Transcript
Mitral Stenosis Class I MV surgery is indicated in adolescent or young adult patients
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
Class IIa 1 MV surgery is reasonable in adolescent or young adult patients with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
2 MV surgery is reasonable in the asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
Class IIb The effectiveness of MV surgery is not well established in the asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation
(Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
CIRUGIA EN ESTENOSIS MITRAL
COMISUROTOMIAREEMPLAZO VALVULAR
ANILLO MITRAL CUERDAS TENDINEAS MUSCULOS PAPILARES
CONCEPTOS ANATOMICOS
Figure 1 Carpentierrsquos functional classification Type I normal leaflet motion Type II increased leaflet motion (leaflet prolapse) Type IIIa restricted leaflet motion during diastole and systole Type IIIb restricted leaflet motion predominantly during systole
La enfermedad mitral degenrativa A La enfermedad de Barlow B La degeneracioacuten fibroelaacutestica
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
CIRUGIA EN ESTENOSIS MITRAL
COMISUROTOMIAREEMPLAZO VALVULAR
ANILLO MITRAL CUERDAS TENDINEAS MUSCULOS PAPILARES
CONCEPTOS ANATOMICOS
Figure 1 Carpentierrsquos functional classification Type I normal leaflet motion Type II increased leaflet motion (leaflet prolapse) Type IIIa restricted leaflet motion during diastole and systole Type IIIb restricted leaflet motion predominantly during systole
La enfermedad mitral degenrativa A La enfermedad de Barlow B La degeneracioacuten fibroelaacutestica
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
ANILLO MITRAL CUERDAS TENDINEAS MUSCULOS PAPILARES
CONCEPTOS ANATOMICOS
Figure 1 Carpentierrsquos functional classification Type I normal leaflet motion Type II increased leaflet motion (leaflet prolapse) Type IIIa restricted leaflet motion during diastole and systole Type IIIb restricted leaflet motion predominantly during systole
La enfermedad mitral degenrativa A La enfermedad de Barlow B La degeneracioacuten fibroelaacutestica
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Figure 1 Carpentierrsquos functional classification Type I normal leaflet motion Type II increased leaflet motion (leaflet prolapse) Type IIIa restricted leaflet motion during diastole and systole Type IIIb restricted leaflet motion predominantly during systole
La enfermedad mitral degenrativa A La enfermedad de Barlow B La degeneracioacuten fibroelaacutestica
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
La enfermedad mitral degenrativa A La enfermedad de Barlow B La degeneracioacuten fibroelaacutestica
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
ASINTOMATICOS QUE TECNICA USAR COMO MANEJAR CUANDO OPERAR LA ISQUEMIA MITRAL
3 controversias aun sin resolver
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Copyright copy2002 American Heart AssociationAvierinos J-F et al Circulation 20021061355-1361
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Natural History of Asymptomatic Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD Bernard J Gersh MB ChB DPhil L Joseph Melton III MD Kent R Bailey PhD Clarence Shub MD Rick A Nishimura MD A Jamil Tajik MD Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J-FA BJG CS RAN AJT ME-S) Section of Clinical Epidemiology (LJM) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Circulation August 1 2006
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Class III1 MV surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic patients with MR and preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimensionless than 40 mm) in whom significant doubt about the feasibility of repair exists (Level of Evidence C)
2 Isolated MV surgery is not indicated for patients withmild or moderate MR (Level of Evidence C)
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Circulation August 1 2006
Class IIa1 MV repair is reasonable in experienced surgical centers for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR with preserved LV function (ejection fraction greater than 060 and end-systolic dimension less than 40 mm) in whom the likelihood of successful repair without residual MR is greater than 90(Level of Evidence B)
2 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and new onset of atrial fibrillation (Level of Evidence C)3 MV surgery is reasonable for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR preserved LV function and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolicpressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greaterthan 60 mm Hg on exercise)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
No need to rush to surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral Regurgitation MAY 4 2006 |
SOBREVIDA LIBRE DE NECESIDAD DE CIRUGIgraveA
Time (y) Survival free of any indication for surgery ()
2 922
4 784
6 655
8 556
Rosenhek R et al Circulation 2006 1132238-2244
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
SOBREVIDA A LARGO PLAZO EN ENINSUFICIENCIAMITRAL SEVERA
