The Earths transmission spectrum from lunar eclipse observations: The pale red dot. E. Palle, M.R. Zapatero-Osorio, R. Barrena, P. Montañes-Rodriguez,

Post on 27-Mar-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

The Earth’s transmission spectrum from lunar eclipse observations: The pale red dot.

E. Palle, M.R. Zapatero-Osorio, R. Barrena,P. Montañes-Rodriguez, E. Martin, A. Garcia-Muñoz

But isolating the light from the planet is VERY challenging,what if direct detection is not possible?

What about transiting Earth’s?

Atmospheric characterization of Hot Jupiters has already been achieved trough transit spectroscopy

Poster 36: Montañes-Rodriguez et al.

We can observe it during a lunar eclipse

NOT, Visible, 0.4-1 μmWHT, Near-IR, 0.9-2.5 μmLa Palma, Canaries

Lunar eclipse August 16th 2008

Umbra

Penumbra

Brigth Moon

Umbra

Umbra/Bright

Bright

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Earth’s Transmission Spectrum

The pale red dot

μm

O2

O3

Ca II

H2O

Earth’s Transmission SpectrumVisible

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 μm

O4Ca II

Ca II

NO2 ?

Fraunhofer lines structure

CO2

H2O

O2•O2

1.0 1.25 1.5

O2

O2•O2

O2•N2

Earth’s Transmission SpectrumNear-IR ZJ

μm

Atmospheric Dimers:

• Van de Waals molecules: Weakly bound complexes

• They are present as minor rather than trace species.

• One likely origin of continuum absorption.

• Observed on Earth (gas) and Jupiter (gas; (H

2)

2), Ganymede, Europa and Callisto

(condensed), and in the laboratory (gas/condensed).

• Never on Venus/Mars, where there must be CO

2 – X

• NOT contained in the common spectral libraries

Calo and Narcisi (1980)

CH4

CO2

H2O

1.5 2.0 2.5

Earth’s Transmission SpectrumNear-IR HK

μm

How deep we see in the planet atmosphere?

h

T(h, )

Traub, 2009

h min ?

• Are antropogenic signatures visible in the lower layers?

• Is there a surface signal?

Evolution of the Earth’s Transmission Spectrum during the eclipse

Reflection vs Transmission

Earth’s Reflectance Spectrum: Earthshine

Same instrumentation only two months apart

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5μm

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Reflected spectrum Transmission Spectrum

CO2 CH4

CH4

O2 CO2

Blue planet?

O2

O2•O2

O2•N2

O2•O2

Palle et al, 2009μm

Thus, the transmission spectrum of telluric planets contains more information for the atmospheric characterization than the reflected spectrum.

And it is also less technically challenging

But, how far are we from making the measurements ?

F*

F* - F* ( ) + F*( ) T Aa

____

A*

Ap*a

______

A*

+ Ruido

+ Ruido

Wavelength (μm)

Differential transit spectroscopy M star + Earth : 1 (2) measurement

Ss+p / Sp

M8 star + 1 Earth ... with the E-ELT

~5 h

~ 150 h~ 50 h

~ 25 h

Wavelength (μm) Wavelength (μm)

Work in progress ...

Still, we must pursue the characterization with direct

observations

Exploration of surface featuresPresence of continentsRotational periodLocalized surface biomarkers (vegetation)

Orbital light curve Ocean glints and polarization effects

Conclusions

We have obtained the Earths transmission spectra 0.4-2.5 μm First order detection and characterization of the main

constituents of the Earth's atmosphere Detection of the Ionosphere : Ca II, ( Mg, Fe, ??) Detection of O2•O2 and O2•N2 interactions Offers more information than the reflectance spectra

Using the measured Earth transmission spectrum and several stellar spectra, we compute the probability of characterizing a transiting earth with E-ELT For a Earth in the habitability zone of an M-star, it is

possible to detect H2O , O2 , CH4 ,CO2 (= Life) within a few tens of hours of observations.

Thank you

top related