does not drive quality improvement efforts
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 65
Operating Characteristic Curve
Shows how well a sampling plan discriminates between good and bad lots (shipments)
Shows the relationship between the probability of accepting a lot and its quality level
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 66
Return whole shipment
The “Perfect” OC Curve
% Defective in Lot
P(A
cc
ept
Wh
ole
Sh
ipm
en
t)
100 –
75 –
50 –
25 –
0 –| | | | | | | | | | |
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Cut-Off
Keep whole shipment
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 67
AQL and LTPD
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)Poorest level of quality we are
willing to accept
Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)Quality level we consider badConsumer (buyer) does not want to
accept lots with more defects than LTPD
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 68
Producer’s and Consumer’s Risks
Producer's risk ()Probability of rejecting a good lot Probability of rejecting a lot when the
fraction defective is at or above the AQL
Consumer's risk (b)Probability of accepting a bad lot Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPD
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 69
An OC Curve
Probability of
Acceptance
Percent defective
| | | | | | | | |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
100 –95 –
75 –
50 –
25 –
10 –
0 –
= 0.05 producer’s risk for AQL
= 0.10
Consumer’s risk for LTPD
LTPDAQL
Bad lotsIndifference zone
Good lots
Figure S6.9
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 70
OC Curves for Different Sampling Plans
n = 50, c = 1
n = 100, c = 2
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 71
Average Outgoing Quality
where
Pd = true percent defective of the lot
Pa = probability of accepting the lot
N = number of items in the lot
n = number of items in the sample
AOQ = (Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
N
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 72
Average Outgoing Quality
1. If a sampling plan replaces all defectives
2. If we know the incoming percent defective for the lot
We can compute the average outgoing quality (AOQ) in percent defective
The maximum AOQ is the highest percent defective or the lowest average quality and is called the average outgoing quality level (AOQL)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 73
SPC and Process Variability
(a) Acceptance sampling (Some bad units accepted)
(b) Statistical process control (Keep the process in control)
(c) Cpk >1 (Design a process that is in control)
Lower specification
limit
Upper specification
limit
Process mean, m Figure S6.10