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Conclusions Quantitative grading of mitral regurgitation is a powerful predictor of the clinical outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation Patients with an effective regurgitant orifice of at least 40 mm2 should promptly be considered for cardiac surgery
Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Jean-Franccedilois Avierinos MD David Messika-Zeitoun MD Delphine Detaint MD Maryann Capps RDCS Vuyisile Nkomo MD Christopher Scott MS Hartzell V Schaff MD and A Jamil Tajik MD
EDITORIALTiming of Surgery in Asymptomatic Mitral Regurgitation
Catherine M Otto MD and Christopher T Salerno MD
RIESGO MANEJO MORTALIDAD
MEDICO 26 vs OPERATORIA 1
The New England Journal of medicineVolume 352875-883 March 3 2005 Number 9
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
FACTORES DE RIESGO DE MUERTE EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS CON INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL SEVERA NO SINTOAMATICA
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
RIESGO DE MUERTE DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Enriquez-Sarano M et al N Engl J Med 2005352875-883
SOBREVIDA ( KAPLAN MEIER) EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS DE EN PACIENTES EN MANEJO MEDICO DE ACUERDO AL AREA DEL
ORIFICIO REGURGITANTE (ERO)
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
However we illustrate here that overwhelmingly coherent cumulative evidence obtained worldwide shows that early surgery should be the preferred management approach for organic MR This approach differs from standard guidelines and it is essential that its principles rationales and conduct be fully considered
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine
Is early surgery recommended for mitral regurgitationEarly Surgery Is Recommended for Mitral RegurgitationMaurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Thoralf M Sundt III MD From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S) and Cardiac Surgery (TMS) Mayo Clinic Rochester Minn
Circulation 2010121804-812
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Fraccioacuten de Eyeccioacuten lt 60
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Diaacutestole gt 65mm
Diaacutemetro VI de fin de Sistole gt 40mm
Hipertensioacuten pulmonar gt 50mmHg
Orificio regurgitante efectivo ERO gt 40mm
Fibrilacioacuten auricular de Novo
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL
EN PACIENTES ASINTOMATICOS
CONCLUSION
90 EacuteXITO EN PLASTIA VALVULAR MITRAL
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Factores a considerar para definir el tiempo ideal de cirugiacutea en vaacutelvula mitral
En pacientes asintomaacuteticos
Anatoacutemicos Eco cardiograacuteficos
Adams D H et al Eur Heart J 2010eurheartjehq222
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of PatientsWith Valvular Heart DiseaseA Report of the American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart AssociationTask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)
Circulation August 1 2006
MV repair is the operation of choice when the valve is suitable for repair and appropriate surgical skill and expertise are available This procedure preserves thepatientrsquos native valve without a prosthesis and therefore avoids the risk of chronic anticoagulation (except in patients in atrial fibrillation) or prosthetic valve failure late after surgery Additionally preservation of the mitral apparatus leads to better postoperative LV function and survival than in cases in which the apparatus is disrupted In most cases
VS
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Class IbullMV surgery is recommended for the symptomatic patient with acute severe MR (Level of Evidence B)
bullMV surgery is beneficial for patients with chronic severe MR and NYHA functional class II III or IVsymptoms in the absence of severe LV dysfunction(severe LV dysfunction is defined as ejection fractionless than 030) andor end-systolic dimension greaterthan 55 mm (Level of Evidence B)
3 MV surgery is beneficial for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe MR and mild to moderate LV dysfunction ejection fraction 030 to 060 andor end-systolic dimension greater than or equal to 40mm (Level of Evidence B)
4 MV repair is recommended over MV replacement inthe majority of patients with severe chronic MR who require surgery and patients should be referred to surgical centers experienced in MV repair Bonow et al ACCAHA Practice Guidelines (Level ofEvidence C)
ACCAHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
VS
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement
Joon Bum Kima Hee Jung Kima Duk Hwan Moona Sung Ho Junga Suk Jung Chooa Cheol Hyun Chunga Hyun Songb Jae Wo Leea
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine 388-1 Pungnap-dong Songpa-gu Seoul 138-736 South Korea
Conclusions When performed for selected patients MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results therefore repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding
VS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010371039-1046
