User Perspective in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO-317007.
Post on 27-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
Transcript
User Perspective in Nature Conservation
Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus
ECP-2007-GEO-317007
2
USER NEEDS The aim: To provide good understanding for
nature conservation data To support implementation phase
SURVEY DESIGN
Online survey
10 sections
67 questions
314 responses
in 23 countries
NATURE-SDIplus user survey:
5
n=314
User needs survey, geographical distribution
87
72
57
45
2118
7 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
P ublic NatureConservation
Education &Research
Commercial Research NGO & Citizens Basic Education
No Information
Completeness & representativity
User needs survey, target user groups
THE SURVEY
6
Numerous different attributes(e.g. species, habitats & biotopes)
Paradigm shiftin nature conservation
NATURE-SDIplus & The DataTHE SURVEY
9
Use of Geoportals: 43%
Handling spatial data & maps Further interest
NATURE-SDIplus & The Tools/ FunctionsTHE SURVEY
12
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
Data users and data providers demand for a high number of attributes.
Features (attributes) regarding INSPIRE DataSpecifications should be amended (see Feature Lists).
Users and producers of nature conservation data point out the relevance of time-series data.
Data models should pay attention to and integrate temporal aspects. In geoportals not only current, but also historic data should be provided (e.g. time slides).
DataDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
13
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
Data users and data providers demand for a specific metadata.
Features (metadata) regarding INSPIRE DataSpecifications must be amended (see Feature Lists).
A majority of data providers do not have ISO compliant metadata.
Demanding a large amount of metadata is unrealistic.
Many have no metadata at all. The usability of metadata editor is important.
Potential users need project and contact information for datasets.
Contact information should be mandatory (this also helps access data with restrictions due to IPR or sensitivity issues).
Users most frequently search by keywords.
Catalogue data and a comprehensive thesaurus are essential.
Metadata, ThesaurusDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
14
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
A majority of data users and data producers uses desktop-GIS tools.
Data should be made accessible via WFS / WCS rather than just WMS for enabling data download.
A majority of users also need advanced analysis tools for spatial data handling (e.g. modelling, statistical analysis).
Data providers should offer web geoprocessing services and / or WFS, WCS to enable further analysis.
The vast majority of data providers offer their data in one format, most often ArcSDE/SHP/Grid and thus are only accessible for GI-experts.
Attention should be paid to support also open source approaches, and open data formats (e.g. kml).
Data providers: web service provisionDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
15
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
Potential users significantly differ by their characteristics (citizens, NGOs, teachers, students, researchers, administrative staff etc.).
Geoportals could offer different (hierarchical) realisations for different user types.
Important tasks carried out by data users and data providers are monitoring, reporting, research work, planning, and management.
Geoportals / services should first focus on the demands of these tasks.
Most users only want to view data. Special attention should be paid to performance and adequate web mapping tools (panning, zooming).
Geoportal usabilityDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
16
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
All target user groups have a strong need for additional data on e.g. land-use, soil type or climatic conditions.
The Nature-SDIplus themes should be linked to and be compliant with other INSPIRE data themes – and / or they should be provided together in the same portal.
There is no specific data policy for nature conservation. Most countries have regulation means for access for third parties (due to issues of security or sensitiveness, intellectual property right (IPR) and confidentiality).
An authentication system or degraded georeferencing using a grid system can be used for limitations of access in the case of security or sensitiveness.
Most of the potential users of a nature conservation SDI use and provide data.
Geoportals should be open for data provision from all user groups (not only public administration).
Geoportal usabilityDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
17
User & data situation Demand & need for Nature-SDIplus
The financial conditions of access to nature conservation data vary from one country to another, depending also on the requesting organisation.
A concerted regulation for the EU member states would be helpful.
Many nature conservation data can be viewed only on isolated websites of public authorities, universities, NGOs or at national or regional geoportals.
Raising awareness amongst data providers to make data accessible by web-services rather than only for local viewing or downloading.
Awareness raisingDEMANDS & NEEDS FOR NATURE-SDIplus
18
Diverse levels of expertise of target users -> demand for simplification of the systems (usability) and user qualification (training)
Nature conservation data are frequently updated positive environment for the adoption of new standards and
functionalities
Added value of Nature-SDIplus for the INSPIRE process by realisation of a user-centred SDI for nature conservation Awareness raising and training
CONCLUSIONS
19
top related