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Valve Repair Improves the Outcome of Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation
A Multivariate Analysis Maurice Enriquez-Sarano MD Hartzell V Schaff MD Thomas A Orszulak MD A Jamil Tajik MD Kent R Bailey PhD Robert L Frye MD From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (ME-S AJT RLF) Section of Cardiovascular Surgery (HVS TAO) and Section of Biostatistics (KRB) Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester Minn
Conclusions Valve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
(70 )plusmn 12 antildeos (57 )plusmn 13 antildeos5a 10a 15a 5a 10a 15ordf
Sobrevida 83 62 43 86 63 45
Libre de Re operacion
94 94 95 92
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve diseasebullMarc Gillinov MDa
Eugene H Blackstone MDab Edward R Nowicki MDa Worawong
Slisatkorn MDa Ghannam Al-Dossari MDa Douglas R Johnston MDa Kristopher M George MDa Penny L Houghtaling MSb Brian Griffin MDc Joseph F Sabik III Mda
bull Lars G Svensson MD PhDa
Conclusion It is reasonable to perform valve repair in elderly patients with complex degenerative mitral valve pathology because it can eliminate the need for anticoagulation and risk of prosthesis-related complications However when valve pathology is so complex that
repair is infeasible this study demonstrates that valve replacement does not diminish long-term outcomes
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008135885-893
VS
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Mitral valve replacement versus repair propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysisJokinen JJ Hippelaumlinen MJ Pitkaumlnen OA Hartikainen JEDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
ConclusionsSurvival is longer after MVP than after MVR The quality of life of MVP and MVR patients does not differ from each other In terms of most quality-of-life variables patients who undergo mitral valve operations cope similarly to an age- and sex-matched reference population Only the scores reflecting energy and mobility were lower in the patients who were operated on than in the reference population
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 84 Issue 2 August 2007 Paes 451-458
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
REPARO MITRALTECNICAS QUIRURGICAS
HOJUELA POSTERIORRESECCION CUADRANGULAR
TRASPOSICION DE CUERDAS TENDINEAS
REIMPLATE MUSCULO PAPILAR
RESECCION TRIANGULAR
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
El Reparo Valvular Mitral (RVM) es Superior Al Cambio Valvular Mitral (CVM) Por La Preservacioacuten De Todo El Aparato Sub valvular Que Garantiza La Competencia Mitral Preserva La Funcioacuten Del VI Y Aumenta La Sobrevida
No hay diferencias en tegraverminos de calidad de vida entre las 2 tegravecnicas si no es necesaria la anticoagulacion cronica con warfarina
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
El efeecto benefico de la PVM versus el CVM en terminos de sobrevida se pierde en pacientes mayores de 70 antildeos por lo que cualquiera de las dos tecnicas utilizadas es aceptable en este grupo de edad
Debe procurarse en todo paciente con CVM la preservacion del aparato subvalvular posterior
CIRUGIA VALVULAR MITRAL CAMBIO VS REPARO
CONCLUSION
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
CONTROVERSIAS EN CIRUGIacuteA DE
LA VALVULA MITRAL
Dra Moacutenica RenterigraveaCali- Colombia
Reconstruccion tridimensional del anillo mitral
ENFERMEDAD VALVULAR MITRAL DE ORIGEN ISQUEMICO
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Remodelacioacuten ventricular izquierda post IAM
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
COAPSYS DEVICE
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
CLIP MITRAL
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
Imagen Ecocardiografica antes y despues de
anuloplastia del seno coronario
(C) CARILLON (Cardiac DimensionsKirkland WA) (D) MONARC (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine CA)(E) Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty Device (Viacor Inc Wilmington MA)
CORRECCION PERCUTANEA DE LA INSUFICIENCIA MITRAL
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
with congenital MS who have symptoms (NYHA functional class III or IV) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
with congenital MS who have mild symptoms (NYHA functional class II) and mean MV gradient greater than 10 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography (Level of Evidence C)
young adult with congenital MS with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 50 mm Hg or greater and a mean MV gradient greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (Level of Evidence C)
asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with congenital MS and new-onset atrial fibrillation or multiple systemic emboli while receiving adequate anticoagulation (Level of Evidence C
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 48598-675 doi101016jjacc200605030
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
top related